Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

AP1 and AP2 Posts

  • 07-04-2021 5:02pm
    #1
    Floricwil
    Registered Users Posts: 41 ✭


    Hi,

    Can someone explain to me what the difference between an AP1 and AP2 post is? Am I correct in thinking that a post is advertised but there is no job description....? If so, how do they decide where to place to you? Also, what is the financial remuneration with each post? Is it worth it?

    Thanks


«1

Comments

  • #2
    Random sample
    Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Random sample


    The duties involved will be different depending on what sort of school you are in. The principal will usually fill the jobs with whatever the needs of the school are that aren’t being met in current posts.

    Ap1 is around €8000 per year, ap2 around €4000, exact figures are on the union websites.

    You can usually guess what the post will be... like if a year head retires and ap1 in advertised, it will more than likely be a year head position.

    Is it worth it? Probably more hassle than it is worth, but if you want to move up the leadership ladder, they are steps along the way that most people have to climb.


  • #3
    joebloggs32
    Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    Also worth noting that an AP1 post holder has their timetable reduced by 4 hours in the ETB sector and C&C sector, but not in the voluntary sector.


  • #4
    Floricwil
    Registered Users Posts: 41 ✭Floricwil


    joebloggs32 wrote: »
    Also worth noting that an AP1 post holder has their timetable reduced by 4 hours in the ETB sector and C&C sector, but not in the voluntary sector.

    So AP2 gets nothing off their timetable? Is is the €8k and €4k pensionable?


  • #5
    joebloggs32
    Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    Floricwil wrote: »
    So AP2 gets nothing off their timetable? Is is the €8k and €4k pensionable?

    Correct on both counts.
    No alleviation of hours for AP2 in any type of school, and both become pensionable after 4 years.


  • #6
    am_zarathustra
    Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭am_zarathustra


    Ap2 is just under 4 and AP1 is €8,968. Works out at 330 extra a month I think. It's a lot of work and dependent on the school. Your roles can change every year and just Year Head alone would not really be in keeping with the new system. You might get Year Head and something else like numeracy or wellbeing. It really depends on the school.

    It's good experience and you can make it what you want but be aware that you need to be willing to work harder or smarter or both preferably than those around you to maintain a healthy work environment. People are supportive of post holders they feel work hard but the opposite can be true too.

    Helps you understand how schools run especially if you have further ambitions. Gives you a taste of what goes on and how to effectively run teams and create good working environments and positive attitudes to change. Not enough time is spent of cohension by management in most schools and it's something that would really benefit teachers.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Random sample
    Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Random sample


    am_zarathustra wrote: »
    Your roles can change every year and just Year Head alone would not really be in keeping with the new system. You might get Year Head and something else like numeracy or wellbeing. It really depends on the school.

    Really? God, year head could be a full time job in my school without teaching, never mind extra duties. What size school are you in? We have 250 per year group, and well-being is an ap2 post separately. Numeracy isn’t at post status yet though! But it’s well covered under deis.


  • #8
    ethical
    Registered Users Posts: 719 ✭✭✭ethical


    Be careful what you wish for!
    Anyone tuned in to Conference yesterday would have come across a good discussion on Posts.
    The criteria was changed a few years ago,previous to this a weighting was given to the level of experience a candidate had,not so much any longer.
    The "new system" is not fit for purpose and needs to be re drawn again was the outcome of yesterdays discussion.
    One teacher gave an example of applying for one of these posts and he was not successful.The "preferred" candidate got the job with damn all transparency shown to the unsuccessful person.Yet this person applied again ,a year later,when another post was advertised and told Conference that his marks were extremely higher this time around,eventhough he admitted that he did not change anything from his perspective!

    There are appeals system but unfortunately they are weighted very much on the side of the employer,and if it happens to be the Nuns or the ETB just forget about it as they are so secretive they make Putin look very open and transparent.

    On renumeration ,a friend tells me she gets an extra €30 per pay cheque for an AP2 post and an endless amount of hassle which consumes the €30 rather quickly!

    Sorry if this puts a dampener on your enthusiasm!...but Posts are not what they used to be back in the old days where it really was "money for doing nothing"...its the other extreme now "nothing but lots of work for damn all money"

    Also bear in mind that young,non unionised teachers are asked/told to take on jobs that were once Posts,of course they do not get any money for this ................but may stand a chance of getting a 3hour CID come next year!!! Good luck!!!


  • #9
    am_zarathustra
    Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭am_zarathustra


    I actually really enjoy my post but I know a lot who don't. I think it comes down to how much you already do outside of your job, do you read circulars, are you interested in new initiatives, will you plan a three year SSE. I like seeing things come to fruition. I find the changing keeps you sharp too, a new set of eyes on a problem can be invaluable. In a school of your size I'd expect year head and something else small. I'm in a small school but have 2 years and 3 other roles (2 big, 1 small) but they are very in keeping with my own interests at the moment.

    It's not worth the money, I'd make it a lot faster and easier with a few grinds.

    The new system certainly has its issue but if seniority was a massive component I wouldn't have gotten the job and staff were very supportive of me getting it given the work I had done and was continuing to do. I think it depends on the attitude of the person and whether by and large the people who got the posts are deserving. If your handing them out to people who haven't put time or work on because they are your mates or agree with you then the schools in trouble anyway. Certainly no one thinks I'm backing management, I probably disagree with them more than anyone and I think the idea of the "inner circle" can be toxic, and in some cases, perpetuated by the post holder for whatever reason. I never did busy work either, the work I had done was directly about improving educational outcomes for the kids.

    Generally I think integrity and honesty will keep you on the right side of staff and management anyway. I know who I am and why I make the decisiolns I do, if I'm wrong I'll apologize but generally I can back my position. My priority is the kids and thats where my list stops so people know where they stand and where I stand. There will always be a few on staff who don't like the system, kill them with kindness would be my advice.


  • #10
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    The wording of that motion at the conference was an embarrassment to the profession, "Every teacher deserves a post". The entitlement is outrageous.


  • #11
    27061986a
    Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭27061986a


    How come no reduction in hours for voluntary schools for AP 1 post?
    Also would a guidance counsellor be considered an AP1 post or is that separate altogether?


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    am_zarathustra
    Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭am_zarathustra


    27061986a wrote: »
    How come no reduction in hours for voluntary schools for AP 1 post?
    Also would a guidance counsellor be considered an AP1 post or is that separate altogether?

    Completely separate. You could be a GC and have a post but it would be extra work to your job, you can't have a lost where the responsibilities are just the responsibilities of your normal job.

    The hours off are a historic quirk, some voluntary schools do get it off but it's not a requirement. I'm here someone here knows why, I don't actually know, maybe a TUI versus ASTI issue in the past or something.

    The old VEC system is full of strange quirks. I get a work phone, it's bizarre. I suppose historically they were tougher schools often in deprived areas with more challenging kids but this is certainly not universal.


  • #13
    am_zarathustra
    Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭am_zarathustra


    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    The wording of that motion at the conference was an embarrassment to the profession, "Every teacher deserves a post". The entitlement is outrageous.

    The vast majority of teachers I know have no interest in posts, they are a lot of work so unless you are interested in governance and management it's probably not worth it really. Frequently hear of people giving them back now, the end of year reviews and increase accountability make them a very different proposal than in the past.

    This is ridiculous motion title. Like any job there will be some deserving people passed over unfortunely but not everyone actually wants the responsibility of a post. You can do a lot of good if your engaged and interested and can get others of board or you can be a detrimental influence on the school .. .. .. it's important to consider your motivations.


  • #14
    27061986a
    Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭27061986a


    I always assumed that a guidance counsellor was a full time post ie no teaching hours


  • #15
    Random sample
    Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Random sample


    27061986a wrote: »
    I always assumed that a guidance counsellor was a full time post ie no teaching hours

    It would depend on the size of the school. With lca a and lcvp a lot of guidance counsellors would have class contact time too.


  • #16
    doc321
    Registered Users Posts: 6 ✭doc321


    I remember back in my secondary school days we had form tutors at junior cert level and my Irish teacher was classified as my form tutor in leaving cert years however as far as I remember we didnt have an allocated class time at leaving cert but we did for junior cert. Does that role still exist and if you are a form tutor for a class group do you get any reduction in teaching hours for admin and meeting work? Also is a form tutor classified as an a post of responsibility?


  • #17
    joebloggs32
    Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    27061986a wrote: »
    I always assumed that a guidance counsellor was a full time post ie no teaching hours

    Post holders are Assistant Principals.

    Being a guidance counsellor has absolutely no link to being a post holder.

    The hours available to employ a guidance counsellor will be based primarily on the size of the school.


  • #18
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    doc321 wrote: »
    I remember back in my secondary school days we had form tutors at junior cert level and my Irish teacher was classified as my form tutor in leaving cert years however as far as I remember we didnt have an allocated class time at leaving cert but we did for junior cert. Does that role still exist and if you are a form tutor for a class group do you get any reduction in teaching hours for admin and meeting work? Also is a form tutor classified as an a post of responsibility?

    No. It is unpaid. In most schools now it is part of the timetable.


  • #19
    Alex86Eire
    Registered Users Posts: 330 ✭✭Alex86Eire


    doc321 wrote: »
    I remember back in my secondary school days we had form tutors at junior cert level and my Irish teacher was classified as my form tutor in leaving cert years however as far as I remember we didnt have an allocated class time at leaving cert but we did for junior cert. Does that role still exist and if you are a form tutor for a class group do you get any reduction in teaching hours for admin and meeting work? Also is a form tutor classified as an a post of responsibility?

    I've been a class teacher every year since I graduated. In some schools you have a 'tutorial class' on your timetable but in my current school we don't. Wasn't a post of responsibility in any school I've been in. Its a lot of work in my experience if you're a tutor to junior classes.


  • #20
    Random sample
    Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭Random sample


    No school would have enough ap2’s available to make class tutor a post of responsibility. We do well to get year heads.


  • #21
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    am_zarathustra wrote: »
    The vast majority of teachers I know have no interest in posts, they are a lot of work so unless you are interested in governance and management it's probably not worth it really. Frequently hear of people giving them back now, the end of year reviews and increase accountability make them a very different proposal than in the past.

    This is ridiculous motion title. Like any job there will be some deserving people passed over unfortunely but not everyone actually wants the responsibility of a post. You can do a lot of good if your engaged and interested and can get others of board or you can be a detrimental influence on the school .. .. .. it's important to consider your motivations.

    The Examiner picked up on it and highlighted the obvious hypocrisy of seeking equality and then seeking to remove promotional opportunities from younger colleagues. They made the same point about S&S. The lack of any defining principle from the union in relation to equality is juvenile in the extreme - "Equality means teachers higher up the seniority list are automatically better and more deserving".


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    am_zarathustra
    Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭am_zarathustra


    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    The Examiner picked up on it and highlighted the obvious hypocrisy of seeking equality and then seeking to remove promotional opportunities from younger colleagues. They made the same point about S&S. The lack of any defining principle from the union in relation to equality is juvenile in the extreme - "Equality means teachers higher up the seniority list are automatically better and more deserving".

    I must check that out, I'm glad someone did. The unions should know better given the rep the have with younger staff as is.

    Older teaches have better pay and condition options (pensions too) than younger staff. An AP2 would be a long time gaining back the tend of thousands most have lost already. I'm lucky to be on the post 2004 pension, I just made it in the door but the discrepancies in that and those who starred a year after me is crazy.......never mind the really old pensions.........and the 2 years training


  • #23
    itrip
    Registered Users Posts: 19 ✭itrip


    The power of teaching unions to wield power with govt is slipping year by year...threatening strikes rarely gets public support which is to govt advantage...unions need to consider more creative ways to deal with issues..they also need to talk to each other and agree joint strategies before raising any flags in the media....young teachers need to see leadership from unions...change is coming, chances are there will be new approach to leaving cert within 10 years(possibly all 2nd level teaching) it's needed, and this is when unions must be on their game.


  • #24
    shtpEdthePlum
    Closed Accounts Posts: 556 ✭✭✭shtpEdthePlum


    The reason that they said every teacher deserves a post is that the job of the postholder now is to delegate the work among staff. They're operating in a management capacity to ensure that everyone is contributing.


  • #25
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    shtpEdthePlum wrote: »
    The reason that they said every teacher deserves a post is that the job of the postholder now is to delegate the work among staff. They're operating in a management capacity to ensure that everyone is contributing.

    This is fairytale stuff. Are year heads delegating? ICT co-ordinators delegating? TY/LCA/SSE co-ordinators delegating? Unbelievable.


  • #26
    mtoutlemonde
    Registered Users Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭mtoutlemonde


    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    This is fairytale stuff. Are year heads delegating? ICT co-ordinators delegating? TY/LCA/SSE co-ordinators delegating? Unbelievable.

    It's distributive leadership - it improves morale as all stakeholders have an opinion in the running of the school - some are paid, some are not. The day of the autocratic leader is gone for the betterment of the school community.


  • #27
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    mtoutlemonde wrote: »
    It's distributive leadership - it improves morale as all stakeholders have an opinion in the running of the school - some are paid, some are not. The day of the autocratic leader is gone for the betterment of the school community.

    Palming a post off isn't distributed leadership. Doing the work of your post is different from encouraging staff to be involved in decision making.


  • #28
    shtpEdthePlum
    Closed Accounts Posts: 556 ✭✭✭shtpEdthePlum


    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    This is fairytale stuff. Are year heads delegating? ICT co-ordinators delegating? TY/LCA/SSE co-ordinators delegating? Unbelievable.
    I'm not familiar with secondary school structure, but at primary level it's not uncommon for the postholder to be given a list of the tasks that need doing by management. Then they distribute the tasks among their colleagues and oversee them.

    As i said, i don't have experience with second level so I'm not sure what the workload would be for postholders who are year heads, ICT Co-ordinators etc. How many posts would a typical SS have, is it same as primary with just the one or two?


  • #29
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    shtpEdthePlum wrote: »
    I'm not familiar with secondary school structure, but at primary level it's not uncommon for the postholder to be given a list of the tasks that need doing by management. Then they distribute the tasks among their colleagues and oversee them.

    As i said, i don't have experience with second level so I'm not sure what the workload would be for postholders who are year heads, ICT Co-ordinators etc. How many posts would a typical SS have, is it same as primary with just the one or two?

    There are over 10 in most schools 600+ schools.


  • #30
    mtoutlemonde
    Registered Users Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭mtoutlemonde


    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    Palming a post off isn't distributive leadership. Doing the work of your post is different from encouraging staff to be involved in decision making.

    Well according to my lecturers on the leadership programme and the papers I’ve been reading - this type of leadership is the idea of empowering staff.

    I also heard that an AP1 is 8 hours extra per week and AP2 is 4 - in a big school - it would be difficult to cover all the bases and teach a full timetable.

    Do I agree with it - not really. I don’t do anyone else’s work but I was a class tutor in a previous school and enjoyed it. The younger teachers would be chomping at the bit to help out and the older ones who want a post. Personally, I won’t ever apply for a post as I would be financially better off marking for the SEC - three weeks hard work with no dealing with whatever during the year.


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    mtoutlemonde wrote: »
    Well according to my lecturers on the leadership programme and the papers I’ve been reading - this type of leadership is the idea of empowering staff.

    I also heard that an AP1 is 8 hours extra per week and AP2 is 4 - in a big school - it would be difficult to cover all the bases and teach a full timetable.

    Do I agree with it - not really. I don’t do anyone else’s work but I was a class tutor in a previous school and enjoyed it. The younger teachers would be chomping at the bit to help out and the older ones who want a post. Personally, I won’t ever apply for a post as I would be financially better off marking for the SEC - three weeks hard work with no dealing with whatever during the year.

    Anyone that says empowering staff should involve them taking more time out from their teaching to assist the ICT coordinator in setting up computers/discipline students for the year head/run a fundraising committee is a snake oil salesman who has no idea of the role of a teacher.


Advertisement