Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Reinhardt,scary prediction for tomorrow, 9/2/09

Options
1234568

Comments

  • Options
    #212
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    And whats it for?
    Are we supposed to guess?
    It's a riddle. Why don't you try and solve it if bothers you so much. I can't get passed the soft porn.


  • Options
    #213
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    It's a riddle. Why don't you try and solve it if bothers you so much. I can't get passed the soft porn.

    Or it could be hm making more **** up hoping something will happen close enough for him to claim he predicted it.

    Just like the previous "predictions".


  • Options
    #214
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    Or it could be hm making more **** up hoping something will happen close enough for him to claim he predicted it.

    Just like the previous "predictions".
    Well, your certainly entitled to you opinion of the guy. But, why is it bothering you so much. Get over it.


  • Options
    #215
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    Well, your certainly entitled to you opinion of the guy. But, why is it bothering you so much. Get over it.

    And would you like to point out where and when exactly his prediction for the 15th of March came true?


  • Options
    #216
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    And would you like to point out where and when exactly his prediction for the 15th of March came true?
    I don't know I'm not a Reinhardtologist. E-mail him if it's that important to you.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #217
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    I don't know I'm not a Reinhardtologist. E-mail him if it's that important to you.

    So correct me if I'm wrong but weren't you the one who claimed that whatever he predicted would be evident by now?

    Weren't you also the one who claimed he was correct in other predictions?

    Given the fact that you can't identify specifically if the prediction came true, would you conclude that it did?


  • Options
    #218
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    So correct me if I'm wrong but weren't you the one who claimed that whatever he predicted would be evident by now?

    Weren't you also the one who claimed he was correct in other predictions?

    Given the fact that you can't identify specifically if the prediction came true, would you conclude that it did?
    No, I never made the claim "the prediction would be evident by now".
    So what if he is correct or not. I just get a kick out of his website and the discussions surrounding it. Will I be making financial decisions based on his predictions, no. Will I go and dig a bunker in my backyard and stock it up with food and ammo if he says "I here war drums", defiantly not.

    It's only a bit of fun get over it.


  • Options
    #219
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    No, I never made the claim "the prediction would be evident by now".
    So what if he is correct or not. I just get a kick out of his website and the discussions surrounding it. Will I be making financial decisions based on his predictions, no. Will I go and dig a bunker in my backyard and stock it up with food and ammo if he says "I here war drums", defiantly not.

    It's only a bit of fun get over it.
    So then we can agree he's talking nonsense?


  • Options
    #220
    meglome
    Registered Users Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    It's only a bit of fun get over it.

    Comedy routines are a bit of fun, clowns are a bit of fun, dancing is a bit of fun. However predicting future horror and market crashes are not what I'd consider fun and even less fun if it turns out to be bull****.


  • Options
    #221
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    meglome wrote: »
    Comedy routines are a bit of fun, clowns are a bit of fun, dancing is a bit of fun. However predicting future horror and market crashes are not what I'd consider fun and even less fun if it turns out to be bull****.
    Sorry, I wouldn't want a word to upset you. It's intriguing. Is that better.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #222
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    I don't see how it's intriguing when he's constantly failed to predict anything.


  • Options
    #223
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    I don't see how it's intriguing when he's constantly failed to predict anything.
    Hmm, and yet you seem obsessed with posting in the Reinhardt thread.


  • Options
    #224
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    Hmm, and yet you seem obsessed with posting in the Reinhardt thread.

    No I'm just seeing whether or not this guy can predict anything.

    Evidently he cannot.

    Do you believe he can?


  • Options
    #225
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    No I'm just seeing whether or not this guy can predict anything.

    Evidently he cannot.

    Do you believe he can?
    If it's your belief he can't predict anything then why do you keep coming back?


  • Options
    #226
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    If it's your belief he can't predict anything then why do you keep coming back?
    It's a belief based on the fact his prediction for 15th March and 9th Feburary failed.
    And I keep coming back because it's a discussion forum.

    So do you believe he can predict anything?
    Do you believe his prediction for 15th of March came to pass?


  • Options
    #227
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    It's a belief based on the fact his prediction for 15th March and 9th Feburary failed.
    And I keep coming back because it's a discussion forum.

