Does a guys looks matter in a relationship?

So pulling three girls means what exactly. Quasimodo would manage that given enough time.

Pawwed Rig wrote: »

Short probably
Non white probably not

Well some people try to pick up girls
And get called assholes
This never happened to Pablo Picasso
He could walk down your street
And girls could not resist his stare and
So Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole
Well the girls would turn the color
Of the avocado when he would drive
Down their street in his El Dorado
He could walk down your street
And girls could not resist his stare
Pablo Picasso never got called an asshole
Not like you
Alright
Well he was only 5'3"
But girls could not resist his stare
Pablo Picasso never got called an asshole
Not in New York
Oh well be not schmuck, be not obnoxious,
Be not bellbottom bummer or asshole
Remember the story of Pablo Picasso
He could walk down your street
And girls could not resist his stare
Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole
Alright this is it
Some people try to pick up girls
And they get called an asshole
This never happened to Pablo Picasso
He could walk down your street
And girls could not resist his stare and so
Pablo Picasso was never called...

Pawwed Rig wrote: »

There has to be an initial attraction. But attraction will get you nowhere longterm without compatibility.

Attractiveness is also subjective (or else I would never have gotten the ride). What I like does not necessarily match your tastes.

Attractiveness is not just looks either. It is your manner, what you say etc.

Yes but the compatibility won't matter without the attraction either. I get what you're saying but the upshot is looks do matter.
Attractiveness is absolutely subjective (and sometimes of the moment) but I do think there are some people who are kind of universally attractive. These people always do well with the opposite sex (and sometimes the same sex) but (to the OP) it is a bad idea to compare yourself to them unless you are one. There's always a section of women who'll find you attractive, the issue is finding them.

As I always say when this question is asked; judge by a person's actions, not their words. How many times have you seen a 5 foot nothing, overweight, balding guy with crooked teeth walking down the street with a stunning blonde?
That's right; zero times.
During my time on this earth, whether it was in college or in the workplace or in the social circles I have moved in, I have never seen a stunningly beautiful woman in a relationship with an unattractive man. They have either been single or hooked up with a guy who had none of the traits I listed above. OK the guy may not have been a ten out of ten, Ryan Gosling lookalike but he certainly wasn't ugly either.
Women love this idea to be out there that they don't care about looks at all and they are more impressed by sense of humour, wit, personality etc.
It gives the a sense of moral superiority over men; "All men are interested in is breast size, having an hourglass figure and face like Scarlett Johansson but we're not like that, oh no"
But where's the evidence of this? There simply isn't any, or at least very little. They are every bit as shallow as men but will never admit it.

lukin wrote: »

How many times have you seen a 5 foot nothing, overweight, balding guy with crooked teeth walking down the street with a stunning blonde?
That's right; zero times.

There’s too much of a gap in looks in this setup and wouldn’t be sustainable. Generally couples match up looks-wise. You might get one part of the couple being better-looking than the other, but the other would probably not be that ‘unattractive’ and they’d have something else to make up for the ‘discrepancy’ - money, humor, status.
I don’t know the name of the Formula 1 guy who was the opposite of a ‘looker’ but had supermodels hanging off him - so this would have been one of the people you describe but he had status and money. But I’m not sure if he ever married any of the supermodels?

And then looks are subjective so one persons ‘stunner’ is another’s ‘meh’.