Missed the point no. Just pointing out those naysayers of The Game Changers are meat advocates i.e. biased.The movie is based on scientific facts - objective peer reviewed science.
Of course since it's espousing a plant-based diet it's sponsored by a plant-based company. You wouldn't find a movie espousing atheism sponsored by the Catholic Church.
But to put it plainly - one of the main issues is simply that- the movie is a movie - produced by Holywood actors / directors and backed by wealthy commercial plant food investment interests ie a biased film. It is also evident that much of the 'science' is not presented in a balanced way and uses a bunch of Observational studies touting small effects which are known to cause a high risk of error and selection bias.
Interesting though that you think it ok for the vested commercial interests in the plant food industy to create and push this film - yet call those who used a single quote (which was removed btw) 'naysayers'and 'meat advocates' and dont see the inherent bias! Odd that no?