Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Rank Irish political parties on their willingness to discriminate against men/similar

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Riskymove wrote: »
    it is though.....it is far, far more a risk to women. Inoculating boys protects them and is another protection for women

    It really isn't the point though. I don't disagree with the separate point you make, but it doesn't take away from the fact that they are not inoculating males to protect males. That's just a positive side effect.

    Staying withe USA, as you brought it up, we see similar focus over there regarding men and women. According to the ACS and using the most common gender specific cancers, 174k Men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer and 31k will die. 268k women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 41k will die. Look at the attention breast cancer gets compared to prostate cancer and the men are dying in larger numbers. Also prostate cancer is seen most commonly from age 40, where breast cancer is most common for women over 50, so younger men are dying.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    It really isn't the point though. I don't disagree with the separate point you make, but it doesn't take away from the fact that they are not inoculating males to protect males. That's just a positive side effect.

    Staying withe USA, as you brought it up, we see similar focus over there regarding men and women. According to the ACS and using the most common gender specific cancers, 174k Men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer and 31k will die. 268k women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 41k will die. Look at the attention breast cancer gets compared to prostate cancer and the men are dying in larger numbers. Also prostate cancer is seen most commonly from age 40, where breast cancer is most common for women over 50, so younger men are dying.
    You may have a general point on the cancers though with regard to the specifics, I think breast cancer does kill earlier on average.

    With regard to the HPV, it is hard to know for definite how much if anything the fact that males being vaccinated would help females played in the decision but it seems plausible that it might have been a factor. Worldwide there does seem to be more women’s health entities than there are ones focused on men’s health. To an extent this can be justified due to pregnancy, breastfeeding and the like but their extent is a lot broader than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    iptba wrote: »
    You may have a general point on the cancers though with regard to the specifics, I think breast cancer does kill earlier on average.

    With regard to the HPV, it is hard to know for definite how much if anything the fact that males being vaccinated would help females played in the decision but it seems plausible that it might have been a factor. Worldwide there does seem to be more women’s health entities than there are ones focused on men’s health. To an extent this can be justified due to pregnancy, breastfeeding and the like but their extent is a lot broader than that.

    Agreed on all points.

    Though I would add that there is a 99% survival rate with breast cancer detected in the early stages. No such detection exists for men, as they don't have the same access to screening and the awareness levels are tiny in comparison. I was just making a general point without going into too much detail. I'm not sure the other poster was picking me up on the correct points.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,362 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    iptba wrote: »
    I wasn't sure where to post this.

    https://twitter.com/NiallMacCathail/status/1152616567714328577

    This is of course only one individual who holds a lowly position.

    But the suggestion that middle-class white males will never have to worry about a problem in their lives is hard to accept as true. But one could easily see that such attitudes could lead to problematic attitudes to men.
    Who is he and what did he say? Twitter account is locked now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    Who is he and what did he say? Twitter account is locked now.
    He had a screenshot of a post by the (female) head of Sinn Fein NUI Galway. She had a photo of a Fine Gael meeting. Nearly all those in the photo were male. She said something which included “middle class white males who will never have to worry about anything in their lives”.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,362 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    iptba wrote: »
    He had a screenshot of a post by the (female) head of Sinn Fein NUI Galway. She had a photo of a Fine Gael meeting. Nearly all those in the photo were male. She said something which included “middle class white males who will never have to worry about anything in their lives”.

    And who is he?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    And who is he?
    I can’t remember. I didn’t follow him myself; can’t recall how I came across it. He did seem to annoy a lot of people. But there didn’t seem to be any doubt that the Sinn Fein person’s tweet was authentic which is the main issue. It was a public tweet by her rather than some private message.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    Sinn Féin Health spokesperson Louise O’Reilly TD has today published her party’s policy document “Young Men’s Health Matters”.
    https://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/54804


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    Agreed on all points.

    Though I would add that there is a 99% survival rate with breast cancer detected in the early stages. No such detection exists for men, as they don't have the same access to screening and the awareness levels are tiny in comparison. I was just making a general point without going into too much detail. I'm not sure the other poster was picking me up on the correct points.

    I know this is an oldish post but I’d just like to correct something here. There is a 99% five year survival rate for early stage breast cancer. In reality, between 20-30% of early stage breast cancer will die of the disease. Five year survival isn’t absolute survival. To look at it another way, in Ireland, ~ 25% of women die from breast cancer but only 5% of women diagnosed with breast cancer were metastatic at diagnosis. That shows that the 99% survival rate quoted can’t be true because the rest of the 25% who die logically has to made up of women who were originally early stage. This is mirrored in other Western countries. The data gathering on women (and men’s) whose breast cancer returns is, shall we say, patchy at best. I know people (men and women) whose BC recurred metastatic after five years who are listed as the original stage they were diagnosed at.

    It’s all a big obfuscated clusterfuck. Basically, if they were more honest about the actual death rate and recurrence risks, all those awareness events wouldn’t raise so much money (of which eff all goes to research). Follow the money. Ditto with highlighting to men that the symptoms of breast cancer are pretty much the same for them as for women. Can’t be highlighting that stuff to men, it’ll ruin the pretty pink marketing. And the death rate for male breast cancer in Ireland is 50%, indicating that men are being diagnosed with it far too late on average. I sometimes share a ward with a guy suffering from breast cancer and I’m pretty sure it’s metastatic based on one of the drugs he takes. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    I see that Ivana Bacik is the Labour Party's director of elections
    https://twitter.com/LabourDunL/status/1217134920306450434
    along with being the Leader of the Labour Party in the Seanad
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivana_Bacik


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    I didn't watch the debate tonight but I overheard Vardakar say Micheal Martin's comments that Sinn Fein was an unusual party* and that there was a puppetmaster/puppet masters controlling Mary Lou McDonald and Michelle O'Neill, or something about puppet masters controlling them, were "misogynistic". If he had said sexist I could just about accept that, but misogynistic means "hatred of women" which I don't think is justified and I dislike that word been thrown around, and distrust people who do it. To be honest, I'm not sure it's sexist is either as I think the same people would make the same points if male leaders who weren't directly associated with paramilitaries in the past were leaders also at this time.

    *that isn't close to the exact wording, but it isn't my main point


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    https://www.facebook.com/PeopleBeforeProfitGalway/posts/3010526735635177
    People Before Profit Galway
    2 hrs ·
    The members of People Before Profit Galway are shocked and outraged to learn of the actions of Joe Loughnane.

    We send our solidarity and support to the young woman involved.

    It has come to light this morning that he has been physically aggressive with, and damaged the property of, a young woman.

    There is absolutely no place in a proudly socialist feminist party like People Before Profit for people who behave like he has. Disciplinary action has been initiated by party HQ and he is suspended from the party.

    He does not represent us.

    We urge voters in Galway West to vote no. 1 Conor Burke of Solidarity-People Before Profit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    I've come across quite a number of tweets about female TDs losing their seats:
    https://twitter.com/fergalrte/status/1226640757764784128
    https://twitter.com/colettebrowne/status/1226682755590873088
    https://twitter.com/ismaithanfear/status/1226679262893215744
    https://twitter.com/mrdavidflane/status/1226645985947979776
    https://twitter.com/ProfPatOConnor/status/1226642470211072001
    https://twitter.com/SkepticalHippo_/status/1226640147799838720

    I haven't seen anything similar about male TDs even though more males may lose their seats (not perfect reference: https://www.rte.ie/news/election-2020/2020/0209/1114127-election-count/ ).

    I saw some people say that it looks like there will be slightly more female TDs than in the last batch


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,416 ✭✭✭tritium


    Well, for anyone looking for a silver lining to the election it’s that a certain clowns in that list won’t be in the Dail anymore


  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Marcos


    iptba wrote: »
    I've come across quite a number of tweets about female TDs losing their seats:
    https://twitter.com/fergalrte/status/1226640757764784128
    https://twitter.com/colettebrowne/status/1226682755590873088
    https://twitter.com/ismaithanfear/status/1226679262893215744
    https://twitter.com/mrdavidflane/status/1226645985947979776
    https://twitter.com/ProfPatOConnor/status/1226642470211072001
    https://twitter.com/SkepticalHippo_/status/1226640147799838720

    I haven't seen anything similar about male TDs even though more males may lose their seats (not perfect reference: https://www.rte.ie/news/election-2020/2020/0209/1114127-election-count/ ).

    I saw some people say that it looks like there will be slightly more female TDs than in the last batch

    Well our electoral system may not be perfect, but thank God it's not a list system, where each party gets to nominate a number of candidates based on the party's percentage of the vote. Because if it was, you can be sure the above would elbow everyone else out to make sure they got in.

