Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Pro-active personality and job performance:a social capital perspective

  • 28-10-2005 4:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭


    a found a good article if your interested in reading it.

    does anyone have an opinon on it?

    Abstract here;

    This study of 126 employee-supervisor dyads examined a mediated model of the relationship between proactive personality and job performance. The model, informed by the social capital perspective, suggests that proactive employees reap performance benefits by means of developing social networks that provide them the resources and latitude to pursue high-level initiatives. Structural equation modeling suggested that the relationship between proactive personality and job performance is mediated by network building and initiative taking on the part of the employee.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,267 ✭✭✭p.pete


    Need a username and password to get onto that site - it's a research website so maybe Joe Public won't be able to get on?

    I'd be very interested in reading some of the article if you can post or PM some or any of it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭snorlax


    great the file is 20kb to big to load as a pdf attachment and 100kb to big to load as a word doc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭DadaKopf


    I'd like to take a look at the article, but knowing some things about social capital, and being more convinced by the heterodox version of it and by a brilliant critique of Putnam's theory, I'd be fairly sceptical about this article. Not that the abstract doesn't seem like common sense, but I think the SC perspective as used like this ignores too much important stuff and tends to 'prove' what it sets out to investigate in advance.

    Is SC really a psychological theory, or sociological? I'd go for the latter.


Advertisement