Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Peter Casey believes Travellers should not be recognised as an ethnic minority

Options
1…328329330331333

Comments

  • Options
    #9962
    Omackeral
    Registered Users Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    shady acres wrote: »
    link?

    I would but I don't want to give you any more malware.


  • Options
    #9963
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    Omackeral wrote: »
    I would but I don't want to give you any more malware.

    OMEGALUL


  • Options
    #9964
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    Omackeral wrote: »
    I would but I don't want to give you any more malware.

    thanks
    could you paraphrase the pure poison so we can avoid it in the next thread


  • Options
    #9965
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    shady acres wrote: »
    thanks
    could you paraphrase the pure poison so we can avoid it in the next thread

    There’s almost 10,000 posts to read through shure. That’ll keep you busy for a while you can see for yourself.


  • Options
    #9966
    Omackeral
    Registered Users Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    shady acres wrote: »
    thanks
    could you paraphrase the pure poison so we can avoid it in the next thread

    no


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #9967
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    Elaina Gigantic RuleMGS wrote: »
    There’s almost 10,000 posts to read through shure. That’ll keep you busy for a while you can see for yourself.

    thats what i thought


  • Options
    #9968
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    shady acres wrote: »
    thats what i thought

    What? You want someone else to read through the 10k posts to summarise for you?


  • Options
    #9969
    givyjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    shady acres wrote: »
    when the thread reaches 10,000 posts it will self-destruct

    You mean Francie will self destruct.


  • Options
    #9970
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    Elaina Gigantic RuleMGS wrote: »
    What? You want someone else to read through the 10k posts to summarise for you?

    it's only 9979 posts stop exxagerating


  • Options
    #9971
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    shady acres wrote: »
    it's only 9979 posts stop exxagerating

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #9972
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 66,832 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    givyjoe wrote: »
    You mean Francie will self destruct.

    Francie has seen many of these teacup storms before. Francie enjoys them.


  • Options
    #9973
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    Elaina Gigantic RuleMGS wrote: »
    :rolleyes:
    :confused:


  • Options
    #9974
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    givyjoe wrote: »
    You mean Francie will self destruct.

    francie wouldnt have any experience or knowledge about blowing things up and if he did he wouldnt admit it :pac::pac:


  • Options
    #9975
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    francie wouldnt have any experience or knowledge about blowing things up and if he did he wouldnt admit it :pac::pac:

    is Francie really Gerry? :pac:


  • Options
    #9976
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    BUMP


  • Options
    #9977
    Purple Mountain
    Registered Users Posts: 13,004 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    fin12 wrote: »
    Sorry he stands for a lot more than his views on travellers. He says exactly what all the rest of us are thinking. I’m sick of these fake fu*ckers we’ve had for years in government.

    Can you explain then why PC said on LLS that he does not discriminate against travellers? That he does not discriminate against anyone?
    Last night he clearly said that the reason he said the travelling community should not have been classed as an ethnic minority was that it did them no good. He didn't want to see them labelled or marganilsed.
    He said that he would like to see education opened up to everyone equally because education is key.
    There was nothing in his interview last night about him bashing the travellers or 'saying what a lot of us think' unless a lot of people on here feel that travellers are further marganilsed by their ethnic status?
    PC also said no to every question he was asked about what welfare benefits he'd cut.
    So I don't get how people on here are thinking he's anti traveller or anti welfare state when he's said on TV, that he never discriminated against anybody?
    Isn't he even going to Pavee Point now and suggesting making a settlement for a traveller community in the Phoenix Park?

    To thine own self be true



  • Options
    #9978
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Elaina Gigantic RuleMGS wrote: »
    is Francie really Gerry? :pac:

    say nothing till you hear more ;)


  • Options
    #9979
    Blazer
    Registered Users Posts: 17,415 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    11 more posts and we're onto part 2. Sweet :)


  • Options
    #9980
    shady acres
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 163 ✭✭shady acres


    Purple Mountain wrote: »
    Can you explain then why PC said on LLS that he does not discriminate against travellers? That he does not discriminate against anyone?
    Last night he clearly said that the reason he said the travelling community should not have been classed as an ethnic minority was that it did them no good. He didn't want to see them labelled or marganilsed.
    He said that he would like to see education opened up to everyone equally because education is key.
    There was nothing in his interview last night about him bashing the travellers or 'saying what a lot of us think' unless a lot of people on here feel that travellers are further marganilsed by their ethnic status?
    PC also said no to every question he was asked about what welfare benefits he'd cut.
    So I don't get how people on here are thinking he's anti traveller or anti welfare state when he's said on TV, that he never discriminated against anybody?
    Isn't he even going to Pavee Point now and suggesting making a settlement for a traveller community in the Phoenix Park?

    READ THE THREAD


  • Options
    #9981
    givyjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Francie has seen many of these teacup storms before. Francie enjoys them.

    Francie is the storm in a teacup.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #9982
    end of the road
    Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Discodog wrote: »
    And what would be the cost, in extra manpower & resources, to stop all the illegal & antisocial behaviour of one group ? You expect taxpayers to pay even more.


    if needs be to insure the authorities have the resources needed to enforce the law, absolutely.
    tayto lover wrote: »
    So why did they want ethnicity?

    because they are an ethnic minority.
    mynamejeff wrote: »
    i guess the difference is between reading and understanding then isnt it ?

    is there a problem with the rest of the lads ? they haven't liked your post yet and im worried about them

    there is no special treatment for travelers contained within the legislation. i have read it and i'm sure francie has as well.
    Wheeliebin30 wrote: »
    Higher than 4/6 of the rest

    still a low percentage. tiny in fact.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Options
    #9983
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    end of the road wrote: »



    there is no special treatment for travelers contained within the legislation. i have read it and i'm sure francie has as well.



    still a low percentage. tiny in fact.

    francie is gone but your back :pac::pac::pac:

    now isnt that a coincidence

    you cnat have read it that well

    one of the names of one of the 3 pieces of legislation contains the word travellers


    (Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act 1998 )


  • Options
    #9984
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    Travellers absolutely get special housing. Usually confined within their own groups.


  • Options
    #9985
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    say nothing till you hear more ;)

    Got me all excited now. Ooo.


  • Options
    #9986
    end of the road
    Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    arent you the one who started on about qualifications francie ?

    im not doubling down on anything i just dont like bully's and bots .


    are you really that annoyed that casey took so much of the SF vote ?


    seriously will you check on the bots, sorry i mean the boys ?

    there are no bots. and you are absolutely doubling down.
    mynamejeff wrote: »
    and you wanted laws that were specifically favoring travellers ,

    here ill post it again for you

    https://www.housing.gov.ie/housing/policy/traveller-accommodation/traveller-accommodation

    any sign of eodr ?, im getting really worried now

    this is fake news, nobody called for legislation to specifically favour travelers.
    shady acres wrote: »
    hopefully the next thread has a higher standard of proof
    if a poster is going to call a fellow countryman a racist or a bigot or fascist then they should provide proofs

    proof was provided. by the person being called such.
    shady acres wrote: »
    any person who attacks a widow or widower in their home, death penalty

    not going to happen. the death penalty is gone, not coming back. it failed, and is against human rights.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Options
    #9987
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    end of the road wrote: »
    not going to happen. the death penalty is gone, not coming back. it failed, and is against human rights.

    Pretty sure a persons right to peaceful enjoyment of their home trumps the rights of the bollox who breaks in and beats the ****e out of the owner and proceeds to rob them.


  • Options
    #9988
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    end of the road wrote: »
    there are no bots. and you are absolutely doubling down.



    this is fake news, nobody called for legislation to specifically favour travelers.

    did francie not fill you in on how things have been going ?

    repeatedly linked and proved

    refer to previous posts please


  • Options
    #9989
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    did francie not fill you in on how things have been going ?

    repeatedly linked and proved

    refer to previous posts please

    why bother to do that when you can shout fake news at someone.

    There’s a buzzword I hope dies very soon.


  • Options
    #9990
    Purple Mountain
    Registered Users Posts: 13,004 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    shady acres wrote: »
    READ THE THREAD

    No need to shout. I have read the thread and don't feel my speculation has been addressed, that's why I'm asking.

    To thine own self be true



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #9991
    Elaina Gigantic Rule
    Posts: 0 ✭ Elaina Gigantic Rule


    Purple Mountain wrote: »
    No need to shout. I have read the thread and don't feel my speculation has been addressed, that's why I'm asking.

    did you read it twice?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement