Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

The SF vote was part of a class war against Middle Ireland

Options
123457

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    Im always impressed how people can get so mad at people who work incredibly hard and contribute to society and who have logged the tax cash to pay for this emergency situation in favour of defending those who only detract and are not helping financially or with their time now or after this is over.

    Ive only ever had a go at detractors and wanted a wider tax base, how you can be angry at that and not lowlifes scamming the welfare is beyond me.

    Times wont get easier for the taxpayer, were importing more detractors, every successive government spends more and theres never tax cuts.

    I pay a fortune in tax and I'm a SF supporter. Have no problem with paying tax.my problem is the endless waste of FFG governments and cronyism when tendering projects.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    smurgen wrote: »
    I pay a fortune in tax and I'm a SF supporter. Have no problem with paying tax.my problem is the endless waste of FFG governments and cronyism when tendering projects.

    Absolutely an issue, SF are not the solution. Wouldnt you rather pay a lot less in tax and not have crony quangos and massove cuvil service overspends


  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Absolutely an issue, SF are not the solution. Wouldnt you rather pay a lot less in tax and not have crony quangos and massove cuvil service overspends

    This isnt what he said though??

    He hates to see money wasted through cronism??,vast difference


    We have somehow through liberialism privatised HCAs....we pay agencies e45 an hour for this,those employed directly by the HSE earn e14.50 an hour tops and many have restricted hours...but can get near unlimited through private company (this was well before crisis)

    How is this value for money?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Im always impressed how people can get so mad at people who work incredibly hard and contribute to society and who have logged the tax cash to pay for this emergency situation in favour of defending those who only detract and are not helping financially or with their time now or after this is over.

    i don't know how you can be impressed at something that isn't happening? takes all sorts i suppose.
    Ive only ever had a go at detractors and wanted a wider tax base, how you can be angry at that and not lowlifes scamming the welfare is beyond me.

    except that isn't the case.
    people can be angry at people scamming wellfare and still not support what you support.
    Times wont get easier for the taxpayer, were importing more detractors, every successive government spends more and theres never tax cuts.

    because tax cuts are unlikely to be viable for a small country like ours.
    if it was viable to have tax cuts and public services and all the other necessities, some of which we are way behind on, then a party would have proposed it, laid out how they would deliver it, and they would i suspect be elected and have delivered it.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,054 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    i don't know how you can be impressed at something that isn't happening? takes all sorts i suppose.



    except that isn't the case.
    people can be angry at people scamming wellfare and still not support what you support.



    because tax cuts are unlikely to be viable for a small country like ours.
    if it was viable to have tax cuts and public services and all the other necessities, some of which we are way behind on, then a party would have proposed it, laid out how they would deliver it, and they would i suspect be elected and have delivered it.

    The key of course is to get everyone on the books, and contributing, however small.

    Look at what’s happening in Southern Italy now...big trouble coping .

    Why... cash economy per the BBC, just like Greece used to have.

    That’s what happens when everyone is ducking and diving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    The key of course is to get everyone on the books, and contributing, however small.

    Look at what’s happening in Southern Italy now...big trouble coping .

    Why... cash economy per the BBC, just like Greece used to have.

    That’s what happens when everyone is ducking and diving.


    you are never going to have everyone the books contributing. there will always be exemptions due to being under an income level threshold.
    and yes of course there will always be the small few ducking and diving.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,054 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    you are never going to have everyone the books contributing. there will always be exemptions due to being under an income level threshold.
    and yes of course there will always be the small few ducking and diving.

    Unfortunately there will always be endemic ‘ducking and diving’ in,granted, relatively few countries or areas

    Southern Italy and Greece being the prime examples and we all saw and are seeing the results of that practice.

    When there is a concerted endemic practice of gaming the tax system it doesn’t take long for things to fold up if it comes under any pressure.

    The report on the BBC recently showed that in stark relief.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Im always impressed how people can get so mad at people who work incredibly hard and contribute to society and who have logged the tax cash to pay for this emergency situation in favour of defending those who only detract and are not helping financially or with their time now or after this is over.

