Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Time for a Car Ban on Lower Abbey Street

  • 09-08-2018 7:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭


    Over the last few months the left turn from Marlborough and O Connell street has been causing major traffic congestion and if private cars were removed it would help as they have increased in recent months. Its more less a complete standstill between O Connell and Gardner St junction at peak hours these days.

    I'm sure Dublin Bus and BE would support it. At the very least an even peak ban between 16.00-19.00 should be considered.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭Yer Da sells Avon


    Car park owners local businesses represented by fronts organisations like 'Dublin Town' might have some objections to that perfectly legitimate suggestion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Car park owners local businesses represented by fronts organisations like 'Dublin Town' might have some objections to that perfectly legitimate suggestion.

    There is no shops but is a car park but I'm not sure if its for Irish Life or public one at the end.


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Over the last few months the left turn from Marlborough and O Connell street has been causing major traffic congestion and if private cars were removed it would help as they have increased in recent months. Its more less a complete standstill between O Connell and Gardner St junction at peak hours these days.

    I'm sure Dublin Bus and BE would support it. At the very least an even peak ban between 16.00-19.00 should be considered.

    So where do you propose the traffic should go then, if its removed from Abbey St


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    So where do you propose the traffic should go then, if its removed from Abbey St

    Left from Marlborough St onto Eden Quay and left again onto Beresford Place? Cars off O'Connell St should be virtually non-existent anyway due to existing restrictions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    So where do you propose the traffic should go then, if its removed from Abbey St

    That's not my problem, they shouldn't be coming down O'Connell Street to exit onto the Quays by Busaras. Its a very busy bus route.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    That's not my problem, they shouldn't be coming down O'Connell Street to exit onto the Quays by Busaras. Its a very busy bus route.

    So no solution then!


  • Registered Users Posts: 407 ✭✭n!ghtmancometh


    Solution is to use public transport, and not to expect to be able to drive unhindered into the city centre where road space is at a premium, and should be put to use as efficiently as possible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    So where do you propose the traffic should go then, if its removed from Abbey St

    same place the traffic from middle abbey st went, or the traffic on Grafton st went.
    Away


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,792 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    They could remove traffic from Lower Abbey St up to the Irish Life car park exit. The entrance is now on Beresford Lane.


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    same place the traffic from middle abbey st went, or the traffic on Grafton st went.
    Away

    Hence the posters post


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,528 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    "Not my problem "attitudes is what slows down the process of removing cars. Cork the first attempt on patrick street a case study


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭Arcade_Tryer


    Introduce congestion charges in the city centre.

    Allow people to drive in the city centre, but make them pay for the privilege.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime


    The biggest issue is where the luas red line crosses the green line heading south

    We've been known to be stuck at the red light there for easily over 7 mins (vehicles even idle shut down activating)

    Then when they do go green only one vehicle can get through !

    Private traffic on that stretch isint really an issue from what I see


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    The biggest issue is where the luas red line crosses the green line heading south

    We've been known to be stuck at the red light there for easily over 7 mins (vehicles even idle shut down activating)

    Then when they do go green only one vehicle can get through !

    Private traffic on that stretch isint really an issue from what I see

    I do agree about lights issue, they need to revisit and depending on trams you could get a full line of traffic cleared but the real problem is after Marlborough you are backed up.

    The route is heavily used by BE, DB and could be wrong but those tourist buses are a more recent addition than a few years ago. Reality is a car ban would not have any significant consequences but I suspect it will require congestion to get worse before a ban is floated.
    "Not my problem "attitudes is what slows down the process of removing cars. Cork the first attempt on patrick street a case study

    Comparing Patrick's street is mad, politics is what reversed this and the place was clogged up with cars since the ban was removed and rightfully put back in place all be it slightly altered.
    They could remove traffic from Lower Abbey St up to the Irish Life car park exit. The entrance is now on Beresford Lane.

    Exactly what I would like to see.


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    Introduce congestion charges in the city centre.

    Allow people to drive in the city centre, but make them pay for the privilege.

    Why penalise the motorist.Most people have to take their cars to work as most cannot afford to live in Dublin, plus the public transport in Dublin and surrounding areas is not good enough.
    People already pay high car insurance, tax, nct petrol/diesel, why ask them to pay more?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭cython


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    Why penalise the motorist.Most people have to take their cars to work as most cannot afford to live in Dublin, plus the public transport in Dublin and surrounding areas is not good enough.
    People already pay high car insurance, tax, nct petrol/diesel, why ask them to pay more?

    Because the motorist has elected to use the most space-inefficient and least sustainable means to navigate the city. Short of razing the city centre and building a 6 lane dual carriageway through it, the city can't be made to accommodate more cars while also facilitating better and more efficient public transport, so driving into the city (in particular in single-occupancy vehicles - if there are 4/5 people in a car obviously the efficiency of the vehicle is greater) has to be disincentivised for motorists somehow. What a lot of people miss is that if there were no cars in the CC, buses would work a lot better, and the excuse of PT not being good enough wouldn't hold true to anywhere near the same extent.

    EDIT: I say this as someone who found themselves driving to and from work in the city centre due to running between work and hospitals for a week or so earlier this year, and to be honest such is my hatred for sitting in traffic I was in work by 6am each day, and generally it was after 6:30pm when I left to go to whichever hospital by car. I took public transport between work and the hospitals during the day or at peak times. Main reason for driving to work was that it was well located between all three of home (Dublin 15) and both hospitals (Vincents and James's), and the fact that I was likely to be coming and going at odd hours.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    Why penalise the motorist.Most people have to take their cars to work as most cannot afford to live in Dublin, plus the public transport in Dublin and surrounding areas is not good enough.
    People already pay high car insurance, tax, nct petrol/diesel, why ask them to pay more?

    No they don't. Most people get to work by public transport, walking or cycling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    No they don't. Most people get to work by public transport, walking or cycling.

    Really ? Thats interesting, have you any info about it?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Mr.Frame wrote: »
    Really ? Thats interesting, have you any info about it?

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Canal_Cordon_Report_2017.pdf

    61,694 people out of 211,416 cross into the city in cars.

    Public transport, walking and cycling account for 144,543


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,234 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    worth noting that that only counts people crossing the canal cordons - does not capture commuters whose commute does not cross one of those points.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    worth noting that that only counts people crossing the canal cordons - does not capture commuters whose commute does not cross one of those points.

    True, though I think it is fair to class that as the "city centre".


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭Mr.Frame


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    True, though I think it is fair to class that as the "city centre".


    not to be pedantic but if it was the city centre the report would have said city centre,
    It was quite specific and said "canal cordons"


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,234 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    what you might class as 'the city centre' is obviously a moving target, but the canals is as good a way of defining it as any other.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,083 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    The car will eventually be removed in its entirety from the City Centre outside of specific and highly restricted time periods. That is the trend, and the trend is supported by the data (pedantry of canals vs city centre aside). Car parks will move out to interchange points with Public Transport outside of the city centre where demand resides.

    It's over, but we just have to suffer the death by a thousand cuts until everyone realises that and stops flogging a dead horse. This will ultimately be understood in the end as a ~60 year process starting from when Henry St was closed to cars as a temporary experiment in June 1971. At EVERY SINGLE STEP OF THE WAY there has been objections from Councillors, lobbyists, businesses, etc. But these objections have always been on the wrong side of history and will continue to be so. It's been far too slow, but we're getting there.


Advertisement