Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

2700s return

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    trellheim wrote: »
    so the 2700s are not coming back then ? What else is there in Inchicore that can seat passengers ?

    only the 8200s i think.
    the 2700s will likely be brought back in the end i think. realistically them and new stock are the only options.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Connolly to Sligo is a looooooonnngg way on a shake rattle and roll 2900 and the additional noise as well


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Connolly to Sligo is a looooooonnngg way on a shake rattle and roll 2900 and the additional noise as well

    yup, for long distance they are horid junk. same with their cousins. brilliant at the suburban stuff though.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Why why why don`t IR use the 2900`s on the Hazelhatch / Phoenix Park tunnel route while the intercity routes to Sligo and Wexford get them and they are clearly unsuitable


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Why why why don`t IR use the 2900`s on the Hazelhatch / Phoenix Park tunnel route while the intercity routes to Sligo and Wexford get them and they are clearly unsuitable

    there aren't enough 29s really and IE do not wish to run anything other then ICRS on the suburbans out of heuston. it all ultimately comes down to the decisian to site a depot at portlaoise, and to service most ICRS there. some are serviced at droghida as well.
    another reason often given is supposed higher speeds out of heuston, which in my limited experience of both types of service out of there, really only apply to limited/non-stop services and not to stopping suburbans.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    IE made it official, 2700 no longer required? Anyone confirm?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,131 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    CME has no plans to put the 2700 back in service.

    That said they have not been scrapped


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    tbh if there are no plans to put them back in service then i can't see anything else happening but them being scrapped in the near future. i can't see what else can be done with them. the longer they sit out of service the more costly it will probably be to bring them back.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    CME has no plans to put the 2700 back in service.

    That said they have not been scrapped

    Im told staff (assuming drivers) have been instructed to remove some operational material about 2700 class from there books.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,018 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Im told staff (assuming drivers) have been instructed to remove some operational material about 2700 class from there books.

    Instructions concerning the specific operation of 2700's have been removed from the General Appendix. Nothing to stop them being put back in at a future date if the need ever arose.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Instructions concerning the specific operation of 2700's have been removed from the General Appendix. Nothing to stop them being put back in at a future date if the need ever arose.

    I see, still looks like a done deal.

    The instructions were fine to be left for 6 years, the sudden removal makes no sense.

    The need arises now, in future they will have new trains and probably clear the way for 8100 and 2900 removal from the appendix.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    The 2700s more than likely won't return. Some of the sets are in a very bad way, external mould and nature is taking over inside some cabs. The sets that got painted into the silver ICR livery are not too bad but the sets that are in the old Commuter livery are really starting to deteriorate.

    They are the same as the first block of 10 201s, 8200 DART units and the 5x 141s left in Inchicore, they are still on the books and no one is willing to write them off for whatever reason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    With all the hst withdrawals and the ones being kept around being halfed in length surely irish rail could pick up a few mark 3 sets and regauge them easy enough, surely there’s a few spare 201/071s knocking around?

    Even just 2/3 sets to take the pressure off the 29000 and maybe keep them off intercity work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    With all the hst withdrawals and the ones being kept around being halfed in length surely irish rail could pick up a few mark 3 sets and regauge them easy enough, surely there’s a few spare 201/071s knocking around?

    Even just 2/3 sets to take the pressure off the 29000 and maybe keep them off intercity work.

    unfortunately it's not as simple as regauge and hook up to a loco as hst mk3s receive power at a different current rate then normal mk3s so will only work with the class 43 power cars. this means as i understand it, serious and costly work to convert them to the power rate of loco hauled stock, and then any work to make them compatible with the 201s, which will need to use the head end power to provide power.
    if they were to take some hsts, and i suspect it's very unlikely, then they would be better taking some power cars as well, as that would remove the issue of making them compatible with the 201s, and trying to convert power rates.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    unfortunately it's not as simple as regauge and hook up to a loco as hst mk3s receive power at a different current rate then normal mk3s so will only work with the class 43 power cars. this means as i understand it, serious and costly work to convert them to the power rate of loco hauled stock, and then any work to make them compatible with the 201s, which will need to use the head end power to provide power.
    if they were to take some hsts, and i suspect it's very unlikely, then they would be better taking some power cars as well, as that would remove the issue of making them compatible with the 201s, and trying to convert power rates.

    Ah that’s a shame.... doubt getting the power cars would be as easy as the scots as well as transport for wales seem to be snapping many of them up. Would have been nice to give the 201/071 a bit more work and preserve their working life a bit longer while also allowing irish rail to provide additional service that many may have found to be superior to what they offer now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    I wonder if Porterbrook or one of the other lessors ever looked the 2700s over with a view to installing NIR gear and shopping them as a surge/capital maintenance fleet as major overhauls came due either side of the border (such as seems to be the case for 29Ks now). Might be a bit late now if the conditions are as reported above.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,131 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Firstly this whole bad state claim, 2700 are aluminium bodies so cannot rust

    Secondly Translink cannot lease stock it’s some weird rule

    The power system used on the HST Mk3 is the CIE system. CIE system is 220/380 V 50 Hz, UK is 240/415 V 50 Hz

    In both cases it is the 3 phase supply at the national standard, we use 220V in Ireland and moved to 230V to match EU, the UK uses 240V and didn't really bother to move to 230V. Its fantasy really to think about it really not happening.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Firstly this whole bad state claim, 2700 are aluminium bodies so cannot rust

    Secondly Translink cannot lease stock it’s some weird rule
    while aluminium bodies may not oxidize they can still degrade - VIA Rail abandoned the rebuild of their LRC coaches after an initial batch because the wear and tear was found to be so extensive.

    Interesting re Translink - seems a bit limiting. Wonder what the rationale is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The 2700s more than likely won't return. Some of the sets are in a very bad way, external mould and nature is taking over inside some cabs. The sets that got painted into the silver ICR livery are not too bad but the sets that are in the old Commuter livery are really starting to deteriorate.

    They are the same as the first block of 10 201s, 8200 DART units and the 5x 141s left in Inchicore, they are still on the books and no one is willing to write them off for whatever reason.


    I can't understand this.

    This 2700 class was built in 1997-1998, so about 20 years old?

    I thought trains can have a lifespan up to 40 years?

    With a strong economy, more people travelling, climate change, modal shift, surely it's crazy to let 25 vehicles rot away in Inchicore?

    How much would it cost to fix them up?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Geuze wrote: »
    How much would it cost to fix them up?

    In excess of €30M according to the only tender submission they received. The NTA will not pay for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    GM228 wrote: »
    In excess of €30M according to the only tender submission they received. The NTA will not pay for it.

    Is that because you could end with aunreliable rebuilt train, 30 million (plus) bill and unspecified time frame? As opposed to a slot on the production line and at least some kind of comeback to the supplier..?

    It does seem bonkers that they're effectively scrap metal.. Half way through their lifespan..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    GM228 wrote: »
    In excess of €30M according to the only tender submission they received. The NTA will not pay for it.

    That is in excess of 1m per vehicle.


    Sure new DMUs aren't much more than that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,714 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Geuze wrote: »
    That is in excess of 1m per vehicle.


    Sure new DMUs aren't much more than that?

    presumably that's why the NTA won't pay it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    loyatemu wrote: »
    presumably that's why the NTA won't pay it.

    OK.

    How could they be in such bad shape?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Why did they get retired in the first place? (assume it was unreliability but why?),

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,981 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    capacity cuts as part of cost cutting i believe. they were the least reliable of the suburban rattlers and could only be used as 2 car sets since the incident on the rosslare line where a unit decoupled while on a service.

    shut down alcohol action ireland now! end MUP today!



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,950 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Geuze wrote: »
    I can't understand this.

    This 2700 class was built in 1997-1998, so about 20 years old?

    I thought trains can have a lifespan up to 40 years?

    With a strong economy, more people travelling, climate change, modal shift, surely it's crazy to let 25 vehicles rot away in Inchicore?

    How much would it cost to fix them up?

    DMU's have a slightly shorter life span compared to hauled carriages, and a far shorter life than locomotives. This is mainly due to the additional stresses and systems on board a DMU that can go wrong when in service over locos and carriages.

    When ordered the 2700's were expected to have an in life service of about 15-18 years, assuming they didn't receive a complete rebuild in service. The same life was expected from the 2600 and 2800 class, the former of which are 25 years into traffic now and with no sign of slowing down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Geuze wrote: »
    That is in excess of 1m per vehicle.


    Sure new DMUs aren't much more than that?

    You are correct, the 22K units average out at 1.2m per vehicle


  • Registered Users Posts: 167 ✭✭Jem72


    They cost significantly more than 1.2m per vehicle - around twice that at this point. From memory, the 22Ks were a little over 2 million a unit when they were originally bought. The new ones are costing almost 2.5 million - around 100 million for 41 units.

    Still, over a million per unit represents very bad value for a refurb.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/tender-out-for-up-to-80-pre-owned-trains-to-meet-urgent-demand-1.3813067


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,131 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    When you only got a single quote, what do you expect?


Advertisement