20-12-2019, 14:59 | #31 |
Registered User
![]() |
|
![]() |
(4) thanks from: |
Advertisement
|
|
20-12-2019, 15:01 | #32 |
Registered User
![]() |
M.T has never been a 'climate denier', but he is what I call 'old school', in that he questions everything and does not take everything told to him at face-value without first researching the facts (or lack of them) himself.
|
![]() |
(25) thanks from: |
20-12-2019, 15:07 | #33 |
Registered User
![]() |
She is nothing but a media created figure. Ample media coverage and privileged to speak to the world leaders on a regular basis. Also, why do 'scientists' need a young, uneducated and obviously terrified teenage girl to speak for them? Are their own pigtails not appealing enough for the cameras?
|
![]() |
(15) thanks from: |
20-12-2019, 15:30 | #34 |
Registered User
![]() |
fair enough, I don't claim any great expertise in this area. But AFAIK 99% of scientists working in this and related fields accept the hypothesis; and even MTC now seems to be backtracking on his previous dismissal of it.
|
![]() |
20-12-2019, 16:21 | #35 | |
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Famine has a number of causes, including climate change, overpopulation, poor agricultural practices. After all, the Great Famine in Ireland had nothing to do with climate change. I support higher carbon taxes in Ireland, I support the banning of diesel cars, I support the phasing out of single-use plastic, I support subsidies for solar panels, I support investment in making homes energy-efficient etc. etc. I vote Green because more needs to be done on these issues. To me, M.T's post isn't saying these aren't needed, it is saying that they aren't sufficient, and that other larger engineering solutions will be needed, as the sea-level will rise even if we stop burning fossil fuels tomorrow. Like all zealots, you dismiss any opposing argument without even thinking about it. |
|
![]() |
(11) thanks from: |
Advertisement
|
|
20-12-2019, 16:27 | #36 |
Registered User
![]() |
Detailed analysis of the acceptance in the field of the IPCC anthropogenic climate change position, concludes 80%
|
![]() |
Thanks from: |
20-12-2019, 16:36 | #38 | |
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
How did you come to the belief that current warming is probably 33% anthropogenic in origin? |
|
![]() |
20-12-2019, 16:42 | #39 | |
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
https://static.skepticalscience.com/pics/Contrib25-30.png Last edited by Coles; 20-12-2019 at 16:46. |
|
![]() |
Thanks from: |
Advertisement
|
|
20-12-2019, 16:56 | #40 | |
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
MT's original post seems to be now lost in a haze of the usual attempts at discrediting the author by the usual individuals. I was wondering who would be the first to mention oil-funded, and it was you. Congrats. MT has a vast body of work done on many areas of climatology, including the effect of astronomical forces on energy timelines on Earth. He's not quite novice or a charlatan. His very presence with his forecast every day is due to his interest in researching weather and climate of different regions in his model. I'd suggest you and a few others first hear the man out before going on the personal attack. Last edited by Gaoth Laidir; 20-12-2019 at 17:28. |
|
![]() |
(20) thanks from: |
20-12-2019, 17:24 | #42 |
Registered User
![]() |
Such a shame....
Exclude the fact it's MT and add in any other poster. Their thoughts and ideas are presented well and posted on a public forum to be read and challenged. Instead of digesting and dissecting the post, some people have decided to attack the poster and not the content. The toxicity from some people when alternatives to AGW is more alarming than the climate. |
![]() |
(24) thanks from: |
20-12-2019, 17:31 | #44 | |
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
20-12-2019, 17:48 | #45 | |
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks from: |