Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New Met Éireann Website (beta)

191012141526

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    Comhra wrote: »
    Well, to me it's not nonsense. My main gripe about the 5 min. radar intervals is that it seems to have made the previous 6 hrs.viewing time-span redundant and it is now only possible to see a short 3 hrs. 'look-back'.

    Not useful if someone wants to check something like an overnight precip event. A 6 hr. timeframe with 5 min. intervals would probably prove very long and cumbersome, and though the 5 min. updates may be a desirable feature for many, it's a pity it necessitates a reduction in the viewing time range from 6 to 3 hrs.

    No doubt different folks have different needs and priorities but still it's a pity that some previous useful features have been omitted in the update.

    I'd also have thought the back & forward buttons on the radar wouldn't have been too much trouble to retain. Almost every other met. website has that feature. It's pretty much standard.

    I also find the further you can look back the easier it is to extrapolate where the rain is going.

    I think the new map endows the rainfall radar with much greater accuracy than it really has.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Comhra wrote: »
    Well, to me it's not nonsense. My main gripe about the 5 min. radar intervals is that it seems to have made the previous 6 hrs.viewing time-span redundant and it is now only possible to see a short 3 hrs. 'look-back'.

    Not useful if someone wants to check something like an overnight precip event. A 6 hr. timeframe with 5 min. intervals would probably prove very long and cumbersome, and though the 5 min. updates may be a desirable feature for many, it's a pity it necessitates a reduction in the viewing time range from 6 to 3 hrs.

    No doubt different folks have different needs and priorities but still it's a pity that some previous useful features have been omitted in the update.

    I'd also have thought the back & forward buttons on the radar wouldn't have been too much trouble to retain. Almost every other met. website has that feature. It's pretty much standard.

    (Edit) The Belfast radar cover is indeed welcome, I have to agree.

    Yep, that's a valid point too. No reason why it should be limited to 3 hours.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭zom


    I am extremely happy user of old version - thank you very much for keeping it! Did a speed test recently and old page is lightweight rocket comparing to new one slow and massive elephant:
    _______________________old__________new
    Visually Complete:_______0.600s_______4.400s
    Speed Index (google):____387__________2795
    Document Complete_____251 KB_______1,815 KB


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭pauldry


    Yes really and truly they should take down the new page altogether and work on it again and perhaps relaunch it in a month


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    zom wrote: »
    I am extremely happy user of old version - thank you very much for keeping it! Did a speed test recently and old page is lightweight rocket comparing to new one slow and massive elephant:
    _______________________old__________new
    Visually Complete:_______0.600s_______4.400s
    Speed Index (google):____387__________2795
    Document Complete_____251 KB_______1,815 KB

    The thing is though, that "lightweight rocket" was probably pretty slow back in 2006 when it was launched.
    Broadband hadn't reached half of the country and mobile data speeds were brutal.
    Imagine how much you all would have moaned about the site you grew to love way back then.

    Oh I think it's also worth mentioning that at 1,815 kb - it's about half the average size of a typical webpage in 2018.
    I find the site loads very quickly, and I'm using my phone as a hotspot.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,492 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Loading speeds is not one of the problems I've been having, I find Boards far worse for loading. Boards can be absolutely appalling for loading speeds sometimes. Going by other people, I guess I should consider myself lucky.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3


    For us ancient, unmovable, pipe-smoking, backward thinking Micks, here are some Atlantic frontal charts courtesy of our similarly backward thinking European neighbours, since we in Ireland are obviously too advanced and forward thinking to have them provided by our own met service.

    Portuguese Met Service (click on "Selecione Campo' and then 'Analise Frontal' on drop down:
    https://www.ipma.pt/en/otempo/prev.numerica/index.jsp


    ZAMG - Austrian Met Service:
    http://www.zamg.ac.at/cms/de/wetter/wetterkarte


    KNMI - Netherlands
    http://www.knmi.nl/nederland-nu/weer/waarschuwingen-en-verwachtingen/weerkaarten

    DWD - Germany:
    https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/hobbymet_wk_europa/hobbyeuropakarten.html?nn=357606

    UKMO - UK
    https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/surface-pressure/#?tab=surfacePressureColour&fcTime=1524441600

    New Moon



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,273 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Just thought this article that I got today about engaging users on design changes might be interesting in the light of this example;

    https://articles.uie.com/users-dont-hate-change-they-hate-our-design-choices/


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭pauldry


    Yeah I actually tried running my own weather website through html and it was a nightmare as I just learned copied n pasted all the tags. It ran well for 10 years but as the internet advanced with interactive charts and 100s of new weather websites I was left in the shade as my knowledge ain't that great so sadly I had to take my site down. Now I just run the blog through Facebook occasionally.

    I can only imagine how difficult it is to completely overhaul Met Eireanns page. That's why I think they should have left most of it as was and just add a few new features bit by bit. Like just the same appearance as before but maybe slightly bigger font and then have "new" beside some links


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    pauldry wrote: »
    Yeah I actually tried running my own weather website through html and it was a nightmare as I just learned copied n pasted all the tags. It ran well for 10 years but as the internet advanced with interactive charts and 100s of new weather websites I was left in the shade as my knowledge ain't that great so sadly I had to take my site down. Now I just run the blog through Facebook occasionally.

    I can only imagine how difficult it is to completely overhaul Met Eireanns page. That's why I think they should have left most of it as was and just add a few new features bit by bit. Like just the same appearance as before but maybe slightly bigger font and then have "new" beside some links

    That's usually a very sensible approach. Iterative, small changes rather than a massive release that upsets user's workflow.

    Unfortunately in this case the codebase was so outdated that it would be nearly impossible to do this.
    You know a little html right? Well the old site used html and css patterns from the nineties.
    The server language used is Microsoft's ASP. ASP was replaced as a coding language by .Net back in 2002.
    So even if your suggested approach was doable, you literally could not find the staff to do it.

    Also, making the site responsive (layout adapts to device - mobile, desktop etc) requires a re-do of literally everything.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,125 ✭✭✭highdef


    Viewing the radar on the new website at the moment and I am seeing circles in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare area which is an anomaly. These are far less pronounced (almost invisible) on the legacy site, despite the fact that the new site is using the data from Belfast as well so in theory it should be more accurate. Anyone know why this is happening as it looks terrible and it makes it very difficult to estimate the precipitation rates in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare areas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    highdef wrote: »
    Viewing the radar on the new website at the moment and I am seeing circles in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare area which is an anomaly. These are far less pronounced (almost invisible) on the legacy site, despite the fact that the new site is using the data from Belfast as well so in theory it should be more accurate. Anyone know why this is happening as it looks terrible and it makes it very difficult to estimate the precipitation rates in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare areas?

    Was watching those myself this morning. Most of the time although it was obviously raining in Limerick because Limerick was the center of one anomaly the rain radar showed no rain there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭Comhrá




    Met Eireann are currently recruiting for the post of Head of Technology Division.
    See details in the link below
    https://www.publicjobs.ie/publicjobs/campaignAdvert/77936.htm
    12:14 PM - 24 Apr 2018

    Has a position suddenly become vacant? :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    highdef wrote: »
    Viewing the radar on the new website at the moment and I am seeing circles in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare area which is an anomaly. These are far less pronounced (almost invisible) on the legacy site, despite the fact that the new site is using the data from Belfast as well so in theory it should be more accurate. Anyone know why this is happening as it looks terrible and it makes it very difficult to estimate the precipitation rates in the Dublin/Meath/Kildare areas?

    It could just be bright banding.

    http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Bright_band


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,811 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    Perhaps this has been asked already but is there any way to change the radar back to 15 minute intervals. It is a pain now with 'every 5 minutes' intervals.

    Also for some reason the app says my location is Dublin. I updated the app while in Dublin but I am not resident there. Do I need to set 'location' on every time for this to know where I am.

    The older app was easy and simple for my needs.

    I am using the android app.

    Thanks

    Edit: just seen now that I can push the slide button across and it can go faster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Perhaps this has been asked already but is there any way to change the radar back to 15 minute intervals. It is a pain now with 'every 5 minutes' intervals.

    Also for some reason the app says my location is Dublin. I updated the app while in Dublin but I am not resident there. Do I need to set 'location' on every time for this to know where I am.

    The older app was easy and simple for my needs.

    I am using the android app.

    Thanks

    Edit: just seen now that I can push the slide button across and it can go faster.

    If you click "enter location" and feed in your home town, it should persist for you next time.

    Does fr me anyways


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,125 ✭✭✭highdef


    It could just be bright banding.

    http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Bright_band

    It was bright banding but my point was that it was only barely noticeable on a couple of frames in the legacy radar, right over Dublin city/airport vicinity but extremely pronounced in the new radar with several rings being extremely apparent north to County Louth, south into Wicklow and west into the midlands.

    If you were viewing the radar and you were located under one of these persistent rings, you would be under the impression that it was raining heavily for hours on end when in actual fact, the rain was generally moderate in any given area in the east.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,811 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    gabeeg wrote: »
    If you click "enter location" and feed in your home town, it should persist for you next time.

    Does fr me anyways

    Where is 'enter location'?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Where is 'enter location'?

    I figured you were on the website on your phone.
    My bad.

    On the Android app you have to click the magnifying glass icon on the top right.
    Then you click the "my location" switch to have it default to your location


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,811 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    gabeeg wrote: »
    I figured you were on the website on your phone.
    My bad.

    On the Android app you have to click the magnifying glass icon on the top right.
    Then you click the "my location" switch to have it default to your location

    I have done that now but it then defaults back to Dublin when I exit and return to the app.
    When I go into the 'magnifying glass' icon again the 'location on' has been switched off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    I have done that now but it then defaults back to Dublin when I exit and return to the app.
    When I go into the 'magnifying glass' icon again the 'location on' has been switched off.

    Sounds like it might be a bug so.

    There's an update available. Might fix it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,811 ✭✭✭Tigerandahalf


    gabeeg wrote: »
    Sounds like it might be a bug so.

    There's an update available. Might fix it.

    The app seems to want you to have gps 'location' permanently on, something I don't want.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    The app seems to want you to have gps 'location' permanently on, something I don't want.

    It won't be permanently on, dude. Just when you open the app.
    It's just using your location as a basis for the forecast.

    Don't worry, It's not a Mark Zuckerberg production.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,432 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The sferics/lightning strikes on the new radar are quite good.

    Credit where credit is due.

    https://www.met.ie/


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭pauldry


    Maybe they are

    Haven't looked as I've bookmarked old site until I see people on here giving positive feedback on new site or until I've no choice!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3


    pauldry wrote: »
    Maybe they are

    Haven't looked as I've bookmarked old site until I see people on here giving positive feedback on new site or until I've no choice!!

    As of now, they don't seem to be addressing any of the issues people are having with the new site.

    New Moon



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    That takes time.

    They have to digest and prioritise the feedback, iterate on the design, engineer it, test it, release it and repeat.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    gabeeg wrote: »
    That takes time.

    They have to digest and prioritise the feedback, iterate on the design, engineer it, test it, release it and repeat.

    They could just start fixing the bugs or is that too much to ask?


Advertisement