Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

16162646667147

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    sk8board wrote: »
    It really doesn’t matter if it was Mercedes protested it or someone else, this one is a slam dunk.
    They all see the RB wing was flexing, the pit Lane is a very small community and every team has a race team back at HQ monitoring every last thing - merc’s HQ race team is over 60 people

    Like the RP brake ducts last year, only one team needs to protest (although Mclaren and Renault both took the lead that time, a s Renault then further appealed it too). ditto for the secret Ferrari trouble the previous season.
    A protest from the heritage teams probably carry’s more weight.

    A slam dunk for what though?

    The wing passes all the FIA stress tests, so it is not illegal. If the FIA change the loads for that test, and RB have to make adjustments to it then I am sure they will do.

    FIA have said June, RB will test it themselves before that so they may or may not have to change something. The comparison to the brake duct isn't the same as that was seen as a direct copy, this case is more so the advantage a team may have with a clever component.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    https://f1-insider.com/formel-1-red-bull-heckflugel-hamilton-anklage/

    This will put the cat amongst the pigeons.
    But there is another reason why Red Bull remains so calm. Sport1 learned: Unfortunately, the FIA regular guards do not target the Verstappen team at all, but rather Alpine. The former Renault factory team is said to be the biggest champion in bending. This would prove top-speed measurements.

    RB sound very calm about what may come their way, which I hope doesn't ruin this close season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,152 ✭✭✭sk8board


    When I say a slam dunk, I mean that the tolerances on modern F1 cars are calibrated to a phenomenal degree - if a wing is flexing under load by a millimetre, it’s being done intentionally.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    https://f1-insider.com/formel-1-red-bull-heckflugel-hamilton-anklage/

    This will put the cat amongst the pigeons.



    RB sound very calm about what may come their way, which I hope doesn't ruin this close season.

    Which beggars the question, do they set the tests to bring everyone to a standard which is even more ridged than the merc or do they tailor the test to bring everyone in line with merc which again would be penalising everyone to a standard that merc has already adapted to.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    sk8board wrote: »
    When I say a slam dunk, I mean that the tolerances on modern F1 cars are calibrated to a phenomenal degree - if a wing is flexing under load by a millimetre, it’s being done intentionally.

    Precisely. RB have (probably) used a certain type of carbon fibre weave that moves under a specific load at a specific time.

    To be clear though, all wings on all cars flex. They need flex or they would shatter under load. It is why buildings flex and aeroplane wings do the same. RB have done this stuff before, and there are videos of it from last year as well.

    Merc said nothing then because it had a clear advantage with its car over the whole field. It is only using this now because the fight is so close.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    Are all the side-to-side wobbles of the wing deliberate as well? Can't imagine that helps with airflow...

    They're gonna build it as weak as they can to comply with the stress tests.

    Also the red lines are purely in relation to the camera, the wing is attached to the rear of the car which squats down under load/high speed. So the wing "flex" will be less than what those gridlines indicate. Plus Red Bull run higher rake so there's more scope for the rear to squat further.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Buttonftw wrote: »
    Are all the side-to-side wobbles of the wing deliberate as well? Can't imagine that helps with airflow...

    They're gonna build it as weak as they can to comply with the stress tests.

    Also the red lines are purely in relation to the camera, the wing is attached to the rear of the car which squats down under load/high speed. So the wing "flex" will be less than what those gridlines indicate. Plus Red Bull run higher rake so there's more scope for the rear to squat further.

    The wing isn't mounted to the suspension though, it is mounted to the crash structure on the chassis (I think?). So the squat at the back relative to the camera shouldn't be that much, the camera and wing are on the chassis and not parts that naturally move like suspension or wheels.

    However, you make a good point about the rake that RB run. The car is higher at the back so there might be some merit in how that effects the movement.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭Joeface


    Is it not the case that the camera is fixed with in the chassis and moves with the chassis so the wing is moving separately , and it appears to tilt back more than move down

    Maybe I'm reading/seeing it differently .


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,152 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Joeface wrote: »
    Is it not the case that the camera is fixed with in the chassis and moves with the chassis so the wing is moving separately , and it appears to tilt back more than move down

    Maybe I'm reading/seeing it differently .

    Yep, it’s effectively rotating backwards under load.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭Joeface


    Should be titled "Baby DRS"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,501 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    Red bull wing allowed for the next 3 races,
    Going to be banned from France I believe.

    https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/red-bull-rear-wing-set-to-be-banned-with-new-fia-technical-directive


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,593 ✭✭✭Northern Monkey


    Has to be a red bull gives you wings joke in there somewhere.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    This is ridiculous and shows how artificial F1 has become. Something is either legal or not – if the powers that be don’t like it then fine, change the rules for next season but you can’t go changing the rules midway through.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    T-Maxx wrote: »
    This is ridiculous and shows how artificial F1 has become. Something is either legal or not – if the powers that be don’t like it then fine, change the rules for next season but you can’t go changing the rules midway through.

    Changing the tests for enforcing the rules has been going on for years. This is nothing new.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭Joeface


    This is going to Hurt other teams more than Redbull cause there were a few at it

    Most stuff I have seen via Reddit has Alpine , Williams and Ferrari to some extent at it as well and they don't have the engine pace of the Redbull anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,904 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah I'd want to know if there's a safety concern with flexing wings. Or if they allow it this year and ban it next year, then bendy wings become fair game for development and that could be dangerous as teams come up with more and more innovative bendy wings.

    The lesser of all evils is probably to clarify the rules, modify the test and give teams a decent time to make the necessary changes.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    Article seems a bit vague. How are they banning it exactly? Will there be tests that the teams won't be given the parameters of?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    OSI wrote: »
    You can't say it's become artificial, there have been rule clarifications mid season for decades.
    Changing the tests for enforcing the rules has been going on for years. This is nothing new.

    I know that - I am referring to decades ago. I guess I'm just getting to the point of giving up on it altogether at his stage. Just when we though we might have a season of battling for the lead...


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,506 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    vectra wrote: »

    Awe that's a pity. F1 should be all about welcoming innovations like this not banning them unless it were to give one team a huge advantage.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,608 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    Buttonftw wrote: »
    Article seems a bit vague. How are they banning it exactly? Will there be tests that the teams won't be given the parameters of?

    They're not banning anything, they issued a new technical directive advising the teams that ahead of the French Grand Prix the loads the wings are subjected to in the pull-back and push-down tests will be doubled. The teams know the new limits, can test it themselves and redesign if required


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    skipper_G wrote: »
    They're not banning anything, they issued a new technical directive advising the teams that ahead of the French Grand Prix the loads the wings are subjected to in the pull-back and push-down tests will be doubled. The teams know the new limits, can test it themselves and redesign if required

    Cheers, that's what I was wondering about. Wouldn't be surprised if footage with gridlines shows something similar then but Merc will be even further ahead so they won't bother moaning so much.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,403 ✭✭✭Harika


    Turkey cancelled and replaced by second Austria race. France to move a week forward.
    Travel restrictions to turkey made the race impossible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,506 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Awe thats a pity. Was looking forward to the Turkey race but alas it's not to be. Not really looking forward to two races in Austria.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭[Deleted User]


    AMKC wrote: »
    Awe thats a pity. Was looking forward to the Turkey race but alas it's not to be. Not really looking forward to two races in Austria.

    Yeah I'd rather the extra race to be added for Silverstone, they have the weekends free it looks like. Could probably sell a ****-ton more tickets as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    It’s bad I know but I’m really looking forward to Manaco just to see how Mazepin handles the track.

    A lot of jokes about how he will do but be fun to see if he survives the week without a mistake.

    When he last raced there in 2019 he did decent I suppose but that was F2, and he’s struggling with that Haas.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,781 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    They should bring forward the sprint trial from Silverstone to the second Spielberg GP. Make for a good comparison between what did and didn't work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,729 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    flazio wrote: »
    They should bring forward the sprint trial from Silverstone to the second Spielberg GP. Make for a good comparison between what did and didn't work.

    That's a great idea, direct comparison of the 2. That's why it will never happen lol!


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    skipper_G wrote: »
    They're not banning anything, they issued a new technical directive advising the teams that ahead of the French Grand Prix the loads the wings are subjected to in the pull-back and push-down tests will be doubled. The teams know the new limits, can test it themselves and redesign if required

    There is also still the possibility that the new directive will still mean that rear wings could flex. These teams are clever and know how to exploit that.

    RB were doing it last year, this also shows the Merc will play every card they can to get an advantage.

    I just hope it doest ruin the rest of the season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    https://the-race.com/formula-1/gary-anderson-on-flexi-f1-wings-and-the-tricks-behind-them/

    Gary Anderson shedding some light on it, interesting article indeed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,617 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Monaco up next. Kobayashi was 'flying' there in 2012:

    517ddeebaeb020e20f5237e4f5bc0520.jpg


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement