Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Speed cameras in Ireland - a guide

1…2930323435…44

Comments

  • #932
    Mc Love
    Registered Users Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    Any idea how to get the revenue collectors on a road close to where I live?


  • #933
    Effects
    Registered Users Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭Effects


    Mc Love wrote: »
    Any idea how to get the revenue collectors on a road close to where I live?

    This is the speed camera thread. You are looking for taxation.


  • #934
    rabbitinlights
    Registered Users Posts: 4,002 ✭✭✭rabbitinlights


    Aston martin wrote: »
    Aston: Not possible to disprove you are not guilty , I would think there hasn't been anyone able to disprove the Radar or equipment evidence was faulty
    you can't look at the contract appointing GO-SAFE ,GO Safe don't have phone Number ? as far as I know its and off shore company based Isle of man.

    Surely as innocence you should be given a fair chance to defend your self , some people get caught and they weren't speeding !!!! Radar manufactories have warning on them that mistakes can happen.

    In UK two separate evidence and two photos in Ireland one photo.

    Its is common that people self regulate but we all know from building regulations in Ireland where people regulated them selfs and there was a mess left behind .

    Say the company that make the radar AGD/Redflex {Redflex are shareholder in Go Safe}
    come along at end of the year to the GO Safe Van and find out that the radar hasn't been calibrating properly for last six months ,
    957 drivers have been caught incorrectly and fined and paid .

    the question I am wondering does Radar company that self regulate by issuing their own certs point out the problem,
    1) does it cost the radar couple hundred thousands and maybe the whole Go Safe company and system collapse
    2) or do the just say all correct , and reissue cert for another 12 months : does anyone know the answer ???

    I can get you certified court extract from an Irish court where the prosecution state clearly the calibration cert used by Go Safe can only be read out of Ireland , Happy to meet you you to show you.

    Interesting I understand that the pictures are uploaded by Redflex software , {Redflex are a third share holder in Go Safe ,}

    There was a very brave Whistle blower in Go-Safe that pointed out , that people had been fined incorrectly , why was he fired ???

    You should get caught speeding and then use all your well researched information to bring down the system.


  • #935
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    In UK two separate evidence and two photos in Ireland one photo.

    There is a lot of error in your post to go through but I'll focus on this for now. You are comparing two different systems. In the UK, and Ireland when we had them, there were two photos from fixed cameras. Why? It was a fixed camera with lines painted on the road. So the two photos were your car in two positions hence distance (From the lines on the road) and time between photos gives you verification of speed to the radar reading.

    This does not apply for GoSafe in Ireland or any camera system that is mobile.

    With respect to your core argument, you are forgetting that the Irish statute has no requirement for equipment to be validated or calibrated. Is this insane? Yes. But it's the law and until that law is examined and challenged (Read 'deep pockets' and 'days in the supreme court') then it's not going to change. Therefore we can wax lyrical on here and present hypotheticals but the second you land in front of a judge, they'll point out that statute and you'll hear a gavel not in your favour.


  • #936
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    ironclaw wrote: »
    There is a lot of error in your post to go through but I'll focus on this for now. You are comparing two different systems. In the UK, and Ireland when we had them, there were two photos from fixed cameras. Why? It was a fixed camera with lines painted on the road. So the two photos were your car in two positions hence distance (From the lines on the road) and time between photos gives you verification of speed to the radar reading.

    reply :Thanks for clarification on the two photos , but still in UK they require two bits of evidence but as you say we are in Ireland so its not the same standard.

    This does not apply for GoSafe in Ireland or any camera system that is mobile.
    Reply: Is there a Video of the speeding cars ?

    There was a case in Thurles before judge Elizabeth Mcgrath threw a case out said only one picture and the case was reported on RTE radio 1 Sean O Rourke show.

    If you were to go before the Ennis court the Judge seems to have a great understanding of the law and does a great job
    and dismiss a lot of case he is not happy with, in fairness to the local solicitors they do a great job and argue for the clients and put up strong legal arguments ..

    With respect to your core argument, you are forgetting that the Irish statute has no requirement for equipment to be validated or calibrated. Is this insane? Yes. But it's the law and until that law is examined and challenged (Read 'deep pockets' and 'days in the supreme court') then it's not going to change. Therefore we can wax lyrical on here and present hypotheticals but the second you land in front of a judge, they'll point out that statute and you'll hear a gavel not in your favour.

    Agree totally with you the law is written that you are guilty as doesn't allow or consider any errors which are possible .


    Please point out any other errors you think as this is a discussion board so please let me know


  • Advertisement
  • #937
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    On an unrelated note .

    Is it a record that this is an 8yr old thread, yet still relevant, and Still active.

    Bula Bus to ironclaw


  • #938
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Is there a Video of the speeding cars ?

    There is video, but it would be useless as you have no fixed reference point i.e. Lines painted on the road.
    There was a case in Thurles before judge Elizabeth Mcgrath threw a case out said only one picture and the case was reported on RTE radio 1 Sean O Rourke show.

    I can't find the judgement/news article but I'm guessing that relates to the permanent record precident? I'd need to read the case notes to see what was actually discussed but there is plenty of judgements in favour of GoSafe and speeding in general in Ireland.


  • #939
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Thanks very much Ironclaw, Maybe the video could help people in there defence, there are plenty measurement in an urban setting , tress, lines on road ,bus stops ,pot holes drains , other cars in the picture that may also be speeding , items that can reflect the radar ,radar reflection Video may also show Van may parked on a grass verge just after a comer they don't always park in great places , or the van parked on a slope

    The program was Sean O Rourke and Paddy O Gorman said case dismissed by judge as there was not two photos case heard Thurles court before a very good Judge Elizabeth McGrath broadcast on the main Irish National radio RTE 1 on 26.09.18 at about 6 mins and 50 secs
    you can search it in the RTE player under Thurles you need Adobe to listen to it or you may find it on the RTE link https://rte.ie/r.html?rii=b9_21437788_15036_26-09-2018_


  • #940
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    The above highlights, at least to me, that you may not have a great understanding of how this technology works.
    there are plenty measurement in an urban setting , tress, lines on road ,bus stops ,pot holes drains

    Taking aside the rural setting with no point of reference, you would need to know the distance between the van, car and every object in the snap, exactly. Contrast to Fixed Gatso, the lines on the road are painted in a tight tolerance and the system is in a known location in relation to these lines. The same is said for Red Light cameras. The measurements are exact. Likewise, you have two points of evidence, a radar reading and an entirely separate timing element for the camera to measure the time between snaps, which show the lines on the road, hence the two pieces of evidence are comparable.

    A video doesn't aid your defence in the slightest as there is no way of knowing, with great accuracy, how fast you were travelling from the footage.

    Remember, if you are in front of a judge, the chances are you were close to the limit and likely far over it given the tolerance to actually get a ticket. Hence, if your video footage is say +/- 10% accurate, which would be generous, you are not helping your case.
    other cars in the picture that may also be speeding

    RedFlex makes systems that are capable of tracking multiple 'targets' and the presence of other cars doesn't influence the reading. To give an example of the complexity, the system can measure the length of a car.
    items that can reflect the radar ,radar reflection

    This problem has long been solved by the engineering of the system itself. Radar has come a long way since the 1940's and even consumer based radar systems have extreme fault tolerance to this. You need only look at self-driving cars and radar-based cruise controls.
    may also show Van may parked on a grass verge just after a comer they don't always park in great places , or the van parked on a slope

    This has no impact on the van as the system and the system is calibrated prior to being used. If you ever have the good fortune of seeing a van being set up, you'll see a small tripod out the back. This calibration is what is occurring and was the focus of the investigation (I think Prime Time) a few years ago.

    In closing, anyone who reads my post history will notice I'm not the greatest fan of these cameras but I'm generally of the opinion, from every ounce of research I've done, that if someone ends up in front of a judge for a speeding ticket, they probably deserve to be there. Trying to get off on a technicality is not a mature way to act on the road. If someone is speeding, at least accept there is a possibility you will get caught and when you do get caught, pay the piper. Of course, that does not apply if someone was genuinely not speeding but the chances of that happening are very, very low.

    My personal recommendation is to expend your energy in fitting to your own car a method of determining your own speed accurately (Read 'race spec gps not cheap china dvr') and when you get caught, check your speed. If you were over, pay the fine, if you were under, try to fight it on those terms.


  • #941
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Thanks ironclaw,

    Very helpful, and have you have great knowledge I will look at 'race spec gps sounds interesting , as I don't speed hopefully won't get caught unless in error by a Go Safe/Garda and could use this in defence but don't think it would be accepted.

    A video could work clearly in anyones defence with some accuracy as if you play the video , two cars traveling opposite directions closely within 3 to 5 ft of each other in a very urban setting loads of reflections one doing car 30kph and one car doing 65kph radar makes a mistake or the software makes a mistake or operator makes a mistake, wrong car caught.
    it’s very easy to see simply from the footage which car was speeding not rocket science .

    There is only one way you can get off if you are innocent , that's to say you didn't get the summons (No penalty points no cost over 250,000 people have done this it’s easy)

    The other way is go to court explain under oath that you are not guilty, you can't prove the radar wasn't working properly as law states it was ,if you had loads of money you can get an radar expert from UK , Stg £3,500 for the day
    DPP will asks then for new date so you might have another day at Stg £3,500 Total Stg £7,000 and you might get off on technically issue its very unfair as you have to be rich to get expert.

    if you louse you get 3 points plus 2 points for saying your innocent and remember you weren't speeding.

    It is possible to get caught when driving carefully and not over the speed limit and many many other offenses that you’re not guilty off and the Garda have mentioned before that over 14,000 errors have happened https://www.odwyersolicitors.ie/garda-error-on-traffic-convictions/

    This came out at the time of the 2,000,000 (yes Two million) drink drive tests that were falsified illegally as they didn't happen as before mentioned the brave GO Safe whistle blower who tried to tell the truth ,why was he fired ? its covered here https://www.thejournal.ie/wrongly-fined-1393534-Apr2014

    Did you get a chance to listen to the Sean O Rourke link , ? wonder why the judge was looking for two photos ?


  • Advertisement
  • #942
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    Aston martin wrote: »
    Thanks ironclaw,

    Very helpful, and have you have great knowledge I will look at 'race spec gps sounds interesting , as I don't speed hopefully won't get caught unless in error by a Go Safe/Garda and could use this in defence but don't think it would be accepted.

    A video could work clearly in your defence with some accuracy as if you play the video , two cars traveling opposite directions closely within 3 ft of each other in a very urban setting loads of reflections one doing car 30kph and one car doing 65kph radar makes a mistake or the software makes a mistake wrong car caught
    it’s very easy to see from the footage which car was speeding.

    There is only one way you can get off if you are innocent , that's to say you didn't get the summons (No penalty points no cost over 250,000 people have done this it’s easy)

    The other way is go to court explain under oath that you are not guilty, you can't prove the radar wasn't working properly as law states it was ,if you had loads of money you can get an radar expert from UK , Stg £3,500 for the day
    DPP will asks then for new date so you might have another day at Stg £3,500 Total Stg £7,000 and you might get off on technically issue its very unfair as you have to be rich to get expert.

    if you louse you get 3 points plus 2 points for saying your innocent and remember you weren't speeding.

    It is possible to get caught when driving carefully and not over the speed limit and many many other offenses that you’re not guilty off and the Garda have mentioned before that over 14,000 errors have happened https://www.odwyersolicitors.ie/garda-error-on-traffic-convictions/

    This came out at the time of the 2,000,000 (yes Two million) drink drive tests that were falsified illegally as they didn't happen as before mentioned the brave GO Safe whistle blower who tried to tell the truth ,why was he fired ? its covered here https://www.thejournal.ie/wrongly-fined-1393534-Apr2014

    Did you get a chance to listen to the Sean O Rourke link , ? wonder why the judge was looking for two photos ?

    The new dual radar systems are pretty accurate.

    You've very very unlikely to be caught incorrectly.

    If you get a ticket, .. just pay it. The chances of being incorrectly recorded are so very very small that the eliminate of doubt is so dismisminhed, you wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell of successfully contrasting it.

    But. Like so many posters before that claim that they will contest.. you'll never hear a follow up.

    If you're caught. You're caught.

    Take your medicine


  • #943
    pauldavis123
    Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭pauldavis123


    Are there any radar detectors to alert you to the presence of these dual radar systems?


  • #944
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Thanks mikeecho,

    i am in general pro speed traps (not Goldfish ones ) and people should not speed.

    Agree totaly with you if you are speeding and caught speeding , simply pay the fine simply easy.

    If you were not speeding then you should have an option of going to court and telling the truth, unless you are prepared to say you were guility
    when you weren't and pay a fine that is not due really good idea.

    Remember other option if you go to court you get off automatically very simply " say i didn't get the fine.." takes a few minutes 250,000 have done this successfully its great.

    But in Ireland "The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty" the speed laws overwrite that you could be innocence and found guilty, does anyone know what counties in Europe have the same law just out of interest

    The dual radars are very good very advanced, but every radar has limits and is outlined clearly for all radars that in a urban environment . tress trucks .buses , houses, metal surfaces they can make mistakes, they also can have mistakes made by the operator, clearly this has happened as reported in the national papers with the Go safe whistle blower who said he made a mistake.. got fired for telling the truth. Not an easy job sitting in a van for 8 hours no toilet two radars beside you and with loads batteries
    looking at a screen in the dark no sun light hot on your own no social interaction a very unhealthy job... quite easy to make a human error.

    If you make an error point it out and become a whistle blower you get fired as is reported in national papers

    Any Go-Safe people on here could update us how it is in the back of the van on a hot summers day , don't think they have air conditioning


  • #945
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    pauldavis123 wrote: »
    Are there any radar detectors to alert you to the presence of these dual radar systems?

    There are, but because of the way that gosafe radar operates , it's difficult to detect.
    You'll be looking at specialist systems that cost well in excess of €1,000.

    Not worth the investment, better to use your eyes and a bit of common sense


  • #946
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    mikeecho wrote: »
    There are, but because of the way that gosafe radar operates , it's difficult to detect.
    You'll be looking at specialist systems that cost well in excess of €1,000.

    Not worth the investment, better to use your eyes and a bit of common sense

    Very much seconded.

    As I've said a few times on this thread, it's far cheaper to slow down and keep an eye out. If you get caught with one, the sound of the book hitting you will be heard in Timbuktu.


  • #947
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Is this the same RedFlex company that own a third of Go-Safe in Ireland

    https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arizona-based-redflex-photo-radar-firm-to-pay-20-million-to-chicago-for-bribery-scheme-9059028


  • #948
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Aston martin wrote: »
    Is this the same RedFlex company that own a third of Go-Safe in Ireland

    https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arizona-based-redflex-photo-radar-firm-to-pay-20-million-to-chicago-for-bribery-scheme-9059028

    Yes, RedFlex are based in Arizona but they supply all over the world. You need to be careful regarding their US track record as laws/protections and other sundries are very different, even more so state to state.


  • #949
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Yes, RedFlex are based in Arizona but they supply all over the world. You need to be careful regarding their US track record as laws/protections and other sundries are very different, even more so state to state.

    Might be time to call a day on this thread.

    Maybe.. just maybe if ironclaw has the time, we might get (pretty please) an updated new thread, with lots of FAQ's answered, and info on ANPR average speed cams..

    It'll take a bit of work.


  • #950
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    worth searching on the web on this one
    America is a great country.

    https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/karen-finley-ex-ceo-of-redflex-pleads-guilty-to-bribery-7425914
    Seems from this article a whistle blower helped , around the world whistle blowers can do a lot of good we had it here with a brave Garda Sargent.

    Anyway to move back to Ireland and the difference Ireland and UK it seems in the UK Radar vans have a rear opening window
    the reason why the window opens is that the radar can be deflected when used through glass ,it may also be possible that there is radar reflection back into the van, this surely wouldn't be helpful to the operator.

    In the UK vans also have additional air conditioning which must be good under health and safety for a hot day .

    Any GOSafe experts know why are the van windows in Ireland not open like in the UK ?


  • #951
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    Aston martin wrote: »
    worth searching on the web on this one
    America is a great country.

    https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/karen-finley-ex-ceo-of-redflex-pleads-guilty-to-bribery-7425914
    Seems from this article a whistle blower helped , around the world whistle blowers can do a lot of good we had it here with a brave Garda Sargent.

    Anyway to move back to Ireland and the difference Ireland and UK it seems in the UK Radar vans have a rear opening window
    the reason why the window opens is that the radar can be deflected when used through glass ,it may also be possible that there is radar reflection back into the van, this surely wouldn't be helpful to the operator.

    In the UK vans also have additional air conditioning which must be good under health and safety for a hot day .

    Any GOSafe experts know why are the van windows in Ireland not open like in the UK ?

    They use laser guns in the van in the UK,
    images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQxV6xpjtNlNuYj5McObUMsTNcese5Gl4KQon5eDZCE2vNu9qA9


    It's a radar unit in Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • #952
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    AGD/RedFlex sell Radar in UK , but not aware of which police force have them or if any have .

    Does radar reflect through glass.. ?

    what are the radar refection levels ? and soak levels in the back of the van for operator been so close to two radars with some radiation level say its low but multiply by two radars for 40 hours a week small space in the back of the van also with the fumes from batteries banks.


  • #953
    garv123
    Registered Users Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭garv123


    I saw 2 guards in a marked i40 last night checking for speed on the waterford bypass (2 lanes each way with a centre divide)
    The speed on the road is 100km/h, there was at least 10 cars in a line in the overtaking lane doing 120km/h plus! They had no interest in going after anyone.

    It looked like one guard had a gun pointing to approaching traffic and the other pointing towards traffic after it had passed.

    Are the hand held guns capable of recording speed and taking pictures these days?


  • #954
    blackwhite
    Registered Users Posts: 8,458 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    garv123 wrote: »
    I saw 2 guards in a marked i40 last night checking for speed on the waterford bypass (2 lanes each way with a centre divide)
    The speed on the road is 100km/h, there was at least 10 cars in a line in the overtaking lane doing 120km/h plus! They had no interest in going after anyone.

    It looked like one guard had a gun pointing to approaching traffic and the other pointing towards traffic after it had passed.

    Are the hand held guns capable of recording speed and taking pictures these days?

    Hand-held means they'll have to pull someone over before they get a ticket.


    The N25 at Waterford features regularly on their twitter - usually those featuring were doing 130+

    Being a semi-regular on that road, I'd say they don't have to wait too long to catch someone doing at least 130.


  • #955
    garv123
    Registered Users Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭garv123


    blackwhite wrote: »
    Hand-held means they'll have to pull someone over before they get a ticket.


    The N25 at Waterford features regularly on their twitter - usually those featuring were doing 130+

    Being a semi-regular on that road, I'd say they don't have to wait too long to catch someone doing at least 130.

    Saw that on twitter alright, 100km/h is awful slow on that stretch of road. When you come off the motorway you'd easily go over by mistake.

    Passed Thursday night and they had 3 squad cars on the exit of the dual carriage way, and 1 car on the 3 other entrances to the roundabout from Dungarvan, Carrick and Kilmeaden.
    Checking everything from tyres to drink driving.


  • #956
    ironclaw
    Registered Users Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Does radar reflect through glass.. ?

    Radar is a radio wave. Without delving into advanced physics, what we as humans consider solid matter is completely transparent to other wavelengths. Secondly, it's trivial to factor any reflection / refraction into the system. I can assure you, these machines are not hobbled together by a group of amateurs in a garage, there is serious money poured into these systems and their research.
    what are the radar refection levels ? and soak levels in the back of the van for operator been so close to two radars with some radiation level say its low but multiply by two radars for 40 hours a week small space in the back of the van also with the fumes from batteries banks.

    All radio equipment has to pass a fairly rigorous set of guidelines in terms of output power. The FCC administer them in the US and within the EU their are a number of governing bodies. All these units would have to pass them before they are permitted to be used. I don't have figures to hand but you are talking milliwatts of output power here as with good antennas and good filters, there is no need for higher outputs. For comparison, your Wifi router is about 100mW of output power.

    As for fumes, batteries have been sealed for many years now.


  • #957
    Esel
    Registered Users Posts: 22,002 ✭✭✭✭Esel


    I thought infrared cannot travel more than 2mm through glass? (Probably not relevant to this thread though).

    Not your ornery onager



  • #958
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    QUOTE=ironclaw;109204706]Radar is a radio wave. Without delving into advanced physics, what we as humans consider solid matter is completely transparent to other wavelengths. Secondly, it's trivial to factor any reflection / refraction into the system. I can assure you, these machines are not hobbled together by a group of amateurs in a garage, there is serious money poured into these systems and their research.

    A simple search on the web under the company name Redflex Chicago will give understanding that they are a very big worldwide company and not working from a garage.
    Van set up looks ok, the vans seem to have no vents and no rear air conditioning they where built for cargo transport and not for a workplace
    so generally poor working conditions.


    QUOTE=ironclaw;
    All radio equipment has to pass a fairly rigorous set of guidelines in terms of output power. The FCC administer them in the US and within the EU their are a number of governing bodies. All these units would have to pass them before they are permitted to be used. I don't have figures to hand but you are talking milliwatts of output power here as with good antennas and good filters, there is no need for higher outputs. For comparison, your Wifi router is about 100mW of output power.


    Radar Frequency Band 24.050 – 24.150 GHz
    your right seems Power 100mW

    Low power radio frequency transmission maybe a health hazard.

    The fairly rigorous tests are on (one radar) and carried out in an open laboratory conditions at 3 meters .
    The results don't say anything about continued exposure for 40 hours a week for say 1,200 to 1,500 per year

    The back of the GO safe Redflex vans have 100% more radars fitted ( two Radars), also both Radars are positioned not in laboratory conditions
    at 3 meters but closer at 1 meter from the operator and not in a controlled conditions they are in the back of a metal box van , with inverters batteries heat etc


    As for fumes, batteries have been sealed for many years now.[/QUOTE]
    The batteries could be subjected to damage where they are placed at the back door off the vans
    if a car or truck crashed into the back of the van or if the van reversed into a tree, or a low wall, or a lamp post, releasing dangerous fumes .

    The batteries are Pro Charge Ultra the fitting instruction give a clear instruction that the batteries should be fitted in a well ventilated space hardly an enclosed ford transit van.


  • #959
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Go Safe contributors gone a bit quite , must be too much info coming out would be good to hear from the van driver here.


    ironclaw you mentioned a while ago that if there were two or maybe three cars / vans in the picture then it wouldn't be use, why is this ?


  • #960
    mikeecho
    Registered Users Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    Aston martin wrote: »

    Go Safe contributors gone a bit quite , must be too much info coming out.....

    Or maybe because some of the latest posts in this thread are better suited to the Conspiracy Theories forum.

    And posts about vetalation in GoSafe vans etc etc.

    Ireland hasn't seen such a derailment since the 1st August 1980


  • Advertisement
  • #961
    Aston martin
    Registered Users Posts: 49 ✭Aston martin


    Good news for the van drivers , hopefully they will get a union and good working conditions with ventilation ,Heathing for winter and some air conditioning for Summer.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/speed-camera-firm-urged-to-recognise-unions-896665.html


Advertisement