Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WDYTYA Series 15

  • 16-07-2018 10:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭


    Anyone watching? It was Lee Mack tonight and the second half was about his mother's people from Ballina. It was fascinating I must say. No spoilers if you haven't seen it yet but one woman in particular they didn't follow up on (she emigrated). I'm going to have a look for her now; dying to know what became of her.

    Btw next week is George O'Dowd aka Boy George. I reckon he'll be crossing the Irish Sea too. :)

    Edit: I found her. Intriguing.


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    There's no spoilers for genealogy! Everyone's dead.

    If you missed Olivia Coleman last week, it's repeated tomorrow night quite late on BBC.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,299 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    The BBC's love affair with the so-called Great War is sickening.

    I'm not sure Lee was so enamoured.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    Hermy wrote: »
    The BBC's love affair with the so-called Great War is sickening. I'm not sure Lee was so enamoured.

    Yeah I kinda switched off for the first half. The Tablet technology was interesting though.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,102 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    There's no spoilers for genealogy! Everyone's dead.

    If you missed Olivia Coleman last week, it's repeated tomorrow night quite late on BBC.

    I enjoyed that episode. The letters written by the male ancestor to his brother about the lady he had met were like something from Jane Austen, as they said in the show. Such lovely things to have in a family.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,299 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    mod9maple wrote: »
    Yeah I kinda switched off for the first half. The Tablet technology was interesting though.

    The tablet technology was great.

    But the chap that was with Lee for that part was so pleased that Lee's great grandfather fought in that dreadful blood bath.
    How can people still be so blind?:confused:

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I admit I was so switched off to the first part that I don't even know what you mean by tablet technology! Do I need to undelete from my tellybox and watch again?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,299 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Lee was given a tablet with a map of the battle field with his position centred on the map and the map moved as he moved.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    That is pretty cool.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,264 ✭✭✭✭Alicat


    Loved the Olivia Coleman episode. What luck to have those letters!

    I was disappointed they didn’t follow up on Lee’s g-grandmother who went to Canada.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    Alicat wrote: »
    I was disappointed they didn’t follow up on Lee’s g-grandmother who went to Canada.

    She married twice, had 8 more children, and died in 1936. What they also failed to reveal was that her son, Lee's grandad, 'Joe', went to join her in Canada first, as an adult, in 1933 before going to live and get married in Southport in 1935.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    Hermy wrote: »
    Lee was given a tablet with a map of the battle field with his position centred on the map and the map moved as he moved.

    With a flashing red cursor/light. It was pretty geeky.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    mod9maple wrote: »
    She married twice, had 8 more children, and died in 1936. What they also failed to reveal was that her son, Lee's grandad, 'Joe', went to join her in Canada first, as an adult, in 1933 before going to live and get married in Southport in 1935.

    What a thing to leave out! That might have put some closure on all that stuff he said about her abandoning him.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,299 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Maybe there were some relatives who didn't want to be featured.

    Something I thought I noticed was when Lee was naming the people in the wedding photo just before he left for Ireland. He started by pointing to the man on the far left of the picture and then the camera moved on to where he begins naming people in the picture and that individual on the left is never mentioned. Maybe he was a friend rather than a relative but maybe not.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭carolinej


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    What a thing to leave out! That might have put some closure on all that stuff he said about her abandoning him.

    His aunt even said she knew very little of what happened to her grandmother. Funny the family didn't know she married and had 8 children.
    Surely someone sometime mentioned cousins in Canada or maybe there is a big family rift still to this day. Who knows what goes on in families.

    I suppose we forget in a time before Skype, FB, email and the humble telephone, contact with emigrated family was rare.

    My own mother holidayed in England in the 1970's and looked up an uncle who had emigrated 30 years previous after the family had lost contact. She barely had an address for him. How she knew she had the right house was when he answered the door, she saw the family resemblance!

    Boy George next week and I think a strong Irish element seeing as both his parents were Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    It’s not about 'Genealogy' or for genealogists, it’s about entertainment for the masses, a voyeuristic gawk into a subject’s ancestry. As the series grow in number, the guests are decreasingly ‘famous’ and the producers are driven to hone in on one of 64 gggggparents which is rather meaningless in an overall picture of a family. The more salacious the tale the better, but it has to be politically correct. The producers miss (ignore?) many opportunities to comment on social history. I have no doubt that the Canadian element was known by the guest & producers, a decision was taken not to include it.
    I found it odd that they brought Diarmuid Ferriter to Ballina just for a couple of sentences on the Civil War. Has he appeared before?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    I really enjoyed that episode. The Henrietta St coincidence was freakish! And the man that showed him the execution chamber at Mountjoy was a tad insensitive, just a wee bit (!)

    "Sure have a go yourself." Sweet holy mother.

    But all in all an interesting story set in Dublin. We got to see a fair few documents too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭DamoRed


    Just watched the Boy George episode and it was pretty shocking to hear about his grandmother being picked up by the NSPCC, just a stone's throw of her own home when she was only 6, and was declared to have been found 'wandering the streets' and sent to Goldenbridge, where she stayed until she was 16. The historian revealed that they were known as 'The Cruelty People' in the area. According to her personal records there, she was a kind and bright child and George concluded that she appeared to have accepted life there and got on with it.

    I wonder what it was like to go back to see her own family when she left Goldenbridge and how difficult and emotional that may have been, to return as almost a stranger, having been taken from them at just 6. Presumably there was no contact, such as a letter to or from home, when she was there.

    The latter part was about his great uncle, Thomas Bryan, whose baby died the day after birth as he was waiting to be hanged along with Kevin Barry and 6 others at Mountjoy.

    Pretty sad all round, but the number of related documents, especially the letter written by Thomas Bryan, was remarkable, and really helped George and everybody else have a greater insight into the stories.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,188 ✭✭✭jos28


    Very good episode overall. I knew George had Irish roots but had no idea they were so extensive. BBC bringing on Diarmuid Ferriter last week and Catríona Crowe this week - impressive. I could listen to Catríona for hours, she is so easy to listen to.
    I would love to see if there is a connection with George's Kinahans and other well known Kinahans. It's quite possible considering the areas of Dublin mentioned.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Very sad episode. I'll refrain from my usual grumble about not enough genealogy.

    That letter must surely be still in the family, otherwise it's a huge find. I also presume it was not a coincidence that they took him to Henrietta St.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,299 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Not a Boy George fan so had no intention of watching it but glad I did - very interesting collection of stories.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Interesting shade in a follow-up piece in today's Irish Times.

    I thought the Glynn's father was called Richard, and he had served in WWI but clearly lived, to receive that letter from his son-in-law in 1921.

    Did the article just get this wrong?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    mod9maple wrote: »
    I really enjoyed that episode. The Henrietta St coincidence was freakish! And the man that showed him the execution chamber at Mountjoy was a tad insensitive, just a wee bit (!)

    "Sure have a go yourself." Sweet holy mother.

    But all in all an interesting story set in Dublin. We got to see a fair few documents too.


    I felt very upset about the Hanging Room sequence. Not just a tad insensitive, awful, just awful. It should have been cut or redone to be more sensitive. Anyone would have been horrified to have been asked to 'have a go yourself'. A word in that chap's ear is necessary as he probably does this for tourists on a regular basis and who knows what connections there may be.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,614 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    It was hugely insensitive.

    I didn't even know Mountjoy's hanging room still existed. Given the prison is fully functional, I doubt it gets any tourists.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 693 ✭✭✭CassieManson


    pinkypinky wrote:
    I thought the Glynn's father was called Richard, and he had served in WWI but clearly lived, to receive that letter from his son-in-law in 1921.


    Her father died in the war and her mother remarried to her husband's brother Richard. Richard was referred to as her father in the show but was really her stepfather/uncle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    In fact the guy at Mountjoy was very insensitive, and it was awful to put George in that position. I was trying to be sarcastic and failing miserably, as so often happens typing on the Internet. I really felt for George then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭DamoRed


    I've just seen on Twitter that Mick Jagger has a son who's younger than his great-grandson! :eek:

    https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/1031979249475829760

    One great response was 'This'll make for one heck of a 'Who Do You Think You Are' episode one day. But that's only one of countless brilliant posts.


Advertisement