Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Deceased wealthy people estate values published in the newspapers

  • 20-09-2020 11:11am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,273 ✭✭✭


    Seeing as many are obsessed with what other people earn/have, I see in today's paper that Peter Sutherland left 2 million in his will. Estate values are public information from the Probate Office.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/former-political-figure-and-one-time-advisor-to-the-pope-peter-sutherland-leaves-2m-in-will-39545170.html

    The Indo is attempting an angle with the comment that Sutherland was once said to be worth 153 million. There's probably people delighted that by the time he died he was only worth 2 million. AFAIK this only covers Irish assets which could be a small part of a person's actual wealth. Also, assets held in joint names often do not need probate. Also, someone may transfer large amounts to family members before death, or shock horror, give large amounts to charity.

    Some other estate values that have appeared in the media over the years

    Garret Fitzgerald - 86k.
    Brian Lenihan Jnr - 368k
    Derek Davis - 170k
    Rick Parfitt from Status Quo - 240k GBP, UK probate
    George Harrison - 99 million GBP, UK probate
    George Michael - 98 million GBP, UK probate
    Mickey Rooney - 18k USD, US probate


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,041 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Goodness, that isn't even the price of a house in most cases!

    Yes, of course, it doesn't take account of jointly held properties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,273 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    looksee wrote: »
    Goodness, that isn't even the price of a house in most cases!

    Yes, of course, it doesn't take account of jointly held properties.
    It's a few years since i filled in a probate form but I just remembered that there was a section on it for jointly held assets. Not sure if half etc. of these would then be counted as part of the deceased's estate.

    If everything is in joint names then no probate is needed so no need to go through the process at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    He seems to have had a history of offshore account usage so wouldn’t be surprised if that was still the case at his death.

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/offshore-account-was-used-to-secure-sutherland-s-house-loan-1.244299%3fmode=amp


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    Its very easy for the rich to transfer money to shell companys in luxembourg and other countrys which mean the irish revenue would have no knowledge of someones wealth if they worked in countrys outside ireland.The rich can afford to employ accountants and tax experts to transfer
    money to minimise their tax bill .this is legal under eu law

    https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100115/why-luxembourg-considered-tax-haven.asp
    i,m just saying the probate office may not have acess to financial data some people who worked abroad who may have assets outside ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    Garret Fitzgerald’s estate is quite low for such a prominent figure. That would just be the money he left though, right?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,273 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Garret Fitzgerald’s estate is quite low for such a prominent figure. That would just be the money he left though, right?
    He got into serious financial difficulty, had debts of 200k written off by AIB and also apparently sold the family home. Still, he was probably transferring assets before his death. His pension in his later years would have been about 150k gross per year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Suds only left Eu2M behind him? To use that great Irish phrase, he did in his hole. Riclad's post sums it up in a nutshell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,848 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Seeing as many are obsessed with what other people earn/have, I see in today's paper that Peter Sutherland left 2 million in his will. Estate values are public information from the Probate Office.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/former-political-figure-and-one-time-advisor-to-the-pope-peter-sutherland-leaves-2m-in-will-39545170.html

    The Indo is attempting an angle with the comment that Sutherland was once said to be worth 153 million. There's probably people delighted that by the time he died he was only worth 2 million. AFAIK this only covers Irish assets which could be a small part of a person's actual wealth. Also, assets held in joint names often do not need probate. Also, someone may transfer large amounts to family members before death, or shock horror, give large amounts to charity.

    Some other estate values that have appeared in the media over the years

    Garret Fitzgerald - 86k.
    Brian Lenihan Jnr - 368k
    Derek Davis - 170k
    Rick Parfitt from Status Quo - 240k GBP, UK probate
    George Harrison - 99 million GBP, UK probate
    George Michael - 98 million GBP, UK probate
    Mickey Rooney - 18k USD, US probate

    Taxes are for the little people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    Stovepipe wrote: »
    Suds only left Eu2M behind him? To use that great Irish phrase, he did in his hole. Riclad's post sums it up in a nutshell.

    No, it was definitely in his will he left it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    He probably gave the rest of his fortune to the people smugglers, to get thousands more from Africa into the EU illegally.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,994 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    I cant believe george michael left as much as george harrison


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,324 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Imagine dying and leaving nearly 100 million unspent!

    Oh to be wealthy ...


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Imagine dying and leaving nearly 100 million unspent!

    Oh to be wealthy ...

    You’re right.

    I certainly won’t be doing it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Taxes are for the little people.

    What have taxes got to do with it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,324 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Allinall wrote: »
    You’re right.

    I certainly won’t be doing it.

    I'll never have a million, never mind 100m. It seems such a waste to let it build up over your life so it's taxed after your death.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    How much did Charlie Haughey leave?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    You would wonder how accurate these are and how much is to avoid inheritance tax?

    There is no way sutherland left only 2 million


  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    retalivity wrote: »
    I cant believe george michael left as much as george harrison

    I googled and picked the first one I saw but going with an american inflation adjusting calculator $100m in 2001 would be $137m in 2016


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,273 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    How much did Charlie Haughey leave?
    About 1 million but his wife left about 9 million.

    Liam Cosgrove left 33 million - mainly due to the value of the family home and land in Dublin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,753 ✭✭✭amacca


    Allinall wrote: »
    What have taxes got to do with it?

    The less you can get away with declaring the less tax you will have to pay

    Wealthy on the ball people have tax avoidance specialist accountants working for them exploiting every loophole, scheme there is.... and grey areas in some cases

    Its usually perfectly legal if occasionally morally questionable, if they get good advice it usually costs but you save a lot more in tax you can avoid.....if you get bad ones you get taken advantage of

    Add that to the likelihood that most of those people will have transferred assets to partners, sons, daughters loved ones in as tax efficient means as possible before their deaths and you are not looking at their true wealth in that report

    Even the 100m ones probably had lots more buried somewhere out of sight of the taxman.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,865 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    How much did Charlie Haughey leave?

    I doubt it was much since he gifted most of his land to his four kids while he was alive. They are minted now on our backs as we know now.

    Anyway who cares anymore. Just to stay Covid Free is a bonus these days.

    And remember the wealthy have the best in the business advising them. For a small fee!


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I doubt it was much since he gifted most of his land to his four kids while he was alive. They are minted now on our backs as we know now.

    Anyway who cares anymore. Just to stay Covid Free is a bonus these days.

    And remember the wealthy have the best in the business advising them. For a small fee!


    AH FECK!

    I care ...i care a lot! :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,848 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    How much did Charlie Haughey leave?

    Debt to be written off?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    As far as I am aware details of discretionary trusts are private?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    As far as I am aware details of discretionary trusts are private?
    You can pretty much work it out when you see how someone lives though.


    I mean yer haughey's young wans live pretty flash!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    You can pretty much work it out when you see how someone lives though.


    I mean yer haughey's young wans live pretty flash!

    I dunno, old money tends to live modestly enough?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    I dunno, old money tends to live modestly enough?
    They NOT old money! They trash!:mad:

    I think its a myth old money lives modestly ..have you seen the tories?

    Also there is a diff between ....not having to work and being rich.

    A lot of old money ..is not rich ..its just not having to work ..if they are careful ..they can't afford to live flash tho.


  • Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭yaknowski


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    I dunno, old money tends to live modestly enough?

    Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in 3 generations. Haughey's grandkids won't appreciate the hard work he put in to rob and con his way to the wealth.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    They NOT old money! They trash!:mad:

    I think its a myth old money lives modestly ..have you seen the tories?

    Also there is a diff between ....not having to work and being rich.

    A lot of old money ..is not rich ..its just not having to work ..if they are careful ..they can't afford to live flash tho.

    I don't think it is all that straightforward tbh. But any old money that I know tend to not be so engaged in their wealth. They are more likely to be less flashy with their money, particularly as they mature.

    Money makes money.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    IAMAMORON wrote: »

    Money makes money.

    True. Its why i hate this pull yourself up lark...if you have nothing to begin with tis not likely.


Advertisement