Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.
JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
To me the facial "explosion" looks far more like an exit wound than an entry wound, entry wounds tend to be bullet sizes only with exit wounds far larger as per the video, unless it was a ricochet and the bullet was tumbling.
The bullet that hit Connelly was tumbling, proven by the wound on his back (and his clothes) showing the bullet entered slightly sideways at a 30 degree yaw - which can only happen if the bullet has already passed through and object.
Quite simple really.
To me the facial "explosion" looks far more like an exit wound than an entry wound, entry wounds tend to be bullet sizes only with exit wounds far larger as per the video,
Its scientifically impossible for that to be an entry wound high and from the front.0 -
What facts?! How do you explain people not hearing a rifle firing from 6 foot away?
And what kind of mob hitman shoots someone in the stomach? Theres an overwhelming possibility of Oswald surviving that. A stomach shot with that gun would only kill 10% ish of people. And Oswald had an immediate escort to the hospital. Common sense sometimes wins.
The first mob hit in history where the killer decided to shoot the target in the stomach, almost guaranteeing Oswald would've survived, been put under 24/7 protection and then talked, had he been involved in a conspiracy.
Such a stupid theory.
The majority of the witnesses said the fatal shot came from the grassy knoll. That documented fact. You even see where all the people ran to on the day of the killing in Photographs.
Orville Nix even said he thought the shot came from behind the picket fence.
Oswald died so obviously Ruby knew what he was doing
0 -
The bullet that hit Connelly was tumbling, proven by the wound on his back (and his clothes) showing the bullet entered slightly sideways at a 30 degree yaw - which can only happen if the bullet has already passed through and object.
Quite simple really.
Its scientifically impossible for that to be an entry wound high and from the front.
We even have video of Parkland hospital doctor who was involved in trying to save Kennedy. He too disagrees with the Warren commission findings.
Two doctors at different hospitals disagree with the Warren commission findings. I believe the doctors and eyewitnesses and not the US government.
Dr Charles Crenshaw explains why the shot came from the right front.
0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »The majority of the witnesses said the fatal shot came from the grassy knoll. That documented fact.
No it is not. Stop lying and spreading misinformation to suit your agenda. You're poison.
Your beloved HSCA said 47% of people believed shots came from the TSBD and only 20% said shots came from the knoll.
See House Select Committee, Volume 2, p. 122.
However they undercooked the knoll numbers. In reality, 40 people from about 200 said they heard shots, saw smoke or smelled gun powder from the general direction of the knoll. How is that a majority?
Also, Dealey Plaza acoustically has the fence and trees and walls etc on the knoll side and nothing on the other side. So of course there will be more echoes on the knoll side.
You still haven't explained how the people on the steps and Zapruder didn't notice a rifle firing 6 feet away from their heads. Please explain this.Cheerful Spring wrote: »
Oswald died so obviously Ruby knew what he was doing
Impossible to know you'll kill someone with a shot to the guts. 1/10 chance they'll survive.Cheerful Spring wrote: »
Two doctors at different hospitals disagree with the Warren commission findings. I believe the doctors and eyewitnesses and not the US government.
So you believe the doctors? The majority of whom think the shots came from the rear?
Right......0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Connelly clearly reacts at the same time as Kennedy, his arm makes a sudden jerk in unison with Kennedy as he raises up his hands. Do you have an explanation as to how Connelly ended up being shot in the back, wrist and leg? Do you think Kennedy was shot from the front a milisecond before Connelly was shot from behind which somehow managed to miss Kennedy?
I do agree that it is a bit odd that a lot of the files are redacted, but I don't understand why you're focusing so much on a 2nd shooter. The 2nd shooter is a total red herring and distraction.
A conspiracy of sorts with Oswald as the lone shooter is a possibility, and doesn't need some shooter behind a fence.
He reacting to the shooting. Connelly stated he was not shot until he turned around and looked back.
Kennedy was already hit in frame 225 and 226. The bullet would have already have impacted Connelly back region as he sat forward. You have to take into account the speed of a bullet which travels at 1700mph.
Once it left Kennedy throat area Connelly would have got hit immediately and jolted in his seat looking forward.
He was shot by a second bullet obviously. With his body turned the bullet would have moved in a different way through his back to the right wrist.
The Warren commission claims the fatal shot hit Kennedy in this area of the head. Do you see a blast of a bullet heading Kennedy in this region of the skull?
Look at the Zapruder film and find the entry point!
0 -
Well they always reckoned there was 2 shooters not just Oswald on his ownCheerful Spring wrote: »
If Oswald was a lone gunman why did the FBI and CIA rush in the last hour before the JFK files got released? They said they needed more time to redact files? No conspiracy really? Fox News fair play to them found this very suspicious and wonder what the CIA and FBI are trying to hide.
The Mortal Error theory looks better and better the more I think about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Error
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_McLaren#JFK:_The_Smoking_Gun
0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »He reacting to the shooting. Connelly stated he was not shot until he turned around and looked back.
Kennedy was already hit in frame 225 and 226. The bullet would have already have impacted Connelly back region as he sat forward. You have to take into account the speed of a bullet which travels at 1700mph.
Once it left Kennedy throat area Connelly would have got hit immediately and jolted in his seat looking forward.
He was shot by a second bullet obviously. With his body turned the bullet would have moved in a different way through his back to the right wrist.
The Warren commission claims the fatal shot hit Kennedy in this area of the head. Do you see a blast of a bullet heading Kennedy in this region of the skull?
Look at the Zapruder film and find the entry point!
If you move forward 1 frame to frame 313 you can clearly see that the back of Kennedy's head is intact while the right side of it is devastated.
I'd like to know what you think happened. The order of shots and injuries and roughly from what direction. Do you have an opinion on that?0 -
The Mortal Error theory looks better and better the more I think about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Error
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_McLaren#JFK:_The_Smoking_Gun
The Zaprauder film does not show any flash or blood splatter at the back of the head. The flash is from the right front.
If the bullet hit Kennedy in the back of the head why don't we see anything?0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »There no flash or blood splatter at the back of the head. Do you think a bullet hitting the back of the head would not be seen on video?
It is seen on video. Clear as day. Fragments moving forward and his brain moving forward.
His head also moves forward first. I won't post it again since you've ignored it all the other times it was posted.Cheerful Spring wrote: »
It clear as day that bullet came from the right front hit Kennedy head near the right ear and his head exploded.
How can a shot from the front cause an exit wound at the front? The left of his head was fine, which it would not have been with a shot from the right. If he was shot from the front right the exit wound would've been at the back left.
Explain these points please
1. JFKs head moving forward briefly before the bullet exited
2. The spray from the wound moving forward
3. The exit wound at the front right of his head
4. The people on the steps, Zapruder and the people near the knoll all ignoring a high powered rifle going off behind their heads. You keep dodging this.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement