Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Teen Porn

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,215 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Hmmm. "Very young girls" might refer to 15-year-olds though. Not children, but they also are children.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭IanCurtis


    I'm a 32 year old bloke and I have a problem with searching for "very young girls"

    It could be a joke or something else, but I'd definitely look into it further.

    It sounds dodgy to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 950 ✭✭✭EamonnKeane


    It's a long shot, but "Very Young Girls" is also a documentary about the porn industry


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Guys, the chances of finding something by typing in "child porn" other than news stories and websites giving some well deserved condemnation to the sick scum who would end up searching for it would be slim to none.

    I doubt cracking child porn rings is as simple as googling and tracking ip addresses.

    OP, at this moment you have one dodgy google search,multiple users of a PC and very little else.

    I wouldn't start accusing your boyfriend of sinister intentions just yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    OP if i were you i'd do some more sleuthing, i dunno what your area of computer expertise is though, but everyone probably knows that you never really totally delete something of a computer. (well almost never)

    NO! No no no. Do not do anymore sleuthing. If I discovered my GF had been snooping around on my computer, I would know we had a serious trust problem, and I would be finishing with her. Wait until your BF comes home, and say you found some funny search terms in google. Re-iterate that you dont mind him looking at porn but you were a bit concerned about one specific search term.

    You dont know for sure it was him. It could have been one of the other guys. It could have been one of the other guys stirring the sh1t between you and your bf.

    It could also have been a stray copy/paste record that got pasted in by accident. I do that all the time.
    is there a computer expert out there that could show this girl how to get into his internet history.
    sorry im not that good on that kind of stuff

    Well yes, Im an IT Security Specialist. But believe it or not even hackers with the blackest of hats, have ethics. It is his computer. No one has the right to show anyone how to access it.

    TALK to him. Get back to us when you have done that.

    IF, and it is a big if, it was him. And IF he did mean to search for that particular phrase, it could still be harmless.

    In my experience with porn, alot of sites have so called "barely legal teens", most of which are between the ages of 18 and 25, and are perfectly legal. What ever other peoples idea of what a young girl is, age in the porn industry is very skewed.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,215 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    I doubt the guy (if it's him) is looking for small children, rather highly sexualised teens - lolita-type girls. Since the OP is asking for our views, mine is that I would have a problem with my boyfriend having such an interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭IanCurtis


    Dudess wrote: »
    I doubt the guy (if it's him) is looking for small children, rather highly sexualised teens - lolita-type girls. Since the OP is asking for our views, mine is that I would have a problem with my boyfriend having such an interest.

    Agree entirely

    I'd say this is spot-on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    This is like saying he's a pedophile for typing 'hot school girls'. And just because he searches it one day that doesn't mean he has a fetish and is constantly thinking about 'very young dirrrty slutty girls'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,532 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Have to agree that this is no potential paedophilia case. Leave the computer alone and talk to him when he comes home, but don't expect any praise if you jump to conclusions.
    Zer0cool wrote: »
    You dont know for sure it was him. It could have been one of the other guys. It could have been one of the other guys stirring the sh1t between you and your bf.

    Well yes, Im an IT Security Specialist. But believe it or not even hackers with the blackest of hats, have ethics. It is his computer. No one has the right to show anyone how to access it.

    Agreed as well, you don't know who he let borrow the computer to go on Bebo. My neighbours last year had once laptop between 4 of them and the other 3 took a lot of fun filling it full of gay porn.

    and Zero, you're a white-hat :p not a blackie (unless you're batman at home) - someone writes the bugs that steal my passwords and paypal login details. But thats neither here nor there:
    OP while it isn't the hardest thing in the world to do, I strongly advise you leave it alone rather than snoop around the computer; its on par with rooting through any of his other personal belongings - its just not done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    Dudess wrote: »
    I doubt the guy (if it's him) is looking for small children, rather highly sexualised teens - lolita-type girls. Since the OP is asking for our views, mine is that I would have a problem with my boyfriend having such an interest.

    Whoa horsey! Lolita type girl is described as between 9-14, thats child porn.

    from what i read the fella sounds like he's into young women type, maybe not but that was my take on it, otherwise he would have googled child or put in a specific age! Lots of men love the schoolgirl thing an all but that does not mean 14 year olds float there boat.

    for fantasy i like 17-18 year old looking school girl, innocent etc.. all legal and above board-some of my mates like older women-its everyone to there own once its all above board. dont mind if the girl is 40 dressing up for me though!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    Ciaran500 wrote: »
    I guarntee if he was searching in for that google he wasn't going to find child porn.
    +1

    if it was that easy to find there would be none on the net because the police would have got it all
    thats it. its the girl bit. very young woman is 18 maybe even 17. 'girls' a completely different ball game.

