Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Western Rail Corridor (all disused sections)
Options
Comments
-
-
Manulla - Ballina under threat, is it??? Hmmm.0
-
Sponge Bob wrote: »Manulla - Ballina under threat, is it??? Hmmm.
ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.
0 -
Tuam-Athenry-Galway would have caused platform occupancy issues and given the location of the overbridge east of the station there's nowhere to notch in a bay. Add the single track section west of Athenry and only two usable platforms in Ceannt and that's the ball game.
It would have caused fewer occupancy issues than Limerick-Athenry-Galway as the Tuam line enters Athenry from the Dublin end of the station, meaning no reversal would be necessary.
In addition, the capacity issues could be resolved through the addition of a couple of passing loops. The price would still end up cheaper than what was actually opened.
Journey times would be surprisingly competitive due to the condition of the road between Galway and Tuam. If the service ran express from Athenry to Tuam then it might even be a bit quicker than driving even at off-peak times.0 -
Tuam-Galway as phase one would of provided a workable approach once Oranmore was opened.
It was the most likely start to not have ended in total failure. The only disaster would of been WOT demanding every long dead station between Tuam and Athenry to be also opened. A run from Tuam to Athenry is a fast straight route with no LCs. Perfect for commuter.
However, I recently saw a WoT working report with a picture of a rail car with KNOCK on the destination board to underpin that the WRC crusade was a coagulation of various village idiots from the start.0 -
Advertisement
-
You ignored it. Have another go because in my opinion you are starting to sound like a troll offering up some dangerous bait. How many decent posters have got the boot from here by reacting to such nonsense.
Funny, I thought that individuals were responsible for their own actions?0 -
Hungerford wrote: »It would have caused fewer occupancy issues than Limerick-Athenry-Galway as the Tuam line enters Athenry from the Dublin end of the station, meaning no reversal would be necessary.
In addition, the capacity issues could be resolved through the addition of a couple of passing loops. The price would still end up cheaper than what was actually opened.
Journey times would be surprisingly competitive due to the condition of the road between Galway and Tuam. If the service ran express from Athenry to Tuam then it might even be a bit quicker than driving even at off-peak times.
North of Athenry isn't going to happen on Leo's watch, but fear not, you'll be able to feast on the demise of the Ballina branch and the South Tipperary Line, with the death of a thousand cuts for the rest of the network. If things keep going the way they are, the regulars here should be happy out before too long, and we'll have 071 whizzing around a circular track somewhere near Mallow as the only bit of railway outside bits of Dublin, if that.
Perhaps they should sell trainsets that you destroy gradually, piece by piece for the Irish market. It should sell well. Made especially for the children of the already comfortable. Perhaps it should be combined with a board game, where players are landowners, politicians and car dealers, hoping to turn money on the thing. Kind of an Irish Monopoly. Be careful with the hot tarmac though.0 -
"Careful with that axe, Eugene"
0 -
Hungerford wrote: »It would have caused fewer occupancy issues than Limerick-Athenry-Galway as the Tuam line enters Athenry from the Dublin end of the station, meaning no reversal would be necessary.
In addition, the capacity issues could be resolved through the addition of a couple of passing loops. The price would still end up cheaper than what was actually opened.
Journey times would be surprisingly competitive due to the condition of the road between Galway and Tuam. If the service ran express from Athenry to Tuam then it might even be a bit quicker than driving even at off-peak times.
As for travel time, the line would have to be fast given that once again the line does not travel on the most direct route but an L shape via Athenry. The problem is that most of the feasibility of Galway rail service is centred on Galway's road system remaining crap with the ring road incomplete and consequent congestion, and that's not good for Galway's economy as a whole.0 -
The Idyl Race wrote: »North of Athenry isn't going to happen on Leo's watch, but fear not, you'll be able to feast on the demise of the Ballina branch and the South Tipperary Line, with the death of a thousand cuts for the rest of the network. If things keep going the way they are, the regulars here should be happy out before too long, and we'll have 071 whizzing around a circular track somewhere near Mallow as the only bit of railway outside bits of Dublin, if that.
Perhaps they should sell trainsets that you destroy gradually, piece by piece for the Irish market. It should sell well. Made especially for the children of the already comfortable. Perhaps it should be combined with a board game, where players are landowners, politicians and car dealers, hoping to turn money on the thing. Kind of an Irish Monopoly. Be careful with the hot tarmac though.
strange attitude - there is no advocating closure of lines - merely not wasting money on sure fire losers that will drain resources further.
