Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

The Bomber

Options
  • 06-11-2018 1:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭


    All the marbles on the line Saturday night

    How do we see it going ?


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    All the marbles on the line Saturday night

    How do we see it going ?

    I think if Usyk's chin is solid, he will have too much momentum and volume for Bellew. He will stop Bellew circa rd 9

    I do give Bellew a decent puncher's chance here

    At least Bellew will try his heart out and go for the kill. Can't wait for this fight.

    You know, sometimes it doesn't always take a monster KO shot to take someone out. Bellew can punch, knows how to punch and has enough pop to at least get respect and hurt Usyk. Can he land 1-2 shots that could get a KO? It's very possible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    Jonny Nelson saying Bellew is a better technical fighter than Usyk is the most outrageous thing I've ever heard.

    Bar a lucky punch Bellew hasn't a prayer.

    Late stoppage or Usyk points is all I can see


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,926 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    Morrison J wrote: »
    Jonny Nelson saying Bellew is a better technical fighter than Usyk is the most outrageous thing I've ever heard.

    Where did you see/hear that?
    It's not the parody Johnny nelson twitter account?

    https://twitter.com/CompanyJohnny/status/1059544879540379648


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Johnny mentioned this several weeks back on the night that Usyk and Bellew came face to face in the ring.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,926 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    Morrison J wrote: »

    Haha, maybe that twitter account is actually real ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 423 ✭✭Bluezar


    I think Usyk is an absolute class act that should have too much for Bellew but I am not backing against Bellew anymore :)

    Does anyone know any pubs in Swords that show Boxing? Just moved in there and I can't order Sky Sports Box Office through Eir (very annoying) and don't want to have a stream dropping. Would prefer to pay for it or watch it somewhere with commentary?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 226 ✭✭PLOPS


    Bellew has a punchers chance, I didn't give him a chance in his last 4 fights and he got the Knockout, I know Haye was a shadow of himself but Bellew still won.

    Usyk has great movement, decent power, and is much fresher. Bellew is on the home straight now, he's made a few quid from his Haye PPVs so i'd say he has one foot out the door. Unless Tony lands something big similar to the Makubu fight, he hasnt a hope. He still struggled with Haye and he was on one leg in the first fight and never looked right in the second.

    Wouldn't begrudge Bellew making a few quid either, up till the Haye fight he made very little i'd say. Not enough to retire anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    PLOPS wrote: »
    Bellew has a punchers chance, I didn't give him a chance in his last 4 fights and he got the Knockout, I know Haye was a shadow of himself but Bellew still won.

    Usyk has great movement, decent power, and is much fresher. Bellew is on the home straight now, he's made a few quid from his Haye PPVs so i'd say he has one foot out the door. Unless Haye lands something big similar to the Makubu fight, he hasnt a hope. He still struggled with Haye and he was on one leg in the first fight and never looked right in the second.

    Wouldn't begrudge Bellew making a few quid either, up till the Haye fight he made very little i'd say. Not enough to retire anyway.

    He still hit and hurt Haye to the point where Haye was knocked down and very wobbly. Haye was circa 220 for that fight. Big man with a fairly decent beard.

    Usyk will be hit, that is for sure. How clean and hard and how he takes/reacts it are the questions that could decide this fight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭A Shaved Duck?


    Uysk by Ko/tko at evs is the bet of the century...

    Bellew doesnt stand a chance against him and the last 2 fights have been a farce.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 226 ✭✭PLOPS


    walshb wrote: »
    He still hit and hurt Haye to the point where Haye was knocked down and very wobbly. Haye was circa 220 for that fight. Big man with a fairly decent beard.

    Usyk will be hit, that is for sure. How clean and hard and how he takes/reacts it are the questions that could decide this fight.

    In the second fight with Haye he definitely did a fairly convincing job on him, but it was definitely an injured Haye. Haye was still dangerous though and Bellew finished the job well. Usyk is very slick though, rides the punches well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    PLOPS wrote: »
    In the second fight with Haye he definitely did a fairly convincing job on him, but it was definitely an injured Haye. Haye was still dangerous though and Bellew finished the job well. Usyk is very slick though, rides the punches well.

    Haye may have been injured, but that had nothing to do with his chin getting cracked/hurt......

