CIE Unions Pathological Strike Culture

CarlosHarpic wrote: »

Spent the last two days reading back threads on here and the train sub forum for 8 years of threads and one particular dynamic jumps out is the CIE rail and bus unions and strikes. They are to strikes what KFC is to fried chicken.

There are almost no threads about new services or positive development in CIE public transport when compared to strikes and industrial action threads. The CIE unions live in a permanent 'strike soon 'mode.

unions in the odd strike shocker. unions exist in a number of , if not most large public transport companies both public and private, and they strike. it's a fact of life.

CarlosHarpic wrote: »

As much as I love the DART underground idea. No way can tax payers money be fed into such an important project with this twisted union culture holding power over it. Metro all the way.

yes it can. the unions have nothing to do with the project. DU is a needed project and is separate to metro, not building it because it's operator has a union is just a copout excuse. also, the metro very may well have a union or unions. in fact it's highly likely it will as there will be some staff working on it. assuming it is ever built.

When you have places like IÉ that didn't get a pay rise for 8 years you can see why unions would be considering striking. However my major issue with the unions is their resistance to change, and said resistance to changing disappearing when money is found.

Now when I say change I'm talking about stuff that wouldn't really affect your conditions or in other workplaces would be considered all in a days work

For example, training new employees, driving to new stops, electric pay etc.

brokenarms wrote: »

One is required to join commencing employment.

I'm open to correction but I think the Industrial Relations Act 1990 ended the requirement to join a trade union in any workplace. Just as an employee has a constitution right to be in a trade union, they also have a right not to be in a trade union.

The puss taking is supported by government. When they strike and just get what they want and are used to it. Of course their behaviour won't change. Last time they striked, id have walked away from the table and shut down rail transport for a few days. Let's see how their behaviour chahges when their pay is being targeted.

newcavanman wrote: »

While i really like trains, unless you live in a few particular areas, they are just a disaster financially in ireland. While there is a case for DART and outer suburban services in the Dublin area, not too many people round the rest of the country are willing to actually pay to use their services. Its a lt easier to drive, thats the simple fact unless you live within 10 miles of a mainline station . And for those not living that near, if they want to use public transport , there are a plethora of private bus services .

private bus services do not meet and cannot meet the needs of those currently using rail services, for which only those rail services can meet our needs. the vast majority of rail services in ireland are well used and have room for growth. trains all over the world require subsidy, and the trains in ireland in the majority of cases are far from a financial disaster. in fact, ireland does get a very cheap rail service in terms of tax payer contributions (it has a whole lot of problems which are easily solvible however)

newcavanman wrote: »

The public transport unions are like dinosaurs. They cant and wont see , that they need to move with the times or they will die. I really believe its only a matter of time. When the next major economic shock comes along , the government of the day will have to make some very very hard decsions

the unions are perfectly fine. the only way they will die is if no new members join. new members will join, especially as people get sick of the likes of 0 hours and other employer methods of screwing employees.

Idbatterim wrote: »

The puss taking is supported by government. When they strike and just get what they want and are used to it. Of course their behaviour won't change. Last time they striked, id have walked away from the table and shut down rail transport for a few days. Let's see how their behaviour chahges when their pay is being targeted.

they lose pay when they go on strike as they don't get paid. so what you would do isn't viable or valid because the aim is already achieved due to being on strike. it would disrupt those of us using rail for longer then maybe necessary out of spite to get at the unions also, which i and many others would not tolerate. i'm okay with my services being disrupted due to strike action, i'm not okay with it being disrupted out of spite to get at unions and their members.

trellheim wrote:

In many workplace the Unions and management work closely together to achieve an optimal outcome. You do not see much of this because it happens quietly because airing in public brings no benefits.

CIE Unions seem to believe it is all a zero-sum game, nothing for nothing.

It takes two to tango. From the outside, there seems to be a real lack of engagement to get agreed changes in cie. That's rarely one sided, and if IR is such a problem the management side have to take some responsibility.

brokenarms wrote: »

One is required to join commencing employment.

No they don't.

Shut the line down on weekends over the summer. The workers need ther salary far more than we need, a few weekends of rail service over the summer. The entire bloody rail network will probably carry less than luas does when all of the new trams are delivered and the current ones extended ...

Idbatterim wrote: »

The puss taking is supported by government. When they strike and just get what they want and are used to it. Of course their behaviour won't change. Last time they striked, id have walked away from the table and shut down rail transport for a few days. Let's see how their behaviour chahges when their pay is being targeted.

There should be no strikes in protected public sector companies - it's easy to pull out the strike card every time you don't like something, because there is no consequences for the striker.

If you want a public sector monopoly, no strikes. If there is a private sector alternative, strike away. The public can then side with whoever they want.

CIE operate mostly as a monopoly - they should have no strike clauses in their contracts.

It takes two to tango. From the outside, there seems to be a real lack of engagement to get agreed changes in cie. That's rarely one sided, and if IR is such a problem the management side have to take some responsibility.

They sure do and it does indeed take two, that does not preclude the Union side evolving and stepping out of the 70s gestures and rhetoric.

hmmm wrote: »

There should be no strikes in protected public sector companies - it's easy to pull out the strike card every time you don't like something, because there is no consequences for the striker.

