Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Tenants sublet house without permission

  • 06-02-2019 11:45am
    #1
    pjackson
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭


    I rented a house to a couple in January 2018. The rent has been paid on time and the house is being kept well. However I have just discovered that the couple brought 2 additional people into the house a number of months ago. My belief is that they intended to do so from the outset as the rent was not sustainable for them. At the time of letting the house, I asked the couple whether the rent was affordable and they indicated that it was. So they are in breach of the lease. My thinking on the next steps is to meet with all 4 people in the house and to indicated that I want to regularise the situation with all parties signing a new lease. I believe one of the tenants (a student) may leave in May when his course finishes and I am thinking that from that point, I will tell them that I want a maximum of 3 in the (3 bedroom) house. My original ideas was to get 3 professional people sharing the house.

    Any advice would be appreciated particularly from anyone who may have had a similar situation as a landlord.

    Thanks in advance.


«1345

Comments

  • #2
    Anthonylfc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 282 ✭✭Anthonylfc


    tell them the maintainance agreement was for 2 people not 4 so they must foot the repairs . wear and tear


  • #3
    ArthurG
    Registered Users Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭ArthurG


    pjackson wrote: »
    .... The rent has been paid on time and the house is being kept well.....

    How much of a stink do you want to kick up given this?


  • #4
    cruizer101
    Registered Users Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭cruizer101


    I kind of agree with ArthurG if they are paying the rent and keeping the house well you may not want to do too much.
    If you set up a new lease with each of the tenants you are having to deal with different people and it could be more hassle.
    I can understand you wanting some more rent as there is more wear and tear on the house mind.


  • #5
    ct5amr2ig1nfhp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭ct5amr2ig1nfhp


    I think it is very wrong when landlords have to tiptoe around tenants that are breaking their lease conditions.

    As a matter of interest, how did you find out they had allowed two additional tenants live in the house?


  • #6
    Doop
    Registered Users Posts: 1,465 ✭✭✭Doop


    Anthonylfc wrote: »
    tell them the maintainance agreement was for 2 people not 4 so they must foot the repairs . wear and tear

    What document is this? and who has a copy?


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    The Student
    Registered Users Posts: 1,238 ✭✭✭The Student


    The tenants are in breach of their lease. There is double the wear and tear on the fixtures and fittings. I would advise them that the sub tenants need to move out.


  • #8
    .......
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,057 ✭✭✭.......


    Does your insurance cover 4 people or only the original 2?


  • #9
    pjackson
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭pjackson


    Thanks for the responses. 'Re the question as to how we found out about the extra tenants met them on an annual boiler service. Insurance is OK I think - doesn't specify the number of tenants. I think I will go with telling them that we need to get to 3 people in the house but given them till May June to do so.


  • #10
    crkcvnirl
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭crkcvnirl


    Assuming you've named the 2 tenants on the original lease they are then in breach of that lease. You can....

    1) Serve a termination notice.
    2) Have them all sign a new lease, update the RTB details, move on and make regular inspection visits every 2 or 3 months.


    Best of luck.


  • #11
    Wheres Me Jumper?
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    tell them they are in breach of their lease.
    tell them you intend to double the rent, if they wish to stay. give them a few days to decide.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    crkcvnirl
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭crkcvnirl


    Wheres Me Jumper? wrote: »
    tell them they are in breach of their lease.
    tell them you intend to double the rent, if they wish to stay. give them a few days to decide.


    We'd all love to be able to double rental income, but this is not great advice. Especially if the property is in a rent control zone, it would be just a little illegal!!! Tenants can make a claim and get overpayment and a possible additional payment back from the LL.


  • #13
    Always Tired
    Closed Accounts Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Always Tired


    Wheres Me Jumper? wrote: »
    tell them they are in breach of their lease.
    tell them you intend to double the rent, if they wish to stay. give them a few days to decide.

    yeah except then the landlord would be in breach. the tenants breaching the lease doesn't give him carte blanche over the situation. he can't raise the rent on the two that are there. he can insist that the non signed tenants move out or get them to sign up to a new lease. if he wants to charge double then it's basically costing the original couple the same as before so maybe they can't afford it and all 4 move out.
    then the LL would just have to readvertise it and do viewings again. if it gets rented to another couple the rent is going to have to be the same. so what's the point going nuclear and forcing them out when the rent is being paid on time?


  • #14
    Wheres Me Jumper?
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    crkcvnirl wrote: »
    We'd all love to be able to double rental income, but this is not great advice. Especially if the property is in a rent control zone, it would be just a little illegal!!! Tenants can make a claim and get overpayment and a possible additional payment back from the LL.

    he doesn't have to follow through, just threaten ie give them the option, pay more rent or get their buddies to move out.
    no tenant likes the prospect of a looming rent increase, especially as they are currently breaching their lease agreement as is.
    every time the postman calls ....!


  • #15
    crkcvnirl
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭crkcvnirl


    crkcvnirl wrote: »
    Assuming you've named the 2 tenants on the original lease they are then in breach of that lease. You can....

    1) Serve a termination notice.
    2) Have them all sign a new lease, update the RTB details, move on and make regular inspection visits every 2 or 3 months.


    Best of luck.


    Hi Pjackson
    Run with above advise or similar and just ignore suggestions about threatening to up rent, that "nuclear" option does not exist.



    Tenants that look after a property are worth keeping.



    Best of luck.


  • #16
    emeldc
    Registered Users Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭emeldc


    Op if they are looking after the place and paying the rent I'd be slow to bring two more people in to the legal framework. If the original couple decide to move out it might not suit you to keep on the other two. I'm not sure if they would have any legal right to stay there but I'd be a lot quicker to change the locks on someone that I had no financial or written agreement with. Try and consider every scenario and how you might deal with it.


  • #17
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    I'm curious, if the tenants sublet for for than the market rate who is then breaking the RPZ.

    In the the OP situation he has not vetted the two new tenants.
    If the original two leave, he is left with tenants he didn't vet and who he doesn't have a deposit from.
    The original two can claim their deposit not the 2nd couple.

    Very messy.


  • #18
    GGTrek
    Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭GGTrek


    emeldc wrote: »
    Op if they are looking after the place and paying the rent I'd be slow to bring two more people in to the legal framework. If the original couple decide to move out it might not suit you to keep on the other two. I'm not sure if they would have any legal right to stay there but I'd be a lot quicker to change the locks on someone that I had no financial or written agreement with. Try and consider every scenario and how you might deal with it.
    After 6 months of the LL knowing there are occupiers without terminating tenancies they have the legal right to request to stay and be treated as a tenant and not a licensee of the main tenants (ain't the RTA such a wonderful piece of ...?)


    I had twice the case of tenant illegally subletting. Once when I was a brand new and innocent landlord (ended up really badly with main tenant leaving and the other one causing a lot of problems and having to take to RTB to kick out). The second time I simply kicked out every single one of the smart-.... (they could afford but they wanted to save on my skin and were overcrowding the property). I do not provide fixed term tenancies of more than 3 months nowadays, so if tenants misbehave at the the 3 months they get termination notice without reason very quickly. Life is too short to deal with the antics of smart-...


    Biggest error of the OP was to question the tenants if they could afford the rent. If the OP knew the tenants could not afford given their paychecks or bank statements, then he/she should not have let the property to this particular set of tenants. It is part of the reference checking process, if the numbers do not add up then no letting.


    My suggestion if the OP's property is inside an RPZ (which leaves no flexibility to negotiate rent to cover additional wear&tear) is to terminate the tenancy for serious breach of lease and then look for tenants who can afford the rent. The current Irish tenancy law does not leave space for negotiations or to provide freebies to tenants (down the line it will seriously punish every LL doing good deeds).


  • #19
    Mrs OBumble
    Registered Users Posts: 25,657 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    OP what problem are you actually trying to fix? Why is three poeple better than four?

    If you insist on only three tenants you mau go from having two couples who look after the house and pay the rent, to some other combination that don't and cause you a lot more trouble. Especially if you got three singles having frequent one night stands or even just a partner to stay for three night per week each, average occupancy could be higher than four.


  • #20
    Wabbit Ears
    Registered Users Posts: 3,042 ✭✭✭Wabbit Ears


    My view is that I dont care who lives there so long as the rent is paid and the place is kept well. I'm not in the business of micromanaging tenants.


  • #21
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Mrs OBumble wrote: »
    OP what problem are you actually trying to fix? Why is three poeple better than four?...

    That they broke the lease I assume.

    Are leases not important for you?


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    rightmove
    Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭rightmove


    Op if they are not playing by the rules you need to be concerned. It could be tip of the iceberg in long run


  • #23
    Pkiernan
    Registered Users Posts: 4,315 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    The wisest move for the OP is to terminate the lease.


  • #24
    SusanC10
    Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    From a Tenant perspective here (albeit 15+ years ago).

    My Husband and I did this in Dublin before we were married while renting and saving for a Mortgage. We rented a 3 Bed House with 2 other friends. The Landlords were a retired couple who did not live in Dublin. They were looking for 3 Professionals and so 3 out of the 4 of us met them with my Husband and I omitting the fact that we were a couple.

    We could all afford one-third of the Rent. But for various reasons we were all saving. Husband & I took the largest en-suite room and the 4 of us split the Rent equally.

    Our friends were a married friend of my Husband whose wife lived their home in Cork and he was there Mon-Thurs and a friend of mine who spent most nights with her boyfriend at the time.

    We kept the place very well. The Landlords always gave notice when calling so we were prepared.

    My Husband and I were the first to leave that house and when we were meeting the Landlords for the last time, they told us that they knew from very early on about the 4th person. One of the neighbours had told them. But the Rent was paid on time and the house was very well looked after so they had decided not to say anything.


  • #25
    Wabbit Ears
    Registered Users Posts: 3,042 ✭✭✭Wabbit Ears


    Pkiernan wrote: »
    The wisest move for the OP is to terminate the lease.


    a fine way to absolutely guarantee good tenants turning bad overnight. Like really, how exactly does anyone thing trying to evict them over this will play out? They go.. yes, we were bad and will take our punishment without any consequences? seriously like


  • #26
    Squatter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭Squatter


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    From a Tenant perspective here (albeit 15+ years ago).

    My Husband and I did this in Dublin before we were married while renting and saving for a Mortgage. We rented a 3 Bed House with 2 other friends. The Landlords were a retired couple who did not live in Dublin. They were looking for 3 Professionals and so 3 out of the 4 of us met them with my Husband and I omitting the fact that we were a couple.

    We could all afford one-third of the Rent. But for various reasons we were all saving. Husband & I took the largest en-suite room and the 4 of us split the Rent equally.

    Our friends were a married friend of my Husband whose wife lived their home in Cork and he was there Mon-Thurs and a friend of mine who spent most nights with her boyfriend at the time.

    We kept the place very well. The Landlords always gave notice when calling so we were prepared.

    My Husband and I were the first to leave that house and when we were meeting the Landlords for the last time, they told us that they knew from very early on about the 4th person. One of the neighbours had told them. But the Rent was paid on time and the house was very well looked after so they had decided not to say anything.

    Ah, but 15 years ago was long before FG's very own Laurel and Hardy (aka Leo and Eoghan) launched a full frontal assault on landlords' rights.


  • #27
    SusanC10
    Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Squatter wrote: »
    Ah, but 15 years ago was long before FG's very own Laurel and Hardy (aka Leo and Eoghan) launched a full frontal assault on landlords.

    Very true!

    But I suppose I am thinking that if the Tenants are paying on time and looking after the place then maybe not the worst thing.


  • #28
    beauf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Wabbit Ears wrote: »
    a fine way to absolutely guarantee good tenants turning bad overnight. Like really, how exactly does anyone thing trying to evict them over this will play out? They go.. yes, we were bad and will take our punishment without any consequences? seriously like



    You say they are good tenants even thought they broke the lease and YOU reckon they will cause trouble in the future.


  • #29
    Wheres Me Jumper?
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    they signed a lease. if they break it then need to be served notice, unless you are not that bothered by the extra person(s). if you aren't bothered then leave them. (i wouldn't btw)

    tenants are like cars, once they start giving you trouble, then you're best rid of 'em.

    if the property is in Dublin, you will have no problem getting new tenants, who will play ball and comply with the terms of the lease. their loss.


  • #30
    Claw Hammer
    Registered Users Posts: 6,153 ✭✭✭Claw Hammer


    Wheres Me Jumper? wrote: »
    they signed a lease. if they break it then need to be served notice, unless you are not that bothered by the extra person(s). if you aren't bothered then leave them. (i wouldn't btw)

    tenants are like cars, once they start giving you trouble, then you're best rid of 'em.

    if the property is in Dublin, you will have no problem getting new tenants, who will play ball and comply with the terms of the lease. their loss.

    The OP could well be throwing out a paying tenant end up getting in a non paying tenant.


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Wheres Me Jumper?
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    Claw Hammer wrote: »
    The OP could well be throwing out a paying tenant end up getting in a non paying tenant.

    if there are extra persons in the place, and they are still paying the same rent then as i see it, they are not paying their rent.

    my advice is to get rid of them as soon as he can.


Advertisement