Freeman Megamerge

Holy Mary · 01-07-2020 6:47pm

Losty Dublin wrote: »

Ben has recently been giving his opinion on this weeks political appointments. Apparently you can't be a Minister for Children if you are gay and childless, a Fisheries Minister if you live in the midlands, a Rural Affairs Minister if you live in Dublin nor a Minister for Health if you've an engineering background. On this logic Mr. Gilroy would be an shoe in for several portfolio's given his record on addressing his bank debts, reclaiming farms, arguing with judges and recent visit to Mountjoy

As for his comments on the new Lord Mayor of Dublin, whom he didn't vote for....

And yet, he ran for elections himself. Double standards much.

Brian Lighthouse · 01-07-2020 7:18pm

Holy Mary wrote: »

To read your article requires a subscription. Feel free to copy and paste the contents.

Thanks for the permission, but I'll decline your offer. It's not really a freeman issue at all according to one learned contributor.

All the best with the thread.
Brian

TheBMG · 01-07-2020 7:41pm

Brian Lighthouse wrote: »

Thanks for the permission, but I'll decline your offer.

Brian

You mean to say you do not consent!

Holy Mary · 01-07-2020 10:15pm

Brian Lighthouse wrote: »

Thanks for the permission, but I'll decline your offer. It's not really a freeman issue at all according to one learned contributor.

All the best with the thread.
Brian

Would love to know what it was about! Synopsis perhaps?

Peregrinus · 02-07-2020 2:08am

Holy Mary wrote: »

Would love to know what it was about! Synopsis perhaps?

Car with three people in it was observed to turn away from a Garda checkpoint. Followed, stopped. Two persons in front were "active criminals of interests to Gardai". Car searched under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Newspaper report doesn't say what, if anything, was found.

Passenger in rear of car gave name which, however, did not match name on bank card he was carrying. Was then required under Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 s. 24 to give his name and address; he failed to comply. This is an offence under s.24(3). Newspaper report is of the court proceedings arising out of that charge. Defenece offered was denial that he was ever required to give name and address under s. 24- demand was never made. Outcome is that he was convicted and fined. Appeal has been lodged.

Holy Mary · 02-07-2020 11:24am

Peregrinus wrote: »

Car with three people in it was observed to turn away from a Garda checkpoint. Followed, stopped. Two persons in front were "active criminals of interests to Gardai". Car searched under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Newspaper report doesn't say what, if anything, was found.

Passenger in rear of car gave name which, however, did not match name on bank card he was carrying. Was then required under Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 s. 24 to give his name and address; he failed to comply. This is an offence under s.24(3). Newspaper report is of the court proceedings arising out of that charge. Defenece offered was denial that he was ever required to give name and address under s. 24- demand was never made. Outcome is that he was convicted and fined. Appeal has been lodged.

Thanks:D Got it!

whippet · 03-07-2020 8:34am

Ben has been on the Facebook again - this time being interviewed by some like minded individual.

He has said that Justice McGovern might get a belt of a hurley off him for what he did (jailing him) and said that he was a corrupt, fraudster tramp.

https://www.facebook.com/106659550863842/videos/215992029520777

blueythebear · 03-07-2020 9:52am

whippet wrote: »

Ben has been on the Facebook again - this time being interviewed by some like minded individual.

He has said that Justice McGovern might get a belt of a hurley off him for what he did (jailing him) and said that he was a corrupt, fraudster tramp.

https://www.facebook.com/106659550863842/videos/215992029520777

SURELY, this is that time when hes gone too far and gets done for contempt again

eldamo · 03-07-2020 9:58am

blueythebear wrote: »

SURELY, this is that time when hes gone too far and gets done for contempt again

god i just can't listen to him anymore

the smugness of the pair of them

no wonder the insecure believe these chaps have some secret magical knowledge

whippet · 03-07-2020 9:59am

blueythebear wrote: »

SURELY, this is that time when hes gone too far and gets done for contempt again

at this stage he judiciary are better to ignore him. If they were to do him for contempt it would martyr him and give more fuel to the protest brigade

Losty Dublin · 03-07-2020 10:29am

whippet wrote: »

at this stage he judiciary are better to ignore him. If they were to do him for contempt it would martyr him and give more fuel to the protest brigade

I disagree. Detain him again, it get a few lines on page 10 in a reputable news source such as RTÉ or the IT, normal people get a giggle and we all move on. Ben's audience are minuscule in number and are socially irrelevant as such so their powers of persuasion are close to zilch. Throw him into Clink, he's off the air, his audience will listen to similar whacko within his vicious circle that they listen to anyway. Meanwhile sane people are none the wiser as we see what sort of biscuit we are on a FB feed

Hotblack Desiato · 03-07-2020 2:16pm

Holy Mary wrote: »

To read your article requires a subscription. Feel free to copy and paste the contents.

Block cookies and javascript and it loads right up (like most of them do

fight the powah!)

Lenar3556 · 03-07-2020 8:05pm

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Block cookies and javascript and it loads right up (like most of them do fight the powah!)

Thanks for that. On a phone? Or PC? How do you do it?

Thargor · 03-07-2020 10:16pm

Lenar3556 wrote: »

Thanks for that. On a phone? Or PC? How do you do it?

Google the exact headline and click on the link to the article in the Google results, that gets you through paywalls aswell most of the time.

Holy Mary · 08-07-2020 4:46pm

Hard to imagine that this would be tolerated in any other State.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/judge-says-he-will-not-trawl-over-15-years-of-events-in-contempt-of-court-case-1010034.html

Hotblack Desiato · 09-07-2020 1:57pm

Any sane person would have walked away years ago and got on with his life.

Losty Dublin · 11-07-2020 12:39pm

Could have blown Freemanneey right out of the water.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/10/mark-royden-jailed-attempting-to-steal-magna-carta-salisbury-cathedral

Hotblack Desiato · 11-07-2020 2:17pm

Nicholas Cotter, defending, said that a serious car accident in 1991 had caused the defendant brain damage

Poor fella.

What's the excuse for the rest of them?

Holy Mary · 30-07-2020 9:34am

Look who is back in town!
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1549707178544715&set=a.137657686416345&type=3&theater

whippet · 30-07-2020 10:38am

does he still have the McMansion he built and the luxury SUVs that he bought with money he got from AIB as a business loan which was never paid back ?

Hotblack Desiato · 30-07-2020 10:51am

Don't be silly, everyone knows money isn't real (except when you're looking to get some)

Holy Mary · 30-07-2020 11:10am

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Don't be silly, everyone knows money isn't real (except when you're looking to get some)

Or except when one is looking for donations.

whippet · 31-07-2020 7:08am

Ben is off on one hell of a rant about the legislation that Tom is worried about.

Apparently this legislation has come about due to some case that Ben obviously has an interest in they was before the courts in the last few weeks. According to his esteemed knowledge the Vulture funds went to FG and Ff with bags of cash to get this passed. So they could lie and take peoples homes.

Oh .. and we are all peasants and British subjects and Irish men have no balls .... he gets really animated when the net tightens on his fantasy world

Holy Mary · 31-07-2020 9:17am

whippet wrote: »

Ben is off on one hell of a rant about the legislation that Tom is worried about.

Let this be a lesson to anybody naive enough to keep following such ranting and raving.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/woman-in-home-repossession-case-there-is-nothing-left-to-purge-34286272.html

31-07-2020 11:57am

whippet wrote: »

Ben is off on one hell of a rant about the legislation that Tom is worried about.

Apparently this legislation has come about due to some case that Ben obviously has an interest in they was before the courts in the last few weeks. According to his esteemed knowledge the Vulture funds went to FG and Ff with bags of cash to get this passed. So they could lie and take peoples homes.

Oh .. and we are all peasants and British subjects and Irish men have no balls .... he gets really animated when the net tightens on his fantasy world

Law Reform Commission has been saying we should make this amendment since 1980.

Vulture funds clearly got to them 40 years ago...

Robbo · 31-07-2020 11:59am

whippet wrote: »

Ben is off on one hell of a rant about the legislation that Tom is worried about.

Apparently this legislation has come about due to some case that Ben obviously has an interest in they was before the courts in the last few weeks. According to his esteemed knowledge the Vulture funds went to FG and Ff with bags of cash to get this passed. So they could lie and take peoples homes.

Oh .. and we are all peasants and British subjects and Irish men have no balls .... he gets really animated when the net tightens on his fantasy world

And of course the same vulture funds went with the same bags of cash to travel back in time to the Law Reform Commission to make them write this into their 2016 report on the Law of Evidence.

Losty Dublin · 31-07-2020 2:48pm

A photo that Benroy posted up this morning was inspected by the Facebook Fact Check police. You can guess what their take on it was :cool:

whippet · 31-07-2020 2:51pm

You can be full sure not one of his grovelling minions will read the actual fact check ... can’t be leaving the echo chamber

Ste.phen · 03-08-2020 4:10pm

Holy Mary wrote: »

Let this be a lesson to anybody naive enough to keep following such ranting and raving.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/woman-in-home-repossession-case-there-is-nothing-left-to-purge-34286272.html

Do I understand

"She said she asked two solicitors in the Circuit Court that day to represent her but they "walked away""

to mean that she asked two random solicitors that were present but not engaged by her, to take her case on the spot?

If so, how quickly do you think they ran out of there?

ohnonotgmail · 03-08-2020 4:15pm

Ste.phen wrote: »

Do I understand

to mean that she asked random two solicitors that were present but not engaged by her, to take her case on the spot?

If so, how quickly do you think they ran out of there?

I'd say they put Usain Bolt to shame.

Freeman Megamerge

Comments