    Bellew can punch, knows how to punch, is not in any way fearful to let the hands go, and can absolutely finish a man when that man is hurt.....all it takes is split seconds in the fight game

    Big live underdog for me...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    pac_man wrote: »
    Johnny said, "Technically he's actually better than Usyk". I'm no Sherlock Holmes but I know when someone is pissing on my leg and tell me it's raining. The word actually is often a dead giveaway for when people use deception.
    Didn't he say someone stupid like Mcgregor has a chance against Mayweather?
    Said McGregor was a live underdog. Also picked Brook to KO GGG early, Burns to beat Crawford and loads of other shockers over the years. He's just a stooge for Sky to sell their PPV's really. I think it's gone so far that he couldn't genuinely be that consistently clueless.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭megadodge


    Strangely enough (as I'm not particularly fond of Bellew), I don't think Nelson's 'technical' comment is as ridiculous as it sounds.

    I've long claimed that Bellew is a much better boxer than given credit for and up until recent times I thought he wasn't as good a puncher as he himself thought. In fairness, he's hitting much harder nowadays, but his punching technique and countering ability are of a very high quality and his defense is more than adequate. People need to forget about the weight-weakened light heavy Bellew.

    Usyk has the best footwork, movement and balance I've seen in a man his size since Ali. He is very strong physically and superbly conditioned. His high guard and footwork make him a tough target, but he's no defensive wizard. Look at the Breidis fight if you don't believe me. However, outside of an excellent jab, his punching technique is 'actually' quite ordinary. He often cuffs with his punches and considering his balance and strength if he had very good technique he would be punching much harder than he does. His right hook is middling, he doesn't hook to the body and almost never uses uppercuts. These are all 'technical' points that Usyk doesn't impress me with.

    Of course, that doesn't make him a bad fighter or mean that I think Bellew will win (I don't), but he'll beat Bellew with movement and a high workrate not being better technically.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I also don’t think Nelson’s comment about technique to be absurd, but decided, for a change to let some other schmuk (no offense, mega) take the lead.

    There’s a lot to technique than what some people think. Mega has nailed them above..


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    A guy who was losing rounds to the one legged corpse of David Haye is a better technical fighter than Usyk?? Come on.

    Bellew is what I'd call fundamentally sound. Does the basic things really well and is a good all rounder who can punch a bit.

    Movement and footwork are all part of ones technical ability as a boxer. I feel like ye are just thinking about pure punch technique/delivery really. Usyk's ability to fluidly counter punch, fight comfortably on the inside as well as the outside, use footwork, feints and angles etc etc etc is on a different planet to Bellew's. I really can't see an arguement for the opposite.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭Too Tough To Die


    Bellew is a fraud. It will be as one sided a fight as you're ever likely to see. Easiest fight Usyk's had in a long time and a great chance to put on a show before moving up in weight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭Boooourns


    megadodge wrote: »
    Strangely enough (as I'm not particularly fond of Bellew), I don't think Nelson's 'technical' comment is as ridiculous as it sounds.

    I've long claimed that Bellew is a much better boxer than given credit for and up until recent times I thought he wasn't as good a puncher as he himself thought. In fairness, he's hitting much harder nowadays, but his punching technique and countering ability are of a very high quality and his defense is more than adequate. People need to forget about the weight-weakened light heavy Bellew.

    Usyk has the best footwork, movement and balance I've seen in a man his size since Ali. He is very strong physically and superbly conditioned. His high guard and footwork make him a tough target, but he's no defensive wizard. Look at the Breidis fight if you don't believe me. However, outside of an excellent jab, his punching technique is 'actually' quite ordinary. He often cuffs with his punches and considering his balance and strength if he had very good technique he would be punching much harder than he does. His right hook is middling, he doesn't hook to the body and almost never uses uppercuts. These are all 'technical' points that Usyk doesn't impress me with.

    Of course, that doesn't make him a bad fighter or mean that I think Bellew will win (I don't), but he'll beat Bellew with movement and a high workrate not being better technically.

    Very well put, watching him in the Super series he never looked like stopping any of his opponents. He's really nice boxer, good movement (where he actually mimics Loma), solid as a rock with his chin but as far as power goes he doesn't impress me. He could do it on volume of punches but i can't see him badly hurting Bellew out of the blue. He'll win this very wide on the cards but in fairness to Bellew he'll give this a right go but Bellew is not as good as Brieidis who can also bang.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Morrison J wrote: »
    A guy who was losing rounds to the one legged corpse of David Haye is a better technical fighter than Usyk?? Come on.

    Bellew is what I'd call fundamentally sound. Does the basic things really well and is a good all rounder who can punch a bit.

    Movement and footwork are all part of ones technical ability as a boxer. I feel like ye are just thinking about pure punch technique/delivery really. Usyk's ability to fluidly counter punch, fight comfortably on the inside as well as the outside, use footwork, feints and angles etc etc etc is on a different planet to Bellew's. I really can't see an arguement for the opposite.

    Losing rds has nothing to do with it. Technically he is very sound. Very natural and very fluid....looks relaxed and composed when in offensive mode. Throws correct and clean and impacting shots. Good feet and balance when throwing. Also has a wide variety of shots. On defenses he has good upper body movement and movement from the waist. Is naturally able to slip and ride shots and duck and dive....Technically his D is every bit as good if not better than Usyk's.

    Usyk and Bellew are simply different types fighters, so comparing them technically is not all that easy. Nelson's comments are not silly or far off any mark.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,520 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    I really dislike Bellew,
    Some reason he has tried to reinvent himself as a clever bloke but just talks nonsense and contradicts himself nearly every time he speaks,

    He is a perfect example of a Hearn/sky job ,

    He ain't half the boxer he thinks he is ,
    Beating Haye about 8 years past his best and on one leg each time is not big deal,

    Can't remember who it was but in the first round of the second fight one of the panel mentioned Haye had been to a specialist that Wednesday about his ankle , they other two went silent and it was never mentioned again ,

    Word is Haye was 100% going into it and said nothing ,He needed the cash and he couldn't com clean after or blame injury again as it would sour him to the public paying for that crap, Remember he want to be a promoter so has to keep his nose clean ,

    It showed him in the locker pre fight warming up doing ground ladders and my Nan would have done it quicker he stopped when he noticed the camera's ,

    Usyk is class I think he blows Bellew away ,

    If Bellew wins then I have him all wrong


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭Too Tough To Die


    I really dislike Bellew,
    Some reason he has tried to reinvent himself as a clever bloke but just talks nonsense and contradicts himself nearly every time he speaks,

    He is a perfect example of a Hearn/sky job ,

    He ain't half the boxer he thinks he is ,
    Beating Haye about 8 years past his best and on one leg each time is not big deal,

    Can't remember who it was but in the first round of the second fight one of the panel mentioned Haye had been to a specialist that Wednesday about his ankle , they other two went silent and it was never mentioned again ,

    Word is Haye was 100% going into it and said nothing ,He needed the cash and he couldn't com clean after or blame injury again as it would sour him to the public paying for that crap, Remember he want to be a promoter so has to keep his nose clean ,

    It showed him in the locker pre fight warming up doing ground ladders and my Nan would have done it quicker he stopped when he noticed the camera's ,

    Usyk is class I think he blows Bellew away ,

    If Bellew wins then I have him all wrong

    Bellew won't win a round. There's more than one level separating these two.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    walshb wrote: »
    Technically he is very sound. Very natural and very fluid....looks relaxed and composed when in offensive mode. Throws correct and clean and impacting shots. Good feet and balance when throwing. Also has a wide variety of shots. On defenses he has good upper body movement and movement from the waist. Is naturally able to slip and ride shots and duck and dive.

    You're just listing basic boxing fundamentals there. I don't disagree that Bellew is fundamentally a good technical boxer. He's just at a far far more basic level than Usyk.
    walshb wrote: »
    Technically his D is every bit as good if not better than Usyk's.

    No it's not. It's nowhere near.

    You think Gassiev wouldn't be able to lay a glove on Bellew for 12 rounds either?

    You think Makabu would drop Usyk too?

    There's a reason we've never seen Usyk wobbled or dropped against super heavies in the WSB or in 15 pro fights at cruiser. He's a great defensive fighter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Morrison J wrote: »
    You're just listing basic boxing fundamentals there. I don't disagree that Bellew is fundamentally a good technical boxer. He's just at a far far more basic level than Usyk.



    No it's not. It's nowhere near.

    You think Gassiev wouldn't be able to lay a glove on Bellew for 12 rounds either?

    You think Makabu would drop Usyk too?

    There's a reason we've never seen Usyk wobbled or dropped against super heavies in the WSB or in 15 pro fights at cruiser. He's a great defensive fighter.

    If Bellew decided to adopt that high guard tactic I am sure he could....It's not his style. That is D most basic and easy defensive styles there is. High guard and hope that shots don't sneak through to really hurt you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    walshb wrote: »
    If Bellew decided to adopt that high guard tactic I am sure he could....It's not his style. That is D most basic and easy defensive styles there is. High guard and hope that shots don't sneak through to really hurt you.

    Is that how you would describe Usyk defensively? "High guard and hope that shots don't sneak through to really hurt you?" You're making him sound like he's Scott Quigg or something. There must be another Oleksander Usyk out there because this isn't the one I'm watching. The Usyk I've seen couldn't be any further from being described as basic.

    I think Bellew slipping a few of the most telegraphed punches I've ever seen in a boxing ring from a shot one legged Haye has people thinking he's some high level defensive fighter. That's just not the case. Watch him get dropped by Makabu, watch him get wobbled big time against Brudov. He can be hit and hurt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,520 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Don't get why people rate Bellew so highly, he's decent but thats about it
    His best win is Makabu who isn't really that great, what's next beating a crippled Haye ?
    Does anyone really rate Bellew outside of England ?
    He hit the jackpot with Hearn promoting him ,


  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Morrison J wrote: »
    Is that how you would describe Usyk defensively? "High guard and hope that shots don't sneak through to really hurt you?" You're making him sound like he's Scott Quigg or something. There must be another Oleksander Usyk out there because this isn't the one I'm watching. The Usyk I've seen couldn't be any further from being described as basic.

    I think Bellew slipping a few of the most telegraphed punches I've ever seen in a boxing ring from a shot one legged Haye has people thinking he's some high level defensive fighter. That's just not the case. Watch him get dropped by Makabu, watch him get wobbled big time against Brudov. He can be hit and hurt.

    No, he has more to him that just a high guard.

    Both Usyk and Bellew can be hit regularly enough...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    Don't get why people rate Bellew so highly, he's decent but thats about it
    His best win is Makabu who isn't really that great, what's next beating a crippled Haye ?
    Does anyone really rate Bellew outside of England ?
    He hit the jackpot with Hearn promoting him ,

    It's mad how much the narrative around him has changed since he beat an over the hill Haye with one working leg coming off spinal reconstruction surgery. Nobody really rated him as world class before that. Now he's being said to be at least on par technically with one of the best fighters of this generation. You couldn't write it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭Morrison J


    walshb wrote: »
    No, he has more to him that just a high guard.

    Both Usyk and Bellew can be hit regularly enough...

    Usyk can be touched but caught flush on the button? I haven't see it. A lot of what Breidis caught him with lacked any real meat behind it because Usyk came forward all night, put Breidis on the backfoot and didn't allow him to come forward and put any substance behind his punches. Was actually a pretty good defensive performance imo in a far higher level fight than we'll see on Saturday.

    You hinted at the fact that you don't know how good Usyk's chin is on the first page. Surely we'd know that by now if he was that easy to hit?


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,520 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    "It's mad how much the narrative around him has changed since he beat an over the hill Haye with one working leg coming off spinal reconstruction surgery. Nobody really rated him as world class before that. Now he's being said to be at least on par technically with one of the best fighters of this generation. You couldn't write it "

    It's the magic of Hearn , Sure he was a world beater after beating Cleverly , people even calling him world class for beating Flores for f*ck sake,

    He really annoys me with the drivel he talks at press conferences,


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 54,588 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Morrison J wrote: »
    You hinted at the fact that you don't know how good Usyk's chin is on the first page. Surely we'd know that by now if he was that easy to hit?

    Yes, but it's what is actually hitting him and landing so clean and flush....

    Bellew presents a different type of puncher....the type of shot, the impact, the delivery etc.....Bellew impresses me here...


Advertisement