Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

No vision for a rapidly changing Ireland

12345679»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I think young people are more likely to go to university and they move to citys
    and large towns to find a good job or get an education .
    This is not unique to ireland ,many towns in italy and other european countrys are declining ,young people are leaving .
    The decline of pubs might be due to changing lifestyle , young people prefer to go for coffee instead of drink a pint,or they drink
    at home .
    drink driving laws are much more strict than they were in the 90,s .
    i Do,nt know what the government can do to help small towns ,
    they are struggling with the housing crisis and brexit .
    It,ll be years before the national broadband plan is actually completed .


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭markpb


    Fine Mark. Lets put a lot of new people in Dublin and not build accomodation as you pointed out.

    What do you think will happen in the short to medium term?

    Bearing in mind it can take years to design, get planning for and build accomodation. And supply will always be significantly behind demand in Dublin.

    What I think is most likely is that Dublin will become uncompetitive, companies will struggle to attract employees and the jobs will go elsewhere. Some will go to other parts of the country, the majority will go to other parts of Europe. Growth will stagnate but overall, Dublin will be fine.

    Other than your repeated dislike for Dublin and failure to understand how other people could have a differing opinion to you, what solution do you propose? In the short term, the other cities have the same lack of accommodation and infrastructure, the same sprawl and worse public transport. What’s your suggestion?

    I think what you and others forget is that Ireland isn’t a centrally planned economy like Korea or China. The government doesn’t decide where people live and where jobs are. The government provides infrastructure and then the market decides what happens next. It isn’t some conspiracy by a Dublin government to spite rural Ireland. Bad planning and parochial politics are a nationwide issue but I think that Dublin, by virtue of its history, had enough scale to muddle along.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭dotsman


    snotboogie wrote: »
    Horgans Quay and Penrose Dock? Navigation Square?

    Plans to build a few 5 story buildings is simply a waste of precious space. Also, if these areas where to be build up properly (and host tens of thousands of workers), exactly where would these workers live? And how would they get to Horgans Quay/Penrose Dock etc? What underground/trams or rapid buses go from these places out to the various suburbs?

    I even love the Navigation Square website trying to entice companies to locate there with 600,000 people within a 60km commute. Are they ****in serious???


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    dotsman wrote: »
    Plans to build a few 5 story buildings is simply a waste of precious space. Also, if these areas where to be build up properly (and host tens of thousands of workers), exactly where would these workers live? And how would they get to Horgans Quay/Penrose Dock etc? What underground/trams or rapid buses go from these places out to the various suburbs?

    I even love the Navigation Square website trying to entice companies to locate there with 600,000 people within a 60km commute. Are they ****in serious???

    Penrose Dock is 9 stories as is Horgans Quay. Horgan's Quay and Penrose Dock are both right next to Kent Station and are on the planned new Luas line. Nav Sq is right across the river.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    markpb wrote: »
    What I think is most likely is that Dublin will become uncompetitive, companies will struggle to attract employees and the jobs will go elsewhere. Some will go to other parts of the country, the majority will go to other parts of Europe.

    Agreed.
    Growth will stagnate but overall, Dublin will be fine.

    Not really. It will have a long term housing shortage. Obvious result of demand far outweighing supply, particularly in the rental market where most of the new Salesforce/Facebook/etc workers will be living.
    Other than your repeated dislike for Dublin and failure to understand how other people could have a differing opinion to you, what solution do you propose?

    I said Dublin has the potential to be a great city if it was given the chance to catch up with housing demand so that residents are not worker bees working to live.
    In the short term, the other cities have the same lack of accommodation and infrastructure, the same sprawl and worse public transport. What’s your suggestion?

    Any suggestion I make will be countered with the usual "you hate Dublin, no-one wants to live outside Dublin or in the sticks, everyone wants to live in Dublin" response, so is there any point suggesting anything? One alternative I suggested was build up as per other cities struggling with over-population - eg Hong Kong or Singapore. We know that's not going to happen in Dublin though. Planners in Dublin City prefer to give planning permission to relatively low rise office blocks than very high rise apartments. Any new building less than 20 stories high in Dublin city centre is a missed opportunity to plan for the future.
    An alternative to the M50 will also be needed for car traffic.
    I think what you and others forget is that Ireland isn’t a centrally planned economy like Korea or China. The government doesn’t decide where people live and where jobs are. The government provides infrastructure and then the market decides what happens next. It isn’t some conspiracy by a Dublin government to spite rural Ireland. Bad planning and parochial politics are a nationwide issue but I think that Dublin, by virtue of its history, had enough scale to muddle along.

