Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russian build up along Ukraine

2456711

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,609 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Royal Navy shadowed by Russian coastguard today along with 20 fighter jets on radar and a Russian war ship in the distance. Threats were made to them to change their course or shots would be fired, which they were but not on target. There was a BBC journalist on board with a camera crew who got footage of the reaction on the bridge and a fighter jet flying close by
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57583363


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Royal Navy shadowed by Russian coastguard today along with 20 fighter jets on radar and a Russian war ship in the distance. Threats were made to them to change their course or shots would be fired, which they were but not on target. There was a BBC journalist on board with a camera crew who got footage of the reaction on the bridge and a fighter jet flying close by
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57583363

    The MOD statement is at odds with this version of events


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,609 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    The MOD statement is at odds with this version of events

    Yeah I know, it is stated in the article I linked. MOD is saying no warning shots were fired but the journalists on board arent agreeing with them with one of them reporting cannon fire from a Russian coastguard vessel and the Commander said the same
    The latest incident saw more than 50 interactions with Russian aircraft recorded by Defender in a few hours. Commander Owen told the Mail: 'That is the closest I have come to a Russian vessel in my 21-year career. I suspect the gunfire was from one of the coastguard vehicles.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9718661/Read-dramatic-eyewitness-report-Vladimir-Putin-gunboat-opens-fire.html

    MOD claim is that the Russians were performing gunnery exercises in the distance and thats the shots that were fired. But one of the journalists has a source in the UK govt who said they are trying to play down the incident.
    Downing Street insisted Defender was taking the 'most direct' route from Ukraine to Georgia along an 'internationally recognised travel corridor' and was not subject to warning shots fired by Russia. A source acknowledged the Government was playing down the incident to deny Moscow the row it is seeking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    BBC footage clearly shows Russians warning that if they didn't change course, they would be fired on. Shows very close pass by Russian Bombers and at least 2 coast guard vessels shadowing RN ship at very close range.

    Wonder why MOD are downplaying it so much


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,776 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Russians look like chumps as usual.

    Russia: We dropped bombs and fired warning shots in the vicinity of these aggressive NATO vessels!

    UK: No you bloody didn't. You told us you'd be exercising in the area and we observed that.

    Russia: Here is the footage! (aerial footage shows nothing but planes flying about and the RN Destroyer on targetting scanners and cameras.)

    This is just more of the same crap we've seen before with Russian jets buzzing US warships while the USN carries on with its exercises.

    I'd love to see one of the Russians loose the plot and let a bomb go on a NATO vessel in international waters and watch them get shredded by the NATO offensive weapons.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    The Russians look like chumps as usual.

    Russia: We dropped bombs and fired warning shots in the vicinity of these aggressive NATO vessels!

    UK: No you bloody didn't. You told us you'd be exercising in the area and we observed that.

    Russia: Here is the footage! (aerial footage shows nothing but planes flying about and the RN Destroyer on targetting scanners and cameras.)

    This is just more of the same crap we've seen before with Russian jets buzzing US warships while the USN carries on with its exercises.

    I'd love to see one of the Russians loose the plot and let a bomb go on a NATO vessel in international waters and watch them get shredded by the NATO offensive weapons.

    In the BBC footage you can see the HMS Defender crew preparing the Decoy launchers, CIWS and Secondary armament.
    It would not have ended well for the Russian coastguard vessels. Love how the British skipper was using VS flags which the russians didn't seem to notice (because they were too far away to see it).


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Well, this seems like it's heating up.

    Fcuk Putin. Glory to Ukraine!



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,776 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I dunno. Its no warmer, really, than at any point in the 7 odd years of conflict. The sabre rattling has always ebbed and flowed.

    Putin knows if he starts anything serious in Ukraine proper, it will inevitably draw the West into active participation and he will lose Crimea, the Donestk enclave and his natural gas income.

    The cancellation of Nord Stream II by Germany certainly ratchets up the stakes, but it doesn't really alter the geopolitical reality on the ground.

    What's interesting from an Irish perspective is the pan-European approach. I saw on the news earlier, the NATO Sec Gen Stolltenberg in the EU Commission building in Brussels, standing in front of a bank of EU flags, giving an interview following an EU Defence Minister's meeting as if he were speaking for both bodies. Bearing in mind Poland, Latvia and Lithuania have formally commenced a NATO Article 4 process, fearing for their territorial integrity.

    Is the line between the European NATO members and the EU itself thinning even more? Where will Ireland stand in possible NATO military action in Belarus or Ukraine



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The same place we stood on the cold war on the Fence. We allowed Nato use airspace and Aeroflot shannon



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Belarus leader is forcing putin hand in a way.

    Firstly threatening to cut the gas supply to Europe, this blind sided putin.

    Today lukashenko requested putin to intervene in the Belarus problem by what ever means necessary.

    Putin likes to flex his military muscle but he definitely doesn't want a direct military action with nato.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    There's a few things happening I think that may create a tense situation where somebody could do something stupid to escalate things. Belarus, Ukraine, Armenia. Different grievances for all, but all have Russian backing to an extent (separatists in Ukraine)

    Fcuk Putin. Glory to Ukraine!



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,776 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They do, but ZX is right, Putin won't let those elements create a scenario to bring him into direct conflict with NATO, none of them on their own are consequential enough to tip that balance. Its clear enough from Lukashenko's attitude in recent days that he got a spanking from Moscow for pushing his luck.

    I also think its a bit rich of NATO to be demanding more from Ukraine in meeting improved governance objectives in order to join the Alliance, when they already include some very dodgy players like Bulgaria, Albania and turkey. NATO can't afford to continue their hypocrisy on that front, its just the sort of geopolitical vacuum that Putin loves to exploit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Maybe because Ukraine is so grossly corrupt and chockfull of Russian sympathisers anyway, that even NATO has to gag.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Ukraine is a funny one all right.

    Nato is probably more worried that if they are a full member they might do something stupid in regards to Crimea.

    Even Poland have stopped lobbying for there membership.

    In a strange way both nato and putin are quite happy to leave Ukraine as it is kind of a buffer between the two.

    A play area for putin In a way.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Looks like a full Ukraine invasion is looking likely. Hard to see how any modern, developed country could attack another. Putin will blame NATO for getting close to its borders, but that's a lame excuse.

    The comparison of Hitler invading the Sudeten and Putin invading the Crimea is stark. Europe was wildly stupid to have allowed itself to be dependent on Russia for energy. Its borderline criminal.

    Worrisome times ahead with January being suggested as when they will invade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Certainly looking that way.

    I've been there in December. Ideal country for tanks/paratroopers. East Ua has been very russian leaning for years. The fear is Russia will use this as a precursor to protect "Ethnic Russians", as it did in Crimea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,776 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    If NATO don't step in, they might as well disband. I mean whats the point when it's appeasement after appeasement.

    Its pretty obvious that Russia intends to annex everything east of the Dnieper River and join up Donbass and the Crimea with surrounding regions to create a buffer between Russia proper and the NATO frontier. But after that, for NATO, where does it stop. Moldova left to its fate on their doorstep? Then the Baltics?

    If the World doesn't come together to reunify the integrity of Ukraine, then they can really have no right to complain when their own borders and territoreis are threatened by the likes of China in the western Pacific.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Ukraine isn't in NATO though, you aren't going to get an intervention beyond diplomatic actions and most likely a reinforcement of the Eastern European nations. There's going to be increased pressure on the nations that aren't hitting the 2% mark.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Hard to know which way this will go.

    Fcuk Putin. Glory to Ukraine!



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,498 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Hard to think Russia would genuinely invade Ukraine. It wouldn't match the sly way their government has operated in recent years, what with using the troll armies online and claiming their soldiers were merely in Donbass on holiday. An invasion of Ukrainian by Russia would be heavily banking on the West doing nothing

    If Russia does move to go into Ukraine, NATO forces should also go in, IF invited to do so by Kiev. Give cocky Putin a slap on his bald head.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,498 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Libya not being in NATO didn't stop NATO forces going there in 2011 after a UN security council resolution was passed to allow it. Ukraine is not in NATO but does have cooperation agreements with NATO. If NATO stands idly by while Russia moves in, then NATO isn't worth much.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭sparky42


    NATO or technically some of NATO launched operations in Libya, but that just highlights the issue. NATO is under no obligation to any nation that isn’t a member whether that’s Ukraine or Finland or Ireland. NATO might choose to involve itself either on a nation by nation approach or by something more coordinated but no NATO has no requirement to counter Russia if NATO chooses not to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,498 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I understand that NATO are not under a strict obligation to get involved with a non member but if it's willing to go into Libya, but does nothing if Russia were to invade, then it just shows NATO up as opportunistic rather than an alliance that can maintain global stability. It also makes mockery of the cooperation pact between Ukraine and NATO. Putin has to be shown some genuine pushback by the West at some point. He'll keep pushing and pushing otherwise.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,189 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I think the word you're looking for is 'realpolitik.' Whatever the moral arguments, even if the moral arguments are the same for an involvement in Libya as in Ukraine, the reality is that the costs incurred by involving in Libya will be far less than involvement in Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,498 ✭✭✭✭briany


    There are costs to helping defend Ukraine, but there are potential costs to standing idly by if Russia do decide to roll in as well.

    If we say that realpolitik is the way of the world, then we run the risk of appeasement up to the point that the problem can no longer be ignored and be forced to fight while cursing that preventative measures had not been taken.

    I'm not advocating war but I do think that Putin should be made to realise, and his peoples made to realise, that he cannot just push his weight around. It wouldn't end at Ukraine if he moves in and the line will have to be drawn somewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    No friend of Ireland,


    That new gear looks mighty fine right about now.


    https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2022/0202/1277437-russia-letter-irish-govt/



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    190,000 people on the Ukraine 🇺🇦 border up to no good

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Genuinely scary, this came from nowhere too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Next up, the Soviet flag will be raised again.



Advertisement