Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Blur or Oasis

  • 05-06-2019 1:34pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭


    I was always Oasis, even if they turned to sh1t after Be Here Now.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭eldamo


    Pulp! to be awkward.

    I was always Oasis at the time, but in hindsight blur are leagues better.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭SuperSean11


    Blur


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,510 ✭✭✭Wheety


    I like both :-)


  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Soulsun


    oasis...the early years were the best


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 828 ✭✭✭tototoe


    1995 called, looking for its thread back


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭CrankyHaus


    Both great bands, but different.

    Oasis hit with an incredibly fertile first 2 albums (and solid B-sides on the singles) before largely drying up.

    Blur kept plugging away at a fairly consistent level of quality for years.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,705 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    Never liked Oasis that much but blur had some good tunes. Each to their own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32 Humphrey Menton


    Blur.

    WHAT!?

    OASIS! I mean Oasis!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Never could see any talent in Blur, more like a novelty act. Most definitely Oasis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭monkeysnapper


    I liked both ....equal amounts at time and people would look at you like you got 2 heads ... "" yeh but which is ur favorite " ...uugghhh same really....

    All these years on I have to say blur won hands down .... I heard Lonesome street a few months ago and other songs on magic whip album and I instantly fell back in love with them ...

    Theres a live version of Lonesome street in studio ....really good .... and I was listening to their live concert from hyde park ....God that was a fab concert and would have loved to have been at that ....2 hours of brilliant music...

    Dont tell to many people but theres also a live version of tender and Noel Gallagher joined them on stage for it .....you have to be careful , I'm sure that clip could break internet if its viewed to many times.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Soulsun


    ended up at a blur gig by mistake back in the day... great gig from what I remember....the rds


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭CPTM


    Oasis had way more superior songs! There should be a poll here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,223 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Funny to realise that those with an opinion on the matter are probably several decades older than I was at the time, wondering what all the fuss about these two new-fangled and, to my ears, decidedly average bands, was about. An ageing thread.

    I’ll go with blur. At least they were a bit original.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    I'd pick Oasis even though Blur had a lot more variety. I think the first two albums by Oasis are better than anything Blur ever put out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭noby


    I cringe every time I see this question, or every time they use the footage in some BBC4 music documentary. The whole premise that you had to choose was, at the time, awful to the average indie kid.
    This was the pinacle of indie finally becoming mainstream, and because it was mainstream suddenly there had to be a battle as to who was the best - whose side you were on. Were you an arty London sort, or were you a working class northern "lad". Honestly - how boring.
    If, two years before that, you had, say, both Suede and Pulp, for example both destined to be the top two on TOTP, as an indie kid it would have been celebrated as a great achievement.
    But no, we had to choose between, frankly, two of the s*ittiest songs either band had released.

    And still the question lives on. Ugh.


    Anyway, the answer is obviously Blur. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 82 ✭✭Dexter2019


    CPTM wrote: »
    Oasis had way more superior songs!

    In what context?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭CPTM


    Dexter2019 wrote: »
    In what context?

    In the sense that blur had less than 10 hit songs that anyone remembers, but oasis had.. dare I say.. more than 20 hit songs that everyone remembers, and remembers all the lyrics to?

    Edit: "Everyone" has a loose definition here..


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭CPTM


    Here's 17 that come to mind straight away without thinking too hard. I challenge anyone to put together a set list of blur songs that would be more entertaining than this.

    Don't look back in anger
    Champagne Supernova
    Wonderwall
    Cast no shadow
    Cigarettes and Alcohol
    All around the world
    She's electric
    Some might say
    Rock and Roll star
    Slide away
    Talk tonight
    The master plan
    Roll with it
    Live forever
    Little by little
    What's the story morning glory
    Hey Now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 82 ✭✭Dexter2019


    That's a fair point, that's why I asked in what context, as i wasn't sure what you meant.

    I would say musically, blurs music is far superior in the sense that its more creative and more complex.
    Oasis tunes were pretty simple, but also very effective, evidently.

    Blur for me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭marketty


    Fr. Damien your tea is ready!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭Relikk


    Blur were a much better band, creatively, than Oasis were. By quite a margin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,707 ✭✭✭NewbridgeIR


    Looking at their whole careers - Blur, much more consistent and better albums.

    But Oasis had better B-Sides. The 1994-1998 era is full of gems.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,991 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    tototoe wrote: »
    1995 called, looking for its thread back

    Oh I wish it was 1995 again
    What a brilliant time for music

    Anyone who was at Glastonbury on the Sunday in 1994 had this as the lineup on the NME stage
    Spiritualized
    Blur
    Radiohead
    Inspiral Carpets
    Pulp
    Chumbawamba
    Credit to the Nation
    Oasis
    Echobelly
    Tiny Monroe
    Rub Ultra
    Burning Glass

    I mean seriously ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    CPTM wrote: »
    Here's 17 that come to mind straight away without thinking too hard. I challenge anyone to put together a set list of blur songs that would be more entertaining than this.

    Don't look back in anger
    Champagne Supernova
    Wonderwall
    Cast no shadow
    Cigarettes and Alcohol
    All around the world
    She's electric
    Some might say
    Rock and Roll star
    Slide away
    Talk tonight
    The master plan
    Roll with it
    Live forever
    Little by little
    What's the story morning glory
    Hey Now

    There are a few songs in there the average punter wouldn’t know, a few that even regular fans wouldn’t know the words to and a couple of decidedly average songs too.

    Like both bands to be honest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,198 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Neither.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,069 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    blur, more original more talented


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,348 ✭✭✭Wrongway1985


    CPTM wrote: »
    Here's 17 that come to mind straight away without thinking too hard. I challenge anyone to put together a set list of blur songs that would be more entertaining than this.

    Don't look back in anger
    Champagne Supernova
    Wonderwall
    Cast no shadow
    Cigarettes and Alcohol
    All around the world
    She's electric
    Some might say
    Rock and Roll star
    Slide away
    Talk tonight
    The master plan
    Roll with it
    Live forever
    Little by little
    What's the story morning glory
    Hey Now
    Very subjective these but go on...

    Stereotypes
    Song 2
    End Of A Century
    Lonesome Street
    Trouble In The Message Centre
    On Your Own
    Coffee & TV
    Entertain Me
    There's No Other Way
    Bettlebum
    Popscene
    It Could Be You
    For Tomorrow
    Tender
    Chemical World
    The Universal
    To The End


    (The real answer is to the OP is Suede anyway)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,923 ✭✭✭vektarman




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭Tammy!


    Looking at their whole careers - Blur, much more consistent and better albums.

    But Oasis had better B-Sides. The 1994-1998 era is full of gems.

    I was listening to a bit of Oasis today and I think it was just their sound. It wasn't complicated but it worked and as a band they were relatable like they were just chancing their arm at it.

    And I absolutely love their b-sides.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    Oasis were on a whole different level live, listening to Columbia live 24 years ago blew me away.

    Nothing wrong with Blur though, Parklife was wonderful but as I said before, Oasis wins it by a mile with the Live performances.


Advertisement