The money spent on the southern branch line WRC would have been more beneficial for the west (and indeed Irish Rail) had it been spent on double tracking Galway Athlone - for instance. Money better spent in many peoples view and would have helped Galway - Dublin compete with the motorway.0 -
Advertisement
-
The Idyl Race wrote: »North of Athenry isn't going to happen on Leo's watch, but fear not, you'll be able to feast on the demise of the Ballina branch and the South Tipperary Line, with the death of a thousand cuts for the rest of the network.
You obviously didn't read my post. I was suggesting that the wrong part of the WRC was opened up. Obviously, the line to Tuam can't be opened now because the miserable failure of Ennis-Athenry has undermined the argument for opening even the most sensible element of the project.0 -
Hungerford wrote: »You obviously didn't read my post. I was suggesting that the wrong part of the WRC was opened up. Obviously, the line to Tuam can't be opened now because the miserable failure of Ennis-Athenry has undermined the argument for opening even the most sensible element of the project.
Plus on the wider picture the announcement a few months back that the N18/17 extension from North of Gort to North of Tuam was one of the few projects that will happen, was let's face it the real statement of intent about the WRC northern branch line. Once this project is completed or even started the statement by Varadkar in yesterdays Irish Times is merely saying - lads forget it we are going to give you what people actually want a good safe fast road - upon which you will see express bus services providing a good efficient service. Once this new road is in place the WRC is as dead as the proverbial parrot. This is the reality of the situation which West on Track are finding hard to stomach. Greenway or not - the road means the end of the line for the northern branch line dream of the WRC.0 -
a good safe fast road - upon which you will see express bus services providing a good efficient service.
ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.
0 -
http://www.galwaynews.ie/29394-funding-western-rail-corridor-be-reviewed-post-2016
Thread could run a while yet.Deputy O' Mahony told West On Track that the position is that within the current Capital Investment Programme to 2016, funds are not provided to extend the line further.
However, it will be reviewed again when the post-2016 programme is being drawn up.0 -
end of the road wrote: »at speeds from the dark ages. but again if phazes 2 and 3 which would be also traveling at dark age speeds not going ahead means no more lines with more potential being sacrificed to open them then fair enough.0
-
Letter in Irish Times today re Varadkar statement that the ~WRC north of Tuam is not about to happen.Sir, – For the first time, an Irish Minister has had the courage to make a definitive statement on the western rail corridor. Minister for Transport Leo Varadkar told Frank McDonald (Home News, December 17th)that it is “not even going to be extended to Tuam”.
Now that the Government position has finally become clear, maybe politicians in Connacht will find the courage to tell the pro-rail lobbyists the trains aren’t coming any time soon? Political pandering to the pro-rail contingent had prevented the route being used for regional development as a tourism and leisure corridor and as a route for high-speed broadband infrastructure, all of which would bring hundreds of jobs to the north west.
In addition, a greenway-type trail on the old trackbed would preserve the route for future generations in case a rail project ever becomes viable. The alternative, allowing the route to be lost piecemeal to public ownership by adverse possession, is not good governance.
Now that Mr Varadkar has “told it like it is”, hopefully Minister Ring and an Taoiseach will find it easier to do the same, and we can all move on with making this asset work for the people of Ireland. – Yours, etc,
JOHN MULLIGAN,
Kiltycreighton,
Boyle, Co Roscommon.
here here.0 -
Letter in Irish Times today re Varadkar statement that the ~WRC north of Tuam is not about to happen.
here here.
The same John Mulligan who made a presentation to Roscommon County Council in February asking them to endorse the destruction of the WRC in favour of a walking trail. They sent him on his wayMembers thanked Mr. Mulligan for his very informative Presentation and the following issues
were raised:-
• Regret that Mr. Mulligan is unaware of the restoration of the O’Sullivan Beara Walk.
• The recently published Government commissioned AECOM/Goodbody Strategic Rail Investments Needs Review indicated that the Athenry/Tuam line on the Western Rail Corridor merits further consideration. The Report also finds that recent developments in rail freight have indicated that opportunities continue to arise for the carriage of bulk materials and unit load traffics, where relatively long distances and port orientated traffics are involved. The
Western Rail corridor is therefore unsuitable as a trail.
