Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Space X, Elon Musk and Rural Broadband

  • 24-05-2019 2:20pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,723 ✭✭✭


    https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48289204

    The SpaceX company has begun the roll-out of its orbiting broadband system.

    A Falcon-9 rocket launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida late on Thursday, packed with 60 satellites capable of giving users on the ground high-speed connections to the internet.

    Entrepreneur Elon Musk's firm aims eventually to loft nearly 12,000 spacecraft for its "Starlink" network.

    SpaceX is one of several commercial outfits with permission to fly an internet mega-constellation.

    I think its time for our government to take the obvious step and bring broadband to rural Ireland via Elon Musk and his proposed Starlink network

    it couldn't be any more expensive than the current plan, and at least they've got started on it

    lads in rural Kerry finally able to search for tractor parts via a satellite system in space. its the only way forward


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    No this plan is stupid for our requirements. It won't have the speeds a fibre network will it's actually a silly comparison for anyone with any semblance of cop on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,408 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    listermint wrote: »
    No this plan is stupid for our requirements. It won't have the speeds a fibre network will it's actually a silly comparison for anyone with any semblance of cop on.


    How do you know how fast it is? It hasn't been launched yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,167 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    listermint wrote: »
    No this plan is stupid for our requirements. It won't have the speeds a fibre network will it's actually a silly comparison for anyone with any semblance of cop on.
    Spacex will be able to provide broadband service at speeds of up to 1 Gbps per end user.

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/02/within-24-months-spacex-could-begin-providing-gigabit-internet-to-the-usa.html?amp


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Yep first two posts prove that people are taken in by the sales pitch.

    I'm out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    listermint wrote: »
    No this plan is stupid for our requirements. It won't have the speeds a fibre network will it's actually a silly comparison for anyone with any semblance of cop on.

    Once the satellites can communicate with each other instead of having to communicate via a ground station, then for someone living in the country side they will have better latency than fibre optic could provide. For city folk they probably will not see a lot of difference.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    nice_guy80 wrote: »
    https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48289204

    The SpaceX company has begun the roll-out of its orbiting broadband system.

    A Falcon-9 rocket launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida late on Thursday, packed with 60 satellites capable of giving users on the ground high-speed connections to the internet.

    Entrepreneur Elon Musk's firm aims eventually to loft nearly 12,000 spacecraft for its "Starlink" network.

    SpaceX is one of several commercial outfits with permission to fly an internet mega-constellation.

    I think its time for our government to take the obvious step and bring broadband to rural Ireland via Elon Musk and his proposed Starlink network

    it couldn't be any more expensive than the current plan, and at least they've got started on it

    lads in rural Kerry finally able to search for tractor parts via a satellite system in space. its the only way forward

    Elon Musk is a Looper.

    People think he's the Dog Ballix but it's other people's money he's investing in all this stuff, not his own.

    He called a man rescuing kids in a cave a Peado
    He also set out to destroy a man named Martin Tripp
    Have a read of this story:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-13/when-elon-musk-tried-to-destroy-tesla-whistleblower-martin-tripp

    This is the Kind of person Elon Musk is!
    An Absolute Psychopath!!!!


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,344 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Take a look in the broadband forum where that notion has been thoroughly debunked by people who actually know what they're taking about.

    And the technical considerations are totally aside from the stupidity of putting that much control of national infrastructure in the hands of a private American company totally outside of the State's control


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,134 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    jester77 wrote: »
    Once the satellites can communicate with each other instead of having to communicate via a ground station, then for someone living in the country side they will have better latency than fibre optic could provide. For city folk they probably will not see a lot of difference.

    Would they not be the same since both signals travel at the speed of light?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,582 ✭✭✭DesperateDan


    marno21 wrote: »
    Take a look in the broadband forum where that notion has been thoroughly debunked by people who actually know what they're taking about.

    And the technical considerations are totally aside from the stupidity of putting that much control of national infrastructure in the hands of a private American company totally outside of the State's control

    AH is not the place for your logic


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    marno21 wrote: »
    Take a look in the broadband forum where that notion has been thoroughly debunked by people who actually know what they're taking about.

    And the technical considerations are totally aside from the stupidity of putting that much control of national infrastructure in the hands of a private American company totally outside of the State's control

    The state won't own the infrastructure in the NBP.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,582 ✭✭✭DesperateDan


    grahambo wrote: »
    Elon Musk is a Looper.

    People think he's the Dog Ballix but it's other people's money he's investing in all this stuff, not his own.

    He called a man rescuing kids in a cave a Peado
    He also set out to destroy a man named Martin Tripp
    Have a read of this story:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-13/when-elon-musk-tried-to-destroy-tesla-whistleblower-martin-tripp

    This is the Kind of person Elon Musk is!
    An Absolute Psychopath!!!!

    Sure he gets drunk, and sometimes says stupid things. He's done a hell of a lot more than almost anyone I can think of right now to make the world a better place though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    jester77 wrote: »
    Once the satellites can communicate with each other instead of having to communicate via a ground station, then for someone living in the country side they will have better latency than fibre optic could provide. For city folk they probably will not see a lot of difference.

    That is not how this technology works and it's certainly ridiculous to saw latency is better with a mesh satellite network. That's pure happy path thinking excluding problematic variables. But sure let's not let facts interrupt Elon on another sales pitch


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    They should have given the money to the ESB and got them to roll it out on their network and using their competency in actually rolling out infrastructure to everywhere in the country.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    Would they not be the same since both signals travel at the speed of light?

    The speed of light is slower in air than in space. But really, the difference is not going to be noticeable to the majority of users. Maybe a hardcore gamer would notice.

    Nice article describing latency in copper vs fibre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    jester77 wrote: »
    The speed of light is slower in air than in space. But really, the difference is not going to be noticeable to the majority of users. Maybe a hardcore gamer would notice.

    Nice article describing latency in copper vs fibre.

    Jesus wept....

    Latency is everything not just 'hardcore' gamers



    Enough of this.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    If it saves us a couple billion its worth investigating at least. I doubt Musk would spend all that time and money on something that doesn't work.

    It seems less loopy than spending 5k to connect houses up boreens in the middle of nowhere to be fair.

    Space X have mastered a number of difficult technologies that even NASA struggled with so there's no doubting their engineering abilities.

    I wish we could say the same about those in charge of broadband rollout in this country.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,408 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    marno21 wrote: »
    Take a look in the broadband forum where that notion has been thoroughly debunked by people who actually know what they're taking about.

    And the technical considerations are totally aside from the stupidity of putting that much control of national infrastructure in the hands of a private American company totally outside of the State's control


    Should have consulted with the boards experts before investing billions.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,344 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Ush1 wrote: »
    The state won't own the infrastructure in the NBP.

    They won't but the actual cables will be on Irish soil. It's different with satellites


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,871 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    marno21 wrote: »

    And the technical considerations are totally aside from the stupidity of putting that much control of national infrastructure in the hands of a private American company totally outside of the State's control

    Yes it's stupid to give an American company control of national infrastructure, instead we are paying the American's €3bn+ to give them the NBP. That's a much more sensible idea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    If it saves us a couple billion its worth investigating at least. I doubt Musk would spend all that time and money on something that doesn't work.

    It seems less loopy than spending 5k to connect houses up boreens in the middle of nowhere to be fair.

    Yep. Handing over our national throughput of information to companies that are outside our legal system.

    Top drawer definitely sounds less loopy alright.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    kneemos wrote: »
    Should have consulted with the boards experts before investing billions.

    Ya perhaps on projects like his solar tiles


    There is a raft of people who think just because Elon says it then it turns to gold

    It's incredible handover of rational thought.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    listermint wrote: »
    Jesus wept....

    Latency is everything not just 'hardcore' gamers



    Enough of this.

    Do you seriously think the average person that does some casual surfing is going to notice a difference between 25ms or 90ms when they are browsing :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 SeanaciousD


    While it seems like a sensible goal at the outset, it quickly falls foul of the same issue that plagues any wireless network: contention.

    1. Even when fully deployed (which could easily take much longer than expected with such a massive project) there will only be a fraction of those satellite over Ireland at any given point to serve these homes. 1.1m homes into ~30 satellites (3k satellites phase one, Ireland is only about 1% of the worlds area, probably much less) is going to give to same major contention problems that already plague rural 4G networks. Have a look at any thread here about Imagine to see how their rural users feel about this.

    2. Either you propose leaving the future of ~1.1m Irish citizens in the hands of an American corporation that could really give a toss about us, or you want the Govt. to invest in infrastructure that would only cover 1% of Ireland at any given time. Either is laughable.

    I think a lot of people fail to see fiber as a serious infrastructure project just like any major road, ESB or old copper wire telephone project was before it. It fits in the same category as these, and is every bit as important.

    What's more is the speed of fiber is not limited by current technology, you can send 1Gbit/s or 1Tb/s down a single piece of fiber, it all depends on what equipment you use. So it will remain as relevant 100 years from now as electric lines or roads. Musk's Starlink is great but once the satellites are in the air that's where they stay, and no amount of software upgrades will make their physical hardware go any faster, which can't be changed.

    I get that the NBP looks like a bad deal to many, but it only came out looking like it does because we found out 3G/4G/5G and indeed any wireless solution just isn't going to cut it and never will. Starlink falls into that category too. And if we scrap the NBP it now it will widen the rural/urban divide even further, not to mention taking probably another bloody decade to come to the same damn conclusion that wireless won't do and only fiber will work. Only this time we'll be behind the rest of Europe instead of ahead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,440 ✭✭✭KildareP


    They should have given the money to the ESB and got them to roll it out on their network and using their competency in actually rolling out infrastructure to everywhere in the country.

    The money was on offer to the ESB.

    ESB turned it down.

    https://siro.ie/nbp-announcement/


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    jester77 wrote: »
    Do you seriously think the average person that does some casual surfing is going to notice a difference between 25ms or 90ms when they are browsing :confused:

    Enough with the notion of browsing.


    This crap has to be stamped out. Most people are doing a hell of alot more than browsing with their connection today and they will be doing a hell of alot more with it sooner

    Future proofing that is what we need not this nonsense about lowest use case scenario's.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,408 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    listermint wrote: »
    Ya perhaps on projects like his solar tiles


    There is a raft of people who think just because Elon says it then it turns to gold

    It's incredible handover of rational thought.


    His cars were a big success,although badly managed and going bankrupt.
    Something about a space rocket also.

    Don't know the guy ,but comes across as insufferable. I'd be far from a fan.
    Willing to give a new idea the chance of success at least before writing it off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    kneemos wrote: »
    His cars were a big success,although badly managed and going bankrupt.
    Something about a space rocket also.

    Don't know the guy ,but comes across as insufferable. I'd be far from a fan.
    Willing to give a new idea the chance of success at least before writing it off.

    Me too. 100%

    But when people draw comparison with other superior technology for a certain application..I draw the line.

    I've alot of time for Musk. He's energetic


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,758 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    It seems less loopy than spending 5k to connect houses up boreens in the middle of nowhere to be fair.

    Farmers need Pornhub.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,408 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    listermint wrote: »
    Me too. 100%

    But when people draw comparison with other superior technology for a certain application..I draw the line.

    I've alot of time for Musk. He's energetic


    Not comparing,but it might be adequate for the most rural areas of the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    kneemos wrote: »
    Not comparing,but it might be adequate for the most rural areas of the country.

    We shouldn't be looking for adequate. We should be looking to future proof and protect our IT focused economy once and for all.


Advertisement