Tina Satchwell *Mod note in op*

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Why? - Maybe she just loved him and wanted to express that?

They seemed to have been an extremely private couple with very little involvement with ppl outside their relationship

Maybe he wanted them to be a private couple as he seems introverted but he has said she was extroverted so that doesn't lend itself to be a extremely private couple

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Where’s the proof she was extroverted? Very few ppl seem to have known her as far as I can see

By Richard's.press interviews

The Inbetween is mine wrote: »

Most? Ok.. that's not all

How many people have you spoken to from the area knew her?

The Inbetween is mine wrote: »

Poster said "no-one knew her"

So tell us who knew her?

The Inbetween is mine wrote: »

That's not how it works I'm afraid..the person making the claims need s to back it up...and he hasn't...

But you're saying people knew her, so tell us who did if the poster is wrong.

I got the impression from his interviews and from what Tina's family said that Richard was very controlling and didn't like Tina to mix. Very often the case in dysfunctional relationships. And no I don't know them but have followed police interviews on other such cases..

Newuser2 wrote: »

Hmm

I don't believe any of that

Nor me. .I think there is probably enough circumstantial evidence.

Its a very strange case. Richard mentioned in one of his interviews that his car was only looked at by Gardai 7 months after her dissapearance.

I wonder was their house ever searched by Gardai. Could it be possible she never left the house.

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Seem to recall Richard saying the house was searched early on

I seem to remember that they were doing some renovations at the time. I hope the Gardai done a complete forensic search.

She wasnt reported missing until a few days later. Gardai then probably didnt search the house straight away as she was being treated just as an ordinary missing person ( probably wasnt taking it too serious). God knows how long a time lapse there was between Tina going missing and searching the house.

I would love to think Tina is out there somewhere living her best life but sadly I dont think she would have been capable of pulling this off.

Deeec wrote: »

Its a very strange case. Richard mentioned in one of his interviews that his car was only looked at by Gardai 7 months after her dissapearance.

I wonder was their house ever searched by Gardai. Could it be possible she never left the house.

The house was searched without him knowing apparently. The car wasn't searched until he volunteered to guards that he was going to sell the car 7 months after her disappearance. Apparently he doesn't do anything without contacting the guards and even has had coffee with them. This is all in a brilliant 1 hr 10 minute interview with Neil Prenderville on Red FM. I know Prenderville wouldn't be everyones cup of tea but when I heard there was a body it reignited my interest in the case again. The reasons cited for selling the car was because of mileage he covers and diesel being more economical. He also said he was being hounded by the print media who would recognise his car and tail him.

His whole story is incongruent and has more holes in it than a swiss cheese certainly from a behavioural standpoint. But he sells it well. Explanations for finding suitcases outside Tesco, €26k of cash vanishing along with his wife, keys/car not taken, pets that she adored in situ, not reporting her missing for 4 days, her best friend in Fermoy who she met everyday at same time and place without ever contacting via phone (this was RS offering). She didn't own a passport but he mentions that same friend thinks she might have went to UK without any basis. He recalls her asking for her british social security number.

He is a skilled interviewee. He drops hints about certain things expecting them to ferment in peoples heads and when he is dragged into deep waters by interviewer he can pivot out by A) portraying himself as a victim, mental health reasons or C) using her so called love for him. He rules out suicide because lets face it who needs €26K if they are suicidal. He mentions UK but that can be ruled out because all lines of inquiry were searched there. He never seems to think it is conceivable that their house was burgled despite keys being on the ground and money taken which you would think would have lead to a call to the guards much earlier than the 4 days it took.

Where did the money go ?

Whiplash85 wrote: »

The house was searched without him knowing apparently. The car wasn't searched until he volunteered to guards that he was going to sell the car 7 months after her disappearance. Apparently he doesn't do anything without contacting the guards and even has had coffee with them. This is all in a brilliant 1 hr 10 minute interview with Neil Prenderville on Red FM. I know Prenderville wouldn't be everyones cup of tea but when I heard there was a body it reignited my interest in the case again. The reasons cited for selling the car was because of mileage he covers and diesel being more economical. He also said he was being hounded by the print media who would recognise his car and tail him.

His whole story is incongruent and has more holes in it than a swiss cheese certainly from a behavioural standpoint. But he sells it well. Explanations for finding suitcases outside Tesco, €26k of cash vanishing along with his wife, keys/car not taken, pets that she adored in situ, not reporting her missing for 4 days, her best friend in Fermoy who she met everyday at same time and place without ever contacting via phone (this was RS offering). She didn't own a passport but he mentions that same friend thinks she might have went to UK without any basis. He recalls her asking for her british social security number.

He is a skilled interviewee. He drops hints about certain things expecting them to ferment in peoples heads and when he is dragged into deep waters by interviewer he can pivot out by A) portraying himself as a victim, mental health reasons or C) using her so called love for him. He rules out suicide because lets face it who needs €26K if they are suicidal. He mentions UK but that can be ruled out because all lines of inquiry were searched there. He never seems to think it is conceivable that their house was burgled despite keys being on the ground and money taken which you would think would have lead to a call to the guards much earlier than the 4 days it took.

Great post but disagree with BIB/ . . it is easy to see through his manipulation. The interview is painful to watch.