uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
23-10-2019, 23:20   #76
Registered User
Dohnjoe's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,647
Out of morbid curiousity I finally watched the video this poster keeps mentioning. Only 3 or so minutes long

Straight off the bat, it's chopped up and edited, "spooky" music added, selective quotes, all the usual conspiracy claptrap

Secondly, the guy who is talking (despite the editing) makes sense. And adds straightforward disclaimers about everything.

It requires an extremely high level of paranoia and a extremely low level of critical thinking to go from this talk to mega global gargantuan conspiracy theory.

The source of the video is also a full-on loon who appears to think that every weather event is somehow "engineered" in some nefarious conspiracy

Last edited by Dohnjoe; 23-10-2019 at 23:24.
Dohnjoe is offline  
(5) thanks from:
23-10-2019, 23:23   #77
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,795
Originally Posted by The Wild Goose View Post
Did you note that the word chemtrails is enclosed with apostrophes?
Did you read the relevant part of the post where I address that issue?

Do you think it's advisable to dump 10 million tons of aluminium into the atmosphere?
What's the issue here.
Are you saying that there is an intentional effort by folks unknown to us to dump 10 millions tons of alluminium into the atmosphere on a daily basis, of just that day you saw the trails?
kippy is offline  
24-10-2019, 10:18   #78
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,573
I posted a video of a presentation 10 years ago where a Harvard scientist and member of the establishment proposes pumping 10 million tons of aluminium into the atmosphere, using airlines as the delivery method.
10 Million Tons of aluminium!
From the start of that video, the small piece of paper shows that this process was under discussion for dealing with the ozone layer, if this was the case, why would they spread it at such low latitudes as Ireland.

10 millions tons of alluminium into the atmosphere on a daily basis
thats an awe full lot of excessive baggage
smurfjed is offline  
Thanks from:
24-10-2019, 13:38   #79
Cheerful Spring2
Registered User
Cheerful Spring2's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,499
Why is it nobody spotted any plane leaking the chemicals yet?
I have a hard time believing commercial airliner firms are working secretly with a group to poison people?
The conspiracy is the chemicals are giving people cancer and its attempt to reduce the population of the earth?
It more believable to me scientists are thinking up new ways to stop climate change and this may involve spraying chemicals in the air, but i have not seen any proof this plan is in operation yet in any way. 
Cheerful Spring2 is offline  
24-10-2019, 14:24   #80
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,635
When you burn 1L of kerosene, you get more than IL of water, due to the oxygen in the air being combined with the hydrogen in the kerosene. At the altitudes the planes fly at, the temperature is often -20° or below. Inject relatively hot water vapour into cold air and instant cloud.

Vapour trails are sometimes refereed to as con-trails - if you think there's anything going on here that isn't just the obvious, because some nut-jobs have a few screws loose - you have been conned.
cnocbui is offline  
Thanks from:
24-10-2019, 14:43   #81
Registered User
Mellor's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,430
Originally Posted by The Wild Goose View Post

So I suppose they were at different altitudes right? Except to the naked eye they were at roughly the same altitude simply because the planes looked the same size? Not accurate I know but certainly an indication..

So for arguments sake let's just say they were all at a similar altitude, if so then why the huge difference in "comtrails" then?
Mellor is offline  
(3) thanks from:
30-10-2019, 13:05   #82
Registered User
stoneill's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,257
Originally Posted by The Wild Goose View Post
Just to clarify that post in case you didn't catch it...
He's asked about the health implications of dumping 10 megatons of aluminium into the atmosphere..
He doesn't balk at the idea, or even dispute the figures..
10 megatons equals 10 million tons! of aluminium.
How much fuel would it take to lift 10 million tons up to the atmosphere?
stoneill is offline  
30-10-2019, 13:38   #83
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,530
Originally Posted by The Wild Goose View Post
If you read the post you would see that I addressed the flight path issue myself. You did read that part right? That part is done and dusted so you're only wasting time and space pulling up giant flight path maps
You're wasting everyone's time with this nonsense. Ffs engage your brain.

Last edited by happyoutscan; 30-10-2019 at 13:57.
happyoutscan is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Remove Text Formatting

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Share Tweet