Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Transport Aircraft

Options
18911131449

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    The Air Corps will not go to Shannon unless they are point blank ordered to do so. When they had the Dauphin there (and in other airports),it was always operated on the basis that Baldonnel was the home and the aircraft would always revert there for even the slightest maintenance. Bal is the nerve centre so no stores for aircraft would be sent to outstations, no storeman (civvies especially) would go there and the admin system stayed firmly rooted in Baldonnel. Same with the current operation of the 135 as a medevac aircraft. Like all outstation operations, it is run on a minimalist basis that costs the AC budget as little as possible and the ordinary military bureaucracy continues to operate. You must have storemen, drivers, admin people etc etc and the lads are all on "sub" while they are detached from Baldonnel. It costs a lot more than a similar civvy operation to run a single helicopter "off the reservation".



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If its as inflexable as you say maybe the air corps should be disbanded in its current form and a new organisation put in place with good pay and perks that meet private sector once KPIs are met



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ffs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Will apart from the lack of funding. How would you solve the historcal problems that seam to he there. There is no point in having transport aircraft if there are as many issues that stovepipe points out



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    You have to move the AC out of Dublin on a Phased basis.

    Start by moving all fixed wing to the west coast. Lets assume Shannon for now. It gives younger staff an option to live in the midwest, where they can actually afford a mortgage on one income. As the Older staff retire out, committed as they are to a 40 year mortgage for a 3 bed semi in May-newt, more operations and squadrons could relocate to the new infrastructure being built in Shannon. It'll take 15 years maybe.

    Closing Gormo took less. Those who didn't want to move to the southside, and had 15 years or so done, just jumped ship. All the Piston spanner swingers, gone overnight.

    Thankfully the Cessna was easy enough to maintain and no longer vital to operations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I guess my expression of frustration is more to do with the general system of things in Ireland, where the right thing to do for the good of the particular service and for the public who pay for it, tends to be the last thing that ends up being done.

    While I respect the work of the Air Corps and all the DF, the most advantageous location for their operations is where the Government and the Military authorities decide it should be, for the benefit of the State, not where the personnel decide it is because of where they will or will not go.

    In my opinion, given the restricted curtilage that Baldonnell now has and how surrounded it is becoming with the ever expanding City, coupled with the increased demand for Air Corps operations off the south and west coast, the current base is no longer fit for purpose.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,470 ✭✭✭MAULBROOK


    Would Waterford airport not be an option?

    Don't shoot me, just asking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,428 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    In a way , the air corp would move if there was full government / department commitment to a move , but you can't blame individuals for not wanting to move because they have a life ...

    But if the opportunitys for advancement as well as (hopefully) job satisfaction lie outside of Baldonel , and there are perks to move - available housing ect or help with available transport to suit shift patterns .. and it was evident that this was a full and serious move with a funded decent plan then it'd happen pretty quick...

    The main reason I could see for any move , would be access to a 24 hour runway , there really isn't much point in the air corp having tower ,apron staff and fire crews sitting there 24/ 7 ,for the odd time that a plane is needed out of hours .

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,804 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Why would you do that ? The aircraft need to be based where they are of most benefit to the state... not to suit those working on / with them... opening up another aer corps base in Shannon would be no great benefit... Taoiseach or minister needs to go to Brussels ? More fuel and an extra landing of the Learjet just to position SNN - DUB or Baldonnel wouldn’t make much sense, logistically or financially...



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I don't think so. In many ways it has the opposite problems to Baldonnell, too remote, too exposed, too short a runway and a serious issue with crosswinds operations for the type of aircraft the AC operate.

    I tend to promote Shannon for a few reasons. It can accommodate any size of Aircraft in the World. It is co-located with a good variety of community, facilities, services and other employments in the nearby area and Limerick City. The infrastructure on the ground is first class, yet the airfield and the passenger and freight operations are well under-capacity and the whole area would benefit from an Air Corps presence.

    I've been into Changi Airport in Singapore a few times and that has a large airbase on the eastern side of the main airport complex that utilises the main runways while maintaining a secure complex with separate external access. Shannon has the capacity to do exactly that at a number of locations on the airfield.

    The operation of the MATS could be perfectly well accommodated in small quarters at Dublin or Weston as needed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    MATS flights are essentially at the beck and call of the Taoiseach's office and the Dept of Foreign Affairs and basically, the operation can run itself and is about on a par with a civvy business jet operation, ALL of which are 24/7/365, such as Netjets. You could operate MATS from any airport in Ireland,so it is not tied to Baldonnel and,as has been demonstrated many times in the past,it is perfectly possible to provide total security for any VIP in Dublin Airport. I totally agree with Larbre 34 on the Shannon issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    The state does not end at Rathcoole. The majority of our surface and air territory exists west of shannon. The aircraft are needed all over the state, not just where the Government lives 4 days a week.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Its Air Corps not Air or Aer Corp & its Baldonnel, not Baldonnell. For alot of talk about that branch alot cant either spell its Title correctly or give it its actual Base Name which is Casement.


    IMO The Air Corps should be at Shannon, in fact they should be a nearly entirely rotary force dedicated to Army Co-Operation, as it stands they can move a handful of Troops nothing more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I have feeling a PC12 or Casa will be heading to Spain for transport duties this week



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,867 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users Posts: 16,467 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Bringing home a criminal that can't be placed safely on commercial flight apparently.

    Saw a story on it this morning, maybe the independent?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Dohvolle




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,470 ✭✭✭MAULBROOK


    Hang him by the balls out the back. or strap him to the roof of a PC12



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Looks like you are bang on the money there is currently a casa enroute from madrid over the UK



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭scotchy


    RTE news : The politics of buying a long-range military airplane



    💙 💛 💙 💛 💙 💛



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Yeah read that this morning. Its the the same pro and no people against the military. Interestly Sinn Fein seam to be on the fence but that maybe to do with sorcha clarke being from mullingar and it a former military town. ( Read somewhere funny enoght a survey was done by the LDA about developing the old barracks and the majorty of people wanted the 4th artillary returned there rather than housing.)


    Back to the article got a got laugh with thomas pringle that we should just take an Aer Lingus or Ryanair plane. Best of luck with the return policy with MOL



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That was a particularly ignorant comment from Pringle alright, made himself look a complete fool.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,867 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Him and Paul Murphy talking shite. But interesting to see RTÉ even give an article on the issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭scotchy


    I've noticed before that topics like this on Boards.ie can pop up as opinion pieces during slow news days, or ready to go articles for the weekend on Irish news websites.

    I'm convinced there are several journalists getting inspiration here.

    💙 💛 💙 💛 💙 💛



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,867 ✭✭✭sparky42


    That's not a particularly comforting thought tbh...



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,804 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    they are needed all over the state but, every aircraft needs a ground support infrastructure to efficiently and safely support its designated role... maintenance base / crews, flight crews, dispatchers, ground handling, ground support, hangarage to mention a few...because of the demanded role or designated role of most aircraft that means they’d be required to be 24/7 365 days a year available... the support infrastructure even for one aircraft is sizable, they can’t contract to swissport, SR technics etc it’s all in house, Aer Corps... which is why you are unlikely to see bases anywhere else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Nonsense.

    Its a mindset that the Air Corpse have had for years. Time to send a few more officers on long term exchanges with foreign air arms. Finns can operate F18 from the side of a road, with just 7 crew to support one aircraft.

    A ship arrived in Cork yesterday with 3 Dutch air force helis on the deck. And it wasn't pretty off the coast yesterday. The ship has a huge hangar yet the KLu didn't see the need to coccoon the aircraft inside as soon as they stopped flying.

    Few, if any of the major airlines store their aircraft in Hangars when not in use. Aer lingus had a number of their aircraft parked up in Cork for the duration of the lockdown. Covered the Air Intakes, pitot tubes etc, and that was it. The USAF stored most of their active aircraft in glorified tents for the 20 years they were deployed to Bagram, a far more hostile environment than south county dublin.

    We don't need all the infrastructure to move a flight of aircraft from one place to another.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,804 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s far from nonsense.

    who mentioned anything about storing aircraft in hangers ? What are you actually on about here ? Hangars however ARE necessary in order to provide shelter from the elements in order for certain maintenance procedures and cycles to be completed...

    tents and bagram in a discussion that relates the the IAC in its home country, great... and you referred to what I wrote as nonsense.

    they are upgrading or were due to upgrade the hangers at Baldonnel... maybe with your logic you can send them an email, suggest using tents or fresh air instead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Your point was that all the air corps aircraft have to live in Baldonnel because that's where all the support services are located.

    I'm saying that is nonsense.

    The fact that an AW139 currently lives in a tent in Athlone is evidence of this. (Though they are building a more permanent structure).

    Also, most of the big maintenance is not done by the air corps, it is done my the aircraft manufacturer, at their purpose built facilities overseas. How many times have the PC12 been back in Switzerland for checks since delivery?

    Indeed no maintenance of the GASU aircraft is done by the Air Corps, it's all contracted out, short of the scheduled checks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,240 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Doesn't seem to be anything included in this morning's National Development Plan for transport aircraft.


    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/774e2-national-development-plan-2021-2030/



Advertisement