    as randylonghorn said, a very young girl could be anyone up to 30 and would be extremely unlikely to be anyone under 18 and pretty much guaranteed not to be if searching on google. that's just how the industry works. veryyounggirls.com is more likely to get hits than 30yearoldwomen.com

    anyone who has searched any porn like terms on file sharing programs will tell you that the file names are all extremely long with random porn related words in them that usually have absolutely nothing to do with whats contained in the video. websites put the files up with their address embedded in the picture or video so people will see the file and go to their site.
    for example, you search the word 'porn' and the first result could be:

    woman porn child kiddy rape sex donkey etc etc etc etc etc.wmv

    and there's nothing in it but a woman in a jumper telling you all about the porn website she's on. download limewire, type in the word porn and you'll see what i'm talking about. pretty much every result is like that


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,532 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Devils Advocate: I don't think the OP is concerned with how successful his search was, more the fact that he searched for it to begin with.

    [/advocate]

    but OP try and realise the search string was more than likely just used to get at genuine 18 material. Have you tried performing these searches yourself to see what you get? Maybe its time you did. Go see how hard it is to arrive at the conclusions you're fearing and try and relax a bit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Ok, I didn't do any more nosing through his computer. I told him I saw what he was looking up and I listed the 'teenies' etc. He knows I don't mind porn so he was kind of laughing it off when I was saying it.

    Until.. I mentioned the 'very young girls' and asked him what exactly he was looking for. I said that in my opinion very young girls are children. He nearly dropped dead with shock at the suggestion that he was looking for child images. I swear, the tears welled in his eyes as he tried to explain to me that it was just a 'teenage' thing he was going through and that there was nothing sinister in the search. He didn't even deny it was him or say it was one of the other lads. I feel that if he had something to hide, he may have denied that he did the search.

    He was hurt that I would even consider that he would be looking for anything other than legal porn. He was pleading with me, did I really think he was into that sh*t? That I must know that he's not like that, that he'd never 'interfere with' or 'force himself' on anyone no matter what age they were and that he has no interest in looking at naked children.

    Housemate came in at this point so it was left up in the air.

    He brought it up again later and said that I had to know that it was innocent. It was. Gut instinct told me originally (but I couldn't help but wonder and wanted to find out other people's views) and his reaction during the conversation told me. He even said that some search he did brought up an image of an anorexic that nearly made him sick so it's mainstream pornsites (if there's such a thing! like redtube) from here on on, no more googling..

    Thanks for the viewpoints. Phew.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,532 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yay, trust is sustained, another relationship saved from the clutches of pornography :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,523 ✭✭✭✭Nerin


    Yay, trust is sustained, another relationship saved from the clutches of pornography :)
    yay :)
    happy everythin turned out ok OP


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭Placebo


    nerin wrote: »
    yay :)
    happy everythin turned out ok OP

    except for the fact that now he thinks you dont trust him.
    cycle continues


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,403 ✭✭✭passive


    redtube? :confused:

    oh... Oh my...


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,082 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    He's a good actor.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,532 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    passive wrote: »
    redtube? :confused:

    oh... Oh my...

    I'd pretend to be surprised, but I can't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,295 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Dudess wrote: »
    So what if it's regular and the "norm"? Doesn't mean there's nothing wrong with it. And how old exactly are these teens?
    Teen = 18-25
    Mature = 45-old


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 29,509 Mod ✭✭✭✭randylonghorn


    Until.. I mentioned the 'very young girls' and asked him what exactly he was looking for. I said that in my opinion very young girls are children. He nearly dropped dead with shock at the suggestion that he was looking for child images. I swear, the tears welled in his eyes as he tried to explain to me that it was just a 'teenage' thing he was going through and that there was nothing sinister in the search. He didn't even deny it was him or say it was one of the other lads. I feel that if he had something to hide, he may have denied that he did the search.
    Can't say I'm surprised in the slightest, I thought from the start that some people were building a case on cobwebs.

    And no-one is that good an actor ... any idea how difficult it is for even professional actors to produce tears on demand?


  • Registered Users Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    If he was looking for child porn, no way he wouldn't have deleted his search terms and internet history afterwards. He wasn't after child porn, he was after hot young women with that first flush of youth appeal. You've nothing to worry about, it doesn't even seem troubling to me. Plenty of people are strongly attracted to recently sexually matured girls, it's when they're most fertile, and of course that's gonna involve some underage people, it can't be helped, it's biology. It's not like the law can pop up with an arbitrary age cut off and expect sexuality to magically fall in line. The problem is people tend to get healthy human sexuality (which leads to interest in young, virginal type girls), confused with the unnatural will to exploit and harm children when it's only the latter that produces the kind of people who pursue underage porn. But there really isn't a correlation. It doesn't matter what your boyfriend is attracted to, I think it's pretty clear that he has no desire to pursue child porn and for that reason his interests are a world away from anything deserving of repulsion or discomfort, no matter how superficially close they seem to dodgy territory.

