Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Drought....Hosepipe Ban.... next they'll be calling for Water meters

Options
13567…12

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    jester77
    Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    RandomName2 wrote: »
    A band aid over a gaping wound.

    Meters don't make it rain more, or make the reservoirs bigger, or reduce the population of Dublin.

    Even if there were meters in place it would only give a couple more weeks reprive before a hose-pipe ban got put in place. The drought isn't caused by a lack of metering. It's not even caused by the leaks in all the pipes. It due to the lack of rain.

    Infrastructural investment, in the form of more numerous reservoirs, and replaced piping systems is important. Hopefully we might see it happen at some point. Nothing's stopping the government from investing in it.

    We did invest a billion euro in Irish Water though. That's been really useful. :mad:

    You got to start somewhere. I live in a city with a population of just under 2 million, this little bit of warm weather that Ireland is having is the norm here in the summer. Never any issues with water supply. Everyone has a meter and everyone pays, my monthly bill is €174, that covers cold water and warm water that is piped into the house, plus it covers the treatment of waste water leaving the house.

    You don't get nice things if you don't pay for them.


  • Options
    #63
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Heard on the radio this morning thaton top of the hose pipe ban, we are facing water being turned off overnight.


  • Options
    #64
    NIMAN
    Registered Users Posts: 32,977 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    jester77 wrote: »
    You don't get nice things if you don't pay for them.

    Unfortunately we have bred a generation of people here in Ireland now who want everything for nothing, and refuse to pay for decent services.


  • Options
    #65
    Benteke
    Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Benteke


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Unfortunately we have bred a generation of people here in Ireland now who want everything for nothing, and refuse to pay for decent services.

    Problem you're missing is we're already paying for it but sadly we have bred a generation of people in Ireland who like to bend over and get shafted and like to pay for everything twice for shoddy services


  • Options
    #66
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Benteke wrote: »
    Problem you're missing is we're already paying for it but sadly we have bred a generation of people in Ireland who like to bend over and get shafted and like to pay for everything twice for shoddy services

    That argument just doesn't work. Some people pay the same taxes and have no public water or sewage provided. Others have all the services and pay nothing. Why not have free buses, as the tax payer can just subsidise Bus Eireann/Dublin Bus fully? Why do you pay for a passport or driver's licence when you've paid your taxes? Let's have free electricity and gas paid for from direct taxation.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    Mr. teddywinkles
    Registered Users Posts: 1,962 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    jooksavage wrote: »
    This 100%. There are bigger things at stake here than rhetorical arguments about universal rights to this or that. The water situation in this country needs to be addressed and the money needs to come from somewhere. You can't drink your principles.

    It's waste of tax payers money in various other areas of the countries budget is the problem. Nothing else.


  • Options
    #68
    goat2
    Registered Users Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    It really is not about who is paying for the water, but how we use it, and car wash stations should not be operating, if we are banned at home from using it to wash cars at moment, I think that we should all try to have some water butts handy they are a great source of water when all else is gone, now there is talk of they stopping supply at night, right in the middle of tourist season, restaurant operation is going to be affected if this come into force,


  • Options
    #69
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    goat2 wrote: »
    It really is not about who is paying for the water, but how we use it, and car wash stations should not be operating, if we are banned at home from using it to wash cars at moment,

    Many modern car washes use water reclamation/recycling systems.
    Making them a lot more efficient than doing it at home using a hose. Considering they are paying for their water it makes sense for them to invest in a system that re-uses a resource they are paying for.

    Not sure if it's a requirement of planning for one in Ireland (wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't to be honest) but it is in many other countries.

    https://www.carwash.ie/water-treatment


  • Options
    #70
    Henwin
    Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Henwin


    we run a dairy farm here and have our own well, the old one gave up so we sunk a new one. it cost 6000 all together, it also needs maintaining and uses a fair bit of electricity to run. I have no problem with this but i also feel that everyone should pay by usage for the amount they use. it costs money to get the water into ur house and dispose of it and there wud be less waste if u are charged


  • Options
    #71
    kurtainsider
    Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭kurtainsider


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Unfortunately we have bred a generation of people here in Ireland now who want everything for nothing, and refuse to pay for decent services.

    The point you're missing is that we already pay for it. The water metering scam was a shakedown to get us to pay or it twice.

    Perhaps the government might offer an olive branch to the taxpayer next budget and reduce VAT on KY Jelly and Vaseline to 0% as a token of good will and an incentive for us all to lube up just another little bit.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    kurtainsider wrote: »
    The point you're missing is that we already pay for it. The water metering scam was a shakedown to get us to pay or it twice.

    What about those who currently don't pay anything? Or those, who by your reckoning, are paying and not receiving any? Or those paying, again by your reasoning, but using twice as much as others do?


  • Options
    #73
    suicide_circus
    Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    I presume people who are opposed to water charges are also opposed to inheritance tax on the basis that tax has already been paid on that cash and the principle of not paying twice still stands?


  • Options
    #74
    kurtainsider
    Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭kurtainsider


    Kyla Ambitious Sleepyhead wrote: »
    What about those who currently don't pay anything? Or those, who by your reckoning, are paying and not receiving any? Or those paying, again by your reasoning, but using twice as much as others do?

    What about them? I'm just making a simple point that the moronically clumsy attempt by the FG government to package the Irish people's water resources up and give them (not even sell them) to private owners was seen for the scam that it was. That's all.

    BTW - I'm taxed to the maximum legal limit by the Revenue but provide my own water from a private well but I'm not making anything of that. My view is that the people of Ireland shouldn't give away our valuable water resources to private ownership.


  • Options
    #75
    Outkast_IRE
    Registered Users Posts: 7,515 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    My neighbour decided today was the day to hose down his driveway . Spraying it with a hose for 40mins, driveway was not noticeably dirty to begin with , some people are just ignorant cxxts


  • Options
    #76
    suicide_circus
    Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Outkast_IRE wrote: »
    My neighbour decided today was the day to hose down his driveway . Spraying it with a hose for 40mins, driveway was not noticeably dirty to begin with , some people are just ignorant cxxts
    would he do that if he were paying by usage?


  • Options
    #77
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    Outkast_IRE wrote: »
    My neighbour decided today was the day to hose down his driveway . Spraying it with a hose for 40mins, driveway was not noticeably dirty to begin with , some people are just ignorant cxxts

    Was driving home this afternoon and noticed a sprinkler coming over the hedge in one house of a group (with a group water scheme)...

    Be interested to know how that's going to go over.


  • Options
    #78
    kurtainsider
    Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭kurtainsider


    suicide_circus wrote: »
    would he do that if he were paying by usage?

    Perhaps he would.
    Isn't it a real shame that our stupid politicians didn't set out to manage our water resources for the common good instead of attempting to bundle them up as a present for private ownership. The whole problem could have been avoided.


  • Options
    #79
    Sycamore Tree
    Closed Accounts Posts: 796 ✭✭✭Sycamore Tree


    RandomName2 wrote: »
    A band aid over a gaping wound.

    Meters don't make it rain more, or make the reservoirs bigger, or reduce the population of Dublin.

    Even if there were meters in place it would only give a couple more weeks reprive before a hose-pipe ban got put in place. The drought isn't caused by a lack of metering. It's not even caused by the leaks in all the pipes. It due to the lack of rain.

    Infrastructural investment, in the form of more numerous reservoirs, and replaced piping systems is important. Hopefully we might see it happen at some point. Nothing's stopping the government from investing in it.

    We did invest a billion euro in Irish Water though. That's been really useful. :mad:

    Correct. How quickly people forget how disastrous the Irish Water project was and continues to be. Don't let them fool you.

    Lest we forget, it was set up as an expensive, bloated, wasteful superquango with shockingly poor management and some very dodgy appointments and contracts. And the stupid taxpayer was expected to turn a blind eye and pay for it. HSE Mark II. No vision, no plan - just an expensive black hole.

    Let's recall what Alan Duke said about it;
    A glorious, god-awful mess has been made of Irish Water. We've ended up with a system now that no rational person would have invented if they had sat down to put this kind of system together. The hope must be that it will work lamely until some sort of coherent system is put in place.


  • Options
    #80
    railer201
    Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭railer201


    suicide_circus wrote: »
    would he do that if he were paying by usage?

    Very possibly yes as the ballpark charge in UK for example is €3 per 1000 litres or metric tonne which can be visualised as a cube of water 1 metre each side - quite a bit of water. Bargain really and not much of an incentive to conserve.


  • Options
    #81
    beveragelady
    Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭beveragelady


    kurtainsider wrote: »
    The point you're missing is that we already pay for it. The water metering scam was a shakedown to get us to pay or it twice.

    Perhaps the government might offer an olive branch to the taxpayer next budget and reduce VAT on KY Jelly and Vaseline to 0% as a token of good will and an incentive for us all to lube up just another little bit.

    I grew up in a house with a rainwater supply because we were nowhere near mains. I now live in a house with a well, again nowhere near a mains supply. It costs money to maintain a private water supply, just like it costs money to maintain a public one. The problem is I'm paying for my private water supply but I'm also paying for yours though taxation. You're not contributing anything towards mine, though, are you?

    You need to pay for your share of water so my taxes can go to things like healthcare, education and public transport instead of filling your kettle and washing your car. You don't expect me to pay for your lunches or your central heating, why am I paying for your water?

    Water is not free. The user should pay, just like you pay for other things you use.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    Franz Von Peppercorn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    kurtainsider wrote: »
    Perhaps he would.
    Isn't it a real shame that our stupid politicians didn't set out to manage our water resources for the common good instead of attempting to bundle them up as a present for private ownership. The whole problem could have been avoided.

    Irish water is a semi state.

    The whole “might be privatised” was just an excuse.


  • Options
    #83
    Topgear on Dave
    Registered Users Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭Topgear on Dave


    I grew up in town, on the town supply.

    Both grannys houses and our farm all had their own wells/river supply for about the first 20 years of my life. All undrinkable.

    A creamery can or 20 litre bucket was used for storing drinking water and this went on for years along with pump breakdowns, well cleaning etc etc.

    Eventually we paid up and both got connected to a group scheme (metered and billed). Its was a luxury to go out there and knowing (a) the water would be running and (b) it was drinkable.

    Folks who have never experience being off the mains supply just would never experience this.


  • Options
    #84
    Topgear on Dave
    Registered Users Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭Topgear on Dave


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    Irish water is a semi state.

    The whole “might be privatised” was just an excuse.

    Exactlt. Now the bills have gone, the whole thing has blown over and will be forgotten about.

    (at least until we have shortages...like today:pac:)


  • Options
    #85
    Sycamore Tree
    Closed Accounts Posts: 796 ✭✭✭Sycamore Tree


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    Irish water is a semi state.

    The whole “might be privatised” was just an excuse.

    The FG minister who helped set up Irish Water thought differently.

    http://www.thejournal.ie/fergus-odowd-irish-water-agendas-privatisation-1825719-Dec2014/
    Former minister who set up Irish Water says 'forces' at work to privatise company
    Speaking about his role in the setting up of Irish Water in the Dáil last night, he said that he always wanted it to be included in legislation that Irish Water could never be privatised and would remain a public company.

    He said he was very surprised then to see in the number two Bill there was no provision guaranteeing the utility remaining a public body.


  • Options
    #86
    kurtainsider
    Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭kurtainsider


    Topgear on Dave wrote: »
    Exactlt. Now the bills have gone, the whole thing has blown over and will be forgotten about.

    (at least until we have shortages...like today:pac:)

    I think that people are trying to rewrite history by giving the impression that Denis O Brien's Siteserv were set up to build huge reservoirs to store loads of cool refershing water against this drought.
    Sorry - their intent was to install meters to make people pay twice for their water. They weren't going to add a single cubic inch of storage capacity.


  • Options
    #87
    alan partridge aha
    Registered Users Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    beveragelady wrote: »
    kurtainsider wrote: »
    The point you're missing is that we already pay for it. The water metering scam was a shakedown to get us to pay or it twice.

    Perhaps the government might offer an olive branch to the taxpayer next budget and reduce VAT on KY Jelly and Vaseline to 0% as a token of good will and an incentive for us all to lube up just another little bit.

    I grew up in a house with a rainwater supply because we were nowhere near mains. I now live in a house with a well, again nowhere near a mains supply. It costs money to maintain a private water supply, just like it costs money to maintain a public one. The problem is I'm paying for my private water supply but I'm also paying for yours though taxation. You're not contributing anything towards mine, though, are you?

    You need to pay for your share of water so my taxes can go to things like healthcare, education and public transport instead of filling your kettle and washing your car. You don't expect me to pay for your lunches or your central heating, why am I paying for your water?

    Water is not free. The user should pay, just like you pay for other things you use.
    You are correct sir but also most people with private wells also have septic tanks/bio units + percolation areas.
    We built in 2010/11. Cost to drill well was €1000 . €1250 for pump, pipes and fittings. €4000 for biocycle. That's a total of €6250. I don't have price of pipe plus labour for pipe from pump to dwelling. Also labour/materials for waste pipes from house to biocycle. Also pipes,distribution box,p gravel and soil plus labour for percolation area. Probably another €1000 min.
    Now also don't forgot pump for water runs on electricity as does motor in biocycle. This runs 24/7 at 70watts per hour.

    If anything thing goes wrong ie pumps etc plus emptying sewerage every 5 years WE pay for that.


  • Options
    #88
    kurtainsider
    Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭kurtainsider


    beveragelady wrote: »
    I grew up in a house with a rainwater supply because we were nowhere near mains. I now live in a house with a well, again nowhere near a mains supply. It costs money to maintain a private water supply, just like it costs money to maintain a public one. The problem is I'm paying for my private water supply but I'm also paying for yours though taxation. You're not contributing anything towards mine, though, are you?

    You need to pay for your share of water so my taxes can go to things like healthcare, education and public transport instead of filling your kettle and washing your car. You don't expect me to pay for your lunches or your central heating, why am I paying for your water?

    Water is not free. The user should pay, just like you pay for other things you use.

    Hello there beveragelady - had you continued following the thread you'ed have seen that I pay all my taxes and then provide my own water and wastewater requirements on my own after tax money -that's beside the point.
    My point is that the setting up of Irish Water was done in a manner so incompetent and disingenuous that it would have been morally wrong of the people of Ireland to support it. We deserve so much better for all our tax money.


  • Options
    #89
    GreeBo
    Registered Users Posts: 27,031 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    kurtainsider wrote: »
    I think that people are trying to rewrite history by giving the impression that Denis O Brien's Siteserv were set up to build huge reservoirs to store loads of cool refershing water against this drought.
    Sorry - their intent was to install meters to make people pay twice for their water. They weren't going to add a single cubic inch of storage capacity.

    This "paying twice" nonsense is really aggravating.

    Its already been pointed out, but lets try one more time.

    You cant use the "already paid for it" argument unless you are paying a thing thats specifically used for water.
    General taxation pays for Education, Health, Roads, lighting, etc, etc and while some of it goes towards water, not enough goes to get or keep our water supply in the state we require it to be in.

    Your argument is equivalent to expecting a free dessert because you already paid for your main course.

    As for privatisation, do you really believe there is a crowd of people just dying to take over an entity that needs over €10 Billion spent on it before it will be economical to run and also its a service that they currently have no way of correctly identifying how much each user consumers?

    Why would anyone in their right mind want to take over that business model?:confused:

    We have a shortage of potable water because, again as pointed out earlier, it takes effort to treat and store drinkable water. Someone earlier made the poor argument that for other countries this weather is typical and they have no water issues....I'm assuming that person is aware this this is not normal weather for Ireland, anymore than they metres of snow we had 3 months ago were?

    If you want a system that can guarantee potable water when the weather hits record highs and record lows for rainfall, then you can expect to pay massively over the odds for it....oh thats right, you dont want to pay at all because you think PAYE will magically cover it....its not loaves and fishes people.


  • Options
    #90
    beveragelady
    Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭beveragelady


    kurtainsider wrote: »
    I pay all my taxes and then provide my own water and wastewater requirements on my own after tax money -that's beside the point.

    Why then do you continue to spout nonsense about being asked to pay for water twice? I want everybody to pay ONCE!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    Ardent
    Registered Users Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭Ardent


    beveragelady wrote: »
    I grew up in a house with a rainwater supply because we were nowhere near mains. I now live in a house with a well, again nowhere near a mains supply. It costs money to maintain a private water supply, just like it costs money to maintain a public one. The problem is I'm paying for my private water supply but I'm also paying for yours though taxation. You're not contributing anything towards mine, though, are you?

    You need to pay for your share of water so my taxes can go to things like healthcare, education and public transport instead of filling your kettle and washing your car. You don't expect me to pay for your lunches or your central heating, why am I paying for your water?

    Water is not free. The user should pay, just like you pay for other things you use.

    Well said.


Advertisement