Source: http://www.roscommoncoco.ie/en/Services/Corporateservices/Council_Meeting_Minutes/Monthly_Meeting_Minutes/2012/Council_Meeting_Minutes_27_2_2012.pdf0 -
sligotrain wrote: »The same John Mulligan who made a presentation to Roscommon County Council in February asking them to endorse the destruction of the WRC in favour of a walking trail. They sent him on his way
Source: http://www.roscommoncoco.ie/en/Services/Corporateservices/Council_Meeting_Minutes/Monthly_Meeting_Minutes/2012/Council_Meeting_Minutes_27_2_2012.pdf
I have to say that as an occasional visitor to this forum I was fairly unaware of the freight angle. Does this have merit interms of connecting areas like Tuam into the mainline grid allowing connection to Dublin and Waterford ports I wonder? would this be an attraction for larger companies to locate in North Galway and use such a service?0 -
No hope of that ever happening.
Tuam-Athenry is now officially a never going to happen dead duck.0 -
I have to say that as an occasional visitor to this forum I was fairly unaware of the freight angle. Does this have merit interms of connecting areas like Tuam into the mainline grid allowing connection to Dublin and Waterford ports I wonder? would this be an attraction for larger companies to locate in North Galway and use such a service?
NO in all respects0 -
Advertisement
-
sligotrain wrote: »The same John Mulligan who made a presentation to Roscommon County Council in February asking them to endorse the destruction of the WRC in favour of a walking trail. They sent him on his way
The Beara Breifne way is really a HIKING route not a "walking trail". It is impassable to cycling over much of its length and not amenable to walkers.
A greenway is a combined HIKING WALKING and CYCLING route...a different animal altogether. But don''t let the facts get in the way
Nor is the O Sullivan route complete, especially in Roscommon. I'd say the county manager was well happy when the councillors went for that presentation somehow.
http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/landscape/initiatives/the-beara-breifne-way/
Click here for schematic route map [PDF 437KB].
For detailed maps of the route go to www.irishtrails.ie (sections not covered include Sli Muscraí, Ormonde Way, Lung Way).
Completed sections of the route as of 2012 (starting in Cork)West Cork: Beara Way www.bearatourism.com
West Cork: Slí Gaeltacht Mhuscraí www.sligaeltachtmuscrai.com
North Cork: Duhallow Area
Limerick: Ballyhoura Way
South Tipperary: Multeen Way www.multeentourism.com
Galway: Hymany Way www.bearatourism.com
Galway/ Roscommon: Suck Valley Way
Roscommon: Minors Way & Historical Trail
Cavan: Cavan Way
Sections of the route to be completed in 2012/13 or upgraded
North Tipperary: Ormonde Way (to be developed)
Roscommon: Lung Way (to be developed)
Leitrim: Leitrim way (to be upgraded)0 -
NO in all respects
Yes in all respects. Shifting much of our long distance road freight traffic onto rail would allow for greater economies of scale. However it would seem that the current IE management don't see it that way.
The forthcoming split of IE into Infrastructure and Operational companies may help advance the cause of rail freight but nothing will develop until companies independent of IE take an interest in providing new freight services. IWT could for instance run their Ballina-North Wall service directly rather than via IE.0 -
What advantage would Tuam have as for being a railfrieght depot any more than say Ardee?0
-
LivelineDipso wrote: »What advantage would Tuam have as for being a railfrieght depot any more than say Ardee?
or Athenry..?0 -
The chance to get a train to Tuam was lost forever when it was not Phase 1 of the WRC.
The question is now what to do with the Ennis-Athenry dead duck rather than creating more dead ducks.0 -
sligotrain wrote: »Yes in all respects. Shifting much of our long distance road freight traffic onto rail would allow for greater economies of scale. However it would seem that the current IE management don't see it that way.
The forthcoming split of IE into Infrastructure and Operational companies may help advance the cause of rail freight but nothing will develop until companies independent of IE take an interest in providing new freight services. IWT could for instance run their Ballina-North Wall service directly rather than via IE.
Are you going to hi-jack the lorries at gunpoint and force the drivers to unload the goods into rail wagons? companies don't want rail because of the Extra expense the unreliable nature of the national railway company(C.I.E.) and the extra time required. And I seriously doubt that the few containers a week that IWT send to Dublin will be driving them into the rail-freight business!0 -
IE railfreight wasn't profitable, now it is. It is profitable because IE shifted risk from itself to freight forwarders and concentrated on trainload movements rather than bits and pieces here and there. Also, the removal from service of the wheeled wagons and the 181s means freight can only expand to the point where the existing bogie stock and unplundered 201s/071s can handle it. Therefore, any new freight flow, not just on the WRC, has to clear several hurdles:
1. Would it need substantial track investment. Tuam (taking that example) would as they are currently disconnected with a relay (at least) required on the alignment, plus fleet flexibility would favour an alignment able to take the weight of a 201.
2. How much cargo handling track or equipment would be required. At least Dublin Port pays for their spur tracks etc. Who pays in Tuam, even for a minimalist operation as at Ballina?
3. Would its (max) 50mph path or required reversals impede current well patronised operations (Tuam-North Wall) or require extra staff hours on manual level crossings (Tuam-Limerick Junction-Waterford).
4. Would the containers be 9'6" and where the alignment cannot be cleared for them would the use of pockets reduce train length below profitable levels.
4. Is there sufficient stock and motive power to make it happen without undue refurbishment or acquisition cost?
5. Is there an organisation willing to provide IE with a contracted income regardless of whether a trainload is ready on a given day?
I know, I know, naysaying.0 -
sligotrain wrote: »The same John Mulligan who made a presentation to Roscommon County Council in February asking them to endorse the destruction of the WRC in favour of a walking trail. They sent him on his way
Source: http://www.roscommoncoco.ie/en/Services/Corporateservices/Council_Meeting_Minutes/Monthly_Meeting_Minutes/2012/Council_Meeting_Minutes_27_2_2012.pdf
Because the councillors who philibustered john in roscommon CC are afraid their cosy position on the Western Inter county railway committee talking about nothing but claiming expenses for pointless meetings every month was being challenged.0 -
Bugger me, 4 or more Galway County councillors are members of this "Western Inter county railway committee" . How much does that cost us every year ???? Galway City Council nominates 2 members.
Been around for 34 Years and keeps giving of the expenses.
www.bmwassembly.ie/media/articles/TuamHerald_5Aug2010.pdfIn 1979 the Western Inter County Rail Committee ( or Western Inter-County inetrchangeably)
was set up made up of County Councillors
from Galway, Mayo, Sligo and Roscommon
and Leitrim. They requested Dr Micheal
MacGreil, SJ, of the Department of Social
Studies at St. Patrick's College, Maynooth to conduct a study.
In his report Dr McGreil listed 19 reasons
for the re-opening of the line, Limerick to Collooney
in Sligo. The Western Inter County
Rail Committee now had people like sociologist
Dr McGreil and Frank Dawson, son of
Hugh Dawson who drove the last train from
Tuam, an expert on trains and transport who
was then Assistant County Development Officer
in Galway and is today County Manager in
Roscommon.
The Western Inter County Rail Committee
with cross party conviction in the merits of reopening
of the Western Rail Corridor were
now a strong lobby group.
Some special trains ran from Tuam and I
remember going on a special from Tuam to
the All-Ireland hurling final in 1981 between
Galway and Offaly.
In May 1986 a concert was held in Tuam Stadium
and the headline act was Country and
Western star Boxcar Willie on the invitation
of the Inter County Rail Committee and other
Community groups to coincide with the running
of a restored steam train from Tuam.
Boxcar Willie advised everyone concerned
to make sure that the track was not taken up
as it would be the death of the WRC, and this
proved to be excellent advice.
The late Minister for Transport Seamus
Brennan cried stop to CIE on two different
occasions, first when he tore up a bill for tens
of thousands of pounds served on Dr McGreil
by CIE after the Western Inter County Railway
Committee succeeded in persuading the
Minister not to allow CIE to formally abandon
the railway from Claremorris to Collooney in
1986.
Secondly Minister Brennan rejected recommendations
of the Strategic Rail Review by
Consultants Booz Allen Hamilton for larnrod
Eireann on April 3, 2003, where they suggested
the cost of re-opening the WRC would be as
high as £572 m. This was a defining moment,
when a Minister rejected a consultants'
report, and expressed confidence in the cross
party Western Inter County Railway Committee
and other Community Groups like the
then recently formed West on Track group
made up of Chamber of Commerce and community
activists.
Minister Brennan established an expert
working group under the chairmanship of Pat
McCann in 2004 to further assess the Western
Rail Corridor. This Committee made recommendations
based on four separate studies,
Land Use chaired by Des Mahon, Mayo
County Manager, Costs and Benefit, chaired
by Frank Dawson, Director of Community
and Enterprise Galway County Council, Rail
Travel Demand, chaired by Hubert Kearns,
Sligo County Manager and Funding chaired
by Gerry Finn, Director of the BMW Regional
Assembly.
The McCann report found in favour of the
reopening of WRC. Its general conclusion was
that a strong case can be made for the restoration
of the line. Land use patterns and settlement
strategies of local authorities along
the western seaboard were identified, which
the re-opening of the WRC would greatly
enhance including the Sligo Gateway, Knock
International Airport, Knock Shrine as a centre
for international pilgrimage, large scale
industrial development including that at
Oranmore-Athenry, Galway Gateway, Link to
Shannon Airport, Limerick Gateway.
Population projections envisaged up to 2020
predict an increase of almost 300,000 with a
commuter traffic increase in the region of 75 per cent.
They concluded that balanced
regional development and the front loading of
infrastructure are critical to the development
of the whole region.
At the request of the Costs & Benefits sub
group , larnrod Eireann commissioned international
consultants Faber Maunsell to undertake
a line survey and prepare a cost estimate
for the renewal of the railway. The resultant
cost estimate of €366 compares favourably
with that of the subgroups' own estimated figure
of €310 using 2002 prices. The very
detailed report includes the cost of totally new
foundations, concrete sleepers, continuous
welded rail, electronic signalling, automated
crossings, new stations, lineside fencing, passing
loops at stations and renewal of bridges.
They have costed a modern state of the art
railway capable of intercity speeds and of
accommodating complementary commuter
and freight traffic.
Section distance capital
cost (and average cost per mile) is
Ennis to Athenry 36 miles €74.7 m(€2.1m)
Athenry to Tuam 15.5 miles €34.7 m(€2.2m),
Tuam toClaremorris 17 miles €58.9 m(€3.5m),
Claremorris to Collooney 49 miles €197.4 m(€4.3m).
The benefits are best described in a non
conventional economic appraisal summary
prepared by the group under the direction of
the Rail Procurement Agency having regard
for Department of Finance guidelines on cost
benefit analysis.
The Demand Sub Group found that the
WRC will satisfy the needs of people wishing
to move from commuting by car, as well as
facilitating long distance travellers moving
away from cars to trains and feeder buses,
while facilitating the diversion of certain
heavy freight movements from road to rail.
These welcome changes would require the
WRC to offer a high quality rail service, with
attractive time tables, preferably clock face:
flexible fare packages, community and customer
participation in operations planning
and integrated travel centres, where bus and
train interacted seamlessly. The economic justification
for investment on this route
includes a number of important wider issues
that must to be taken into account.
Social and developmental considerations
must be considered due to the relative neglect
of the Western seaboard over a number of
decades. It was the sub group's view that a
commitment to significant infrastructural
investment including rail services within the
western corridor would have major benefits
into the future in relation to demographic,
social, cultural and land use development. The
long term development of the west requires a
rail and road network, which are complementary.
A bi-modal approach similar to that
existing on the east coast is recommended.
Research which was undertaken when I
was Chairman of Galway County Development
Board indicates that bus and road traffic
volumes on the Sligo-Claremorris road at present
generate 2.5 million passenger journeys
per annum with 3.5 million extra between
Claremorris and Loughgeorge and a further 6
million between Loughgeorge and Galway,
representing a pool of 12 million current passenger
journeys from which to draw rail passengers.
Co-incidentally 11 million people
drive through Claregalway each year!
The railway enjoys about 10 per cent market
share of traffic annually. Why should the
railway not expect a similar share of Galway,
Mayo, Sligo journeys. If the citizens of the
region took one return trip in the year there
would be 1.4m urneys. McCann points to the
demand that has emerged on the new Ennis-
Limerick train service introduced in 2004,
which within the first year generated 130,000
passengers on a 24-mile journey, with a frequent,
attractively priced service using new
trains. As stated in the Strategic Rail Review:
"It is clear that additional rail capacity, when
provided, has been more than matched by
demand.
The sub group reported that the WRC has
considerable freight potential. This was
acknowledged ten years ago when Minister
Noel Treacy brought about the introduction of
a daily container train between Mayo and
Waterford.
In a submission to the group, Mayo industries
advised that they alone produce 11,000
containers annually for export, worth €3 billion.
This includes 30 per cent of the world's
Coca Cola concentrate produced in Ballina.
This cargo goes by rail through the Greater
Dublin Area en route to Waterford Port.
Mayo industries have expressed a deep felt
interest in using the rail service and the WRC
would provide the most direct route. There is
an existing daily freight train between Mayo
and Waterford ideally more suited to the WRC
than the current routing which takes up to
twelve trains each week through the greater
Dublin Area. Each of these, carrying containers
for export and pulpwood for Coillte,
removes 18 articulated lorries from our roads.
Many companies in Tuam, Claremorris and in
several other centres have expressed interest
in using the rail service to ship products and
import raw material and other goods. Road
Engineers state that an articulated lorry fully
loaded to capacity can do up to 10,000 times
more damage annually to roads than the average
car.
Funding the Western Rail Corridor only
represents less than 1/2 of 1 per cent of the Budget of Transport 21. Yes 0.049 per cent! It is difficult to understand why Conor McCarthy
of An Bord Snip Nua tried to suggest that no
further work should be done on the Western
Rail Corrido the hext phase being, Athenry to Tuam
remains part of the Programme for Government.
This commitment has'beeh firmed up
on three separate meetings I had with Transport
Minister Noel Dempsey in recent months.
The most recent meeting was attended by Dr Micheal MacGreil, Secretary of Western Inter
County Rail committee, Cllr Michael McGreal
from Roscommon County Council (Chairman),
myself Cllr Michael Connolly (Vice
Chairman), Michael Kitt TD, Cllr Damien
Ryan, Mayo and Cllr Michael Fleming, Sligo.
Minister Dempsey was accompanied by
Anne Marie Smith from his Department when
he told us that the Luas and Metro were now a
five to six year programme, instead of three
years. The Minister explained this delay
would release funding for projects like the
Western Rail Corridor, phase two from
Athenry to Tuam and Claremorris.
This project has only a few critics and they
are mainly in the Dublin media, constantly
writing articles in the national press trying to
derail this project which is critical for the
future development of the West Coast and the
west in general. Phase 1 Ennis to Athenry officially
opened on March 29, 2010.
The Ennis to Athenry section has been completed and open
to the public since March 30, 2010 and has four
or five times the passenger numbers projected
and has surpassed all expectations. After the
first week, the service had to convert from a
two carriage passenger train to a four carriage
because of demand. Two extra trains are now
being introduced on the Galway-Ennis section.
The Future
I have great confidence in the future development
of the Western Rail Corridor. A report
and costing have recently gone to the Department
of Transport for the Athenry to Tuam
link. There is such cross party support for the
Claremorris-Tuam section that I am very confident
that it will be completed by 2014.
Work has already been carried out on the
Claremorris to Collooney section by CIE
reviewing fencing, cleaning undergrowth
from the track and re-opening of drains,
preparing it for laying new track, under the
CLAR programme. When the Collooney section
from Claremorris is open I believe that in
the future a link to Donegal could be explored
and a further link to Derry. This would have
the knock on effect of connecting every section
of the rail network to Tuam with a link to
every Irish airport, North and South. This
would have significant economic and tourism
benefits to the western economy. The Western
Rail Athenry to Tuam and other Railway
Companies started out in the age of steam and
graduated to diesel trains. In the third century
of rail fossil fuels will become less acceptable
and less available. The most effective way to
power public transport will be through a good
network of electrical rail routes drawing on
ocean and wind sources, which will be readily
available on the west coast.
I will conclude with the resolution passed
by the Western Inter County Railway Committee
in July 2005, a committee that I am a
member of for the past 11 years. The McCann
report was welcomed as a significant and supportive
document for the re-opening of the
Western Rail Corridor, from Collooney to
Ennis which would be a most valuable transport
infrastructure and would provide concrete
proof of the State's commitment to balanced
regional development.0 -
Advertisement
-
I have to say that as an occasional visitor to this forum I was fairly unaware of the freight angle. Does this have merit interms of connecting areas like Tuam into the mainline grid allowing connection to Dublin and Waterford ports I wonder? would this be an attraction for larger companies to locate in North Galway and use such a service?
You would think that, but expanding rail frieght won't create traffic flows for motorways that need to be built in order that connected landowners can call in favours from politicians.
Private road hauliers will be pissed off and private bus companies will also be annoyed because your use of a publically owned asset prolongs its life and means that they cant get a contract moving pensioners twice weekly to the county town from formerly rail connected places.
So, in Irish terms, rail is a Bad Thing.0
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement