Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Armstrong Cup 2018-19

1246715

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Is there an up to date league table somewhere?

    No, that's what we have been complaining about.

    The table at
    http://www.chessleague.net/chessorg/leinster/table.php?org=1&lid=101
    is just the same tonight as it was when I made my previous post.

    Some of the missing results can be found above but we still don't know about the nine Kilkenny games, and two of the Gonzaga A v B games are due to be played this week. Also presumably the last Balbriggan v Benildus game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Is there an up to date league table somewhere?

    No, that's what we have been complaining about.

    The table at
    http://www.chessleague.net/chessorg/leinster/table.php?org=1&lid=101
    is just the same tonight as it was when I made my previous post.

    Some of the missing results can be found above but we still don't know about the nine Kilkenny games, and two of the Gonzaga A v B games are due to be played this week. Also presumably the last Balbriggan v Benildus game.

    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?
    No, the backend is a complicated offline excel/visual basic package Peter Scott put together a good few years ago.

    Something more responsive with a simple interface would be a nice upgrade, but finding someone with the skills and time and motivation to write and maintain it (at least until the bugs are worked out) is not trivial. I thought about suggesting a wiki-based approach, but it'd lack functionality beyond a live table and I suspect it'd require a couple of fairly active editors to keep it going. The current system handles ratings files input/output and other functions too, and I'd rather have a slowly updating table than heap work on the leagues controllers or duplicate work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    mikhail wrote: »
    Joedryan wrote: »
    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?
    No, the backend is a complicated offline excel/visual basic package Peter Scott put together a good few years ago.

    Something more responsive with a simple interface would be a nice upgrade, but finding someone with the skills and time and motivation to write and maintain it (at least until the bugs are worked out) is not trivial. I thought about suggesting a wiki-based approach, but it'd lack functionality beyond a live table and I suspect it'd require a couple of fairly active editors to keep it going. The current system handles ratings files input/output and other functions too, and I'd rather have a slowly updating table than heap work on the leagues controllers or duplicate work.

    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Joedryan wrote: »
    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really
    You wouldn't happen to be at a loose end, would you? ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    mikhail wrote: »
    Joedryan wrote: »
    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really
    You wouldn't happen to be at a loose end, would you? ;)
    up to my ears at the min but this is not a particularly difficult effort

    LCU feel free to get on to me if you wish


  • Registered Users Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Gonzaga A 5-2 Gonzaga B (Collins vs O'Donnell to play this week)

    Gonzaga B 1-0 Balbriggan (late tactic in my game from a worse position)

    Flimsy table update:
    Trinity 11/16
    Elm Mount 9.5/16
    Gonzaga A 9/15
    Bray 9/15
    Gonzaga B 9/16
    Blanch 8.5/16
    Benildus 7/15
    Balbriggan 6.5/16
    Rathmines 6.5/16
    Dublin 4/8
    Dun Laoghaire 3.5/16
    Kilkenny 2.5/7

    Kilkenny CC was away on their club trip (to Germany) last week while Dublin were at the ECC so presumably that game will happen soon - maybe this Saturday if neither team is going in numbers to Limerick. De Verdier vs Quinn is this Thursday I believe. Healy vs Nolan (delayed for the ECC) should be soon too bringing us up to date.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    I am no expert on computers but it beggars belief that the chess league site cannot be updated by the captains of the teams as soon as the matches finish.
    If the results were sent in to the Controller by carrier pigeon and then posted in envelopes with stamps to each club we would have the results sooner than we get them on the chess league site now (and that is not an exaggeration).


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭mikhail


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I am no expert on computers but it beggars belief that the chess league site cannot be updated by the captains of the teams as soon as the matches finish.
    If the results were sent in to the Controller by carrier pigeon and then posted in envelopes with stamps to each club we would have the results sooner than we get them on the chess league site now (and that is not an exaggeration).
    I'm sure they'll welcome your offer of help.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    mikhail wrote: »
    I'm sure they'll welcome your offer of help.

    I will supply the pigeons.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Past_Pawn_99


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I will supply the pigeons.

    I've got the stamps :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭Danville


    Dublin 0-Kilkenny 3, 5 Games yet to be played.


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Danville wrote: »
    Dublin 0-Kilkenny 3, 5 Games yet to be played.
    How come 5 games have not been played?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Joedryan wrote: »
    How come 5 games have not been played?

    Dublin only have three chess sets. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Joedryan wrote: »
    How come 5 games have not been played?
    Dublin had a team at the European Chess Team Cup.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Where exactly do Trinity play their home games and is there any free parking in the area on a Saturday afternoon?


  • Registered Users Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Round 1: Gonzaga B 2.5-5.5 Gonzaga A


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Trinity home venue is room 1.18b in the Biosciences building (only about 2 years old) on 152-160 Pearse Street. This is a better room than last season.
    I believe there is free parking on Saturdays in the area; another regular poster may clarify. Looking at an old message in our Whatsapp group, somebody said it's behind Goldsmith Hall; take turn by the Ginger Man pub. But don't take my word for it as I go by bus.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    mikhail wrote: »
    Dublin had a team at the European Chess Team Cup.

    But only half their Armstrong regulars played the ECC. I prefer Sodacat's explanation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    In my opinion far too many postponements are being permitted by the League and games played in advance are not ideal either as it's a much better experience playing the whole match on the same (scheduled) day.

    In any other league I ever played in, clubs just fielded whoever they could on the day and if somebody was away, too bad. In the Armstrong in the 1980s, postponements were allowed for people representing Ireland in olympiads and that was it. I am not sure when or why the present lax system developed.

    The rule says:
    7.7 Subject to agreement between the respective team captains, games may be played in advance of the scheduled date. If a team wishes to postpone games in a match, the approval of the divisional controller must be obtained in advance, which approval shall be given only in extenuating circumstances.

    For the second year in a row, we are in danger of the ICU being unable to submit the Armstrong round 1 and 2 results to FIDE in time for inclusion in the November list. This affects anyone from Ireland who plays in the league and will be playing a rated game abroad in November.
    All outstanding games would need to be played this Saturday, at latest,and the results promptly confirmed by both captains to the division controller, so that he can pass on the results to the ICU rating officer not later than Tuesday 30 October.

    Let's take a look at the games still not reported on the LCU site.

    Round 1 (supposed to be played on 29 Sept.), one missing result from the Kilkenny-Bray match: Quinn v De Verdier. Neither of them were at either the olympiad or the ECC.
    So has this game been played or not? What were the "extenuating circumstances" that meant the division controller agreed for it to be postponed?

    Gonzaga A v B was affected by the Millfield junior event and two players being away for the Olympiad, but the match has been completed now and the result is on the LCU site.

    Round 2. St Benildus v Balbriggan. John Healy v Sean Nolan. Healy was at the ECC so fair enough - but if not played yet, it should be played at latest this Saturday. (Balbriggan matches are always on Saturday.) Benildus were at the ECC but still managed to play seven of the games as scheduled.

    Round 2. Gonzaga A v Trinity. This match has finished 4-4 after the board 2 game was played last Saturday. That was delayed because Ioana Miller was at the Olympiad as women's captain, fair enough.

    Round 2. Kilkenny v Dublin. Scheduled for 13 October but five of Dublin's ten declared players were at the ECC; so postponement is reasonable - but to what date? We are told unofficially that three games have been played. So teams must have been declared before that could happen. There is no information online so we don't know which games were played or which ones are outstanding. Will they play on Saturday?

    In all, Kilkenny have 9 results holding up the rating. Does anybody from that club read this board and can help out here? Or one of the Dublin players?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    In my opinion far too many postponements are being permitted by the League and games played in advance are not ideal either as it's a much better experience playing the whole match on the same (scheduled) day.

    In any other league I ever played in, clubs just fielded whoever they could on the day and if somebody was away, too bad. In the Armstrong in the 1980s, postponements were allowed for people representing Ireland in olympiads and that was it. I am not sure when or why the present lax system developed.

    Another annoying trend is this dubious practice of players agreeing draws in the Armstrong without playing a game at all. One Kilkenny player used to draw an amazing amount of games every season and I'm not even sure if he was even in the country for half of them. Another I.M , who shall remain nameless, is also guilty of this carry on which not only distorts the league table but also gives completely unmerited rating points to lower rated players. One player I heard about has gained at least 20 rating points in the past twelve months through these "non games".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Another annoying trend is this dubious practice of players agreeing draws in the Armstrong without playing a game at all. One Kilkenny player used to draw an amazing amount of games every season and I'm not even sure if he was even in the country for half of them. Another I.M , who shall remain nameless, is also guilty of this carry on which not only distorts the league table but also gives completely unmerited rating points to lower rated players. One player I heard about has gained at least 20 rating points in the past twelve months through these "non games".

    That of course is another abuse arising from allowing advance or postponed games. I regret I have allowed my name to be used in this way a couple of times to save my club from fielding a weakened team against Gonzaga (not this year) - but the second time I only regained a few rating points I had conceded the first time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    I never liked the games being postponed or played in advance in the Armstrong, it kind of messes up the whole feeling of the team and the match.
    Interestingly in the Catalan leagues points are awarded for the team winning the match. e.g. 5.5-4.5 win would be just as good as a 9-1 thrashing and all games are played on the day.
    This leads to some interesting scenarios with players running around frantically looking at the other boards to see if they should agree a draw or push for the win.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Could never understand the logic of that tbh. A 9-1 win is clearly better than 5.5-4.5, and game points makes the 9-1 interesting until the end too.

    10 boards is a lot though. Nigs on being captain for that


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    cdeb wrote: »
    Could never understand the logic of that tbh. A 9-1 win is clearly better than 5.5-4.5, and game points makes the 9-1 interesting until the end too.

    10 boards is a lot though. Nigs on being captain for that

    I used to think the same, but it does introduce the element of team strategy to matches, instead of every man/woman for themselves.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    I think you can be strategic with game points as well though. I've put out plenty of unusual line-ups in my time based on trying to maximise points.

    I think also if the last two games don't count for anything because the score is already, say, 4½-1½, then that does become the case of every man/woman to himself that you're trying to avoid. But with game points, those last two games are still of equal importance to the team.

    I can kind of understand match points in Swiss tournaments like the Olympiad/European Club Cup, but in an all-play-all league, game points make far more sense.

    In my opinion, of course.


  • Registered Users Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Strategic with line ups is one thing, but with match points the "strategy" can literally change every 10 mins depending on the ongoing games.
    Players are allowed to consult team captains on draw offers which means the team captain really needs to be a strong player with a good idea of what is going on in every board.
    Better if the players can keep an eye themselves.
    Its just different, I dont think either system is better or worse than the other.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Players are allowed to consult team captains on draw offers which means the team captain really needs to be a strong player with a good idea of what is going on in every board.
    This happens in the Leinster leagues too though? Granted, more on the last day of the leagues than every week. But when it happens, it's with far more detail, because it's one thing judging a match result, but it's another to judge a series of game results.


  • Registered Users Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Let's take a look at the games still not reported on the LCU site.

    Round 1 (supposed to be played on 29 Sept.), one missing result from the Kilkenny-Bray
    Gonzaga A v B was affected by the Millfield junior event and two players being away for the Olympiad, but the match has been completed now and the result is on the LCU site.

    Round 2. St Benildus v Balbriggan. John Healy v Sean Nolan. Healy was at the ECC so fair enough - but if not played yet, it should be played at latest this Saturday. (Balbriggan matches are always on Saturday.) Benildus were at the ECC but still managed to play seven of the games as scheduled.

    Round 2. Gonzaga A v Trinity. This match has finished 4-4 after the board 2 game was played last Saturday. That was delayed because Ioana Miller was at the Olympiad as women's captain, fair enough.

    Round 2. Kilkenny v Dublin. Scheduled for 13 October but five of Dublin's ten declared players were at the ECC; so postponement is reasonable - but to what date? We are told unofficially that three games have been played. So teams must have been declared before that could happen. There is no information online so we don't know which games were played or which ones are outstanding. Will they play on Saturday?

    In all, Kilkenny have 9 results holding up the rating. Does anybody from that club read this board and can help out here? Or one of the Dublin players?

    Round 1 games are now complete. Draw in the Quinn vs MDV game. League table updated.

    Just awaiting the Healy-Nolan and KK-Dub games for round 2.

    Having updated some results - I can confirm what Cdeb said previously: that the results update automatically and instantly once both captains submit matching team sheets. If they don’t match, the league controller emails the captains to confirm.

    The delays are likely due to captains not having time to submit their scoresheets or mismatching scoresheets. (The system to update results, having never done it before this season, is very easy to use and takes 2 minutes).


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Having updated some results - I can confirm what Cdeb said previously: that the results update automatically and instantly once both captains submit matching team sheets. If they don’t match, the league controller emails the captains to confirm.
    I'll correct that - you can update once one captain submits the result. There is a check then once the second half of the scoresheet comes in, but if it's the same, then the system just confirms that fact and updates nothing.


Advertisement