    Ive only ever had a go at detractors and wanted a wider tax base, how you can be angry at that and not lowlifes scamming the welfare is beyond me.

    Times wont get easier for the taxpayer, were importing more detractors, every successive government spends more and theres never tax cuts.


    Nobody's defending any able bodied and minded person who spends their life on the dole. We just don't base our political thoughts or think society should be structured around a Thatcherite obsession about an extremely small part of the populace. You use this sliver of the population as a substitute for critical thinking, because thinking is hard, and it also helps you feel better relative to someone else in the societal sh*theap where you're actually far from the top.

    Ireland's structural problems don't stem from this minuscule minority of people. It's a ridiculous hang-up the political and economic right has, and is played out over and over again on boards. And I'm sorry to say, you appear guilty of it as well.

    High insurance costs: spongers!
    Rental unaffordability: wasters!
    Trolly crisis: spongers!
    USC: wasters!
    War in the middle east: chancers!
    Rapid property inflation: feckless millennial!
    Health insurance premiums: Fake sick people!


    Repeat ad nauseam. It honestly bores the t*ts off me.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Runaways


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Nobody's defending any able bodied and minded person who spends their life on the dole. We just don't base our political thoughts or think society should be structured around a Thatcherite obsession about an extremely small part of the populace. You use this sliver of the population as a substitute for critical thinking, because thinking is hard, and it also helps you feel better relative to someone else in the societal sh*theap where you're actually far from the top.

    Ireland's structural problems don't stem from this minuscule minority of people. It's a ridiculous hang-up the political and economic right has, and is played out over and over again on boards. And I'm sorry to say, you appear guilty of it as well.

    High insurance costs: spongers!
    Rental unaffordability: wasters!
    Trolly crisis: spongers!
    USC: wasters!
    War in the middle east: chancers!
    Rapid property inflation: feckless millennial!
    Health insurance premiums: Fake sick people!


    Repeat ad nauseam. It honestly bores the t*ts off me.


    We have only have two parties ruling the country since the foundation of the state.
    They created this ‘free houses free doctors free money!’ Set up we currently live in and hear all about all day in every available space on boards.
    Does it actually exist? Asking for a friend.


    Yet somehow it’s Sinn Fein are the blame for those things.

    You’d have to wonder


    Almost like


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Runaways wrote: »
    We have only have two parties ruling the country since the foundation of the state.
    They created this ‘free houses free doctors free money!’ Set up we currently live in and hear all about all day in every available space on boards.
    Does it actually exist? Asking for a friend.

    Yet somehow it’s Sinn Fein are the blame for those things.

    You’d have to wonder

    Almost like


    You'll notice these folks are always clever hard-working boys beyond reproach, pay a 67% marginal tax rate, and were 'never handed nuffink never' nor never benefited from any public scheme ever. Nor did any of their family, not never.

    They were all born in wattle and daw huts used their individual brilliance to get where they are today. They wore sackcloths until they could afford their first pair of trousers when they got their first paycheck from working in the copper mines aged 11; and grateful they were for it too. There was never any helping hand along the way (it's imperative you remember this).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Field east


    RustyNut wrote: »
    Or maybe people just want change.
    The left individuals/ parties have completely failed to deliver on the apparent change that the majority of the voting public required. As far as the left is concerned those for change ‘won ‘ the election. So what type of change will all the left leaning Parties/individuals pontificate on in the lead up to the next elections?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Nobody's defending any able bodied and minded person who spends their life on the dole. We just don't base our political thoughts or think society should be structured around a Thatcherite obsession about an extremely small part of the populace. You use this sliver of the population as a substitute for critical thinking, because thinking is hard, and it also helps you feel better relative to someone else in the societal sh*theap where you're actually far from the top.

    Ireland's structural problems don't stem from this minuscule minority of people. It's a ridiculous hang-up the political and economic right has, and is played out over and over again on boards. And I'm sorry to say, you appear guilty of it as well.

    High insurance costs: spongers!
    Rental unaffordability: wasters!
    Trolly crisis: spongers!
    USC: wasters!
    War in the middle east: chancers!
    Rapid property inflation: feckless millennial!
    Health insurance premiums: Fake sick people!


    Repeat ad nauseam. It honestly bores the t*ts off me.

    its a hell of a lot more valid than

    High insurance costs: THE RICH
    Rental unaffordability: THE RICH
    Trolly crisis: THE RICH
    USC: THE RICH
    War in the middle east: THE RICH
    Rapid property inflation: THE RICH
    Health insurance premiums: THE RICH

    which is exactly what SF/PbP preach.

    People get almost irrationally angry when I talk about widening the tax base as in their heads they visualise less money in their pockets , doesn't matter how high up the income scale you go, that anger doesn't go away.

    some people want to just selfishly push the burden on to anyone just beyond their income, I want to fix the root of the problem.

    if you have a leaking bucket do you turn on another tap or fix the leak to keep it full ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    its a hell of a lot more valid than

    some people want to just selfishly push the burden on to anyone just beyond their income, I want to fix the root of the problem.



    Forgive me, but with your obsession with the tiny amount of long-term unemployed in this country, you wont be fixing anything. You could put them on an island and dynamite it to the bottom of the sea, and the issues above would remain.

    If you're p*ssed off with high taxation and sh*t services in return, as always, you're looking in the wrong place. You've deluded yourself into thinking you've found the source of the problem, you haven't, you've just gone into a political and spiritual psychosis about the negligible amount of people on long-term unemployed that every developed country has.

    You're frothing at the mouth about the wrong things.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Forgive me, but with your obsession with the tiny amount of long-term unemployed in this country, you wont be fixing anything. You could put them on an island an dynamite it to the bottom of the sea, and the issues above would remain.


    If you're p*ssed off with high taxation and sh*t services in return, as always, you're looking in the wrong place. You've deluded yourself into thinking you've found the source of the problem, you haven't, you've just gone into a political and spiritual psychosis about the negligible amount of people on long-term unemployed that every developed country has.


    You're frothing at the mouth about the wrong things.

    my issue is government spending, I want a government to provide me the bare necessities of infrastructure and emergency services. I shouldnt be paying our obscene tax rates when the only people who benefit from the vast majority of services are outside of the tax net . Cut taxation, Cut Spending, Cut services, Cut Quangos, its been a simple consistent message from me.

    The problems in our society be it social or economic are not in any way the fault of the 'high income' earners and corporations that parties like SF love pointing blame at.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    its a hell of a lot more valid than

    High insurance costs: THE RICH
    Rental unaffordability: THE RICH
    Trolly crisis: THE RICH
    USC: THE RICH
    War in the middle east: THE RICH
    Rapid property inflation: THE RICH
    Health insurance premiums: THE RICH

    which is exactly what SF/PbP preach.

    except it's not what sf and pbp preach.
    People get almost irrationally angry when I talk about widening the tax base as in their heads they visualise less money in their pockets , doesn't matter how high up the income scale you go, that anger doesn't go away.

    some people want to just selfishly push the burden on to anyone just beyond their income, I want to fix the root of the problem.

    if you have a leaking bucket do you turn on another tap or fix the leak to keep it full ?

    you want to widen the tax base and implement tax cuts.
    widening the tax base means more money out of people's pockets because it can only be done via extra charges in some form.
    tax cuts means less money for services, which widening the tax base couldn't make up the shortfall for, unless any charges were so high as to make any tax cuts redundant.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    my issue is government spending, I want a government to provide me the bare necessities of infrastructure and emergency services. I shouldnt be paying our obscene tax rates when the only people who benefit from the vast majority of services are outside of the tax net .


    I'm sorry that's absolute BS, and a warped way to view how public monies are directed and the benefits everyone derives from the same.

    I'm not saying that the government always gets tax and spend right, but you appear to have an extremely 2-D and basic understanding about things.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    except it's not what sf and pbp preach.



    you want to widen the tax base and implement tax cuts.
    widening the tax base means more money out of people's pockets because it can only be done via extra charges in some form.
    tax cuts means less money for services, which widening the tax base couldn't make up the shortfall for, unless any charges were so high as to make any tax cuts redundant.

    correct.....so you cut services..... and before you start Im not talking about nurses and doctors , I'm talking about like the immigrant council of Ireland, the duplicate bodies in the homeless sector, hse management etc...


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    my issue is government spending, I want a government to provide me the bare necessities of infrastructure and emergency services. I shouldnt be paying our obscene tax rates when the only people who benefit from the vast majority of services are outside of the tax net . Cut taxation, Cut Spending, Cut services, Cut Quangos, its been a simple consistent message from me.

    The problems in our society be it social or economic are not in any way the fault of the 'high income' earners and corporations that parties like SF love pointing blame at.

    a simple consistent message from you that isn't deliverable without in all likely hood turning ireland back into the ireland of the 1950s, which by the sounds of it is what you want.
    or if not that, some rose tinted glasses view of america perhapse, a country which isn't even any great shakes itself in the real world.
    cutting services means people who need those services no longer have access to necessary services and supports they need, ultimately increasing costs to them and ultimately the tax payer in another form when the innevitable fallout happens, because we will be paying either way.
    providing only bare bones infrastructure means ireland is not able to be as productive as it could be, which in turn means less investment, which means less jobs, less income for the state and less ability for people to change careers meaning less ability to earn a better income.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    correct.....so you cut services..... and before you start Im not talking about nurses and doctors , I'm talking about like the immigrant council of Ireland, the duplicate bodies in the homeless sector, hse management etc...


    if the government are actually going to set up their own homeless service, and independant immigrant body to insure the rights of immigrants are upheld then by all means.
    as they aren't, then the homeless services and charities, and the immigrant council of ireland are needed.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Runaways


    correct.....so you cut services..... and before you start Im not talking about nurses and doctors , I'm talking about like the immigrant council of Ireland, the duplicate bodies in the homeless sector, hse management etc...

    Anything I’ve read from you is roaring and ranting about people on social welfare and free houses etc etc


    I’ve never seen you mention the above before.

    So you’re realizing the real problem. at last. that’s progress anyways c


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Yurt! wrote: »
    I'm sorry that's absolute BS, and a warped way to view how public monies are directed and the benefits everyone derives from the same.

    I'm not saying that the government always gets tax and spend right, but you appear to have an extremely 2-D and basic understanding about things.

    2020 Total Expenditure: €80.4 billion

    Categories :
    Other - Current Spend 12.3 billion, spend that impacts those who work - 7.14 billion
    Transport - Current Spend 2.7 billion , all of it benefits all
    Debt Payment - 9.9 billion , all benefits all
    Agriculture - 1.6 billon , all benefits all
    Justice - 3 billion , Except for 251 million for free legal aid and 'fair immigration' all benefits all
    education - 11.2 billion , most of its alright,
    Welfare - 21.3 Billion , of which 10 billion is pensions and other sensible benefits
    Health - 18.3 billion, all benefits all except the system is abused, ill leave as is but trimming the fat would save 5 billion easily.

    63.59 billion benefits everyone, 16.81 billion quid going purely to those who detract from the economy.

    we could actually abolish vat if we stopped spending on these people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    2020 Total Expenditure: €80.4 billion


    63.59 billion benefits everyone, 16.81 billion quid going purely to those who detract from the economy.

    Once upon a time (and I'm sure many reading this will have a similar story) I was on the dole for a few months due to the financial crisis. I am now a high tax bracket earner and have contributed many times back what I received and will fingers crossed do so for the rest of my career.

    Back then, I wasn't one who purely detracts from the economy, and most of the people who are on the dole aren't either. The vast majority go back into the labour force and contribute towards services. You have a narrow and quite frankly Thatcherite view of the world, which is marginal and best ignored (I intend to do so from here on out, because you're saying nothing I haven't heard before from Bill Cullen types).

    People like you would have people in difficulty gone on a boat or a plane to Canada / the UK permanently. We're a society not a spiv economy, long may it stay that way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,984 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    2020 Total Expenditure: €80.4 billion

    Categories :
    Other - Current Spend 12.3 billion, spend that impacts those who work - 7.14 billion
    Transport - Current Spend 2.7 billion , all of it benefits all
    Debt Payment - 9.9 billion , all benefits all
    Agriculture - 1.6 billon , all benefits all
    Justice - 3 billion , Except for 251 million for free legal aid and 'fair immigration' all benefits all
    education - 11.2 billion , most of its alright,
    Welfare - 21.3 Billion , of which 10 billion is pensions and other sensible benefits
    Health - 18.3 billion, all benefits all except the system is abused, ill leave as is but trimming the fat would save 5 billion easily.

    63.59 billion benefits everyone, 16.81 billion quid going purely to those who detract from the economy.

    we could actually abolish vat if we stopped spending on these people.

    yes, good idea, we could put genuine people who are receiving some of that spend into serious hardship, no doubt they would actually be the only ones effected as the tiny few who are doal lifers will just find other sources and it won't be a job.
    legal aid is worth every penny by the way, it insures those unable to afford access to legal aid to try and get fair justice are able to do so.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,909 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I want a government to provide me the bare necessities of infrastructure and emergency services. I shouldnt be paying our obscene tax rates when the only people who benefit from the vast majority of services are outside of the tax net .

    This is absolute cobblers. But wholly indicative of your utterly miserable mindset.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Forgive me, but with your obsession with the tiny amount of long-term unemployed in this country, you wont be fixing anything. You could put them on an island and dynamite it to the bottom of the sea, and the issues above would remain.

    If you're p*ssed off with high taxation and sh*t services in return, as always, you're looking in the wrong place. You've deluded yourself into thinking you've found the source of the problem, you haven't, you've just gone into a political and spiritual psychosis about the negligible amount of people on long-term unemployed that every developed country has.

    You're frothing at the mouth about the wrong things.

    I fully agree that the high price level / medical / legal / energy / property costs are nothing to do with the LT unemployed.

    However, it is true that we have high rates of economic inactivity in Ireland.

    We have led the EU in rates of VLWI for over a decade.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    m I shouldnt be paying our obscene tax rates when the only people who benefit from the vast majority of services are outside of the tax net.

    Note that other than the crazy low entry point into the top MTR, overall taxes are not high in Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    correct.....so you cut services..... and before you start Im not talking about nurses and doctors , I'm talking about like the immigrant council of Ireland, the duplicate bodies in the homeless sector, hse management etc...

    Having hundreds of AHBs doesn't make sense, fair enough.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    if the government are actually going to set up their own homeless service, .... then the homeless services and charities, are needed.


    We have 31 LA which deal with homelessness.

    But as well there are dozens of homeless charities.

    And hundreds of AHBs.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Runaways


    Tony EH wrote: »
    This is absolute cobblers. But wholly indicative of your utterly miserable mindset.

    All it took was a pandemic and a lockdown before 1/2 the country was on the dole and the other 1/2 wishing they were allowed to Travel to where they want without getting moved on by the Gardaí.

    Sure another few weeks of this and he'll be recognised as an ethnic minority. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    Geuze wrote: »
    We have 31 LA which deal with homelessness.

    But as well there are dozens of homeless charities.

    And hundreds of AHBs.

    Like a lot of these things they are not as they seem when you drill down, for example, an organization coulld have been providing services to some group and have lots of houses. Becaue of legislation they have to separate off the housing part and set it up as some sort of social housing organization giving the impression that there is more housing organization that there use to be, when in fact it is just a change in category.


Advertisement