Does anyone use a camera for your own protection?

There is a thread for discussing close passes @ Near Misses Volume 2 (So close you can feel it)
I've reported a number of drivers in both Lucan and Leixlip stations for various incidents since getting my cameras around Christmas.
The only one I'v had "closure" to is this one where a pair of nutjobs figured it would be a bit of craic to open the car door at me (as they initially passed and when they passed the second time after the lights): https://streamable.com/nnye4a

I'd still recommend reporting any incidents that you are concerned about although it can take about half an hour whilst the garda writes up the statement (it's so old school!). Your statement will include such bollox such as how the overtake made you scared, blah blah.
You'll probably hear nothing back without chasing the garda so keep a note of what you reported, who you reported it to and when you reported it.
The law is quite clear about dangerous and inconsiderate overtaking. However, apparently footage & statements are reviewed by the super who will decide if it's worthwhile taking it further (you're the alleged victim so you've no say in the matter).

In terms of getting the footage to AGS, some will ask for it on a DVD or USB drive. I've had gardai (who generally wouldn't be technical) asking me to email a movie file which might be 1000 times the maximum size allowed by their email systems.
My succesful outcome was backed up by the linked footage above on Streamable.com. This doesn't seem to alter the quality of the video whereas the likes of YouTube compressed the video which sacrifices the quality of the picture.

TheBoyConor wrote: »

My guess as to why the gardai require a written statement made in person at a station is that it acts as a filter for what is a genuine legitimate grievance as opposed to a hyped up ranting complaint the likes of what they would receive if there were some on-line or app based means of making complaints.

If someone has to take a few hours out of their day to go to a Garda station and sit down to give a statement, it tends to focus the mind as to whether it is a legitimate problem that needs dealing with or it being just a need for them to vent frustration and anger.

That crystal clear video footage isn't sufficient for a conviction is the main reason. Video footage is a support to a case but the case can't be based on it. Our law is such that the case is based on a witness statement (and the video then supports the statement).
However, the statement and video are then filtered for further action on the super (IIRC) who will decide if it's worth pursuing (even if the video shows a clear breach of the law).