Originally Posted by Vetch
I checked a few against the Tithe Applotment and it appears to be the bride's address (although I really only did check a few). Makes more sense as the bride will normally marry in her home parish.
Thanks Vetch. That's interesting. I checked the baptisms for the children of marriages picked at random and in most cases, but not in all, the townlands shown for the baptisms are the same as for the marriages. In others, it seems to be a neighbouring townland. I'm not sure what that's telling me but I imagine in most cases the woman, once married, would have moved to live with her husband in his townland.
Originally Posted by BarryD2
I'm sure somebody may know for definite but my guess would be the townland listed is the husbands townland of residency, simply on basis that men were considered more 'important'.
These are townlands that are listed as far as I can see. So whilst the marriage might well be in the brides parish, said parish could contain anything from half a dozen to hundreds of townlands.
It's possible that in some cases that both parties are from same townland but more likely to be neighbouring or nearby as people didn't travel too far to get married then.
If you knew one or two with certainty, you could establish the rule, but my guess is the mans townland of residence.
In the transcription of the records, the townland is shown after the husband's name, even though in the actual church record, the townland is written in after the wife's name.
See here for an example: https://churchrecords.irishgenealogy...&submit=Search
The link in my first post shows how it is written in the actual church record.
I agree Barry that someone must know for definite but the more I think about it, I think it could be the husband's townland -by the way, Iveleary (Inchigeelagh) has over 100 townlands. If marriages took place almost always in the wife's townland, then it would make sense to write the husband's place of residence rather than the wife's in the church record.
I'd like to more certain though.
However, the 'domicilium' mentioned in the church record is a townland and not a parish so that may nullify the argument that it is likely to be the husband's townland.