Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Who created the 26 counties?

Options
  • 01-09-2012 1:22pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭


    Who was responsible for creating the 26 county state of Ireland or the Republic of Ireland as the British like to call it?
    I know for certain that it wasn't an Irishman. Somebody mentioned here before that Winston Churchill was the sole architect but I don't know for sure. And whoever it was, why aren't they remembered?


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 555 ✭✭✭cristoir


    The first mention of partition goes as far back as the Gladstones first attempted Home Rule Bill where exemptions for the 4 most north eastern county's where voted on as amendments.

    Partition first became mainstream supported position of the British in the Government of Ireland Act 1920. The then radical idea of two home rule parliaments came from Walter Long.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    So essentially, the founders of the 26 county state were British and not Irish. SO why is it then that this state commemorates Irish Republicans when the state was created by the British?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    paky wrote: »
    So essentially, the founders of the 26 county state were British and not Irish. SO why is it then that this state commemorates Irish Republicans when the state was created by the British?

    What a question ? ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Seanchai


    cristoir wrote: »
    The first mention of partition goes as far back as the Gladstones first attempted Home Rule Bill where exemptions for the 4 most north eastern county's where voted on as amendments.

    Can you be more precise here? As far as I know, the first mention of partition was in 1912 and then all 9 counties of Ulster were mentioned. As far as I'm aware it was only in the summer of 1920 that the Unionists, meeting in Glengall Street, decided to request that six counties opt out of Home Rule.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    Well obviously there was a great deal of collaboration with the British by supposed republicans - even extending to using British guns against Irishmen and engaging in a level of barbarity their masters would have been proud of.

    Why does the Irish state commemorate Irish republicans? It was part of an attempt to divert support away from Irish republicanism by pretending to be republican - to muddy the waters as to what republicanism actually was. Saying one thing, doing another - indeed the exact opposite. Lip service was essential. They diluted the message of Irish patriots to serve their own limited vision of "liberty". Irish politicians have long been good at this (Fianna Fáil in particular)

    Lynch went from "not standing idly by" in 1969 to saying cathoilics and nationalists in the north didn't need protection from the British state:

    Evening-Press-May-01-1972000009.jpg


    Just a few months after Bloody Sunday.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭jonniebgood1


    Seanchai wrote: »
    As far as I know, the first mention of partition was in 1912 and then all 9 counties of Ulster were mentioned. As far as I'm aware it was only in the summer of 1920 that the Unionists, meeting in Glengall Street, decided to request that six counties opt out of Home Rule.

    Wrong.

    The historical record shows that partition in its modern guise was discussed alongside earlier home rule bills. In 'The long gestation' by Patrick Maume, the author says that "In 1893, Unionist conventions in Dublin and Belfast, called to oppose the second home rule bill, denounced partition." (pg 10). They had discussed it as an alternative solution to home rule but rejected it as they wanted the whole of Ireland to remain in union. It is debatable that had home rule been forced through in 1914 that partition would have been given at that stage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭guinnessdrinker


    The reason the Dublin Unionists did not support partition is because they obviously wanted to remain in the union.

    This did not affect Unionists in the North East of course who seemed to only care about themselves and not their fellow countrymen in Dublin or any of the other 25 counties that became the Irish Free State.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    So does this mean that Irish people live in a British statelet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    paky wrote: »
    So does this mean that Irish people live in a British statelet?
    "If you remove the English army tomorrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle, unless you set about the organization of the Socialist Republic your efforts would be in vain. England would still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs"

    Prophetic words as it turns out from James Connolly.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    I can't see how it's not a matter of concern for Irish people that they live in a state which was created for them by the British. Through its very inception, the borders in which the British created were based on religious lines, which are totally and utterly contrary to any sense of what is to be considered free, secular or republican!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 159 ✭✭whitelines


    paky wrote: »
    I can't see how it's not a matter of concern for Irish people that they live in a state which was created for them by the British. Through its very inception, the borders in which the British created were based on religious lines, which are totally and utterly contrary to any sense of what is to be considered free, secular or republican!

    Religion was an important parameter at that time and one on which many borders between states were settled. In any case, then as now, the terms Protestant and Catholic were as much ethnic labels as anything else. You could say that the new border was put in place in order to recognise the reality of two peoples living on the island - The Irish and The Ulster British - both entitled to self determination.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 159 ✭✭whitelines


    The reason the Dublin Unionists did not support partition is because they obviously wanted to remain in the union.

    This did not affect Unionists in the North East of course who seemed to only care about themselves and not their fellow countrymen in Dublin or any of the other 25 counties that became the Irish Free State.

    It was irrelevant whether they cared or not - they couldn't do anything for them (except provide safe haven following partition). Similar to the uncaring 26 county 'nationalists' ditching 500 000 of their fellow 'nationalists' trapped in NI.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    whitelines wrote: »
    Religion was an important parameter at that time and one on which many borders between states were settled. In any case, then as now, the terms Protestant and Catholic were as much ethnic labels as anything else. You could say that the new border was put in place in order to recognise the reality of two peoples living on the island - The Irish and The Ulster British - both entitled to self determination.


    Yes these were all factors the British took into account upon deciding to what extent the Irish could be free. It was hardly self determination at that point?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 159 ✭✭whitelines


    paky wrote: »
    Yes these were all factors the British took into account upon deciding to what extent the Irish could be free. It was hardly self determination at that point?

    It seems like self determination to me. What was the alternative?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    paky wrote: »
    Who was responsible for creating the 26 county state of Ireland or the Republic of Ireland as the British like to call it?
    I know for certain that it wasn't an Irishman. Somebody mentioned here before that Winston Churchill was the sole architect but I don't know for sure. And whoever it was, why aren't they remembered?

    Not only the British, but the rest of the English-speaking world, according to the government of the Republic of Ireland -

    The Irish Constitution of 1937 says: "The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland".

    The Republic of Ireland Act, 1948, says: "It is hereby declared that the description of the State shall be the Republic of Ireland."

    Irish passports simply bear the name Ireland.

    Irish government regulations and official statements frequently refer to "the Republic of Ireland".

    Or, in Irish -

    "Poblacht na hÉireann" or "Saorstát Éireann"

    I hope that clears it up for you.

    tac


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    the name of the state is Ireland in the same way that the Republic of France is referred to as France.

    As a matter of interest, most Britlish people refer to it NOT as the Republic but as Southern Ireland,(as in the Opposite of Northen Ireland presumably) a wholly incorrect description which I'm amazed the Irish don't ever seem to object to, particularly those in Donegal who live further North than anywhere in Northern Ireland!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    corktina wrote: »
    the name of the state is Ireland in the same way that the Republic of France is referred to as France.

    As a matter of interest, most Britlish people refer to it NOT as the Republic but as Southern Ireland,(as in the Opposite of Northen Ireland presumably) a wholly incorrect description which I'm amazed the Irish don't ever seem to object to, particularly those in Donegal who live further North than anywhere in Northern Ireland!

    I usually retort that I'm not from the South, I'm from the Wesht! ;) which always leads to confusion hah


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    corktina wrote: »
    As a matter of interest, most Britlish people refer to it NOT as the Republic but as Southern Ireland,(as in the Opposite of Northen Ireland presumably) a wholly incorrect description which I'm amazed the Irish don't ever seem to object to, particularly those in Donegal who live further North than anywhere in Northern Ireland!

    Outsiders use the term Southern Ireland to distinguish us from Northern Ireland, a wholly understandable and logical term for outsiders I think.
    On this issue, was watching the build up to the American football match in the AviVa stadium over the weekend on the RTE news and an american supporter said that he was really glad to be visiting southern Ireland. Fair enough I think we know what he means, his small change being in Euro/Cents and not Sterling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    understandable but still ignorant at the best.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,373 ✭✭✭im invisible


    tac foley wrote: »
    I hope that clears it up for you.

    tac
    not really...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    corktina wrote: »
    the name of the state is Ireland in the same way that the Republic of France is referred to as France.

    As a matter of interest, most Britlish people refer to it NOT as the Republic but as Southern Ireland,(as in the Opposite of Northen Ireland presumably) a wholly incorrect description which I'm amazed the Irish don't ever seem to object to, particularly those in Donegal who live further North than anywhere in Northern Ireland!

    Agree on the North/South 'geographic' bit, but my experience when working for an English company was that everyone invariably called it 'Eire' which for some reason I found more annoying. It provoked me to start referring to the branch in Wales as the office in Cymru and suggested that it be referred to as such in company literature to ensure consistency..... (Exasperated cry from Marketing Dept.- 'Look, it bloody Eire, that's what you have on you money isn't it!')


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    (Exasperated cry from Marketing Dept.- 'Look, it bloody Eire, that's what you have on you money isn't it!')

    hah of course it's even funnier when you realise that Eire ≠ Éire, without the fada they are two totally different words (pronounced differently to boot!). Of course you can always retort by referring to any branches in Belfast as been in "Northern Éire" or heavens forbid Ulaidh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    I've had this argument countless times - one such interchange ended when I suggested that the company concerned referred to the English part of GB as 'Angleterre', in much the same way as the Scots use 'Écosse' on their car bumper stickers.

    The Welsh, correctly, call their country by its national language name, Cymru, as you can see by the bumper sticker on mrs tac's car - she is, of course, Welsh.

    IMO, if you wish to draw other folks' attention to your British nationality, and they can't for some reason, identify you by the vehicle plates, you should have a sticker that reads 'Britannia'. Meanwhile we are left over here with either GB big island only] or UK [big island plus a bit of the other big island] or nothin'.

    My dad, being Irish, always called it Ireland, and that's what I call it, too.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    corktina wrote: »
    the name of the state is Ireland in the same way that the Republic of France is referred to as France.

    As a matter of interest, most Britlish people refer to it NOT as the Republic but as Southern Ireland,(as in the Opposite of Northen Ireland presumably) a wholly incorrect description which I'm amazed the Irish don't ever seem to object to, particularly those in Donegal who live further North than anywhere in Northern Ireland!

    I'd bet a tidy sum that most of those who live here do not know that the top part of the island of Ireland is NOT all part of the UK. My next-door neighbour's wife is from Malin, BTW. She laffs as she tells about coming from northern Ireland, as opposed to Northern Ireland.

    BTW, I'm SURE you meant BriTish, didn't you?

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo



    I'd bet a tidy sum that most of those who live here do not know that the top part of the island of Ireland is NOT all part of the UK. My next-door neighbour's wife is from Malin, BTW. She laffs as she tells about coming from northern Ireland, as opposed to Northern Ireland.

    BTW, I'm SURE you meant BriTish, didn't you?

    tac

    I'd take that bet to be honest. I have never met a single Irish person who wasn't aware of the location of Donegal and the fact that it's not a part of Northern Ireland. It's taught to everyone in primary school geography.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 22,293 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    I would take that bet too. It is fairly drilled down your throat in primary school where the location of all the counties, mountains, rivers etc are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Given that Tac doesn't live in Ireland I would think it's safe to assume that he meant that "most of those who live here do not know that the top part of the island of Ireland is NOT all part of the UK" applies to where he lives. (UK?)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    When the ignorant ask "which Ireland" I'm from, I simply reply "Ireland". I don't have a partitionist mindset.

    As if there'd be a major difference if I happened to live 20 mins up the road! (compared to say crossing borders in continental Europe)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    i think its Sainsburys in the UK have a maop on their TV ad which shows the Border as a straight line across the map west to east....

    ps Britlish, yes I am from Japan...:D (OMG that smilie is sooo racist...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    corktina wrote: »
    i think its Sainsburys in the UK have a maop on their TV ad which shows the Border as a straight line across the map west to east....

    ps Britlish, yes I am from Japan...:D (OMG that smilie is sooo racist...

    What a coincidence! Until recently I worked in Tokyo - since 2004.

    Must admit that I didn't see too many green people there, though.;)

    tac


Advertisement