    Muddle along. Well put. Muddle from one crisis to the next. The result of poor planning in Dublin.

    No-one expects North Korea type central planning. We do expect our leaders to have long term vision and foresight though. You throw a lot of people into one area without accommodation, guess what, you end up with a housing crisis.


  • Advertisement
  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Nimbyism at its finest from Dublin councillors.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/councillors-express-height-concerns-over-apartment-block-899225.html

    Credit to Eoghan Murphy for removing the height limits.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,983 ✭✭✭conorhal


    [PHP][/PHP]
    I agree there is no hope for Dublin. Its a complete basketcase and will only get worse. At this stage you'd need a number of 50 story buildings to come close to solving its problems.
    And yet we are still allowing planning for new buildings in the city centre and docklands that are no more than a few stories high. Insanity.


    First you need an extensive underground system in place.


    Imagine Manhattan, now imagine Manhattan transposed onto Dublin's medieval/Georgian street layout and remove the subway system and you will quickly see how fast adding height, without all the ancillary support structures to move a population around that city, will grind it to a halt.


    BUILD THE DAMN METRO NOW GOVERNMENT!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    conorhal wrote: »

    BUILD THE DAMN METRO NOW GOVERNMENT!

    Metro is a massive waste of money better spent elsewhere.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    conorhal wrote: »
    [PHP][/PHP]


    First you need an extensive underground system in place.


    Imagine Manhattan, now imagine Manhattan transposed onto Dublin's medieval/Georgian street layout and remove the subway system and you will quickly see how fast adding height, without all the ancillary support structures to move a population around that city, will grind it to a halt.


    BUILD THE DAMN METRO NOW GOVERNMENT!

    When you build up, you also have to build down in terms of an underground. Fully agree with that. Making Dublin fit for purpose for an increased population will take substantial resources. Talking billions or even tens of billions in investment in infrastructure. It won't be cheap or easy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,983 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Metro is a massive waste of money better spent elsewhere.


    I remember the front page of the papers with a picture of a sole car puttering down the M50 the day it opened, declaring it a 'white elephant'. Yeah, that actually happened.
    That gobsheen economist Colm McCarthy who was full of advice during the bust also has his doubts about the METRO, but he is also the economist that called the DART a waste of money when it opened, so there is that.

    I'm a big fan of the Chinese proverb that states, 'the best time to plant a tree is 20yrs ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today.'


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,517 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    conorhal wrote: »
    I remember the front page of the papers with a picture of a sole car puttering down the M50 the day it opened, declaring it a 'white elephant'. Yeah, that actually happened.
    That gobsheen economist Colm McCarthy who was full of advice during the bust also has his doubts about the METRO, but he is also the economist that called the DART a waste of money when it opened, so there is that.

    I'm a big fan of the Chinese proverb that states, 'the best time to plant a tree is 20yrs ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today.'

    The metro would be beneficial. No doubt. And, given the population it is not to say that it is not needed.

    But, I would rather see that money going in to facilitating developing other locations in the country. Galway, Cork Limerick etc as mentioned elsewhere.

    I feel that would be a better way to consider that national strategy as it is intended (which is what a government should do is it not?). If it goes ahead, Dublin will have the most extensive public bus service, and what would be then 3 separate rail networks to serve the city. While no other metropolitan area has anything other than a rudimentary bus service.

    As it stands, the populations of our cities as a % of our national population are as a follows.

    Ireland = 4,784,000 (100%)
    Cork = 190,384 (3.98%)
    Dublin = 1,308,027 (27.34%)
    Limerick = 90,054 (1.88%)
    Galway = 70,686 (1.48%)
    Waterford = 47,904 (1%)

    This disparate accumulation of the population in one area of the country should never have gotten this bad. And our focus is not best meeting the needs of the country.
    A second runway at Dublin while Shannon and Cork are under utilised for what they could serve is one example of not best using our available resources because the focus is too narrow.

