Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

BusConnects Dublin - Big changes to Bus Network

Options
1296297299301302405

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I am still using the old app - and that does require you to look back along the route on the map and click on the buses as you say.

    But that feature DOES work, which is my point and it is a very useful tool as it gives accurate information, which is valuable when, right now, the predictive times algorithms are still not fully working properly.

    Being able to filter by route would be a huge improvement.

    It's also useful in certain cases where the journey time can vary significantly and randomly. For example the 14 can take anything from 3 to 18 minutes to get from the terminus at Dundrum LUAS to the first stop on Ballinteer Road now that it has that ludicrous loop (involving five right turns and five sets of traffic lights) to negotiate (as opposed to a clear run from the terminus up the Main Street). The variations arise from the traffic light sequencing, traffic in general, and the school traffic on Kilmacud Road Upper.

    Using the live map I can now watch and wait before going to a stop, until after the bus has passed Dundrum Village crossroads. The predictive times won't ever help with that as they are based on the schedule.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭Breezer


    I do use the map (on the old app), but it’s a frustrating experience in the city centre, where each of the many bus icons could be any number of buses that aren’t the one I want. Add in trying to figure out which stop to stand at, depending on which bus the icon represents, and city centre traffic while I’m walking around looking at my phone.

    Anyway this isn’t a Bus Connects issue, I guess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,390 ✭✭✭VG31


    Thanks, that's very interesting. I downloaded TFI Live a while back but I've still been using the old app as I thought the new app didn't have the map live location functionality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Yes, the city centre can be a bit of an issue for the GPS too with the higher buildings - it’s more useful in the suburbs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Sometimes I've noticed the buses not appearing to be fair, but it's worked fine for the most part.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 740 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    There are so many variations of this app now I'm completely confused as to which is the "correct" one to use. I have the Real Time Ireland app which I find reasonable enough to use and while it can be a bit dodgy in its prediction on how long until a bus arrives it tends to have all of the buses as well as showing cancelled buses.

    I'm assuming the one shown prevously is the early access TFI Live app. Is this a replacement app for both the RTI and DB apps? It doesn't seem to show the bus location like the RTI app does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,680 ✭✭✭jd


    I was told today that the frequency of the N4 is to be reduced at some periods during the day. Resource issues and low loadings at some times.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,390 ✭✭✭VG31


    It actually does show the bus locations although it's not very intuitive. I originally thought the same as you but p_haugh explained how it works here:

    Although there's no map showing all buses anymore, I still think it's better overall as trying to find your bus could be quite hard on the old app, particularly in the city centre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭Fizzy Duck


    Great if true. Biggest delays inbound in the morning on 16/33/41 are the cars filling up the bus lane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Are the 'boxes' going to be used though? The same thing on blackhall place remains dormant after the guts of a decade.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It seems that the network review is now effectively shelved, at least until the staffing issue is resolved. Given that the new network was designed 4 years ago, and is unlikely to be completed within the next 4 years, it will be effectively outdated by the completion date, if ever. This is fairly standard practice in Ireland though, the luas was completely swamped within a year of opening.

    Given our climate change and modal shift targets are becoming ever more ambitious the proposed bus connects frequencies will be completely inadequate soon enough. Factor in that our economy continues to grow at pace despite global downturns, it seems again we've under designed. The network is flexible at least. The core bus corridors are not and I dare say they're already a bit dated looking on paper with still massive emphasis on providing turning lanes for cars, despite design guidance to the contrary in place 5 years ago. The whole project is also hinged on camera enforcement and, as predicted, there has been no progress to date. All very exhausting to say the least and I think I'm out of ideas aside from just hand over administration of the place to some EU agency that knows what they're doing, this state is incapable of delivering even a basic bus based project. Even the 3km cycle lane project on the quays that has been going on 13 years has now been shelved due to incompetence. I give up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The orbitals that are planned won’t be out of date, and frankly they are the main element of the network review. They should all happen this year at some point.

    Being honest, the rest is re-arranging the existing routes through the city centre into spines.

    I wouldn’t be as negative as your post, but would say what can you do if the staff pool doesn’t exist? There’s no point in launching expanded services without the staff in place. We have the seen the effect to date with services being cancelled off existing routes to deliver the new ones, and that’s not good.

    Both operators are being quite aggressive in their recruitment campaigns at present - let’s see what comes of them before writing everything off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Also, the final network plan was only published in September 2020, just over two years ago - not four as suggested above. That original plan was (rightly) binned.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,463 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Despite the time that has passed, I really don't see anything wrong with the core BusConnect Network Redesign. The core of the plan is:

    1. Rearranging the core routes into the city so that there is less bunching and greater consistency.
    2. Orbital routes to connect between all the different core/spine routes.
    3. 24/7 operation on the above

    Even if your scrapped the plan and developed a new one, it isn't like any of the above would be different, you would still do all of the above. For the most part these routes follow obvious major roads into and around the city. It isn't like we have built a bunch of new roads into the city in the past 2/4 years!

    Sure they are tweaks to the schedule and routes that could be made and from what we have seen so far, they appear to be tweaking the plan as they rollout these new routes and seeing issues. I'm sure that will continue and once the major infrastructure changes are rolled out I'm certain there will be more changes required.

    I've never seen BusConnects as an end point, rather it is buidnig a solid, well integrated, core network, which will continue to be developed on far into the future.

    I think the worst thing you could do is scrap BusConnects at start over again, delaying everything for years more to come. We are great at doing that here, constantly coming up with new plans, not so great with actually delivering on them. We really need to just stop that nonsense, pull the finger out and start getting building, even if it isn't perfect.

    One thing I will say, is it might be worth considering the phasing of the routes. When staff are available I'd focus first on getting all the oribtal routes done, perhaps then more 24/7 routes, before finally returning to the core routes. I think that would get you the biggest improvement in the shortest time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    When I say inadequate I mostly refer to the poor frequency on some routes. There's also the inefficiency of having the H spine terminate without crossing the city centre and the continued obsession with all North South routes using O'Connell St.

    I agree it's a good improvement on what we have but time is ticking and there'll be a lot of improvements needed even by the time it's finished.

    What is inexcusable is the continuous delays to the infrastructure element. The website still claims that construction is to begin this year but half of the cbcs have yet to go to abp



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I don't see the big advantage of Bus Connects network redesign tbh. Why couldn't they just improve the current routes without re numbering them how is the C3/C4 an improvement on the 66/67 bar being 24hr. I don't see how interconnectivity has been or is going to be improved by as that was a simple case of introducing the 90 minute fare.

    The only good ideas have been improving the orbital and local routes. The N4 is definitely a big improvement on the 17a that seems to be the only element of the plan that makes sense as will be the southern orbitals when they are introduced.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41 theskeptic


    Sure, renumbering bus routes can take a bit of getting used to. But I think having a common letter:

    1. Emphasises there is a common element of the route for busses with the same letter.
    2. Routes with a common letter are scheduled so that they don't bunch (all arrive together) on the common parts of the route.

    N4 is a new route and has been a success imo. The 17A was replaced by the N6, albeit the N6 route is a bit shorter than the 17A was.

    Yes, as others have said, infrastructure changes in Ireland always seem to be frustratingly slow but let's hope BC continues to progress including the "road works" element ;)



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,463 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "When I say inadequate I mostly refer to the poor frequency on some routes."

    Sure and frequency of routes can be increased if drivers and buses are available, without making changes to the core BusConnects plan.

    "There's also the inefficiency of having the H spine terminate without crossing the city centre and the continued obsession with all North South routes using O'Connell St."

    As I'm sure you know, the H spine wasn't in the original BusConnects plan and was pretty much just added because people in those areas were complaining about being left out, it is really only a half spine.

    And they switched back to using O'Connell St because so many people complained about routes being taken off OCS.

    "I don't see the big advantage of Bus Connects network redesign tbh. Why couldn't they just improve the current routes without re numbering them how is the C3/C4 an improvement on the 66/67 bar being 24hr."

    The point is that they are overlapping routes for at least part of the route.

    For instance, I can take any A bus to get to my home. A1/2/3/4, all the same for me. I can tell someone who is coming to visit to just get any "A" bus, rather then saying 1/13/16/41. Much easier.

    Of course more practically all the A buses will be using the same bus stops and even more importantly they will all be scheduled together like one super route, to try and avoid bunching between routes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Yeah use a different number if the route is changed significantly enough to justify it they could've literally used any number they wished. Anyway N is confusing for non locals as N in most cities usually denotes night buses. The 17a was replaced by both the N4 and N6. N4 replaced the Blanch to Finglas section and the N6 replaced the the Finglas to Kilbarrack section.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    It really shouldn't take so long to re-arrange a few routes though ...it's why the whole redesign taking so long is so completely baffling when most of the big changes are concerning the orbitals and radial routes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer



    I agree with much of what you're saying about the revised network, but there are certainly some really basic problems and shortcomings with the timetable construction and co-ordination, with the provision of accurate information and with connections in the phases implemented so far.

    Co-ordination of Timetables:

    First of all I would comment on the co-ordination of timetables on the Spines, which was one of the key elements of the plan. This has not been followed through sadly.

    Since the timetables on the H Spine were revised in November 2021, the H1, H2 and H3 are no longer co-ordinated inbound anymore from Raheny inwards. So bunching is perfectly possible and is scheduled.

    On the C-Spine the C1/C2 are not co-ordinated in either direction with the C3/C4 since the timetables were revised in July 2022, so again there can be bunching along that Spine.

    C-Spine Connections:

    The connections of the local services in Leixlip to/from River Forest and Castletown with the C-Spine routes are very poor. These are where direct buses to/from the city were removed outside of the peaks.

    For example, the obvious way to offer connections (in my view) would have been to have the L54 connect out of the C4 at Lucan Village heading towards Leixlip, and into the C4 at Lucan Village heading from River Forest. That would have given a co-ordinated service to/from the city centre and River Forest and a service between Leixlip and the city every 15 minutes (albeit every other bus requiring a connection at Lucan). Instead it's a complete hotch-potch and you can have an L54 and a C3 operating between Leixlip village and Ballyowen Road in tandem which really is not using the capacity properly.

    Similarly the connections at Hazelhatch Railway Station leave an awful lot to be desired. No real effort was made to co-ordinate the bus and rail schedules and it means buses are carrying thin air at times. Also the bus stop at the station is just about as far away from the station entrance as it could be, which is anything but user friendly.

    N4 Timetable Construction:

    On the N4, the buses leave the terminus every 10 minutes, but during the morning peak there are two gaps of over 20 minutes in arrivals at the Point Village caused by differing running times. There are similar if not longer gaps in the other direction. This could be avoided by adding a couple of departures starting from DCU in either direction to split the gaps over the second half of the route. Some buses are then actually scheduled to overtake the bus in front of them in either direction as the running times reduce post-peak. That should just never happen. It's just awful scheduling. Similar issues happen in the evening in both directions.

    Published Timetables:

    The timetables on the H-Spine changed in November 2021 and the C-Spine changed in July 2022, and these included earlier and later departure times from termini and revised running times. None of the stop timetable posters on-street have been updated with the revised timetables, and in the case of the C-Spine, the timetables on the Dublin Bus website and the Transport for Ireland website are the original ones still, which are long out of date.

    G-Spine:

    I won't comment on the G-Spine until the revised timetables come into effect, as we all know the running time issues there, except to say that an additional route 60 peak hour service was added in either direction following local lobbying fairly close before the launch, but none of the timetables on display at bus stops or those on the Dublin Bus and TFI websites show these additional term time buses. So how is anyone to know about them? That's just crazy.

    Conclusion:

    Getting these things right is pretty basic and is really important as otherwise people just lose confidence in the service.

    I do think that in this regard that the NTA have to a degree bitten off more than they can chew. They clearly either don't have staff with the requisite operational knowledge, or don't have sufficient staff to get the information updated rapidly and on a timely basis.

    There is no point in going to all the trouble of posting information to stops if it's not kept up to date.

    Finally, I do think that the NTA need to be more responsive and accept that they may not have got everything right. A case in point is the G-Spine and the reduction in services operating directly via Heuston and the Quays to/from Ballyfermot.

    Responses to queries keep saying that the C-Spine offers a service along that corridor, but those services don't serve Ballyfermot, and nor do they connect with the G-Spine buses without a reasonable walk including crossing a dual carriageway.

    It wouldn't do the NTA any harm to admit where they got the implementation wrong and put some extra route 60 services on until the bus gates on the G-Spine are introduced. Instead they come across as telling people that they, the NTA, know better than the people using the buses. That's not a good approach.

    They should also be communicating with passengers post-each rollout to advise them that they are aware of whatever issues are arising and what they plan on doing about them - it should not have taken two hearings of the Oireachtas Transport Committee to actually find out what was going on. Their comms is shocking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    But it's anything but just "re-arranging a few routes".

    It involves a large expansion of services, which requires extra drivers and buses for every single phase (the extra buses are being built and delivered over a number of years - remember that fleet replacement buses are delivered every year as well, and there simply aren't enough drivers to deliver any more phases right now).

    It also involves drawing up completely new schedules for every route and far more importantly new bus and driver rosters for every service, and that takes significant time as it is a very cumbersome process, as can be seen by how long it's taking to fix the G-Spine running time issues.

    The bus companies don't have armies of schedulers to do this work, and it's very specialised. There are finite resources available to do the work.

    The project also involves new physical bus stops along every route to be in place and publishing detailed information about the changes for customers.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    None of those things need to happen in sync or at once. They could just re-number the routes then ramp up the frequency or delay 24h services.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    But the routes aren’t the same as they are now. It isn’t just a renumbering exercise.

    You really are massively oversimplifying the process.

    Virtually every bus route in the city is changing from what it is now, and that requires brand new timetables, including new stop-by-stop timetables for every route and brand new driver and bus rosters to back them up.

    That’s what takes significant time.

    There is no way of avoiding that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Anyone claiming that BC is just a renumbering exercise clearly hasn't looked at the entire city, but merely at a single route/corridor, probably their local that just so happens to not really change that much.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Until the housing situation in Dublin particularly is brought under control, then I fear that staffing is a lost cause. Cost Rental is the solution but we still hear about cost rental “trials”



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seen that Dublin Bus now also show the "We are hiring" message on in service buses as well as OOS ones.




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,586 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Can't say I am a fan of that to be honest, out of service vehicles yes, but not on in service vehicles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Yeah fine on Out of Service vehicles but not on in service vehicles potentially obscuring crucial passenger information. At least they haven't covered the route number like I've seen some operators do.

    Post edited by mikeybhoy on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Yes, if it's on in service vehicles, it should be like the "wear a mask" message, keep the main destination visible and have the driver hiring message replace the via section for a cycle.

    I don't know if it's possible, but it could even be scrolling text if they want to still display the full message too.



Advertisement