    So do you believe he can predict anything?
    Do you believe his prediction for 15th of March came to pass?
    Hmm, your not intrigued by Rienhardts predictions but you have collected facts about the predictions not coming true, yet you don't know what the predictions were to begin with. Well, that makes sense.


  • Options
    #228
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    Hmm, your not intrigued by Rienhardts predictions but you have collected facts about the predictions not coming true, yet you don't know what the predictions were to begin with. Well, that makes sense.
    Well there wasn't anything in the news on those dates nor could anyone on this forum point out what did happen on these dates that was predicted (yourself included).

    Can you point out where exactly the prediction came through?


  • Options
    #229
    bonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    Hmm, your not intrigued by Rienhardts predictions but you have collected facts about the predictions not coming true, yet you don't know what the predictions were to begin with. Well, that makes sense.

    There's a thread here. You're posting on it. The information in the thread is exactly what you're alleging King Mob has "collected".

    Are you trying to fault him for partaking in a discussion thread?


  • Options
    #230
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    bonkey wrote: »
    There's a thread here. You're posting on it. The information in the thread is exactly what you're alleging King Mob has "collected".

    Are you trying to fault him for partaking in a discussion thread?
    King Mob said its a fact that Reinhardts predictions didn't come true but, he doesn't know what the predictions were. I don't either. Do you? I wish we would try to figure it out through a discussion and then debunk it if necessary. But, that doesn't happen here. The people that try to just seem get bullied.


  • Options
    #231
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    King Mob said its a fact that Reinhardts predictions didn't come true but, he doesn't know what the predictions were. I don't either. Do you? I wish we would try to figure it out through a discussion and then debunk it if necessary. But, that doesn't happen here. The people that try to just seem get bullied.

    I believe he was predicting something but never actually specified what he was predicting. This left it open to interpretation so anything and everything could have been what he predicted. And when something like that couldn't be found we were told "He predicted the start of something, we won't see it for weeks."
    It's been a month since his prediction now. I asked if it has come true and you cannot point out if it had.

    It's a fair conclusion that he didn't predict anything.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #232
    Woger
    Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭Woger


    Anyone hear of David Icke?


  • Options
    #233
    bonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    King Mob said its a fact that Reinhardts predictions didn't come true but, he doesn't know what the predictions were. I don't either. Do you?

    Going by his past predictions having been spot on I'll give him the benefit of the doubt this week.

    Sound familiar? This was a comment made by you earlier in this thread. If you don't know what his predictions were, how could you claim he was "spot on" with them?
    I wish we would try to figure it out through a discussion and then debunk it if necessary. But, that doesn't happen here.
    If you read back to the prediction being questioned, you'll see comments like the following:

    I'll be watching the bond market.

    Again...that's from you.

    Rienhardt's been active. 15th is another date he has pointed to.
    Again...you.

    So although you didn't know what he was predicting, you believed it was the 15th and was to do with the bond market...strongly enough to make those comments.

    Now you want us to believe that is bullying to ask you if something happened on the 15th, or with the bond markets, or with the prediction in general?
    The people that try to just seem get bullied.

    The people who have been supporting the guy are being asked for an update on claims they made previously.

    Casting that as bullying is little more than a tacit admission that there's nothing positive to report.


  • Options
    #234
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    King Mob wrote: »
    I believe he was predicting something but never actually specified what he was predicting. This left it open to interpretation so anything and everything could have been what he predicted. And when something like that couldn't be found we were told "He predicted the start of something, we won't see it for weeks."
    It's been a month since his prediction now. I asked if it has come true and you cannot point out if it had.

    It's a fair conclusion that he didn't predict anything.
    "We were told" this came from an individual on this board that has an opinion on the matter. He's not the spokesman for the the we totally understand Reinhardts riddles club. Either am I. Your conclusions are based on deciphered secondhand speculation from Rienhardt followers.


  • Options
    #235
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    "We were told" this came from an individual on this board that has an opinion on the matter. He's not the spokesman for the the we totally understand Reinhardts riddles club. Either am I. Your conclusions are based on deciphered secondhand speculation from Rienhardt followers.
    Can you point out exactly if his prediction came true or not?


  • Options
    #236
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    bonkey wrote: »
    Going by his past predictions having been spot on I'll give him the benefit of the doubt this week.

    Sound familiar? This was a comment made by you earlier in this thread. If you don't know what his predictions were, how could you claim he was "spot on" with them?


    If you read back to the prediction being questioned, you'll see comments like the following:

    I'll be watching the bond market.

    Again...that's from you.

    Rienhardt's been active. 15th is another date he has pointed to.
    Again...you.

    So although you didn't know what he was predicting, you believed it was the 15th and was to do with the bond market...strongly enough to make those comments.

    Now you want us to believe that is bullying to ask you if something happened on the 15th, or with the bond markets, or with the prediction in general?



    The people who have been supporting the guy are being asked for an update on claims they made previously.

    Casting that as bullying is little more than a tacit admission that there's nothing positive to report.
    I'm not an expert on Rieinhardt. I was just speculating in order to stimulate a discussion. But , that never happened. It never does.


  • Options
    #237
    bonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    Your conclusions are based on deciphered secondhand speculation from Rienhardt followers.

    Again, you seem to be faulting someone for asking the same people to pass comment.

    Nyarlothep suggested people wait 3 weeks. 4 weeks have passed. Is it unreasonable to ask what it was we were suggested to wait for?
    I was just speculating in order to stimulate a discussion. But , that never happened. It never does.
    This thread has in excess of 200 posts. There has been plenty of discussion.

    We were asked to wait 3 weeks for the results of a prediction to become clear. We've waited and nothing has become clear. Now, people are asking what it was we were waiting for. At the risk of pointing out the obvious...that is a question. It opens the path for further discussion.

    How is it that you can accuse those asking for details of not being interested in discussion? The thread was dead. It was gone. It was buried.

    You seem to want to accuse the person who brought it back to life of bullying and not being interested in discussing the topic...because they asked a question.


  • Options
    #238
    uncle_sam_ie
    Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    From page 14 #209 "Have you seen his site today. A lot of info to digest. He's has a count down of 28 days."
    Again, a lot of stuff there to decipher, discuss and debunk. I wish we would. But not on this site it seems.


  • Options
    #239
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    From page 14 #209 "Have you seen his site today. A lot of info to digest. He's has a count down of 28 days."
    Again, a lot of stuff there to decipher, discuss and debunk. I wish we would. But not on this site it seems.

    I believe I did express my opinion on this.
    Based on his previously failed predictions I believe that he's being intentionally vague in this new prediction so as to allow people to take anything they want to be the event that was predicted.
    Hence I believe he is not actually predicting anything at all.

    Do you believe he can?


  • Options
    #240
    bonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    uncle_sam_ie wrote: »
    From page 14 #209 "Have you seen his site today. A lot of info to digest. He's has a count down of 28 days."
    Again, a lot of stuff there to decipher, discuss and debunk. I wish we would.

    If you want to discuss it, then go right ahead. Tell us what you think. Tell us what your thoughts on the subject are.


    I'll happily engage you on the subject after you offer your thoughts.
    But not on this site it seems.
    If what you want is for others to discuss things for you, then yes...you're quite possibly in the wrong place. Generally, people here are expected to take the lead in discussions they want to start.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #241
    nyarlothothep
    Registered Users Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭nyarlothothep


    bonkey wrote: »
    Again, you seem to be faulting someone for asking the same people to pass comment.

    Nyarlothep suggested people wait 3 weeks. 4 weeks have passed. Is it unreasonable to ask what it was we were suggested to wait for?


    This thread has in excess of 200 posts. There has been plenty of discussion.

    We were asked to wait 3 weeks for the results of a prediction to become clear. We've waited and nothing has become clear. Now, people are asking what it was we were waiting for. At the risk of pointing out the obvious...that is a question. It opens the path for further discussion.

    How is it that you can accuse those asking for details of not being interested in discussion? The thread was dead. It was gone. It was buried.

    You seem to want to accuse the person who brought it back to life of bullying and not being interested in discussing the topic...because they asked a question.

    give it 3 more months


Advertisement