Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
24-11-2018, 22:42   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years

Pathologist James C. Jenkins was one of four doctors who did an autopsy on JFK body after it got moved to Bethesda Naval Hospital.

He hasn't spoken of what he saw till now.

Key points he highlighted.

The body was in a crappy Vietnam like a casket when it arrived. He body was therefore removed from the brown casket that was unloaded off airforce one.

He noticed the skull has been operated on before it got there. He noticed incisions in the skull.

He said the head wound he witnessed could not have resulted from a gunshot from behind. It was would only result from a gunshot from the right front.

The autopsy reports are not accurate.

Video just uploaded day or yesterday.

Cheerful Spring is offline  
Advertisement
24-11-2018, 23:48   #2
Terrlock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 673
Fascinating Interview.
Terrlock is offline  
25-11-2018, 00:03   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrlock View Post
Fascinating Interview.
Yep, one of the four doctors who saw the body confirms the conspiracy. He said the fatal shot came from the right front. That is the direction of the overpass and grassy knoll.

He also said there was no back head wound. The autopsy report is fake. He said there is also a wound in the throat area.
Cheerful Spring is offline  
Thanks from:
25-11-2018, 01:36   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
I wonder just speculation on this could they have removed bullet fragments from the skull to cover up the calibre of the bullets used?
Cheerful Spring is offline  
25-11-2018, 11:03   #5
namloc1980
Registered User
 
namloc1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Spring View Post
Yep, one of the four doctors who saw the body confirms the conspiracy. He said the fatal shot came from the right front. That is the direction of the overpass and grassy knoll.

He also said there was no back head wound. The autopsy report is fake. He said there is also a wound in the throat area.
Why is he coming out after 55 years? What's his motivation? How do we know what he's saying is correct or true? 55 years is an awfully long time to be recalling events accurately.
namloc1980 is offline  
Advertisement
25-11-2018, 12:13   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by namloc1980 View Post
Why is he coming out after 55 years? What's his motivation? How do we know what he's saying is correct or true? 55 years is an awfully long time to be recalling events accurately.
A friend of his an author approached him and asked him to detail his account in a new book. He testimony was given at the Warren Commission but nobody has seen that transcript. It under lock and key.

Maybe others involved in the event have said the same thing.

He going to remember doing an autopsy on JFK. He likely shared this with others he knows but not the public.

The magic bullet theory is nonsensical anyhow. How does a bullet zigzag through different bodies and turn in the air?
Cheerful Spring is offline  
(2) thanks from:
25-11-2018, 12:27   #7
Terrlock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 673
The mere fact they they conceal documents and evidence from the public causes me to be suspicious of they're motives behind doing that.
Terrlock is offline  
25-11-2018, 12:33   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrlock View Post
The mere fact they they conceal documents and evidence from the public causes me to be suspicious of they're motives behind doing that.
Exactly people seem to have forgotten when the JFK files were going to fully released last year. The CIA and FBI stepped in and told Trump thousands of files cannot be released for national security reasons. Trump agreed and classified thousands of files again till 2025.

Oswald was the only person who did the killing if you believe that. Oswald before he could stand trial was murdered in public by a mobster.
Cheerful Spring is offline  
Thanks from:
25-11-2018, 17:09   #9
The Nal
Registered User
 
The Nal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by namloc1980 View Post
Why is he coming out after 55 years? What's his motivation? How do we know what he's saying is correct or true? 55 years is an awfully long time to be recalling events accurately.
His theories would be decent if there wasnt a video of the assassination which clearly debunk his claims.
The Nal is offline  
Advertisement
25-11-2018, 18:38   #10
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Nal View Post
His theories would be decent if there wasnt a video of the assassination which clearly debunk his claims.
He was one of four doctors who did the JFK autopsy a theory nope.

The Zapruder film clearly shows an impact from the right front.


Cheerful Spring is offline  
(5) thanks from:
25-11-2018, 18:44   #11
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
According to Nal and the Warren Commission the bullet impacted the back of the skull and exited out the right side.

The video does not show a bullet hitting the back of the skull.
Cheerful Spring is offline  
(3) thanks from:
25-11-2018, 19:05   #12
Dtp1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,439
Jesus it looked like the side of his face exploded? What was the large mass on his face?
Dtp1979 is offline  
(3) thanks from:
25-11-2018, 20:17   #13
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dtp1979 View Post
Jesus it looked like the side of his face exploded? What was the large mass on his face?
Bone Tissue and blood splatter? Probably hit with a high impact velocity bullet.
Cheerful Spring is offline  
25-11-2018, 20:48   #14
Dtp1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,439
I don’t know much about the history but he was obviously shot twice?
Dtp1979 is offline  
Thanks from:
25-11-2018, 21:06   #15
ligerdub
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Spring
He going to remember doing an autopsy on JFK. He likely shared this with others he knows but not the public.

The magic bullet theory is nonsensical anyhow. How does a bullet zigzag through different bodies and turn in the air?
The magic bullet is no fantasy. The only plausible explanation for Connolly being shot in the back, through the lungs, smash his wrist and then lodge into his leg is that he was shot from behind and from quite high up, and this can be traced back to pretty much Oswalds perch/working area. There's just no way he can get those specific wounds from anywhere else but there, and there's almost no chance he could get hit there without also hitting Kennedy en route. There's no zigzag required, just so long as the bullet doesn't hit bone.

I'm not a great believer in the likelihood of a shot from the front, and a shot from behind is much easier than a shot from the side amongst the crowd of people.

The bullets used are likely to have been frangible bullets, which will create wounds inconsistent with a normal gunshot wound.

Having said all that this isn't a new revelation re: the doctors overseeing the body. Several doctors who worked on JFK have said the same thing over the years, about the wounds they saw, the likely point of entry, and the position of the wounds.
ligerdub is offline  
Thanks from:
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet