Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Property Market 2019

1103104106108109156

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Cyrus wrote: »
    for the record im in my 30s so my perspective isnt that of someone who bought their house in the 80s.

    people do want everything nowadays and because society in general is as well off as it has ever been people want more and more.

    the problem with everyone wanting the same thing is that they can't all afford it.

    Is it the perspective of someone who wants for nothing because of Daddy?

    Because the silver spoon types love to espouse such rhetoric as you're engaging in..


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Cyrus wrote: »
    for the record im in my 30s so my perspective isnt that of someone who bought their house in the 80s.

    people do want everything nowadays and because society in general is as well off as it has ever been people want more and more.

    the problem with everyone wanting the same thing is that they can't all afford it.


    I'm in my 30's too, early 30's, and currently in the process of selling my first property to buy my second.


    Cyrus wrote: »
    society has changed, in the 80s the majority of wives didnt work and werent university educated. they are now, so guess what, a decent house in a decent suburb costs what two salaries can borrow not one.
    Yes, that is a change, but taking my example, the £20k becomes £40k. Not €400k.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Is it the perspective of someone who wants for nothing because of Daddy?

    Because the silver spoon types love to espouse such rhetoric as you're engaging in..

    no its the perspective of someone who went out and earned what he needed to to get what he wanted instead of whinging about how hard it was and how unfair it was ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    ELM327 wrote: »

    Yes, that is a change, but taking my example, the £20k becomes £40k. Not €400k.

    unfortunately the increase in prosperity of our trades people, govt taxation policy and new better building standards means that the cost of building the house you are talking about (large 4 bed semi ) is 3-400k. No one will build it if they cant sell it for more than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Cyrus wrote: »
    no its the perspective of someone who went out and earned what he needed to to get what he wanted instead of whinging about how hard it was and how unfair it was ;)
    Like me?
    Yet I also disagree with your tired clichés and lazy rhetoric


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,318 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Cyrus wrote: »
    unfortunately the increase in prosperity of our trades people, govt taxation policy and new better building standards means that the cost of building the house you are talking about (large 4 bed semi ) is 3-400k. No one will build it if they cant sell it for more than that.


    Bunkum and hogwash. There's a fair bit of margin in building a semi D at 300-400k!

    Cost doesn't increase tenfold in little over 3 decades.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Like me?
    Yet I also disagree with your tired clichés and lazy rhetoric

    they arent my cliches, i just agreed with some of them.

    i'm not sure what point you are making, you arent moaning about how hard it is? or you are but you are getting on with it anyway?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    awec wrote: »
    Pretty much everyone saves all the time. While there is a section of society who unfortunately earn so little that they virtually live month-to-month,

    Not really so sure about that. In the uk its around 50% that actually have savings. I would take a guess and say its not much different here than with our neighbours.

    And for the type of saving current required to both rent and save up a deposit buy modest houses in urban areas, its possible for most but its not exactly a enjoyable life or really possible outside of theory.

    Renting a room in shared accomodation in Dublin is what now, 600-800 a month? Monthly income for 35k is 2400 after tax. They could get their own apartment in a bad area for 200k? They just need a 80k deposit there. Thats easy, just pay rent, live off 100 Euros a week including bills and sacrifice for five and a half years. Ignoring the fact that if you actually needed to leave home for college and rent, not a chance your now in debt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Bunkum and hogwash. There's a fair bit of margin in building a semi D at 300-400k!

    Cost doesn't increase tenfold in little over 3 decades
    .

    many many things have increased tenfold in nominal cost in the last 3 decades


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Bunkum and hogwash. There's a fair bit of margin in building a semi D at 300-400k!

    Cost doesn't increase tenfold in little over 3 decades.

    you can go to any of the online calculators, or read cairn or glenveaghs annual reports, of course there will be margin in it you have to make money for any entrepreneurial endeavor, but its not as if the local councils are building them any cheaper.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭SozBbz


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Bunkum and hogwash. There's a fair bit of margin in building a semi D at 300-400k!

    Cost doesn't increase tenfold in little over 3 decades.

    People are totally missing the point about the 80’s.

    Single income v double income for one, but secondly the interest rates were orders of magnitude of what they are today. Inflation was rampant, our whole economy was on the verge and we were viewed as a bit of a basket case internally. Inward migration was basically nil.

    Also houses in the 80s were not built to the standards that we expect today. There standard of materials that goes into today’s builds is serious, let alone how trades people now expect to be paid.
    I know they were probably fundamentally sound, but they didn’t typically come with bells and whistles like underfloor heating and surround sound wired in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭SozBbz


    There has literally only been one point in history that buying property was extremely easy, and that was during the Celtic tiger years.

    110% mortgage- you got it! Buying off plans - great idea! 9/10 x your income, why not! Building standards? Don’t be such a buzz kill! just build like there’s no tomorrow!

    We all know how that ended.

    Anyone buying a home should have some skin in the game. That will be easier for some than for others. Some will have well off parents, some people are just good savers, and for some it will mean making a really conscious effort.

    But the alternatives are worse. Relaxing the CB rules would be a disaster (saying this even though I personally would benefit but I don’t see it as good for society). Giving more grants etc would also have the same outcome. You can even see this by virtue of the prices now being charged for new builds versus existing stock. The HTB has assisted the construction industry but it has also increased the amount of money chasing those houses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,945 ✭✭✭duffman13


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Bunkum and hogwash. There's a fair bit of margin in building a semi D at 300-400k!

    Cost doesn't increase tenfold in little over 3 decades.

    Interesting article from 2016, it's not as bad as you make out but an obvious change in the landscape between the 80s and 2016, obviously we've seen 3 more years of growth since this was written but an interesting read regardless

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/personal-finance/sorry-millennials-buying-a-home-was-just-as-hard-for-your-parents-1.2862014


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 391 ✭✭99problems1


    Pheonix10 wrote: »
    Why do several posters think there is something wrong with having an expectation to (reasonably) close to work, have a bit of a life in terms of going out to cinema and for a meal once a week, while having a 2/3 small city breaks to see the world.

    Everyone works for 40 years and gets only 20-25 leave. It's not unreasonable to expect people to want a decent lifestyle in return for that.

    Yes we can't have everything given to us but if you are willing to work hard for 40 years, I think asking for a roof over your head and non extravagant lifestyle isn't unreasonable at all.

    Because you're talking as if that should be the expectation for someone on an average or less wage...

    Now, what would happen if everyone could easily have such a great life? People would work harder, give up some of those sacrifices and then get MORE, get a bigger house, more expensive holidays...then enough people would do it so the average lifestyle would move up and then the ones on average wages would want more and it's a constant cycle.

    It's the same thing with people wanting the minimum wage to go up to 12 euro or whatever. What happens the people on 12 euro? They suddenly go from 2 euro above minimum wage to being the lowest earners. So they demand more money, and everyone up the ladder does. Then prices go up! So the people on 12 euro are still relatively in the same position.

    BTW you can do all that you mentioned, just don't expect to decide in a month you want a mortgage and get one.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 391 ✭✭99problems1


    Can people stop complaining about how "easy" it was in the 80's, how you could get a mortgage for a 20k house and that was one salary.

    I can tell you now not every one was earning 20k a year. Back then that would have been a big wedge.

    Plus Ireland was a place people left in their droves to leave. If life was so great and everything so easy why was there massive emigration?

    Then there's the fact there's better services and amenities close by to houses these days. In the 80s you didn't have a state of the art GAA pitch with global musicians playing there, great motorways allowing easy access between cities, building standards were worse back then..


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭TheSheriff


    Was at three viewings today in the 350-400k region in South dublin, lots of interest, but for us they were incredibly overpriced for what you get. We went purely for interest, I think we know South Dublin is not for us.

    Similarly we went to view one last week, a two bed in bray for 300k, it needed ~100k work to bring it up to standard. I pity the person who buys it at that price tag to be honest .


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,865 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    TheSheriff wrote: »
    Was at three viewings today in the 350-400k region in South dublin, lots of interest, but for us they were incredibly overpriced for what you get. We went purely for interest, I think we know South Dublin is not for us.

    Similarly we went to view one last week, a two bed in bray for 300k, it needed ~100k work to bring it up to standard. I pity the person who buys it at that price tag to be honest .
    Got a link to the Bray one? I was looking in Bray for the last couple of years but Im close to giving up now, its just not worth it. Im going to see if my company will send me to the US or Germany for a year or two instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    TheSheriff wrote: »
    Was at three viewings today in the 350-400k region in South dublin, lots of interest, but for us they were incredibly overpriced for what you get. We went purely for interest, I think we know South Dublin is not for us.