    To be honest, I'd have a job staying with someone who'd even entertained such a melodramatic and hurtful explanation as this with no solid grounding, especially when if it was meant to be the person closest to me in the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 124 ✭✭CrazyNoob


    Until.. I mentioned the 'very young girls' and asked him what exactly he was looking for. I said that in my opinion very young girls are children. He nearly dropped dead with shock at the suggestion that he was looking for child images. I swear, the tears welled in his eyes as he tried to explain to me that it was just a 'teenage' thing he was going through and that there was nothing sinister in the search. He didn't even deny it was him or say it was one of the other lads. I feel that if he had something to hide, he may have denied that he did the search.

    No wonder he was almost in tears, you implied he is looking at children in a sexual way.
    Phew???? OP if I was your BF i'd have dumped you on the spot for having such low regard and trust for me.

    I really hope you havent wrecked your relationship with such speculative and wild accusations. (innocent until proven guilty is a concept completely lost on you - hang him with speculation seems to be the general order of the day)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,395 ✭✭✭Marksie


    CrazyNoob wrote: »
    No wonder he was almost in tears, you implied he is looking at children in a sexual way.
    Phew???? OP if I was your BF i'd have dumped you on the spot for having such low regard and trust for me.

    I really hope you havent wrecked your relationship with such speculative and wild accusations. (innocent until proven guilty is a concept completely lost on you - hang him with speculation seems to be the general order of the day)

    We dont know how she approached it so thats specualtion. But Op well done on doing the correct thing and asking rather than letting all the if's and but's fill the head.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    CrazyNoob wrote: »
    No wonder he was almost in tears, you implied he is looking at children in a sexual way.
    Phew???? OP if I was your BF i'd have dumped you on the spot for having such low regard and trust for me.

    I really hope you havent wrecked your relationship with such speculative and wild accusations. (innocent until proven guilty is a concept completely lost on you - hang him with speculation seems to be the general order of the day)
    gotta agree there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 124 ✭✭CrazyNoob


    Marksie wrote: »
    We dont know how she approached it so thats specualtion. But Op well done on doing the correct thing and asking rather than letting all the if's and but's fill the head.

    We do cos OP gave us the info when she updated, so its not speculation.
    (Any speculation in this thread is entirely the OP's if and but's in her head and her if and but child porn shock brigade bandwagoners! - granted society must protect children but not to the extent of calling others good name into question)
    she asked him what he was looking for and SAID clearly in her opinion, very young girls are children - and therefore did in fact imply her BF was looking at children in a sexual manner - without actually saying those words!

    OP also pointed out that it was erronous of her to do so - and she should have trusted her gut feeling


    The point of my post was to state that if she had of implied that with me at the very least she would have done serious damage to the relationship with such accusations, possibly to the point of being dumped outright


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭togster


    CrazyNoob wrote: »

    The point of my post was to state that if she had of implied that with me at the very least she would have done serious damage to the relationship with such accusations, possibly to the point of being dumped outright

    Meh i bet if you were to ask the majority of people what "very young girls" meant the majority would presume underage girls i.e young teenagers/children. AFAIK the legal age for anyone to be involed in anything pronographic is 18 y o. You presume differently. That is your perception, it was obviously not the OP's. She did the right thing in talking to him about it imo. Leaving it up in the air would have been detrimental to the relationship anyway. I still think there is something very fishy about this whole thing. Searching "very young girls" is still suspect imo. But its just my opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭TequilaMockingBird


    togster wrote: »
    Meh i bet if you were to ask the majority of people what "very young girls" meant the majority would presume underage girls i.e young teenagers/children. AFAIK the legal age for anyone to be involed in anything pronographic is 18 y o. You presume differently. That is your perception, it was obviously not the OP's. She did the right thing in talking to him about it imo. Leaving it up in the air would have been detrimental to the relationship anyway. I still think there is something very fishy about this whole thing. Searching "very young girls" is still suspect imo. But its just my opinion.


    I agree with you.

    And of course he's going to lie. He's hardly going to admit to it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    To me "very young girls" means around 12 years old, and "child" means 5 or 6 or something like that.

    The term "teenies" defo means "early teens".

    So it sounds like he likes girls who have just hit puberty.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    togster wrote: »
    I still think there is something very fishy about this whole thing. Searching "very young girls" is still suspect imo. But its just my opinion.

    Im on record as saying that i have sexual preference physicaly for young girls of 18 or so even 40 if they look 18! this is totally legal and just my type, when i search on the net for this type of girl you have to type in stupid things like young girls etc.. then most of the time you still get 28 year old girls instead of the 18 yr old your looking for.

    i found kiddie stuff by mistake (sick, making kids look like models, but looked like professional stuff probably known to there parents) yesterday by mistake searching a term used in this thread as i did not know what it meant, that was the 1st time i ever seen such thing and i'd regularly search for young girls meaning 18 year olds..

    if i was mistaken as a paedo i would be so hurt as i'd imagine the op's partner was..lots of my mates prefer younger women and its just the same as some people who like older women.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement