Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

The west had a lot to fear from russia, all has ended up being unfounded, nuclear is all they have left and NATO will have everything positioned and pinpointed were they to try anything there (the GOP might try and make it a thing for the mid-terms).

SA are treading a fine line at the moment, with the world moving away from oil, their influence will wane, and the US has tar sands to fall back on if prices go too high (also possibly a conspiracy there over their $2bn to Kushner).

N. Korea are a failed state, they do this any time they need resources, if that missile actually hit anything, they'd be frightened about what to do and what would happen next (but let's be clear, they could cause a lot of trouble in S.Korea if they wanted to before they fell).

I'm sorry but you're uttering pure nonsense here. The single bullet theory is based on the theory that the bullet exits Kennedy throat and due to hit something tumbles out sideways and hits Connally at that angle. Carcano would have to leave 3cm wound for Single bullet theory make any sense

There is a reason that charlatans and liars who support the official story have been manipulating the medical evidence of Dr Shaw for years in books and writings. A 1.5cm wound would prove Connally' had bullet nose-on wound and be of a tangent shot.

A carcano bullet hitting sideways is very unlikely to cause a 1.5cm wound, as debunkers know, hence the promotion of the 3cm wound in pictures such as those posted here by Nal, 

For what reason did a leading 9/11 debunker admit NIST screwed up badly in their study? Are you convinced that it is not credible to accuse officials of negligence? My question is just a simple one!

You can dismiss the controlled demolition of building seven as nonsense if you do not consider government officials manipulating the structural design of the building as important.

In my opinion, NIST should be questioned if they are not doing their job properly rather than being left alone.

When we hear something we haven't heard before, we tend to doubt it. Did anyone in mainstream media mention to you that Rudi Dekkers was a Dutch gangster with CIA ties when he managed Huffman Aviation? Years later, he was busted for major drug trafficking. He was presented as a well-standing individual who just happened to train these hijackers on TV. What mainstream media not telling you this was Iran Contra type airport where drug smuggling went on. It seems like this was some kind of heroin operation from Afghanistan explains why all these guys on 9/11 ended up at Huffman aviation. The Barry Seal movie starring Tom Cruise illustrates how the CIA operates in reality, that the phone call from Bill Clinton was real to get him off the hook. All Presidents end up in some sort of scandal because they are corrupt as hell and have an underground world of espionage and dirty tricks, including 9/11.

There is no mention in the public of men carrying boxes through the lobbies of the WTC. In fact, those pictures show how easy it was to move stuff into those towers unnoticed. It seems suspicious because ceiling panels were removed without any reason inside the room. This makes no sense.

I did not mention "The Single-Bullet theory" but based on your reply I don't think you even read the post.

You just return to your "gotcha" about the 3cm wound that was actually a 1.5cm wound.

Go back, read my post carefully and respond. Either that or remove yourself entirely from the discussion as you are not engaging in good faith.

Maybe it's one of you guys on an alt account with an extreme caricature of a conspiracy theorist to make them look especially bad. A conspiracy of one if you will ;)

Imagine creating a new type of bullet wound and claiming it is real. Bullets have dimensions and if a Carcano bullet hit sideways, it would have to create a puncture wound of the same size to pass through bone and flesh.

A bullet strikes Connally back in a sideways trajectory, and that's the theory used to demonstrate Oswald fired this bullet.

Researchers have left out that Connally's wound was 1.5 cm and instead claimed Connally's wound was 3 cm, the same length as Carcano bullet.

Nal even uploaded what they claim on another thread blissfully unaware of the lie. Read the entry wound description

That's another conspiracy I hear a lot from the likes of Alex Jones, that the "mainstream media" is all controlled.

There are hundreds if not thousands of outlets all over the world, does someone tell Swedish and Italian and British journalists what to report? Do they all have to be told at the exact same time to get the whole story right?

Or is it, as I suspect, just the usual case of a few conspiracy types cherry-picking some isolated stories or reports from decades of journalism from thousands of outlets in order to gaslight that all of it is magically controlled, and they haven't put much thought into it after that.

Good point, the CT'ers just run screaming when presented with facts. Even the bit you could read outside the paywall said it was a preprint, not reviewed and controversial. The full article goes into the reasoning behind this (one) study and what the issues are.

GQP'ers of course love to demonize Fauci, who saved millions of American lives despite their best efforts and the GQP making grift including frauds like Rand Paul.

Obviously it doesn't. It's just enormous amounts of intellectual p*nis envy on the part of the GQP'ers - ignorance is intelligence in their world, uneducated is educated. They hate Fauci (And Birx and the lot) because they know they'll never be as successful as he has been nor as smart, they just can't stand being reminded of their intellectual failings by someone on TV. It's what TFG panders to.

what are you referring to?

how is fauci to blame for not knowing something that has only just been discovered, if indeed anything has actually been discovered?

you want to tie him to a chair so you do place responsibility on him. how is he responsible? do you think he hid the information during the pandemic? do you think he even has that power?

as well as thinking that Fauci has some authority to prevent research being published.