Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
12-10-2018, 09:55   #151
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 118
I am not trying to wind people up here, but is it legal to kick someone in the balls in MMA?
Cos I think that would be a great tactic, straight out and a kick in the knackers - that way anyone could really win a fight.
QuintusFabius is offline  
Advertisement
12-10-2018, 10:22   #152
Mellor
Registered User
 
Mellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuintusFabius View Post
I am not trying to wind people up here, but is it legal to kick someone in the balls in MMA?
Cos I think that would be a great tactic, straight out and a kick in the knackers - that way anyone could really win a fight.
No, it's not legal. Not anymore.

Mellor is offline  
Thanks from:
12-10-2018, 10:53   #153
Donald Trump
Registered User
 
Donald Trump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,348
Quick question.



I only have a passing interest in the UFC circus thing. But I had an oul' google to see the ranking after Conor McGregor got battered.

He is now ranked at #2 for lightweight behind a Tony Ferguson. And then the champion being your man Khabib that battered McG.

McGregor has moved down to number 8 on the P4P list. This Tony Ferguson is at #13 P4P.


How can he be ranked above him in his own category and below him on a P4P? Isn't P4P supposed to be just a method to compare across weights? Within the same weight, the order of people in an P4P list should surely not be different
Donald Trump is offline  
12-10-2018, 11:02   #154
Mellor
Registered User
 
Mellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33,071
Ranking lists are aggregated from votes media votes. People are asked to rank all divisions as well as the P4P list.
If people were talking their time and being careful, they would cross check their P4P list, and make sure that the same-division orders match.
But the realities it, people are that careful and just knock it out on a Monday while nursing a hangover.
Mellor is offline  
12-10-2018, 11:14   #155
Donald Trump
Registered User
 
Donald Trump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellor View Post
Ranking lists are aggregated from votes media votes. People are asked to rank all divisions as well as the P4P list.
If people were talking their time and being careful, they would cross check their P4P list, and make sure that the same-division orders match.
But the realities it, people are that careful and just knock it out on a Monday while nursing a hangover.



So there's no "scientific" basis?


And by scientific I just meant a defined methodology
Donald Trump is offline  
Advertisement
12-10-2018, 12:08   #156
finglashoop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Trump View Post
So there's no "scientific" basis?


And by scientific I just meant a defined methodology
The ufc makes up rankings depending on what fights they are trying to make
finglashoop is offline  
13-10-2018, 03:24   #157
cletus
Registered User
 
cletus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by finglashoop View Post
The ufc makes up rankings depending on what fights they are trying to make
Nah, they just pay no attention to the rankings, which are done by a group of mma journalists, who don't know/care or at worst are hugely biased.
cletus is offline  
13-10-2018, 07:47   #158
Mellor
Registered User
 
Mellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Trump View Post
So there's no "scientific" basis?

And by scientific I just meant a defined methodology
There's no scientific basis to the selections, it's entirely subjective. Yes it is a defined methodology. I gave it to you.

A panel of people pick their arbitrary, and sunjective rankings.
The rankings are aggregated to form the UFC rankings.
That's the method.
Mellor is offline  
13-10-2018, 14:00   #159
Donald Trump
Registered User
 
Donald Trump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellor View Post
There's no scientific basis to the selections, it's entirely subjective. Yes it is a defined methodology. I gave it to you.

A panel of people pick their arbitrary, and sunjective rankings.
The rankings are aggregated to form the UFC rankings.
That's the method.



Well there is at least a defined panel I meant? Not just random media asked to vote?



For example, in boxing you have boxrec rankings which are based on a defined formula.

And you also have the transnational boxing rankings board. But that is a carefully selected panel rather than the "media"


Anyway, thanks for the responses. I appreciate it. Not a big issue. I had just been curious as to how the ranking were made and particularly so given the discrepancy in the ordering
Donald Trump is offline  
Advertisement
13-10-2018, 15:00   #160
Mellor
Registered User
 
Mellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Trump View Post
Well there is at least a defined panel I meant? Not just random media asked to vote?
You can go on to the rankings pages and see who the voters are, and who their individual votes were for.
Some might not have updated their P4P rankings yet. Which would contribute to a discrepancy
Mellor is offline  
14-10-2018, 19:51   #161
Brussels Sprout
Registered User
 
Brussels Sprout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Trump View Post
Well there is at least a defined panel I meant? Not just random media asked to vote?



For example, in boxing you have boxrec rankings which are based on a defined formula.

And you also have the transnational boxing rankings board. But that is a carefully selected panel rather than the "media"


Anyway, thanks for the responses. I appreciate it. Not a big issue. I had just been curious as to how the ranking were made and particularly so given the discrepancy in the ordering
As others have said it's entirely subjective and based on the opinions of a small number of journalists. Apparently they aren't even high profile MMA journalists either.

Apparently the UFC never even wanted rankings but when they started one of their TV deals the network wanted them so that they could use them to advertise the fights. They probably came up with this half-assed system as a result.

Only yesterday I was wondering if anybody was doing any unofficial rankings and I found this thread on Reddit. His rankings are pretty bad though so he definitely hasn't perfected his algorithm yet.
Brussels Sprout is offline  
Thanks from:
15-10-2018, 09:07   #162
Mellor
Registered User
 
Mellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brussels Sprout View Post
Only yesterday I was wondering if anybody was doing any unofficial rankings and I found this thread on Reddit. His rankings are pretty bad though so he definitely hasn't perfected his algorithm yet.
There's another guy doing a ranking system based on the ranking used in chess. It seems pretty solid.
Mellor is offline  
15-07-2019, 12:09   #163
Brussels Sprout
Registered User
 
Brussels Sprout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellor View Post
There's another guy doing a ranking system based on the ranking used in chess. It seems pretty solid.
I've subsequently found this one which is pretty good. the rankings feel about right and you can quickly see upcoming fights in each division which is nice (as well as the last 3 bouts for each fighter)
Brussels Sprout is offline  
Thanks from:
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet