Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Ethiopian Airlines Crash/ B737MAX grounding

Options
1666769717274

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 19,340 CMod ✭✭✭✭Davy


    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/travel/2020/09/11/boeing-737-max-europes-flight-safety-authority-completes-test-flights/3471605001/

    Europe’s flight safety authority said Friday the first flight tests for the Boeing 737 Max, which has been grounded worldwide after two deadly crashes revealed design issues with the jet, have now been completed.

    The test flights conducted over the past week by the European Aviation Safety Agency took place in Vancouver, Canada, because of travel restrictions due to the coronavirus and are now complete, the agency said.

    “As the next step in its evaluation of the aircraft for return to service, EASA is now analyzing the data and other information gathered during the flights,” the agency said.

    The data will then be turned over to EASA’s joint operations evaluation board, which is scheduled to start its assessment next week in London.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,466 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Boeing and the FAA are not coming out of the congressional report as anything other than corrupt on the part of Boeing and open to Boeing's manipulation and utterly incompetent on the part of the FAA .

    https://www.npr.org/2020/09/16/913426448/congressional-inquiry-faults-boeing-and-faa-failures-for-deadly-737-max-plane-cr
    "The Max crashes were not the result of a singular failure, technical mistake, or mismanaged event," the committee report says. Instead, "they were the horrific culmination of a series of faulty technical assumptions by Boeing's engineers, a lack of transparency on the part of Boeing's management, and grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA."


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,249 ✭✭✭Damien360


    banie01 wrote: »
    Boeing and the FAA are not coming out of the congressional report as anything other than corrupt on the part of Boeing and open to Boeing's manipulation and utterly incompetent on the part of the FAA .

    https://www.npr.org/2020/09/16/913426448/congressional-inquiry-faults-boeing-and-faa-failures-for-deadly-737-max-plane-cr

    I’ll give the US government one simple Kudos. Their congressional hearings appear to be hard hitting. Not sure if they have any effect but I wish our tribunal of enquires had even half the balls they have.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Oireachtas enquiries here are limited by the Abbeylara judgement, and the proposed constitutional amendment and legislation to give them more powers was a mess and rejected by the people a few years ago.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 19,340 CMod ✭✭✭✭Davy


    https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/ryanair-to-place-max-order-by-year-end-predicts-davy-39538016.html

    Ryanair will take advantage of the bruised global aviation market to place a fresh order for Boeing's troubled Max jet by the end of the year, Davy Stockbrokers believes.

    Ryanair group CEO Michael O'Leary has previously indicated that the airline has been having discussions with Boeing in relation to its Max 10 variant. Eddie Wilson, the chief executive of Ryanair, recently confirmed that talks with Boeing are continuing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,867 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    They already have the Max200 orders customised to their specification, why would they want the Max10?

    Life ain't always empty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    It makes no sense

    They wants 200 seat aircraft to maximise numbers and minimize staffing

    The 10 is a interesting bit of kit with the strange landing gear. A321NEO still has the lead on range and runways, not to mention is late 1980's engineering vs late 1950's


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    Up to 33 more passengers than the Max 8 200. Just look at the success that Wizz Air and Easyjet have had with the A321Neo. I think they would like a small percentage of the fleet to maximise this extra revenue on high performing routes. Makes sense to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,867 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    321neo isn't the MAX10 though - it's an established and popular airframe that is built to modern standards and isn't a bodge clunkily modified in a desperate attempt to avoid tailstrikes.

    Life ain't always empty.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 869 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    All comes down to price. It is inferior to the A21N, everyone knows this. If they get it for pennies though, they’ll make it work, even if they just sell the production slots when things pick up. From MOL’s point of view, a virtually free Max 10 can be as inefficient as it likes vs the most in demand and therefore least discounted aircraft in the world in the Neo.

    And don’t forget, Airbus flat out refuse to deal with the Ryanair group.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,867 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Er, there are Airbus fleets within the Ryanair Group!

    Life ain't always empty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Airbus does not enter into sales discussions with Ryanair anymore.

    Ryanair group does have some Airbus aircraft which came via Lauda, but has never bought directly from Airbus, that said nothing stopping them leasing


  • Registered Users Posts: 798 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    321neo isn't the MAX10 though - it's an established and popular airframe that is built to modern standards and isn't a bodge clunkily modified in a desperate attempt to avoid tailstrikes.

    and CFIT's :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,633 ✭✭✭✭josip


    HTCOne wrote: »
    ...
    And don’t forget, Airbus flat out refuse to deal with the Ryanair group.


    And knowing that, why would Boeing give RyanAir any special discounts?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    josip wrote: »
    And knowing that, why would Boeing give RyanAir any special discounts?

    Because Boeing aren't competing with Airbus, they're competing with bankruptcy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Because Boeing aren't competing with Airbus, they're competing with bankruptcy.

    And Ryanair has a tendency to order big when no one else wants to. Ryanair placed a massive order post 9/11. After Southwest, Ryanair is Boeing's biggest customer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    And Ryanair has a tendency to order big when no one else wants to. Ryanair placed a massive order post 9/11. After Southwest, Ryanair is Boeing's biggest customer.

    Is GE Capital Aviation Services and LION not ahead of Ryanair?

    Historically (and including the MD order book) I think Ryanair is Boeing's 7th largest customer.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,803 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    GM228 wrote: »
    Is GE Capital Aviation Services and LION not ahead of Ryanair?

    Historically (and including the MD order book) I think Ryanair is Boeing's 7th largest customer.


    737 customer I'd say. Probably means nobody buys as many 737s as Southwest and Ryanair.


  • Registered Users Posts: 488 ✭✭Fritzbox


    It makes no sense
    https://b-static.net/vbulletin/images/editor/color.gif
    They wants 200 seat aircraft to maximise numbers and minimize staffing

    The 10 is a interesting bit of kit with the strange landing gear. A321NEO still has the lead on range and runways, not to mention is late 1980's engineering vs late 1950's

    The MAX 10 might still have the advantage in operating economics, though?:confused: I mean, if Boeing had wanted the MAX 10 to compete with the A320XLR in range they would have designed the MAX 10 differently. Obviously the MAX 10 is for a somewhat different market.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,867 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Ryanair chose not to order the MAX10 though - the -200 hits their sweet spot of capacity vs. costs - cabin crew included. So why would they order MAX10 now, especially as they can still drive a very hard bargain on unbuilt MAX-8-200 frames? Any -10s gathering dust are Boeing's problem.

    Life ain't always empty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    Ryanair chose not to order the MAX10 though - the -200 hits their sweet spot of capacity vs. costs - cabin crew included. So why would they order MAX10 now, especially as they can still drive a very hard bargain on unbuilt MAX-8-200 frames? Any -10s gathering dust are Boeing's problem.

    The max 10 didn't exist when they ordered the Max 8 200 though. Times change and I see no reason why they wouldn't want to take advantage of a higher capacity varient on certain routes. Itll all come down to money and what offers are on the table from Boeing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,729 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    IngazZagni wrote: »
    The max 10 didn't exist when they ordered the Max 8 200 though. Times change and I see no reason why they wouldn't want to take advantage of a higher capacity varient on certain routes. Itll all come down to money and what offers are on the table from Boeing.

    Very good offers I'd say!


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,466 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    FAA engineers union issues a statement that says MAX is still unsafe and recommended changes don't go far enough.

    As has been discussed on thread, Boeing have relied on grandfathering of the original typecerts to allow modification and upgrade to the original 50's airframe.

    This allowed changes to be made without a commensurate change to the cockpit alert systems.
    The NATCA/FAA engineers have made 5 recommendations to the "comment" phase of the FAA recertification process.

    This has long been the elephant in the room for the MAX imo.
    If it loses its typecert grandfathering, it is fundamentally uncertifiable and Boeing can't change that with a software fix.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-21/boeing-whistle-blower-says-proposed-737-max-fixes-aren-t-enough


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,237 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    banie01 wrote: »
    FAA engineers union issues a statement that says MAX is still unsafe and recommended changes don't go far enough.

    As has been discussed on thread, Boeing have relied on grandfathering of the original typecerts to allow modification and upgrade to the original 50's airframe.

    This allowed changes to be made without a commensurate change to the cockpit alert systems.
    The NATCA/FAA engineers have made 5 recommendations to the "comment" phase of the FAA recertification process.

    This has long been the elephant in the room for the MAX imo.
    If it loses its typecert grandfathering, it is fundamentally uncertifiable and Boeing can't change that with a software fix.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-21/boeing-whistle-blower-says-proposed-737-max-fixes-aren-t-enough

    No expert on Aviation here, but if I understand correctly, does this not highlight huge flaws in the FAA's own certification process?

    Have they allowed this to actually happen and take place, because they allow continuous upgrades to a plane, where full certification to the new requirements do not apply?

    Is this similar to a car company using an old chassis and then claiming, we do not need to install ABS brakes or rear seat belt, as we have only upgraded the previous car??


    Who decides at the start of the MAX project what certification, validation and applicable regulations apply?

    Does the FAA review the plans at the start and say; Yes these planned updates will qualify for "typecert grandfathering"?

    If they reverse this decision now, are they not partially responsible? (Unless Boeing done some not in the original plans).

    When was the last time Boeing got full certification on this "Air frame"? Could someone post a picture of this first certified aircraft and the MAX, with maybe short description, to see how many difference have been added over the years?

    Meanwhile Airbus are planning new Hydrogen planes (I assume a completed new aircraft with full certification:)) and boeing are planning how to add something new to their planes again or do they have something brand new coming?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,466 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    ForestFire wrote: »
    No expert on Aviation here, but if I understand correctly, does this not highlight huge flaws in the FAA's own certification process?

    Yes, it's even worse than a "flawed" process.
    Boeing basically self certified the MAX, they dictated, led and even advised the FAA on the certification.


  • Registered Users Posts: 869 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    banie01 wrote: »
    Yes, it's even worse than a "flawed" process.
    Boeing basically self certified the MAX, they dictated, led and even advised the FAA on the certification.

    They are a cluster you know what. A former Boeing engineer told me it is actually forbidden for engineers at manufacturers to contact the FAA for clarifications on design issues, regulations etc unless the FAA specifically tell a specific engineer to liase with them. The FAA only contact them to tell them they've done something wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,466 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    HTCOne wrote: »
    They are a cluster you know what. A former Boeing engineer told me it is actually forbidden for engineers at manufacturers to contact the FAA for clarifications on design issues, regulations etc unless the FAA specifically tell a specific engineer to liase with them. The FAA only contact them to tell them they've done something wrong.

    And shur...
    The FAA only know when Boeing have done something wrong because Boeing decided to let them know ;)
    Or
    When a plane falls out of the sky :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Ryanair eyes order for up to 200 new Boeing jets

    John Mulligan

    Ryanair is eyeing an order for between 150 and 200 of Boeing's troubled 737 Max aircraft, the Irish Independent understands.

    A deal for 150 Max jets would cost at least €15.9bn at list price and be the biggest commercial aircraft order placed anywhere in the world this year.

    It's believed the order could be sealed by the end of the year as the Max is certified to fly again.

    Such an huge order would be symbolically and financially important for struggling Boeing and also be in keeping with Ryanair's track record of buying jets during challenging economic conditions, when it can negotiate harder bargains.

    The Irish Independent believes that talks between Ryanair and the US jet maker are focused on an order for a mix of Max 10 and Max 200 aircraft.

    Even with a significant discount the order would be worth billions.

    At list prices, the Max 200 sells for $124.8m (€106m) each, while a Max 10 costs $134.9m, according to Boeing. The 737 Max 200 can carry 200 passengers in a single cabin configuration, while the Max 10 can carry 204.

    With Boeing trying to recover from the existential crisis the Max failure created for the aerospace company, coupled with a global airline industry that's being hammered by the Covid pandemic, any airline placing an order comes from a very strong bargaining position.

    Boeing's Max jets have been grounded all over the world for more than 18 months following two deadly crashes involving the aircraft.

    The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recently been conducting a series of certification flights for the revamped jet.

    On Wednesday, FAA boss Steve Dickson flew on a Max and said he "liked what I saw", adding that certification is "in the home stretch".

    The head of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Patrick Ky, said last week that the agency expects to lift its technical ban on the Max soon after the FAA does, making for a November timeline. Mr Ky also said that there is "an end in sight" to EASA's work on the Max.

    Ryanair - which currently has a fleet of more than 450 aircraft - was the launch customer for the Max 200, placing an order for 100 of the jets in 2014. Its total Max 200 orders - including commitments and options to buy - is 210.

    In early February, before the pandemic struck, Ryanair group chief executive Michael O'Leary said that the airline was already in talks with Boeing about an order for Max 10 jets. He did not specify how many of the aircraft Ryanair was looking to buy.

    One industry source suggested to the Irish Independent that Ryanair could place an order for significantly more than range of between 150 and 200 aircraft, but another downplayed that, arguing that too big an order could raise concerns for investors.

    Ryanair is hoping to take delivery of its first Max aircraft in January or February next year, and to have between 30 and 40 of the jets in service in time for the summer of 2021.

    Davy Stockbrokers also recently predicted that Ryanair will place an order with Boeing by the end of the year.

    Ryanair has deep pockets with about €4bn of cash on its books as well as 333 unencumbered aircraft, with a book value of €7bn.

    It boosted that financial fire-power when it raised €400m in equity last month via a share placement and subsequently issued a five-year €850m bond that was five times oversubscribed.

    Ryanair has said it expects to see "significant growth opportunities".


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Ryanair eyes order for up to 200 new Boeing jets

    No surprise there.

    Downturn in aviation, MOL calls Boeing sales. I'm on the way over lads. Drop the pants, assume the position.


Advertisement