Originally Posted by Nabber
Trees are important as a habitat for a multitude of animals. But for example the 'lungs of the earth' for the Amazon has been debunked. The Amazon forest has a net contribution of 0%, replacing forest with farms isn't as impactful to the planet as most would think. Deforestation is alarming none the less but for different reasons, but not critical to human or existence.
Debunk by whom?