    Consider another Chinese proverb, "A bad beginning makes a bad ending."


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    The metro would be beneficial. No doubt. And, given the population it is not to say that it is not needed.

    But, I would rather see that money going in to facilitating developing other locations in the country. Galway, Cork Limerick etc as mentioned elsewhere.

    I feel that would be a better way to consider that national strategy as it is intended (which is what a government should do is it not?). If it goes ahead, Dublin will have the most extensive public bus service, and what would be then 3 separate rail networks to serve the city. While no other metropolitan area has anything other than a rudimentary bus service.

    As it stands, the populations of our cities as a % of our national population are as a follows.

    Ireland = 4,784,000 (100%)
    Cork = 190,384 (3.98%)
    Dublin = 1,308,027 (27.34%)
    Limerick = 90,054 (1.88%)
    Galway = 70,686 (1.48%)
    Waterford = 47,904 (1%)

    This disparate accumulation of the population in one area of the country should never have gotten this bad. And our focus is not best meeting the needs of the country.
    A second runway at Dublin while Shannon and Cork are under utilised for what they could serve is one example of not best using our available resources because the focus is too narrow.

    Consider another Chinese proverb, "A bad beginning makes a bad ending."

    Cork is about 210k, Limerick is 95k, Galway is 80k and Dublin is about 1.1 million according to the 2016 census: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland_by_population you aren’t majorly wrong but you have slightly overstated Dublin’s population and understated the other cities


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,517 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    snotboogie wrote: »
    Cork is about 210k, Limerick is 95k, Galway is 80k and Dublin is about 1.1 million according to the 2016 census: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland_by_population you aren’t majorly wrong but you have slightly overstated Dublin’s population and understated the other cities

    I went with figures from following location

    Irish cities

    And crudely added Swords, Dun laoghaire and Tallaght to Dublins figure.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I went with figures from following location

    Irish cities

    And crudely added Swords, Dun laoghaire and Tallaght to Dublins figure.

    The wiki figures are taken directly from the CSO website 2016 census


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,517 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    snotboogie wrote: »
    The wiki figures are taken directly from the CSO website 2016 census

    Ok...

    I don't think the figures I used are so far out to invalidate the point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,234 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    The metro would be beneficial. No doubt. And, given the population it is not to say that it is not needed.

    But, I would rather see that money going in to facilitating developing other locations in the country. Galway, Cork Limerick etc as mentioned elsewhere.

    I feel that would be a better way to consider that national strategy as it is intended (which is what a government should do is it not?). If it goes ahead, Dublin will have the most extensive public bus service, and what would be then 3 separate rail networks to serve the city. While no other metropolitan area has anything other than a rudimentary bus service.
    There are already plans for major infrastructural spending in the cities that you mentioned.
    I don't think it's asking too much for a rail link between Dublin Airport and the city centre.
    That and the Green line needs an upgrade or it will have major capacity issues in the future.
    Can you find a scheme somewhere else in the country that would deliver the same cost benefit ratio?
    A second runway at Dublin while Shannon and Cork are under utilised for what they could serve is one example of not best using our available resources because the focus is too narrow.
    And how do you want to address this?
    Airlines are free to set up routes where they want.
    Long gone are the days of the Shannon stopover style of government interference.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    The metro would be beneficial. No doubt. And, given the population it is not to say that it is not needed.

    But, I would rather see that money going in to facilitating developing other locations in the country. Galway, Cork Limerick etc as mentioned elsewhere.

    I feel that would be a better way to consider that national strategy as it is intended (which is what a government should do is it not?). If it goes ahead, Dublin will have the most extensive public bus service, and what would be then 3 separate rail networks to serve the city. While no other metropolitan area has anything other than a rudimentary bus service.
    There are already plans for major infrastructural spending in the cities that you mentioned.
    I don't think it's asking too much for a rail link between Dublin Airport and the city centre.
    That and the Green line needs an upgrade or it will have major capacity issues in the future.
    Can you find a scheme somewhere else in the country that would deliver the same cost benefit ratio?
    A second runway at Dublin while Shannon and Cork are under utilised for what they could serve is one example of not best using our available resources because the focus is too narrow.
    And how do you want to address this?
    Airlines are free to set up routes where they want.
    Long gone are the days of the Shannon stopover style of government interference.

    Get the DAA out of running Cork for a start.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,823 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Young people are always going to be attracted to cities for college life a better social life etc. Generally people move back down the country in their 30s and 40s when they have young families and thats not going to change.

    Unfortunately the following would help parts of rural but in reality will never happen.
    1. Develop and upgrade rail services into our regional cities. At the moment their is a proposal to convert the old midleton to youghal railline to a greenway instead of reopening it as an extention of the rail services for communting. This is the exact line that would serve not only cork city centre where there is loads of office development taking place within a stones throw of kent station and serves Little Island where traffic congestion is a big issue at rush hrs
    Same can be said for the limerick to ballybrophy line. At times you would be quicker walking than using that train. If that rail line was anyway half decent (with a stop near the back Thomand Park that would serve the students and staff of LIT) for comuting towns and villages like Roscrea Nenagh cloughjordan would all benfit from it. Similar examination of services at cork and shannon airports .shannon is way underperforming considering its hinterland

    2 Speaking from experience in my own local home town, a town where the population declined according to the last 2 census, some towns only have themselves partly to blame. Last year I rang a garage in the town I grew up in to book the car in for new tyres and tracking done some saturday. They didnt open the workshop on a saturday. Now this is a small struggling town many people commute 5 days a week to either limerick or kilkenny some even train it to dublin both for work and college. Unless you took a day off you couldnt get the car serviced or tyres done. Massive opportunity missed their even if they opened for a half day. In a lot of communter towns many business like beauticans hairdresser etc wont open late say till 7 on a thurs or friday to faciliate communter who works 9 to 5/5.30. Come to think of it my denstist in a nearby larger town doesnt do saturdays either. Such business should look at their operating hours maybe close earlier or open later on a mon or tues and use these hours to open when their are more potential customers locally.The local physio does it so more should try it esp the likes beauticans in the summer and in the run up to christmas.

    3. Im not calling for another big wave of decentralisation but as society changes the needs of the country evolve and so does the role of the civil services. There is a significant number of civil servants on the redeployment list esp for a move out of dublin. As it stands the dept of education has a significant presence in athlone between thurles and templemore a number of dept of justice function. As these departments evolve more roles could be based outside of dublin. Im sure the same could be said for the dept of social welfare in Sligo and may moreWith the role of technology no need for everything to be happening in dublin. Just look at our multinationals a lot opperate and co work with other locations around the world via the use of video and conferance calling. Surely we could manage it within the country. Plus this would help manage wage demands for the state as these areas have lower cost of living etc

    4. No brainer but broadband. No before people jump down my throat i not just referring to one off housing. Even witin many rural towns and villages here the broadband is v poor. The way we work has changed dramaticlly in the last 10 15 years with the increase of remote working and work from home and its an area that will continue to grow. It does take maturity on the employees part that work from home is an effective way to work. But increasingly many companies in the tech and financial services industries allow employees to do it. This model of work should be of rural ireland advantage. When you work from home you may pop down to your local shop or cafe on your lunch for your break and then your not communting for 1 or 2 hrs each way so you get that time bacl to spend with your family, spend in your local gym sports club or getting involved in a local community group.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,517 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Big news yesterday that the bill to allow for the expansion of Cork city boundaries has passed and will go to the president to be signed.

    Cork-City-Boundary-Extension-2019-map.jpg

    Link
    With this expansion the population of the city will grow by 85,000 to 210,000 in June 2019. However, the city is expected to further grow over the next two decades to circa 350,000.

    The result of this larger City Council administrative area, with responsibility for the city, its immediate suburbs and adjoining settlements, will allow the City Council take a lead role in driving the growth of the city and metropolitan region.

    The boundary extension will provide scope for improvements in the capacity of the city to maintain, improve and expand services. The expanded City Council can better identify and respond to the differing strategic needs and priorities of the urban and wider metropolitan areas, including areas that form part of the natural hinterland of Cork city.

    I think this is a great opportunity put together a long term development in terms of transport, industry, housing and entertainment to ensure that it develops in a sensible manner rather than loads of house first, then try to fit roads and amenities in and that industry locations are identified upfront and allocated for such.


Advertisement