Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Commonly believed historical inaccuracies

1246711

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,731 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    In spite of several memorials and at least one popular song, you would be lead to believe Ireland had more sympathy for the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War but the reverse was actually true at the time.
    Many more Irishmen were prepared to fight for Franco than for the Republicans but that uncomfortable fact is largely forgotten today.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In spite of several memorials and at least one popular song, you would be lead to believe Ireland had more sympathy for the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War . . . .
    Interestingly, I have never been led to believe this, or met anyone who appears to believe this.

    Perhaps the commonly-believed inaccuracy is not that "Ireland had more sympathy for the republican side", but that "it is widely believed that Ireland had more sympathy for the republican side"! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,731 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Not historical but a fable that has been turned into fact, I once heard a mother telling her daughter that women have more ribs than men, I corrected her but she was adamant that it was because God used Adams rib to make eve. I don't know if she ever learned the truth but she was passing the misinformation on to the next generation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    tabbey wrote: »
    A lot of such quotes were actually from O'Connell, "to hell or to Connaught " being another.

    mr full of **** o'connell , the great waffler


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    What is current thinking of what happened them?

    it was shakespeare that made up the story


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    A common American misconception, that WW2 started in 1941.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,463 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    A common American misconception, that WW2 started in 1941.

    A common European one is that it started in 1939.
    Most east Asians would give 1937.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,544 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    banie01 wrote: »
    A common European one is that it started in 1939.
    Most east Asians would give 1937.

    There's also the thought thread that it should be just called "Part 2", at any rate it didn't start in 1941.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,431 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Not historical but a fable that has been turned into fact, I once heard a mother telling her daughter that women have more ribs than men, I corrected her but she was adamant that it was because God used Adams rib to make eve. I don't know if she ever learned the truth but she was passing the misinformation on to the next generation.

    But strangely cervical ribs (or extra ribs) are much more common in women than men and agenesis (being born with one less rib) is more common in men.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    The claim that the hull number assigned to the Titanic by its shipbuilders, Harland and Wolff, was 3909 04; a number which, when written longhand and viewed as a mirror image, spelled out the words ‘NO POPE’.

    This despite the fact was that the hull number painted on the ship is known to have been 401, the same as its yard number at Harland and Wolff, and its assigned Board of Trade number was 131,428.

    There was no "pope" at all...


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,731 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    gozunda wrote: »
    The claim that the hull number assigned to the Titanic by its shipbuilders, Harland and Wolff, was 3909 04; a number which, when written longhand and viewed as a mirror image, spelled out the words ‘NO POPE’.

    This despite the fact was that the hull number painted on the ship is known to have been 401, the same as its yard number at Harland and Wolff, and its assigned Board of Trade number was 131,428.

    There was no "pope" at all...

    This is a gold mine of myths and exaggerations; exchanged identity with sister ship Olympic and deliberately wrecked, a cursed mummy case allegedly on board, man dressed as a woman getting into a lifeboat, many photos purporting to be RMS Titanic are of its near identical sister.

    Like "grandad fighting in the GPO" family story, there's lots of family legends of relatives who bought a ticket but didn't travel.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    This is a gold mine of myths and exaggerations; exchanged identity with sister ship Olympic and deliberately wrecked, a cursed mummy case allegedly on board, man dressed as a woman getting into a lifeboat, many photos purporting to be RMS Titanic are of its near identical sister.

    Like "grandad fighting in the GPO" family story, there's lots of family legends of relatives who bought a ticket but didn't travel.


    I was told that this actually happened. A group were planning to travel to Dublin for the rising but all the buses were cancelled by the British!


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,731 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    saabsaab wrote: »
    I was told that this actually happened. A group were planning to travel to Dublin for the rising but all the buses were cancelled by the British!

    A ticket for the Titanic I meant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    A ticket for the Titanic I meant.


    No sorry haven't heard anything on that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,698 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    In spite of several memorials and at least one popular song, you would be lead to believe Ireland had more sympathy for the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War but the reverse was actually true at the time.
    Many more Irishmen were prepared to fight for Franco than for the Republicans but that uncomfortable fact is largely forgotten today.

    Franco had the Catholic Church on his side, so they were feeding information about the republicans murdering clergy etc to recruit people in ireland. Not sure about the numbers, but I know that oduffy did round up an squadron that were largely an embarrassment to franco as they were so incompetent.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Franco had the Catholic Church on his side, so they were feeding information about the republicans murdering clergy etc to recruit people in ireland. Not sure about the numbers, but I know that oduffy did round up an squadron that were largely an embarrassment to franco as they were so incompetent.
    About 700 went to Spain to fight for the Francoists. More volunteered to go but, by the time they were ready to depart, Franco had lost interest and transport was never provided.

    Franco's main interest was always political — he thought that being seen to attract Catholic support internationally would make it easier for him to get support from conservative Spanish royalists, who were fervently Catholic but much more supportive of the monarchy than of fascism. But by the time the Irish brigade arrived he has already secured the support of the main royalist groups, so the political benefit was nil. He never expected the group to have any military significance, and he was right. They were poorly disciplined, badly led and demoralised.

    They were only in Spain for about six months, arriving in December 1936 and being shipped home in June 1937. By that time support for the cause in Ireland had more or less collapsed — atrocities like the bombing of Guernica made it difficult to present the Francoist cause as a Catholic one, and the organising/funding group for the brigade in Ireland, the Irish Christian Front, was publicly squabbling and disintegrating.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Isn't there a story that the original source of the assertion that the USA was named after Amerigo Vespucci retracted the assertion in the second edition of the book, but the original edition was the one sent out far and wide, copied and circulated.

    Despite the assertion being contradicted as untrue in all subsequent editions, the myth stuck.

    I very much like this story that it is in fact, named after a Welsh customs official.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Lorddrakul wrote: »
    Isn't there a story that the original source of the assertion that the USA was named after Amerigo Vespucci retracted the assertion in the second edition of the book, but the original edition was the one sent out far and wide, copied and circulated.

    Despite the assertion being contradicted as untrue in all subsequent editions, the myth stuck.

    I very much like this story that it is in fact, named after a Welsh customs official.


    So it's Amerike! Spelling it wrong all this time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    Biggest one promoted by the Irish and British media in recent times :

    Irish WW1 veterans were mistreated on return

    In reality, most voted for SF and voted for freedom, the British government refused to treat Irish volunteers equally in terms of rank in the trenches and executed much higher numbers.

    Best IRA fighters were in the British army

    They were lied to regarding home rule and humiliated by fighting for Britain

    It was the FF and the deValera government who had to pay the pensions of the WW1 veterans, as the British would not


    Secondly, myth WW1 had anything to do with Prussian militarism or Belgian freedom

    Thirdly, that Irish who fought for Britain in the second world war were targeted as traitors :

    1) Britain had plans to invade Ireland in 1940 and set up a British dictator to rule - like Germany in Poland

    2) The Irish who deserted the Irish defence forces to the British army, usually due to pay, were deliberately treated leniently.

    They had a tokenistic temporary blacklisting from the civil service

    Other countries executed deserters (especially if they joined an enemy)

    They deserted their posts - a hanging offence in the military - those who joined directly to the British army were never touched - media like to imply this

    The British who perpetuated this myth actually arrested people up until the 1970s for desertion, even if desertion was to the US army (as they got paid more)

    3) Interestingly, Churchill spread a lie that German navy were refuelling on the west coast in Ireland since 1914, it was pointed out to him that that area was under British occupation then, so was not actually possible - man was a clown

    This has been spread more recently online by the White supremacist site Stormfront


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    George Orwell was some freedom loving anti-right wing rebel

    He was a British imperial policeman, deeply racist and occasionally anti-Semitic

    He was pro-British imperialist with all the trappings


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    Last one, is the historical inaccuracy of saying the Irish sent to the Caribbean were not slaves, despite fitting the definition of slavery

    Any argument arguing against that , is usually just semantics, facetious and hypocritical


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,283 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    unless people start quoting (reputable) sources, i'm pretty much at the point where i think this thread is being used to peddle the very opinions it was set up to chop down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,875 ✭✭✭Edgware


    Biggest one promoted by the Irish and British media in recent times :

    Irish WW1 veterans were mistreated on return

    In reality, most voted for SF and voted for freedom, the British government refused to treat Irish volunteers equally in terms of rank in the trenches and executed much higher numbers.

    Best IRA fighters were in the British army

    They were lied to regarding home rule and humiliated by fighting for Britain

    It was the FF and the deValera government who had to pay the pensions of the WW1 veterans, as the British would not


    Secondly, myth WW1 had anything to do with Prussian militarism or Belgian freedom

    Thirdly, that Irish who fought for Britain in the second world war were targeted as traitors :

    1) Britain had plans to invade Ireland in 1940 and set up a British dictator to rule - like Germany in Poland

    2) The Irish who deserted the Irish defence forces to the British army, usually due to pay, were deliberately treated leniently.

    They had a tokenistic temporary blacklisting from the civil service

    Other countries executed deserters (especially if they joined an enemy)

    They deserted their posts - a hanging offence in the military - those who joined directly to the British army were never touched - media like to imply this

    The British who perpetuated this myth actually arrested people up until the 1970s for desertion, even if desertion was to the US army (as they got paid more)

    3) Interestingly, Churchill spread a lie that German navy were refuelling on the west coast in Ireland since 1914, it was pointed out to him that that area was under British occupation then, so was not actually possible - man was a clown

    This has been spread more recently online by the White supremacist site Stormfront

    Just reading about Ulster Bank today.
    In WW2 if an employee left to join the British forces your job was kept for you.
    If you joined the Free State Army it was not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Edgware wrote: »
    Just reading about Ulster Bank today.
    In WW2 if an employee left to join the British forces your job was kept for you.
    If you joined the Free State Army it was not.


    Was that all Ireland policy?


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    unless people start quoting (reputable) sources, i'm pretty much at the point where i think this thread is being used to peddle the very opinions it was set up to chop down.

    I agree M but looking through the posts there's a huge percentage of them without quotes but still making claims.

    I think it's fair to say that the quote issue was only brought up when it arose from one side of the political fence. That's something we can't do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Unless somebody can prove it, I have yet to see any evidence jimi Hendrix said Rory Gallagher is the best guitarist in the world


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭coco0981


    That Hill 16 in Croke Park was built using the rubble from the destroyed buildings of the rising


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭coco0981


    Last one, is the historical inaccuracy of saying the Irish sent to the Caribbean were not slaves, despite fitting the definition of slavery

    Any argument arguing against that , is usually just semantics, facetious and hypocritical

    I think most the problem there is that the Irish were almost exclusively indentured servants. To us, this seems akin to slavery
    But when compared to chattel slavery that Africans endured in America there is a difference


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Edgware wrote: »
    Just reading about Ulster Bank today.
    In WW2 if an employee left to join the British forces your job was kept for you.
    If you joined the Free State Army it was not.

    Anyone taking part in the 1916 rising was fired from the Guinness brewery and reported to the ric


Advertisement