If you want a public sector monopoly, no strikes. If there is a private sector alternative, strike away. The public can then side with whoever they want.

CIE operate mostly as a monopoly - they should have no strike clauses in their contracts.

a no strike clause would be against worker's rights and democracy. allowing them to strike only where there is a private sector alternative would be favouritism toards the private sector operator which we cannot allow.

Jamie2k9 wrote: »

CIE unions don't set any sort of standard for the industry.

The threat of privatization scares a lot of staff in the companies. I like to think it keeps them on their toes.

the threat of privatization scares a lot of the public as well thankfully.

bebeman wrote: »

Unions standing up for workers rights is a bad thing now?
Workers should be lucky to have a job, never mind pay or conditions?

Always it comes to this...always...you complain about CIE or Irish ps unions in general and you get the boilerplate reply of portraying that without them going totally over the top like this we'd have the workhouses back and child labour, nobody reasonable is against unions

Irish PS unions are not hated because they protect workers they are hated because:

1. Instead of protecting workers rights moreoften than not they instead protect inefficiency, laziness, bad work practices
2. They throw a spanner in the works every single time a progressive positive change to the transport system is suggested
3. They distort the truth instead of having a fair an honest discussion (ie the lie, yes it's a LIE that there were no pay rises for 8 years, apparently ''incriments'' (ie f---g PAY RISES!) don't count as pay rises)


THey are not honest actors who just advocate for workers and protect them from abuse they are an active force for bad, and because of them and unions like them elsewhere they are going to end up destroying workers rights in the long run. How could a union destroy workers rights you ask?
Where did Maggy Thatcher and Reagan and rthe PD's come from? a climate where exccecssive PS union power went into overdrive with unburied bodies on the streets, trash uncollected, busted monopolies like Telecom Eireann abusing their customers. So they help to force the exasperated public towards reactionary right wing politicians, and let me tell you as someone involved in politics since I was a kid there are many right wingers (mostly in FG but still) coming up the ranks who would happily tear our public services and safety net to shreds. At the moment they are considered the fringe, but if you create the right climate people like them will triumph.

Their protecting inefficiency, protesting every little f---g change no matter how small and striking over stupid things like new trains also destroyes the idea of unions in the public mindset, union membership is declining RIGHT at a time when it needs to be skyrocketing. The public have been deluded into thinking that because of labour laws and because were not the United States because we in Europe are all progressive in our policies we no longer need unions, but we got most of that fluffy progressive stuff because of unions, labour parties and collective effort in the first place and tribalistic militant PS unions are going to destroy the very thing they helped create. We are living in a world now where new labour rights will be coming to the fore:

• automation
• employers demanding social media access of employees and candidates for interview
• challenges of globalization

We need unions now more than ever but when normal people (NOT people who think it's sane to have represnatives from the Cuban or Venezualan dictatorship at their union hall, who think in purely ideological terms - normal everyday workers) look at people striking over new trains or 10 minute DARTs and throwing a spanner in the works CONSTANTLY they roll their eyes and think "this is all unions seem to do, even 3 euro a week out of my paycheque is too much for these clowns". That's before getting into the disgustingly overpaid union leadership who move in the same bubble as the elite on 6 figure saleries with their kids in fee paying schools who then turn up to uni influenced by their parents indoctrination and start ironic protests like "no free speech for fascists" :rolleyes:...sorry off topic I know but it's a dig I could not resist given the obvious pattern. These same overpaid leaders also seem to never ever go away once they are in office, how long have the same 3-4 berdos been in those same jobs? how many boards have they been on they had no qualification or business being anywhere near?

But the usual suspects won't bother to think of this from our perspective, they'll dismiss us all as reactionary right wingers (even though I'm no such thing I've always been a union member, in the private sector where my employers don't have a money printer and taxation power ) and they will keep making the same mistakes, union power and numbers will keep declining, and reactionary elements will get in charge and tear CIE and the HSE and the rest to peices and the beardos will not for a split second think they had any hand in fuelling any of it.

I can only hope from the ashes that a new union movement can emerge that protects workers rights, not waste, bad work practices, inefficiency and sloth.

Hilly Bill wrote: »

No they don't.

Better tell that to the peeps in the training school then. We had to join after we got our permanent staff numbers.

Stephen15 wrote: »

How does it work do they approach anyone accepted into the training school or when the drivers passes their test and is assigned a depot will a shop steward from SIPTU and the NBRU approach the new recruit saying take your pick you have join one of us.

Once trainees pass the test and finish all the class work the NBRU and Siptu are given a 15 min pitch each . In a closed room with the class.

10 mins of which is spent slagging the other union off about what they did or did not do at some stage. Everyone is given folders full of paper from each union about what they done in the past, like election pamphlets . They do supply the duty bills for your garage as well . Thats really the only thing you keep.

Then you pick.

And a fiver is taken from you pay at source forever.

As said. We were told is was a requirement. At that stage of recruitment, after the hurdles we had to jump to get that far, no one was going to argue.
Also, its best just being in the union as you might need them if you have a bash and its your fault.