Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
09-10-2018, 20:03   #16
Samuel T. Cogley
Registered User
 
Samuel T. Cogley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by GingerLily View Post
Of course its less than the market rate, HAP properties should be the most affordable housing, not the average rent in an area?

HAP should be the average for a given area or you end up ghettoising the poor/vulnerable to certain areas and accomodation types.

This is why HAP is flawed from the absolutel outset. The state should not be using private LL's to house people.
Samuel T. Cogley is offline  
(2) thanks from:
Advertisement
09-10-2018, 21:40   #17
GingerLily
Registered User
 
GingerLily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel T. Cogley View Post
HAP should be the average for a given area or you end up ghettoising the poor/vulnerable to certain areas and accomodation types.

This is why HAP is flawed from the absolutel outset. The state should not be using private LL's to house people.
Maybe the average actual rent paid, but if your expecting the average asking rent on Daft I think your expectations are unrealistic
GingerLily is offline  
10-10-2018, 07:14   #18
dudara
Administrator
 
dudara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garibaldi? View Post
So the best solution is to serve notice according to the length of occupation, to move into your property and to let your present house at a viable rent. Seems so unnecessary, and unfair to nice tenants, but with the expenses of letting out a house being so onerous what else can you do. Ridiculous situation.
The first thing to do is to use the RTB calculator to figure out the maximum allowable increase. Depending on when the rent was last set, it could be a decent sum.
dudara is offline  
10-10-2018, 07:29   #19
raxy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 212
If a property has been let for the first time then they can break the 4% rule to bring the rent inline with the current market rate in the area.
It was talked about on the radio a while back when a state/council owned property raised the rents more than the 4% allowed.
raxy is offline  
10-10-2018, 07:42   #20
Samuel T. Cogley
Registered User
 
Samuel T. Cogley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by GingerLily View Post
Maybe the average actual rent paid, but if your expecting the average asking rent on Daft I think your expectations are unrealistic

I don't expect anything from HAP other than a hot mess, but if the model is to distribute social tenants over a wider area (a good policy socially) then HAP has to keep up. That includes paying HAP to a level that allows (some) people to be housed people in desirable areas.
Samuel T. Cogley is offline  
Advertisement
10-10-2018, 08:55   #21
beauf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 13,687
If the hap is to be kept low and attractive to LL. Its should offer some other value added to the landlord. Lower risk. Many LL would be happy with a modest rent if the risk was reduced.

But one of the cost savings of out sourcing is that the risk of over holding and repairs is borne by the landlord not the local authority.
beauf is offline  
Thanks from:
10-10-2018, 23:32   #22
unreg999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by GingerLily View Post
Of course its less than the market rate, HAP properties should be the most affordable housing, not the average rent in an area?
That makes no sense as there are certain standards a house has to reach to be able to be used for HAP.
I've been renting my whole adult life, almost 30 years now and this is my first time on HAP, it's the nicest house I've ever lived in and there was an inspection done with a list of work given to the landlord to bring it up to spec or else it would have been cancelled!
Therefore, by default you are looking at the better houses in an area for the HAP scheme and certainly not the lower end, forcing people who are already financially vulnerable to 'top up' the miserly rent cap, putting them in a much worse situation just trying to keep a roof over their heads.
It's a REALLY messed up situation
unreg999 is offline  
10-10-2018, 23:39   #23
unreg999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by beauf View Post
If the hap is to be kept low and attractive to LL. Its should offer some other value added to the landlord. Lower risk. Many LL would be happy with a modest rent if the risk was reduced.

But one of the cost savings of out sourcing is that the risk of over holding and repairs is borne by the landlord not the local authority.
There is no incentive to keep the rent low as the tenant is expected to top the rent up out of their social welfare payment.
I am on Disability Allowance and my weekly top up to the landlord is almost half my weekly payment including the weekly contribution that is made to the county council.
I know of people in even worse situations than that. If the rent increases then that comes out of the top up too, there is no increase from the cc above the cap!
It's a very bad system in my opinion, a total poverty trap
unreg999 is offline  
11-10-2018, 00:05   #24
Garibaldi?
Registered User
 
Garibaldi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 158
There is a set maximum rent for each area in the country, This is considerably lower than the market rent. The local authority pays this to the landlord every month(on the last Wednesday). The tenant pays a contribution from their own income, not to the landlord, but to the authority.This contribution is based on the tenants's income. If the income is very modest, so also is the contribution. If the tenant fails to pay the contribution, the full payment to the landlord is withheld and the landlord needs to address the matter through the PRTB.
Garibaldi? is offline  
Advertisement
12-10-2018, 13:43   #25
unreg999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garibaldi? View Post
There is a set maximum rent for each area in the country, This is considerably lower than the market rent. The local authority pays this to the landlord every month(on the last Wednesday). The tenant pays a contribution from their own income, not to the landlord, but to the authority.This contribution is based on the tenants's income. If the income is very modest, so also is the contribution. If the tenant fails to pay the contribution, the full payment to the landlord is withheld and the landlord needs to address the matter through the PRTB.
I don't know about the procedure 're. non-payment but the rest is correct.

The minimum contribution is €26 per week but very few people are paying that as it is means tested so even as a disabled single parent I was paying €36 per week out of my payment of €220 as I was also receiving the extra €29 per week for my child. If I had been receiving maintenance it would have been discounted pound for pound.

That did not include the extra monthly top-up of €200 (endorsed by the CC as part of the HAP scheme) making my total rent payable €82 out of €220 weekly.
Though I am very lucky to have a roof over our heads for now, don't get me wrong, this is not a sustainable system in my opinion and nothing more than a poverty trap.
unreg999 is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet