Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
23-01-2018, 10:43   #1
Say my name
Registered User
 
Say my name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,388
Tsunami alert for the Western coast of North America.

A tsunami alert has just been issued for the western coast of north America.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42786107

Last edited by Say my name; 23-01-2018 at 10:59.
Say my name is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
23-01-2018, 10:58   #2
hawkwing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,265
TSUNAMI MESSAGE NUMBER 2
NWS PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER EWA BEACH HI
1220 AM HST TUE JAN 23 2018

TO - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE STATE OF HAWAII

SUBJECT - TSUNAMI WATCH SUPPLEMENT

A TSUNAMI WATCH CONTINUES IN EFFECT FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII.

AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

ORIGIN TIME - 1132 PM HST 22 JAN 2018
COORDINATES - 56.0 NORTH 149.2 WEST
LOCATION - GULF OF ALASKA
MAGNITUDE - 8.2 MOMENT

EVALUATION

BASED ON ALL AVAILABLE DATA A TSUNAMI MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED BY
THIS EARTHQUAKE THAT COULD BE DESTRUCTIVE ON COASTAL AREAS EVEN
FAR FROM THE EPICENTER. AN INVESTIGATION IS UNDERWAY TO DETERMINE
IF THERE IS A TSUNAMI THREAT TO HAWAII.

IF TSUNAMI WAVES IMPACT HAWAII THE ESTIMATED EARLIEST ARRIVAL OF
THE FIRST TSUNAMI WAVE IS

0423 AM HST TUE 23 JAN 2018
hawkwing is offline  
(2) thanks from:
23-01-2018, 11:41   #3
vicwatson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Help Santa Strike Force
Posts: 24,494
Thinks that's been revised to 7.9 magnitude
vicwatson is offline  
23-01-2018, 11:41   #4
Tabnabs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,603
Tabnabs is offline  
Thanks from:
23-01-2018, 12:12   #5
Say my name
Registered User
 
Say my name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,388
It seems that there might be no tsunamis after all.
Warnings are still in place but the time has passed now that any effects would have shown up in Kodiak.
Kodiak is near to the epicentre of the earthquake.
Say my name is offline  
Advertisement
23-01-2018, 12:41   #6
141_Oscar_Mike
Moderator
 
141_Oscar_Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,928
A scary warning to wake up to in the middle of the night none the less

https://twitter.com/AndrewWSYX6/stat...59153536004096
141_Oscar_Mike is offline  
23-01-2018, 16:31   #7
Say my name
Registered User
 
Say my name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by 141_Oscar_Mike View Post
A scary warning to wake up to in the middle of the night none the less
According to Twitter a lot of people slept through the warnings.
Say my name is offline  
23-01-2018, 17:33   #8
M.T. Cranium
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: across from the neighbours
Posts: 9,506
News reports here state that most people heeded the tsunami warning sirens and went to higher ground (this would be mostly in outer coastal areas of Vancouver Island and further north), but after they arrived the tsunami alert was cancelled and nothing happened, so all good.
M.T. Cranium is offline  
24-01-2018, 00:41   #9
piuswal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.T. Cranium View Post
News reports here state that most people heeded the tsunami warning sirens and went to higher ground (this would be mostly in outer coastal areas of Vancouver Island and further north), but after they arrived the tsunami alert was cancelled and nothing happened, so all good.
Any idea as to how many alerts have been issued since the system went into operation and how many were eventually validated?
piuswal is offline  
Advertisement
24-01-2018, 01:36   #10
M.T. Cranium
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: across from the neighbours
Posts: 9,506
No idea, will try to find out. I don't think they sound these sirens (in B.C.) very often, seems that it was automatic on receipt of earthquake in given location and magnitude, then later it was realized by earthquake analysts that it was of the wrong sort to create a tsunami but the cancellation was about the same time that the wave was supposed to arrive.

We haven't had many large quakes that distant in recent years, the only test cases have been almost immediate local warnings that have generally been on such a short time cycle that people just ran for higher ground when they felt the shaking but those turned out to be too small in magnitude to create big tsunamis even where the quake was felt.

There has not been anything very actionable here since a large tsunami with the March 1964 earthquake (believe that was 9.2) near Valdez AK, and that one did considerable damage on west coast of Vancouver Island with some drownings, hence the warning system.

I think people out on the "outer" coast are very aware of these warning systems, but if one ever went off in the more sheltered inner coasts near bigger cities, I doubt that people would necessarily respond, in fact I don't even know what parts of the inner coast have that system in place. A quake in just the right spot in Puget Sound or the Strait of Juan de Fuca might cause a tsunami further inland but it has never happened in the two centuries of our recorded history, some archaeological indications that a big quake in Japan in 1700 sent a devastating tidal wave across the Pacific and did enormous damage to coastal native settlements.

Generally speaking this whole region (BC, WA) is living in the expectation that we are long overdue for something large-scale, Mount Rainier going volcanic being the most significant worry, then a damaging earthquake off the west coast or in Puget Sound. We had a rather minor one in Feb 2002 that still did quite a bit of damage in Seattle, and they get 5-6 on Richter scale tremors all the time near the coast. I've felt two myself in the 22 years we lived there. But it's "tick tock" on the Big One.
M.T. Cranium is offline  
24-01-2018, 08:37   #11
Wanderer78
Registered User
 
Wanderer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10,668
Astonishing amount of aftershocks in the region, plate is very active
Wanderer78 is offline  
01-02-2018, 06:13   #12
Pa ElGrande
Registered User
 
Pa ElGrande's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 986
Something Shocking Happened in Florida After the Alaska Earthquake: Well Water Levels Changed
https://weather.com/news/news/2018-0...-wells-shaking

Quote:
Tuesday's 7.9 magnitude earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska sent vibrations through the earth that caused water to rise and fall in wells in Florida, thousands of miles away.

Sensors near Fort Lauderdale and Madison, near the Georgia border, showed a minor change in water levels after the earthquake, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS).

A water level rise from 41.59 feet to 41.77 feet was recorded at the well near Madison before it returned to normal. At the well near Fort Lauderdale, the water level fell from 1.42 feet to 1.31 feet.

Why did water levels in these wells some 3,800 miles away from the earthquake's epicenter change?

Vibrations that move through the earth called seismic waves are the culprit. Seismic waves are depicted by the upward and downward lines on seismographs used to detect earthquakes around the world.

"Water levels in wells respond to the seismic-wave induced expansion and contraction of the aquifer tapped by the well, in turn causing step or oscillatory fluid-pressure changes," the USGS says.

source

What Are Seismic Waves? - -> http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html

The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves - -> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...03915/abstract

Here is an example from a well in Virginia, note the spike on Jan 23
Pa ElGrande is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet