Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Front Wheel Misalignment Issue - Concentrcity

Options
  • 31-07-2020 12:47pm
    #1
    Exodus 1811
    Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭


    Hello all,

    I have a BMW E21 320/6. Recently I have come across an issue with its front wheels coming out of concentricity. Mainly, my driver side wheel is too far forward. A problem that has existed since I got some front end work done to the car by a mechanic, which was then discovered myself during some work I was doing.

    When I received the car, no issue was noted regarding wheel position in the arch. BBS spoiler was fitted which decreases arch clearance in the problem area, so for sure it was not a problem. Front end needed new springs and shocks, rear had been done by previous owner (odd?). I should note that from the offset, no peculiar chassis misalignment is noted and the car appears to be true in terms of alignment.

    First Maintenance interval:
    - top mount bearings
    - front springs and shocks (only new back units was installed when I bought the car),
    - reconditioned rack, Powerflex poly bushes installed.
    - Work was carried out by a local mechanic

    Post maintenance: Car drove fine, no problems with arch strike (I think). I didn't have the car on the road for that long, so it could have been an issue that wasn't solved and I just didn't notice.

    Second maintenance interval:
    NCT was carried out, found some worn track rod ends. I decided to change the wishbones also to the standard ones so I could get a retest quickly and not have any other questions asked of the assembly. Upon disassembly, I noticed the following as noted below (picture 1). An extra washer on the passenger side had been cut (green) and slid behind one of the washers on the front side only. Odd I thought! Wishbones were changed out and standard bushings left in (I was going to change them back to the Powerflex at a later stage)
    Ym7h1Wf.jpg

    Upon lowering the car, the arch striking issue began, passenger wheel was way too far forward, and was striking the arch. Bugger. By calculation, the thickness of the yellow and blue and green section above equals about 12-13mm (if anyone could verify this, it would be great). So a piece of stock was cut and flattened. This came to about 11mm and was inserted as below.
    sPvHxOd.jpg
    Comparison to driverside:
    B0uQtzq.jpg

    Current Standing

    I am now getting struck on both sides of arches (PS + DS). PS is worse than DS, driveable but not liveable. Steering is loose enough, far looser than poly bushed wishbones (expected?).

    Driver Side
    KzNasRn.jpg

    Questions
    - Is this due to the fact I don't have any washers present on the front side of the wishbone? If the wish bone gives slight flexibility, how does sandwiching it between two metal washers allow the movement to occur in driving?
    lLcK49s.jpg
    - The wheels seem to find their own alignment after driving, reversing, turning etc. Is this due to the lack of washers on front end of wishbones also?

    Apologies for the long post, but I figure this might give people a better idea of what's going on.


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    macplaxton
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,957 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    Exodus 1811 wrote: »

    Questions
    - Is this due to the fact I don't have any washers present on the front side of the wishbone?

    There should be washers either side of the bush in the wishbone, otherwise the wishbone can move around (move fore and aft pivoting around the axis of the bottom arm inner bush.

    IMG_0926-X2.jpg

    diag_2p5.png


  • Options
    #3
    macplaxton
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,957 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    How a McPherson strut is located.

    main-qimg-64d07e84f5e3ea6b00e5a5896c61d126.webp

    Note: Anti-roll bar is integral to lower control arm location.


  • Options
    #4
    Exodus 1811
    Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Exodus 1811


    macplaxton wrote: »
    How a McPherson strut is located.

    Note: Anti-roll bar is integral to lower control arm location.

    Thanks for your response macplaxton.

    That explains the new found driver side wheel issue. I reckon once I put the washer in on that side, it'll resolve that issue. I should have copped that.

    Still up for debate is the passenger side. It seems to be a good 10mm off when identically set up to the drivers side. We had the sway bar off, and it didn't seem bent? Is it possible that the clamps have lost their rigidity around the sway bar bushings?


  • Options
    #5
    macplaxton
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,957 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    Disclaimer - I've never knowingly been close up to an E21 front suspension. This is based on my general suspension knowledge.

    521772.jpg

    521773.jpg

    In the third diagram of the first picture, I've put four round blobs to highlight the four location points of the front suspension. All bushes would have some movement in various directions, with worn bushes allowing more movement in various directions.

    The inner control arm to front subframe / crossmember pivot point which principally allows the wheel to rise and fall vertically. Depending on the slop in the bush, this arm would also be able to move backwards and forwards under acceleration, braking and steering.

    The backwards and forwards movement is limited by the contol arm to anti-roll (sway) bar bushes and the anti-roll bar bushes. Washers only on the ends would limit backwards movement, but not forwards movement. Washers either side would limit both. When the wheel rises twist in the bar would be resisted by the other side of the suspension.

    The top mounting of the strut, so in this case you've found places where it can move around.

    For a wheel to sit forward in the arch then something has to be amiss somewhere. As listed, the bottom/control arm could be bent, the subframe to which it attaches (or the body to which the subframe is attached), or the strut itself.

    Perhaps find some place that can measure the suspension alignment and get a starting set of figures to work from and compare them with what the manufacturer recommends in the service manual.


  • Options
    #6
    Exodus 1811
    Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Exodus 1811


    macplaxton wrote: »
    Disclaimer - I've never knowingly been close up to an E21 front suspension. This is based on my general suspension knowledge.

    In the third diagram of the first picture, I've put four round blobs to highlight the four location points of the front suspension. All bushes would have some movement in various directions, with worn bushes allowing more movement in various directions.

    The inner control arm to front subframe / crossmember pivot point which principally allows the wheel to rise and fall vertically. Depending on the slop in the bush, this arm would also be able to move backwards and forwards under acceleration, braking and steering.

    The backwards and forwards movement is limited by the contol arm to anti-roll (sway) bar bushes and the anti-roll bar bushes. Washers only on the ends would limit backwards movement, but not forwards movement. Washers either side would limit both. When the wheel rises twist in the bar would be resisted by the other side of the suspension.

    The top mounting of the strut, so in this case you've found places where it can move around.

    For a wheel to sit forward in the arch then something has to be amiss somewhere. As listed, the bottom/control arm could be bent, the subframe to which it attaches (or the body to which the subframe is attached), or the strut itself.

    Perhaps find some place that can measure the suspension alignment and get a starting set of figures to work from and compare them with what the manufacturer recommends in the service manual.

    Macplaxton, thank you for the comprehensive explanation. That is great.

    I dropped the car into a classic mechanics for their opinion. I went down for a chat and we had a discussion about the next course of action.

    As far as we can tell, the subframe, chassis etc are not bent or distorted in any way. I recognise the that there is no washer on the front end side of the sway bar to the wishbone, but I am also confused by the fact that this will not touch the wish bone, albeit being a diameter that suggests it would. This is slightly confusing to me, is it to limit movement in the bushing?

    We have the following course of action
    - Remove sway bar, check between both sides if it is bent
    - install Powerflex polyurethane bushings and spacers. (1x extra on the passenger side
    - Reassess.

    Do powerflex bushing normally have one small side and one large side? As pictured?

    MOKr952.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    galwaytt
    Registered Users Posts: 12,761 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Can i suggest as a simple check - if not done aleady - is to measure the wheelbase on each side.

    That is, measure from wheel centre to wheel centre, front to back, on each side.

    The forces involved on bushes is such they should be very tight statically, certainly no discernible movement by hand anywhere, and only some with a good lever bar.

    1.5t of car moving at 60mph won't be long compressing & moving parts around.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Options
    #8
    Exodus 1811
    Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Exodus 1811


    I did a rough measurement of this at the beginning, we found about 10mm difference, although hard to accurately measure.

    I am planning on getting a little laser set up to get to the bottom of this.

    The current remedy is polybushes on both sides, thicker washers for clearance, now both sides line up with reference to expose threads on the end of the ARB. which i find strange!


Advertisement