    I wonder how long it'll be before they start to agitate for a fixed percentage of female only seats? Given Mary Mitchell O'Connor's track record with female only professorships I wouldn't put it past them.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    Poor showing for women in Seanad elections as Varadkar’s plea ignored
    Taoiseach may nominate women to meet 40% gender quota for next Dáil election

    Fine Gael voters ignored a Seanad election appeal by the Taoiseach to vote for female candidates, with no party women elected to three of the five vocational panels counted to date.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/poor-showing-for-women-in-seanad-elections-as-varadkar-s-plea-ignored-1.4218343


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    It is understood Fine Gael leader Leo Varadkar has told his parliamentary party that any government coalition deal would seek to ensure the 11 taoiseach nominations for the Seanad would be mostly if not all women.
    https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2020/0403/1128218-seanad-election/


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭CageWager


    We are inching closer and closer to the day where both houses will have 50% “female only seats”. Mark my words.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭boombang


    This guy came to my attention recently as a total tool.

    https://twitter.com/MTaylorClare/status/1246149828393996295?s=19


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    He/Him....right...we all know what we are dealing with then.

    Take a look at how the UK Labour Party and the Lib Dems have fared with enforced gender quotas....those parties have done enormous damage to themselves.

    Feminism is starting to destroy whatever it touches, hopefully it will destroy the Seanad.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TBH, I'm kinda glad that this is happening. There is nothing more in the public eye than politics. So, these quotas will also be under the public eye, and we might see people acknowledging the inherent sexism that is being promoted these days.
    Once that starts, then a push to connect that sexism with what we see in quota's or other initiatives boosting women in an already equal society... (considering that they're doing better than males in many aspects already, and have been for years)

    Hopefully, we can put all this BS behind us, and return to encouraging actual equality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/its-time-for-women-to-get-half-of-all-seats-in-the-next-cabinet-39302462.html
    June 21 2020 02:30 AM

    Now that the programme for government has been agreed, pending all the usual ifs and buts, the real business begins - deciding who should get all those plum jobs in cabinet. The big question is: how many of them should go to women?

    The maths is straightforward enough. There were 36 women elected to the 33rd Dail at February's election (only one more than in 2016), compared to 124 men.

    Of those fortunate few women, 23 will be sitting on the opposition benches, compared to 49 men, a significantly higher representation than in the Dail as a whole - though still far from equal.
    I can't see the full article as it is pay walled. It doesn't seem like a good idea that half the Cabinet should be picked from such a small pool of people (13 women).


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,362 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    He/Him....right...we all know what we are dealing with then.

    Take a look at how the UK Labour Party and the Lib Dems have fared with enforced gender quotas....those parties have done enormous damage to themselves.

    Feminism is starting to destroy whatever it touches, hopefully it will destroy the Seanad.

    Are you referring to the Labour All Women Shortlists brought in around 1993? I'm not sure that 'enormous damage' would cover all of Labour's developments since then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    Nominated members of Seanad Éireann
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominated_members_of_Seanad_%C3%89ireann

    9 of the 11 individuals nominated by the Taoiseach are female, including 3 out of the 4 Fianna Fáil nominations and all 4 of the Fine Gael nominations


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    The National Women's Council of Ireland says it is really disappointed that just four of the 15 cabinet ministers appointed are women.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/womens-council-really-disappointing-that-just-four-of-15-ministers-appointed-are-women-1007917.html
    "Four women do not even meet the current quota of 30% where we can begin to address gender balance, let alone the desired 50/50 split that has been achieved in many other countries across the world.

    4/15 is 26.7% higher than the 22.5% for the Dail as a whole, and I think higher than the percentage of females in the 3 governing parties. As it is, one woman was chosen after just having been elected to the Dail. Also 2 out the 3 other politicians who will be at the Cabinet are female.
    "NWCI is calling on the new Government to pass legislation for a gender quota for the local elections in 2023 and to increase support for initiatives that support women to run for political office at all levels.’’


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭CageWager


    If it were up to me I‘d have mandatory 50/50 gender split in terms of candidates in the election, and then let the chips fall where they may. If women choose not to vote for other women then so be it - they had their chance. At that stage nobody could come back after the fact and whinge about not enough women getting elected.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    There's going to be a 40% quota soon, which is pretty close to 50-50. The 30% quota was only for the first 7 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,873 ✭✭✭iptba


    The Irish Times view on Government jobs: open dissent in Fianna Fáil
    More significant than geographical imbalances is scarcity of women in new administration

    [..]

    What is more striking – and worrying – is the failure to have a greater gender balance at both senior and junior levels. Just four of the 15 Cabinet ministers are women and only five of the 20 junior ministers. This is not nearly good enough and reflects badly on all three coalition parties.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/editorial/the-irish-times-view-on-government-jobs-open-dissent-in-fianna-f%C3%A1il-1.4294885

    I don't have easy access to the figures, but don't get the impression the percentages of cabinet ministers and junior ministers who were women were lower than the overall percentages of women who were elected in these parties. So there doesn't seem to have been any discrimination against women, from what I see. So a bit disappointing that the Irish Times would highlight this.


Advertisement