Could "Edmund & Mary" and "Laurence & Bridget" be "Edmund & Mar

This is another question where I'm using the context of records to figure out their accuracy. This is a list of all Molonys born in Murroe to a mother whose surname is Hayes:



The father shown as ? is definitely Larry. So we have a Larry Moloney & Mary Hayes who had children in 1820, 1828, 1831, 1836 and 1839.

Initally I could only find 1 marriage for a Laurence Moloney - that to a Mary Leary in 1822. However, I did then find a Laurence Mahony marriage to a Mary Hayes in 1817; checking the original microfiche images, it's obviously "Molony". With their first child in 1820, that makes sense. So we definitely have a Larry Moloney/Mary Hayes.

EDMUND & MARY:

Searching for marriages for Mary Hayes, I couldn't find any to an Edmund (or anything resembling it) though. I even tried the whole country, with just Molonys and Hayes, and nothing shows that could resemble an Edmund.

In the baptism for Kitty, it definitely looks like the abbreviation for Edmund and nothing ressembling Larry.

LAURENCE & BRIDGET

Found a Bridget Hayes marrying an Edmund _BOURKE_ in 1831. Again, I tried the whole country, nothing resembling an Edmund Molony/Bridget Hayes marriage

Similarly, looks like Bridget in the original record, nothing like Mary.

===

So should I accept the records at face value and that there was an Edmund & Mary who have large gaps between what looks like regularly spaced out children (every three years) and also a Laurence & Bridget who have no marriage records and only one child each, or is it possible they are original errors?

P.