Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Maths Paradox

  • 16-04-2021 12:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭


    Hi folks,
    New to this forum so apologies if this has been asked before.

    I love Maths puzzles but this apparent paradox has confused me for years.
    The scenario is as follows.

    There are two unmarked envelopes containing random sums of money.
    We know that if we open one of the envelopes the other will contain either double or half the amount of money. When you open an envelope, you will have a choice, take that amount of money or gamble and open the other envelope and get that amount.

    You pick an envelope. It contains €100. Should you keep that amount or gamble.
    Now obviously the other envelope contains either €50 or €200 so you should definitely gamble and open the other envelope as you will either win an extra €100 or lose €50.
    Therefore it is always +EV to gamble and open the other envelope, which begs the question,

    If it is always correct to open the other envelope, why not just open the other envelope first?

    What am I missing?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭purplefields


    Is this the Monty Hall problem?

    I believe that there are three envelopes, if it is.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭dinjo99


    No, totally different. The Monty Hall, I can understand and makes sense to me from a maths point of view.

    This one doesn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭purplefields


    I don't know if you've seen the wikipedia explanation. The resolutions seem insane for what appears to a simple conundrum.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_envelopes_problem


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭dinjo99


    Cheers Purplefields,

    I hadn't seen that.
    I will spend the weekend trying to make sense of it!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    dinjo99 wrote: »
    Hi folks,
    New to this forum so apologies if this has been asked before.

    I love Maths puzzles but this apparent paradox has confused me for years.
    The scenario is as follows.

    There are two unmarked envelopes containing random sums of money.
    We know that if we open one of the envelopes the other will contain either double or half the amount of money. When you open an envelope, you will have a choice, take that amount of money or gamble and open the other envelope and get that amount.

    You pick an envelope. It contains €100. Should you keep that amount or gamble.
    Now obviously the other envelope contains either €50 or €200 so you should definitely gamble and open the other envelope as you will either win an extra €100 or lose €50.
    Therefore it is always +EV to gamble and open the other envelope, which begs the question,

    If it is always correct to open the other envelope, why not just open the other envelope first?

    What am I missing?

    It doesn’t matter which envelope you open first, the second envelope is always the second envelope and should always be opened as you always have a chance of doubling your money.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,960 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I think its nothing to do with first or second, you should always open both envelopes as you can always win more than you can lose.


  • Registered Users Posts: 350 ✭✭Elwood_Blues


    Pretty simple answer really. Take both envelopes and do a legger.


Advertisement