Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Garmin Vivoactive 3

1235

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Literally half a dozen posts above ^^


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,858 ✭✭✭cletus


    RHJ wrote: »
    It's a great watch, but if you are more into running, then you are better off getting the Forerunner 645 which isn't that much more.

    Sorry, I know this is off topic, but one of the best prices I found for the 645 was from an Irish company.

    https://northxsouth.ie/products/garmin-forerunner-645-music-black-band


    The 645 is €360 in that link. The Vivoactive 3 can be had for around €180 on Amazon. That's not a little more, it's twice the price


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭cfeeneyinterior


    Basil3 wrote: »
    Literally half a dozen posts above ^^
    Sorry, saw the price..... Remembered the thread.... Googled for it... Posted..... Checked back now and see. Sorry


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 925 ✭✭✭RHJ


    Very tempted to go for the music one as it has offline Spotify support so would be great for listening to music without bringing my phone - how is the battery life if you use the music a lot?

    Battery life is quoted at 5 hours when using GPS and playing music. The one thing that can be annoying is the Bluetooth signal from the watch isn't very strong so will need to wear the watch on the same side as the Bluetooth receiver on your headphones ( I believe most have the receiver on the right).


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,437 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    RHJ wrote: »
    Battery life is quoted at 5 hours when using GPS and playing music. The one thing that can be annoying is the Bluetooth signal from the watch isn't very strong so will need to wear the watch on the same side as the Bluetooth receiver on your headphones ( I believe most have the receiver on the right).

    Thanks, that's put me off a bit now - very helpful!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Anyone got a new strap for these? Mine is starting to tear so want to have a replacement


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,651 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Anyone got a new strap for these? Mine is starting to tear so want to have a replacement

    Yeah I've bought a few different straps for these off Amazon. Plenty of choice.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,774 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Anyone having trouble with the VA3 music not counting reps in an strength workout?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,279 ✭✭✭positron


    RHJ wrote: »
    Battery life is quoted at 5 hours when using GPS and playing music. The one thing that can be annoying is the Bluetooth signal from the watch isn't very strong so will need to wear the watch on the same side as the Bluetooth receiver on your headphones ( I believe most have the receiver on the right).

    I love this watch (VA3 without music) but battery is my main issue with it. I used to have a FR230 which gave me two weeks of standby, or 10-12 hours of GPS use (occasional long day on the bike). VA3 needs charging every 4-5 days if I am not being active, more like every second or third day if I am doing some regular training that needs GPS, and long rides are out of question.

    Hoping to upgrade to FR245.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭T-b0n3


    positron wrote: »
    I love this watch (VA3 without music) but battery is my main issue with it. I used to have a FR230 which gave me two weeks of standby, or 10-12 hours of GPS use (occasional long day on the bike). VA3 needs charging every 4-5 days if I am not being active, more like every second or third day if I am doing some regular training that needs GPS, and long rides are out of question.

    Hoping to upgrade to FR245.

    I got the VA3 on this deal. While the battery does need to be charged regularly I find it charges very quickly which makes it much less of an issue.

    I'm very happy with it so far. Only thing I'm missing is a football tracking mode, but running mode does the job.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,821 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    have to say I don't think the battery is bad either
    I use it for golf which could be a 5 hour drain on the battery and once im at about 40%+ it will get me through
    as above poster says it charges very very quick. I have my charger in the car.
    I though I posted a bit of a review of it before. its a very very very good fitess tracker with some added benefits but it is not a replacement for anything.
    so if you want it for running.... buy a running watch
    if you want if for cycling.... buy a cycling watch
    if you want it for golf..... buy a golf watch
    etc.etc

    but if you want something to track numerous activities and are happy with better than basic info on your activities it is a very good option


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭cronos


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    Anyone having trouble with the VA3 music not counting reps in an strength workout?

    Often misses the last rep for me. So if I do 10 it shows 9.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,774 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    cronos wrote: »
    Often misses the last rep for me. So if I do 10 it shows 9.

    I set up my own workouts as follows

    Workout 1

    Jog - 5 minutes

    Heels Raised Squat - 12
    Bench Press - 12
    x3

    Single Leg Curl - 12
    Dumbbell Row - 12
    x3

    Cool down

    The watch never picks up any reps and won't give me an option to edit the reps or weights. I think I must have set it up wrong orginally because if I do one of the premade workouts it does count the reps.

    I set the workouts in the Connect app as follows - Training, Workout, Create Workout, Strength Workout.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,651 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Seve OB wrote: »
    have to say I don't think the battery is bad either
    I use it for golf which could be a 5 hour drain on the battery and once im at about 40%+ it will get me through
    as above poster says it charges very very quick. I have my charger in the car.
    I though I posted a bit of a review of it before. its a very very very good fitess tracker with some added benefits but it is not a replacement for anything.
    so if you want it for running.... buy a running watch
    if you want if for cycling.... buy a cycling watch
    if you want it for golf..... buy a golf watch
    etc.etc

    but if you want something to track numerous activities and are happy with better than basic info on your activities it is a very good option

    What more information could you want for running?

    Loads of information on Garmin Connect.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users Posts: 730 ✭✭✭thejaguar


    VA3 Music down to £198.50 on Amazon at the moment.

    That's as cheap as I've seen it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    thejaguar wrote: »
    VA3 Music down to £198.50 on Amazon at the moment.

    That's as cheap as I've seen it.

    Was £170 last month. Still a good price @ £200.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭ANXIOUS


    Basil3 wrote: »
    Was £170 last month. Still a good price @ £200.

    £149 in Argos last week, sorry I forgot to post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,821 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    What more information could you want for running?

    Loads of information on Garmin Connect.

    i have an old garmin forerunner 410. there is a world of difference. i don't bother with the VA3 now for running.

    all im saying is that if you are looking for a running watch...... get a running watch


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,651 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Seve OB wrote: »
    i have an old garmin forerunner 410. there is a world of difference. i don't bother with the VA3 now for running.

    all im saying is that if you are looking for a running watch...... get a running watch

    Grand, well I use the vivoactive for running but I'd be willing to upgrade to the 410 if there is worthwhile improvements over the VA3.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,683 ✭✭✭zweton


    RHJ wrote: »
    It's a great watch, but if you are more into running, then you are better off getting the Forerunner 645 which isn't that much more.

    Sorry, I know this is off topic, but one of the best prices I found for the 645 was from an Irish company.

    https://northxsouth.ie/products/garmin-forerunner-645-music-black-band

    Does the Forerunner 645 Music pair ok with the airpods gen2 does anyone know?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭Mgit


    Seve OB wrote: »
    i have an old garmin forerunner 410. there is a world of difference. i don't bother with the VA3 now for running.

    all im saying is that if you are looking for a running watch...... get a running watch

    I have a vivoactive music 3 and use for running 3 days a week, and maybe 1 cycle a week. For running it tells me my pace, heart rate, cadence, vo2 max, elevation, distance, calories, my friend has a forerunner and we compared stats in the garmin Connect app and everything was the same.

    The main drawback of the vivo is using a touchscreen, doesn't bother me cause I have the one physical button to stop, start or pause the activity. The vivo won't connect to external devices like chest heart rate sensors etc, when you look at comparison charts on garmin websites this is one of the few differences, so unless you're an elite athlete I doubt the extra cost of a forerunner music is justified.

    For me I wanted to leave my phone at home and have music on the go and VA3 music does that well. The garmin watches or so much better than fitbits so I don't regret my purchase,and like that it looks like a normal watch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,821 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    My vivoactive 3 does connect to external HR chest strap. Check yours again.

    The main drawback I have with the vivoactive 3 for running is the pace. It doesn’t give proper pace. I think it just gives you your current pace. I don’t know what it’s measuring maybe last 10meters or something. So for eg my forerunner gives me my lap pace, as in my lap is set at 1km so I know what my real pace is for that km, so I know if I’m going to fast or if I need to pick it up. You just don’t get that with the vivoactive.

    Also with the forerunner you can set targets, it will let you know if you are behind or ahead. I’m not in anyway an elite athlete, I’m a brutal runner, but these little things do make a difference and as I’ve said, if you want a watch for running, get a running watch, i do think that it would be worth the extra money. if you want a good fitness tracker with added benefits, then the vivoactive 3 fits the bill.

    Totally agree with you about Garmin over Fitbit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭denachoman


    Ordered the VA3 for €178.80 from Halfords yesterday. Good price. Store pick up from 7 days later


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭jay0109


    I used to get up to 6 days out of my V3 between charges. But the past month or so, it needs to be recharged every 2 to 3 days. No change to my usage patterns and no, GPS is not on.
    The change seemed to nearly happen overnight.

    Anyone else notice this?

    (I bought mine last xmas)


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭Mgit


    no, haven't gone for any runs this week or used GPS and I'm on my 3rd or 4th day after charging and have 62% battery left. I'd try a factory reset of the watch, I had to do that a couple of months back as GPS was taking ages to get going and some other weird stuff following a sw update.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,821 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    battery is fine on mine


  • Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭Anjunadeep


    Seve OB wrote: »

    The main drawback I have with the vivoactive 3 for running is the pace. It doesn’t give proper pace. I think it just gives you your current pace. I don’t know what it’s measuring maybe last 10meters or something. So for eg my forerunner gives me my lap pace, as in my lap is set at 1km so I know what my real pace is for that km, so I know if I’m going to fast or if I need to pick it up. You just don’t get that with the vivoactive.

    If you go into settings, activities & apps , run, run settings and data screens.
    There are a few different options for pace.
    - Pace
    - Ave Pace
    - Lap Pace
    - Last Lap Pace

    maybe that helps?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,821 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Anjunadeep wrote: »
    If you go into settings, activities & apps , run, run settings and data screens.
    There are a few different options for pace.
    - Pace
    - Ave Pace
    - Lap Pace
    - Last Lap Pace

    maybe that helps?

    thanks, i'll have a look at that


  • Registered Users Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Rojo


    I'm on the hunt for a vivoactive music 3... Who is giving the best price? :-)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭bromley52


    Rojo wrote: »
    I'm on the hunt for a vivoactive music 3... Who is giving the best price? :-)

    Do you want people to search for you or something?:rolleyes:


Advertisement