    Similarly we went to view one last week, a two bed in bray for 300k, it needed ~100k work to bring it up to standard. I pity the person who buys it at that price tag to be honest .

    Where in south Dublin for that kind of money ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    Cyrus wrote: »
    Where in south Dublin for that kind of money ?


    Kimmage, Crumlin, Inchicore, Rathfarnham, loads of places.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭pearcider


    TheSheriff wrote: »
    Was at three viewings today in the 350-400k region in South dublin, lots of interest, but for us they were incredibly overpriced for what you get. We went purely for interest, I think we know South Dublin is not for us.

    Similarly we went to view one last week, a two bed in bray for 300k, it needed ~100k work to bring it up to standard. I pity the person who buys it at that price tag to be honest .

    Keep your powder dry. There has been tremendous volatility in the international markets this summer...normally the crashes come in the autumn. Just like the Dow Jones, this market is only going one way. It’s almost certain that the government will be forced to raise taxes in October. This will lower property prices.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,948 ✭✭✭0gac3yjefb5sv7


    In 2007, did property prices fall overnight by 50pc or was it over the space of a year or years?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    6a00d8342f650553ef01b7c95b9ade970b-pi


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    489602.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,304 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    celtic_oz wrote: »
    6a00d8342f650553ef01b7c95b9ade970b-pi

    See that peak in red right there? That’s exactly when we bought our house. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Dolbhad


    Pheonix10 wrote: »
    In 2007, did property prices fall overnight by 50pc or was it over the space of a year or years?


    No - the market was it’s lowest around 2012. Even in 2012/2013 those who could buy were debating would they keep waiting (I worked in property then) as it seemed to be the belief that it would keep crashing. But economy started to pick up.

    It’s normal to have slight ups and downs in a property market but for some reason, Ireland can’t see to find that balance yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    celtic_oz wrote: »
    489602.jpg

    So we're at the point of optimism. Great!


  • Registered Users Posts: 209 ✭✭Bez Bing


    Kimmage, Crumlin, Inchicore, Rathfarnham, loads of places.


    There's not much in Rathfarnham at that price.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    pearcider wrote: »
    TheSheriff wrote: »
    Was at three viewings today in the 350-400k region in South dublin, lots of interest, but for us they were incredibly overpriced for what you get. We went purely for interest, I think we know South Dublin is not for us.

    Similarly we went to view one last week, a two bed in bray for 300k, it needed ~100k work to bring it up to standard. I pity the person who buys it at that price tag to be honest .

    Keep your powder dry. There has been tremendous volatility in the international markets this summer...normally the crashes come in the autumn. Just like the Dow Jones, this market is only going one way. It’s almost certain that the government will be forced to raise taxes in October. This will lower property prices.

    What has that to do with the Irish property market?

    Equity markets dropped by 40% from the year 2000 to 2002, property in Ireland didn't drop at all, equity markets correct far more often than property markets, 2008 was an anamoly


  • Registered Users Posts: 158 ✭✭Horusire


    VonLuck wrote: »
    celtic_oz wrote: »
    489602.jpg

    So we're at the point of optimism. Great!

    I think more like anxiety. That's how I feel about buying atm


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭pearcider


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    What has that to do with the Irish property market?

    Equity markets dropped by 40% from the year 2000 to 2002, property in Ireland didn't drop at all, equity markets correct far more often than property markets, 2008 was an anamoly

    2008 was a warning not an anomaly. When US property crashed in 2006 Ireland wasn’t far behind. The financials are a good indicator for property as that represents their collateral. Look at the major European banks share price in the last two years. They are all in serious trouble. Bank of Ireland is down 50% but even the biggest HSBC is down 50% in the last two years. Banco Santander is down a similar amount as is Deutsche Bank and BNP Paribas. If the property market was in any way healthy they would be doing well. They aren’t.

    But the primary near term risk I see is Ireland having to significantly tighten fiscal policy post Brexit. This will undermine confidence too which along with credit availability is ultimately what fixes property prices. It actually has precious little to do with earnings.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement