Is this the end of Democrat front runner Joe Biden?

Pa ElGrande wrote: »

I currently don't see Bidens appeal beyond US voters who will always vote Democrat. Lets see what August turns up after the DNC convention. Where is the swing vote likely to go is the question?

Really? You need to look further. Google "Lincoln Republicans" for starters. Then take a look here: https://rvat.org/

They're voting Biden.

Fivethirtyeight's been looking at polls and their swing state data (as of today, of course) has Biden comfortably 100+ Electoral College votes ahead of Trump. Biden's way ahead in places where Trump squeaked by last time like Michigan

Actor, gambler, political commentator, and certified genius James Woods’ Twitter account is one to watch in this election. He mostly posts political commentary and regularly skewers democrats. Biden should take heed to Woods account because he regularly posts common sense attitudes that most people would say... "yeah, that’s right."

In one of his latest tweets he took Nancy Pelosi to task on something that will be an issue in this election… The taking down of Confederate statues, memorials and recognition’s.

Pelosi, Speaker of the House, ordered the Capitol removal of portraits of former Speakers who’d served in the Confederacy.

In reaction Woods tweeted the following

“How about your buddy, KKK leader Robert Byrd?”

It’s a fair question if democrats have now squarely moved into a political cancel culture to buy votes from the woke. Robert Byrd (D) served in the Senate as Minority Leader from 1981-1987, and Majority leader from 1987-1989, and he was a former member of the Ku Klux Klan.

In 1944, during WW2 Bird wrote the following to Mississippi Senator Theodore Bilbo:

“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

I bet Pelosi will ignore the requests that will be picked up from Woods and will be used in response to her cancel decree.

Upon Byrd’s death Pelosi, who loved the guy, said... “While some simply bore witness to history, Senator Byrd shaped it – and strove to build a brighter future for us all. ... He never hesitated to speak truth to power. He was a voice of reason during times of war and economic hardship. ...' And he always stood on principle, even when others did not.”

"Stood on principle" eh? Funny how it’s always do as I say, not as I do, with democrats.

Woods is one to watch this election. His commentary will surely be picked up and used against Biden and democrats this election season. And watch for liberal social media justice warriors go into overdrive to try and have Twitter ban Woods in the lead-up to the election.

notobtuse wrote: »

Actor, gambler, political commentator, and certified genius James Woods’ Twitter account is one to watch in this election. He mostly posts political commentary and regularly skewers democrats. Biden should take heed to Woods account because he regularly posts common sense attitudes that most people would say... "yeah, that’s right."

In one of his latest tweets he took Nancy Pelosi to task on something that will be an issue in this election… The taking down of Confederate statues, memorials and recognition’s.

Pelosi, Speaker of the House, ordered the Capitol removal of portraits of former Speakers who’d served in the Confederacy.

In reaction Woods tweeted the following



It’s a fair question if democrats have now squarely moved into a political cancel culture to buy votes from the woke. Robert Byrd (D) served in the Senate as Minority Leader from 1981-1987, and Majority leader from 1987-1989, and he was a former member of the Ku Klux Klan.

In 1944, during WW2 Bird wrote the following to Mississippi Senator Theodore Bilbo:



I bet Pelosi will ignore the requests that will be picked up from Woods and will be used in response to her cancel decree.

Upon Byrd’s death Pelosi, who loved the guy, said... “While some simply bore witness to history, Senator Byrd shaped it – and strove to build a brighter future for us all. ... He never hesitated to speak truth to power. He was a voice of reason during times of war and economic hardship. ...' And he always stood on principle, even when others did not.”

"Stood on principle" eh? Funny how it’s always do as I say, not as I do, with democrats.

Woods is one to watch this election. His commentary will surely be picked up and used against Biden and democrats this election season. And watch for liberal social media justice warriors go into overdrive to try and have Twitter ban Woods in the lead-up to the election.

The same Robert Byrd who saw the error of his ways

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd

While he initially voted against civil rights legislation, in 1959 he hired one of the Capitol's first black congressional aides, and he also took steps to integrate the United States Capitol Police for the first time since Reconstruction.[73] Beginning in the 1970s, Byrd explicitly renounced his earlier views in favor of racial segregation.[22][74] Byrd said that he regretted filibustering and voting against the Civil Rights Act of 1964[75] and would change it if he had the opportunity. 

For the 2003–2004 session, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)[85] rated Byrd's voting record as being 100% in line with the NAACP's position on the thirty-three Senate bills they evaluated. Sixteen other senators received that rating. In June 2005, Byrd proposed an additional $10,000,000 in federal funding for the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorialin Washington, D.C., remarking that, "With the passage of time, we have come to learn that his Dream was the American Dream, and few ever expressed it more eloquently."[86] Upon news of his death, the NAACP released a statement praising Byrd, saying that he "became a champion for civil rights and liberties" and "came to consistently support the NAACP civil rights agenda".

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

The same Robert Byrd who saw the error of his ways

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd

While he initially voted against civil rights legislation, in 1959 he hired one of the Capitol's first black congressional aides, and he also took steps to integrate the United States Capitol Police for the first time since Reconstruction.[73] Beginning in the 1970s, Byrd explicitly renounced his earlier views in favor of racial segregation.[22][74] Byrd said that he regretted filibustering and voting against the Civil Rights Act of 1964[75] and would change it if he had the opportunity.

Oh, so is redemption only allowed for Byrd and no one else? I believe each and every one of those Speakers that fought for the Confederacy repented and condemned slavery after the Civil War, as did Robert E Lee. (I believe Jefferson Davis is the only Confederate politician or major figure to not renounce his actions after the war). Shouldn’t they ALL be provided equal treatment? Or is it the case of “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” that democrats seem to live by?

notobtuse wrote: »

I guess that puts him on par with the liberal mainstream media Trump hatred. Biden on the other hand could speak incoherently, and dribble on himself in the process, and the media would still call him a great orator.

nah. woods is just straight out nasty. no wonder he likes trump so much

notobtuse wrote: »

Oh, so is redemption only allowed for Byrd and no one else? I believe each and every one of those Speakers that fought for the Confederacy repented and condemned slavery after the Civil War, as did Robert E Lee. (I believe Jefferson Davis is the only Confederate politician or major figure to not renounce his actions after the war). Shouldn’t they ALL be provided equal treatment? Or is it the case of “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” that democrats seem to live by?

Even though you’d be the first in line to say “wait a god damn minute” if anyone wanted to commission a statute of Byrd

notobtuse wrote: »

Oh, so is redemption only allowed for Byrd and no one else? I believe each and every one of those Speakers that fought for the Confederacy repented and condemned slavery after the Civil War, as did Robert E Lee. (I believe Jefferson Davis is the only Confederate politician or major figure to not renounce his actions after the war). Shouldn’t they ALL be provided equal treatment? Or is it the case of “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” that democrats seem to live by?

Have you ever seen me say anything about the people you have mentioned?

notobtuse wrote: »

Military bases are usually named after great commanders for their military decisions, prowess and achievements. Although they fought for the wrong side one can’t deny some of their military genius applied against an enemy. Find me someone, anyone, human and free from sin.

Lee’s viewpoints before, during, and after the war are still debated today. He once wrote "In this enlightened age, there are few, I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any country.” In addition, Robert Garlick Hill Kean, a Lynchburg native working in the Confederate war department, confessed to his diary on January 24, 1865, that he was "astonished" that Lee "favors emancipation per se," as well as advocating "large enlistments accompanied by the promise of prospective emancipation of the families of the negro soldier." I think you will forever find differences of opinion regarding Lee.

So why shouldn’t Pearl Harbor be renamed for Hirohito?

notobtuse wrote: »

Not that I recall. But I do find it hypocritical if you treat Byrd differently than those Pelosi wants to cancel from history. If one believes Byrd should be forgiven for his change of heart, or seen the error of their ways, shouldn’t all the others be treated likewise for theirs?

Who is giving him a statue in the town square?

notobtuse wrote: »

Not that I recall. But I do find it hypocritical if you treat Byrd differently than those Pelosi wants to cancel from history.

But I'm not, I haven't compared him to anyone so I'm not sure why you keep quoting me whilst heading down this path. You wouldn't discuss Trump nmdrinking water like a 3 year old earlier because you said it was "off topic" so why all of a sudden do you wish to go off topic with this?

If one believes Byrd should be forgiven for his change of heart, or seen the error of their ways, shouldn’t all the others be treated likewise for theirs?

More off topic waffle.

pauldavis123 wrote: »

This is Joe Biden 2 days ago in Philadelphia



There are currently over a million people looking to attend the next Trump rally in Tulsa.

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

And the point you're making is?

one world order wrote: »

Trump is very popular, Biden and the fake mainstream media are not.

Not according to the data.

one world order wrote: »

Trump is very popular, Biden and the fake mainstream media are not.

What an idiotic post, he is obviously being socially aware that there is a pandemic doing the rounds, unlike Trump who will let 100,000 people put themselves at risk just so he can massage his fragile ego.

pauldavis123 wrote: »

Biden is zero energy, going to be replaced, Trump would eviscerate him.

Who is zero energy?

https://twitter.com/mcspocky/status/1272424366655979521?s=21

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

But I'm not, I haven't compared him to anyone so I'm not sure why you keep quoting me whilst heading down this path. You wouldn't discuss Trump nmdrinking water like a 3 year old earlier because you said it was "off topic" so why all of a sudden do you wish to go off topic with this?



More off topic waffle.

I meant 'you' in the general term. Sorry if that was unclear. The actions of Pelosi most definitely relate to Biden and his election chances. She is the Speaker of the House, controlled by democrats. There is no way he can distance himself from her unless he condemns her actions.